The Invisible Dead (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
ORLOFF AGAINST THE INVISIBLE MAN (Pierre Chevalier, 1971) **
Bunuel19767 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Apparently, the Orloff name was strong and universal enough to be dealt with by hands other than Jess Franco's, who created him (like, say, Dr. Mabuse, whom the notorious Spanish film-maker eventually got to grips with himself). As for The Invisible Man, he would go into even wilder directions over the years from what H.G. Wells had envisioned in print and James Whale immortalized on the screen in his classic 1933 adaptation!

Incidentally, while the 1961 film that spawned the Orloff character unfolded within a period setting, the second (which was helmed by the same director but did not feature the actor best-known for playing the titular figure i.e. Franco regular Howard Vernon) was updated to contemporary times; this, then, takes it even further back than the original to the Gothic era (though belying this fact by accompanying the proceedings with incongruous jazzy rhythms, complete with finger snaps that half-promised the inclusion along the way of a Jets-vs.-Sharks skirmish)! While it would like to evoke the style of the series, the result is decidedly more low-brow than Franco had so far gotten with this character (incidentally, two other of the director's efforts from this early phase, namely THE SADISTIC BARON VON KLAUS {1962} and THE DIABOLICAL DOCTOR Z {1965}, come far closer to the established formula) - for the record, I would like to check out Franco's similarly-titled THE SINISTER EYES OF DR. ORLOFF and THE SINISTER DR. ORLOFF from 1973 (this was recently released on DVD) and 1982 respectively.

Anyway, here we get a young doctor (played by an actor who, apart from being bafflingly adorned in a Dracula cape, never once changes his facial expression, irrespective of what situation he may be facing!) being asked to the Orloff estate - and hilariously shunned off by the townsfolk when he dares mention the name, even the horseman who offers himself to take the hero up there - ostensibly to treat a patient (why he does not even bother to ask himself how come Orloff did not do this in the first place is anybody's guess). However, it transpires that Orloff's daughter had requested his presence (one wonders whether she got his name off the epoch's equivalent of the "Yellow Pages"!) because she fears for her father's sanity and her own life, as he seems to be involved in a weird experiment of some kind. Ironically, when he confronts Orloff, the latter not only expresses surprise at seeing the young man but claims that it is the girl who is unwellafter having been buried alive, robbed in her grave by their ungrateful servants, and stabbed by same when she interrupts their greedy labor by inconveniently waking up! While Orloff manages to imprison one of the culprits ("Euro-Cult" regular Fernando Sancho) in his dungeon, their layabout replacements prove not much better!

Still, things soon start to go bump in the night as the hero notices a book's pages apparently turning by themselves (the heroine had already mentioned to him a curious episode in which she went before the mirror but could not see her reflection as something was obscuring it!). Orloff explains to the hero (whilst ordering his 'creation' to serve them coffee!) that he has found an invisibility serum and intends creating a super-race to take over the world (talk about a Five-Year Plan!). However, The Invisible Man turns out to be not only a rapist (ravaging Vernon's new girl servant - cue gratuitous extended nudity: this is where it really feels like a Franco movie...big deal! - in the dungeon via zoom-happy simulation that actually anticipates Walerian Borowczyk's notorious THE BEAST {1975}!) but not even human (as the heroine has the ingenious idea of sprinkling flour behind them while roaming the castle grounds so that they will know if the monster is in the vicinity but, of course, it never occurs to these twerps that he might be in front of them all the time - in any case, we get a fairly good glimpse of his hairy ape-like hide after one fortuitous flick of the white powder!).

Following this, the monster catches the leading lady and undresses her in a split-second (uncovering a veritable bush wherein birds could freely nest!). The ending, for what it is worth, has the castle go up in flames and Orloff ostensibly staying behind to destroy the Invisible Man - but the heroes, all cuddled-up outside, actually witness the monster emerge alone and be mangled (conveniently unseen) by a pack of dogs! At a mere 76 minutes, I guess the film (whose original title translates to THE LOVE LIFE OF AN INVISIBLE MAN, even if it was also released as THE INVISIBLE DEAD!) is tolerable but, at the same time, too dull - and clearly incompetent - to really entertain for the duration; finally, being the first film I have watched from this director, I cannot say to be anxious to catch more of his dubious gems any time soon...
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
bunch of guys wander round a castle, one's an invisible ape man, murky stuff happens.
marxtafford19 June 2006
Anyone encountering this film on VHS in the UK as the Invisible Dead, tag line; " god help us if they rise again" will find themselves utterly baffled or just ripped off by the content of the actual film. Not only have they been lead to believe that it's a zombie flick by the sleeve art but the film itself has been sliced and diced, presumably by the distributors following the 1982 video act,so that sleazy content of any kind is absent, and what we are left with is essentially 80 odd minutes of people wandering through corridors very....slowly.....indeed. As others have doubtless pointed out, none of the dialogue bears much relation to the action on screen, some of the soundtrack has been left blatantly undubbed, and that goddamn music clangs away throughout for all the world like a troop of drunken boy scouts assaulting each other with biscuit tins. Listing the inconsistencies and "what the heck?.." moments would take too damn long, but suffice to say that it's one of those eurosleaze offerings that manage to conjure up a surreal, dream-like atmosphere chiefly through being incoherent and flat out badly made.And judging by the speed of the opening doors and "magically" appearing footprints, the invisible ape-man doesn't really pose much of a threat to anyone who can move faster than a relaxed stroll.It's crap. I quite enjoyed it
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lame and Funny Euro Trash Sexploitation
claudio_carvalho30 June 2014
The newcomer Dr. Garondet (Francis Valladares) is summoned by professor Orloff (Howard Vernon) but people in his village is afraid to go to his castle. The insistent Dr. Garondet reaches the castle and the servants send him to talk to Cécile Orloff (Brigitte Carva), who is the daughter of the professor and is worried about the mental health of her father. Dr. Garondet meets professor Orloff and he tells what happened to Cécile sometime ago and his experiment with an invisible man, and he explains that his daughter is deranged due to the reported incident. Dr. Garondet has to spend the night in the castle and soon he learns who is the insane in the castle.

"La vie amoureuse de l'homme invisible" is a lame and funny euro trash sexploitation by Pierre Chevalier, a wannabee of Jess Franco and Ed Wood. The silly story has poor acting, awful scenarios and gratuitous nudity. The rape of the servant by the invisible man and the bush of Brigitte Carva are scenes of so bad taste that become hilarious. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "O Monstro do Dr. Orloff" ("The Monster of the Dr. Orloff")
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Howard Vernon strikes again!
aschepler27 April 2004
ORLOFF AND THE INVISIBLE MAN (1971) *** Howard Vernon, Brigitte Carva, Fernando Sancho, Paco Valladares, Isabel del Río, Evane Hanska. In this 1971 French-Spanish co-production, the irrepressible Howard Vernon returns for his second turn as Dr. Orloff. This time, he's created an invisible man who feeds on human blood. It's fairly typical Eurosleaze fare: there's the usual muddled plot, cheap special effects (wait until you see the invisible `man'!) and a fair amount of gratuitous nudity (the rape of the servant girl by the invisible man, with shots of Vernon leering through the whole thing, is especially tasteless). But a good score, nice atmosphere and fairly brisk direction by Pierre Chevalier manage to keep things interesting.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mediocre French/Spanish co-production about the classic character created by Jess Frank
ma-cortes29 June 2022
Moody terror movie about a mad doctor and revolving around an invisible man . The newcomer Dr. Garondet (Francisco Valladares) is called for healing sick professor Orloff (Howard Vernon) , but people in his village are afraid of going to his castle . The insistent doctor asks for his whereabout but the feared villagers tell nothing . The newcomer Dr. Garondet reaches the castle and the servants send him to talk to Cécile Orloff, who is the daughter of the professor and is worried about the insane health of her daddy . Eventually , Dr. Garondet meets professor Orloff and he tells what happened to Cécile sometime ago . But results that evil scientist has created a murderous , invisible ape man-lookalike . Due to strange circumstances , Dr. Garondet has to spend the night in the creepy location and soon he learns there's a dangerous being stalking the castle .

Austerily eerie terror film that contains thrills , chills , fantastic events and being mostly set at a sinister castle . This so-so Spanish/French co-production is generally characterized by botcher images , sleaziness , nudism and contaning a symbolic attack on the ethics of science . Although the film passed European censors upon its original release in 1970 the nudism , grisly killings and the susprising rape by the invisible monster still caused controversy , existing a double version , both , a light Spanish and another hard French one . Being produced in short budget by Marious Lesoeur : Eurocine , Célia Films and Producciones Miguel Mezquíriz . Initial releases of the film were met with negative reactions from film critics , while the general critical reaction had been poor , however ,today is considered an acceptable terror picture . Nice acting by Howard Vernon as Doctor Orloff , his classic role who would repeat over and over again . As Vernon is brilliant as a demented researcher/scientific/surgeon haunted by a past tragedy. Functional acting by the Spanish Francisco Valladares as the doctor who figures out the mysterious events . By the time , Valladares getting big success thanks to his role in hit Spanish TV series as Ana Karenina and Diego de Acevedo . And secondary acting by the great Fernando Sancho , the Mexican antihero in hundreds of Spaghetti/Paella Westerns .The motion picture was regularly directed by Pierre Chevalier . He was a director and assistant director, known for Escuadrón pantera or Panther Squad (1984) with Sybil Danning , Pigalle carrefour des illusions (1973) and La maison des filles perdues (1974). He made various exploitation films , though in his starts he directed A-films with known stars , such as : Micheline Presle , Raymond Pellegrin , Fernandel , Gino Cervi or Eddie Constantine.

This is third entry on the long series about Doctor Orloff , a former prison doctor who tries to use skin of his victims to repair his beloved daughter's fire-scarred face and whose role subsequently to show up in various flicks mainly directed by prolific writer/producer/director Jesús Franco . The Orloff character starred a saga , using the same shots in more than one film ; some of his actors relate how they they were hired for one film and later saw their name in two or more different one . Orloff was habitually played by Howard Vernon who initiated the terrifying saga in ¨Gritos en la Noche¨ (1962) , the best of all them , also titled "The Awful Dr. Orlof" , considered to be one of the best films in his first period and deemed to be the first movie of the ¨Spanish Fantaterror¨. This vintage horror motion picture , a classic in some circles , was well directed by Jesús Franco who never considered the film to be a terror story , but instead felt it was tale of "anguish" . Here Franco established his uniquely poetic , stunningly filmed in black and white and expressionist darkness with visually striking style , including unforgettable images that owed a great deal to early cinema in general and German Expressionism in particular , though imitating to classy "Eyes Without A Face" (1960) , the masterpiece directed by George Franju , packing a haunting poetic fantasy . It's followed by ¨El Secreto del Dr. Orloff¨ (1964) aka "The Mistresses of Dr. Jekyll" - USA . It's gone on by " Orloff y el hombre invisible (1970) aka "Dr. Orloff's Invisible Monster" , ¨Ojos siniestros de Doctor Orloff¨(1973) . Furthermore , ¨El enigma Del Ataúd¨ (1969) aka "Only a Coffin" and ¨El Siniestro doctor Orloff¨ (1984) aka "The Sinister Dr. Orloff . Finally, ¨Faceless¨ or ¨Depredadores de Noche¨(1987) in which Orloff appears as a secondary role and of course, performed by Howard Vernon.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unique but predictable
ethylester6 January 2005
Everyone else's reviews on here pretty much say what I would say, however, I wanted to add that that music score is quite impressive. I usually don't listen to the music in a film unless it strikes me and this one stuck me as being more than just boring background music. Also, the lighting they used really gave the movie a unique feel. It seemed like everyone was lit up brightly with a light right in their face. It added much needed color to the film. Without the color and music, this movie would have been very drab. Also, the "horror" nature of this film focuses on rape more than anything gory or gross. The rape scene with the maid was too much for me to watch, I had to close my eyes. It seemed to go on forever. Quite unsettling and distasteful. And the ape suit guy was hilarious. Very far from the "superior race" of people the doctor thought he was creating. It seemed like just a dumb ape to me.

3/10 because of the music, lighting and unintentional humor.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bargain basement French Gothic horror film
Red-Barracuda21 August 2013
This Gothic horror film was released by Eurociné who were purveyors of cheap French exploitation movies. While it has slightly higher production values than most of the others released by this distributer, it's still a pretty bargain basement effort. It's one of a series of Dr Orloff movies. The character was a Euro horror alternative to Dr Frankenstein and seems to have fulfilled a similar role. The story starts when a new village doctor is summoned to Orloff's castle on business unspecified. The local populace are aghast that he would consider going to such an evil place. On arrival, it seems it was the doctor's daughter who has requested him secretly in an attempt to turn her father around from his dangerous experiments that she fears are endangering her life and his sanity. It turns out that Orloff has created an invisible man…

I think the chief problem with this one is that an invisible man makes for a very underwhelming villain. Aside from a few simple trick shots an invisible character involves very little effort to create. He is certainly a cheap alternative to a decent monster that's for sure. We are treated to floating drinks trays, pages of books turning by themselves, footprints in flour and…eh…invisible rape. The latter was clearly added to up the requisite sleaze factor that the early 70's Euro Gothic horrors were aiming for. There is quite a bit of nudity in general in the movie but it's never in danger of becoming erotic unfortunately. From the horror side of the fence, aside from the invisible man, there is a back story involving premature burial and grave robbery. Nothing of which is anything too memorable. Perhaps the single most original idea in the film is the fact that, for reasons never really explained, the invisible man appears to be a gorilla! The invisible ape…you couldn't make it up! Acting performances are generally dull but Howard Vernon (Dr Orloff) is always watchable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"I'd never marry a man with such a stupid face." Really boring Euro horror film.
poolandrews20 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
La Vie Amoureuse de L'Homme Invisible, or titles like Dr. Orloff's Invisible Monster, Orloff Against the Invisible Man as it's known amongst English speaking audiences & even The Invisible Dead as it's known over here in the UK, starts late one night in a small European village where Dr. Garondet (Paco Valladares) receives a message to go to Dr. Orloff's (Howard Vernon) castle. Being the local doctor he feels obliged, after getting there he meets Dr. Orloff's daughter Cecile (Brigitte Carva) who says something strange is going on in the castle & she is scared, Garondet agrees to look into it & speaks with her father Dr. Orloff who admits he has created a invisible super human creature who he intends to create an entire race of to take over the world! But will Orloff's diabolical plans succeed?

This French Spanish co-production was co-written & directed by Pierre Chevalier & is quite simply one of the most boring Euro horror flicks I've ever seen, in fact it's so boring it could have been a Jesus 'I have no talent' Franco film! The script by Chevalier & Juan Fortuny is as slow as they come, I'm sorry but I don't sit down to watch a film & expect or want to be bored out of my skull. The script is also full of plot holes & makes no sense, for instance Dr. Orloff says he has operated & created an invisible man. Well alright but lets think about that statement for a moment, I mean how can Dr. Orloff operate on an invisible man? How can Dr. Orloff see what he's operating on? Then there's the puzzling flashback padding sequence, despite serving no real purpose for the main story other than to pad it out Dr. Orloff says his daughter Cecile dies & they put her in a coffin & stick her in a tomb. Is it ever explained why she suddenly comes back to life because if it is I missed it, wouldn't Dr. Gardonet have at least questioned Cecile's miraculous resurrection from the dead? Also, why does Dr. Orloff make such a point of claiming his daughter Cecile is insane? It has no relevance to the plot as Dr. Gardonet at this point knows about his experiments & at no time in the film does Cecile act like she's insane so that makes it even more of an odd plot point to emphasise so much. So in short there's far too many silly plot holes, things that make no sense, a dull very slow pace & there's barely any exploitation either besides a few naked women. So is there anything good about this film? No, not really I'm afraid or at least I couldn't see anything good while watching it.

Director Chevalier does alright actually, despite looking cheap the castle locations, sets & period clothing are quite impressive & atmospheric. In terms of gore there isn't any, seriously some fat guy has a small cut on his forehead otherwise there isn't a single drop of blood in the entire thing. There's a few scenes of full frontal nudity if that's your sort of thing & a woman is raped by an invisible man is a scene of pure comedy as she tries to simulate being raped by herself! Speaking of the so-called invisible man when he's finally revealed at the end he looks like some ape creature rather than a normal guy so why does Dr. Orloff keep referring to it as a 'man' when clearly it isn't? Special effects wise it's a man in a bad ape suit. The climax also features one of the most pathetic burning castles ever, all the filmmakers do is pump smoke out of the castle on locations window!

Technically the film is OK, the photography is alright & the production values are pretty decent. The sound on my copy was awful, the soundtrack is full of hisses, pops & crackles especially noticeable when there's no music. The film is obviously dubbed, it's not as bad as some Euro horror films but the dialogue is just strange & doesn't make much sense.

La Vie Amoureuse de L'Homme Invisible is a really dull & boring Euro horror flick & I usually love these things. I was disappointed, no blood, no gore, virtually no sleaze & a stupid storyline that makes zero sense, I wasn't impressed. For die hard Euro horror flick junkies only, as far as everyone else is concerned there are much, much better films out there.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Invisible Man/Beast-Thing Servant
currax5 August 2000
This movie is really lame, unless you're really into Eurocine films, in which case you kind of know what to expect (i.e. Zombies Lake or Oasis of the Living Dead). We start with a young doctor receiving a request for his immediate help at Professor Orloff's Castle. Of course, when he tries to find a ride at a tavern, people act like he's crazy to be going up there; behavior which he ignores. People even slam doors in his face as soon as he mentions Orloff. But we get no real feeling that the doctor wonders why people react this way. I guess he's just really determined to help strangers. The movie is very sloppy and is full of many errors. When his carriage gets stuck, he decides to walk to the castle. The carriage continues in the same direction and the doctor heads off in the direction he just came from?!? Later we meet Orloff's daughter and hear her description of this invisible man: "...it was shapeless and substantial...somehow it was transparent and opaque!" Maybe they should have called it The Invisible Yet Still Somehow Visible Dead. The doctor, after meeting two of the hired help and on his way to meet Professor Orloff, makes this judgment about his daughter: "Visions are not uncommon among girls who live alone." Okay, doc, but what about women who live with three other people? The "invisible dead" is really just one guy/beast thing which Orloff orders to do mostly mundane things: "Get the lantern. Now hold it up higher. Open the door." You know, things that Orloff is perfectly capable of doing. This movie really drags along, though. And even though it seems a lot longer than 90 minutes, the ending is abrupt and sort of cartoony and out of place.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perfect B movie
John_Mclaren27 February 2003
OK, so the plot is risible, the acting woeful, and the production values worthy of Ed Wood. However this early Eurocine outing is a great "B" movie- at least for those who understand cinematic irony.

Crumbling castles, dandyesque clothing and buxom wenches all give it the authentic sexploitation feel. The camera angles add that dangerous and unpredictable quality that only lovers of bad movies can really appreciate.

More than that, the film is best known for the most famous bush in cinematic history, that of Brigitte Carva. Oh for the days when women were not just plastic-packed crotch-shaven dollies! The women in this film are real, and the creaking plot makes their naked exploits all the more impressive. For collectors of the genre (or admirers of the hirsute), this B-flick is a must. The plot is only marginally of relevance.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Help us ... if they rise again!
parry_na23 June 2017
Possibly the biggest challenge in watching this Spanish/French horror extravaganza is the dubbing. As is sometimes the case, less than a scrupulous translation of the dialogue can produce unintentionally hilarious results. Some would say that adds to the charm. Perhaps they are right.

You may be led to believe this is a Jess Franco production. I was. It is in fact directed by Pierre Chevalier who delivers a comparatively accessible yarn filled with genre cliches used to fairly good effect. Once again playing Orloff is the mighty Howard Verson (who had played the character for Franco before, and would do so again in the future), the hero-type is Dr. Garondet (Frances Valladares), and the vampy young lady of the piece is Cécile (Brigitte Carva). If you're ready, there's also an invisible ape who gets up to all sorts of nasty business - again, some of his vile antics do unintentionally (I presume) raise a smile.

The story seems to have bits and pieces from most of the horror classics thrown in. You might recognise elements from Dracula, and Frankenstein, and there are dark tunnels and a hero who delights in wearing a red-lined cloak. It's all here and is delightfully unconventional in places and darn right ridiculous in others.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertainingly silly junk
Woodyanders2 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Young Dr. Garondet (likable Paco Valladares) goes to the castle of batty Dr. Orloff (the always reliable Howard Vernon in peak sinister form). At the castle Garondet meets Orloff's daughter Cecile (lovely Brigitte Carva) and runs afoul of Orloff's dangerous invisible man experiment. Boy, does this gloriously ghastly atrocity possess all the right wrong stuff to qualify as a real four-star stinkbomb: we've got plodding misdirection by Pierre Chevalier, ragged editing, poor dubbing, a talky script, sluggish pacing, crude, zoom-happy cinematography by Juan Fortuny and Raymond Heil, paltry (not so) special effects (the invisible maniac turns out to be some zhlub in a hopelessly cheesy and unconvincing ape suit!), and a limply staged and unexciting fiery climax. Naturally, there's also a generous sprinkling of tasty gratuitous female nudity. This movie reaches its hilariously inept apex with a protracted sequence depicting the invisible maniac raping a hapless maid. The supporting cast flounder with the patently ludicrous script: Isabel Del Rio as the bitchy, greedy, treacherous Marie, Fernando Sancho as Marie's despicable weakling accomplice, and Evane Hanska as a surly servant. Extra kudos are in order for Camille and Claude Sauvage's wildly inappropriate, but still insanely groovy finger-snapping swinging jazz score. In fact, this flick is downright Jess Francoesque in its endearingly awful crumminess. A complete schlocky hoot.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Typical Jess Franco film…only NOT by Jess Franco!
Coventry21 October 2005
I always assumed that it was Jess Franco who had a monopoly on this type of cinema, namely: the routine euro-exploitation flicks with an always-returning villain (Dr. Orloff), absurd story lines (invisible ape-creatures??), truckloads of sleaze and absolutely no logic at all. Every small detail in "Orloff Against the Invisible Man" has got Franco's name written all over it, so it was quite a surprise to find out that he actually hasn't got anything to do with it. But still Franco admirers don't have to fear that this will be a 'soft' film, because director Pierre Chevalier proves himself to be "Godfather of Sleaze" as well and his movie is delightfully trashy and nonsensical. Howard Vernon (normally a Franco-regular as well) stars as a totally insane man of science who created an invisible monster, supposedly for his daughter that got traumatized after being buried alive when she was 16. How exactly this creation helps the poor girl's situation is entirely beside the point, as are many other sudden twist in the script. Everything eventually revolves on the sexual aspect when the invisible ape-man goes completely berserk after graphically raping the housemaid (sickly illustrated by an overlong scene showing the poor woman struggling naked on a pile of hay). Every normal film-loving person will most likely detest this film, but for exploitation-fans, there is always the weird atmosphere and morbid set pieces to admire. Orloff's castle is genuinely ominous, with lots of dark cellars and secret tombs and Howard Vernon looks uniquely sinister again. Great entertainment for the slightly more demanding cult-freaks among us.
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I love invisible Gorillas
dbborroughs4 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps because I've seen this before it played slightly better this time. A doctor is summoned to a castle where no one will go. Once there no one will admit that they summoned him. It transpires that the daughter of Dr Orloff had summoned him because she was having odd experiences. It transpires that her father has made an invisible man (gorilla) and after a long rambling story in flashback about his the daughters near death, the doctor is locked up, escapes and the castle is blown up. Its at best 40 minutes of material stretched to almost twice that thanks to lots of sequences of people walking the country side, walking down corridors, just walking. It wouldn't be bad if you stripped all of the extra stuff away. Thankfully I was engaged in something else at the same time I was watching it so the tedium was relieved. Worth a look if you're a Eurohorror fan or like the idea of invisible gorillas.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheap But Mildly Entertaining
Michael_Elliott26 October 2013
Orloff and the Invisible Man (1970)

** (out of 4)

Answering the call of a medical emergency, a young doctor avoids all warnings and goes to the home of Dr. Orloff (Howard Vernon) where he is told about a medical breakthrough where Orloff has created an invisible man. Vernon would play the Dr. Orloff character several times in his career so it's obvious a role he has no trouble in doing. ORLOFF AND THE INVISIBLE MAN (one of its many titles) is a decent time killer if you don't expect anything too good or too serious. The entire film suffers from a very low-budget and it appears that director Pierre Chevalier doesn't have much faith in anything that he's doing. Most of the scenes seem extremely rushed or at least made quickly without too much effort put into them. There really isn't any story of vision on display here as it almost seems as if Chevalier was just a director-for-hire who got the film in the can as quickly as he could. It's certainly not on the same page as THE AWFUL DR. ORLOFF or DR. ORLOFF'S MONSTER but there are a few interesting ideas here. It's funny how the entire doctor coming to the castle is handled because it's clearly ripping off the start of Dracula. The entire relationship between this young doctor and Orloff is a tad bit weird to say the least and the story never really bothered to explain why we need this younger doctor around. At just 75-minutes the film certainly goes by pretty quickly, although, to be honest, not much really happens in regards to the invisible man. The strangest sequence comes towards the end when a woman is stripped totally naked and sexually assaulted by the invisible man. Obviously the special effects aren't that good and the actresses acting isn't all that good either so we're left with an extremely weird sequence that belongs in the Euro Horror Hall of Fame. Vernon is good in his role and the supporting players aren't too bad either. There's plenty of nudity to keep fans of that entertained and there's some mild humor as well.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Orloff & The Wearisome Invisible Ape-Man. 1-2-Miss.
P3n-E-W1s330 June 2022
Greetings And Salutations, and welcome to my review of The Invisible Dead - AKA Orloff And The Invisible Man; here's the breakdown of my ratings:

Story: 0.75 Direction: 0.75 Pace: 0.50 Acting: 0.75 Enjoyment: 0.75

TOTAL: 3.50 out of 10.00

The Invisible Dead is nothing more than a cheap third-rate Hammer'esq period horror that suffers badly throughout.

Pierre Chevalier (who also directed) and Juan Fortuny bring you Doctor Orloff, the mad scientist of the story. And, this guy is truly insane. He has an understandable bee in his bonnet after his housemaid and gamekeeper break into the crypt and robs his daughter's corpse of her jewellery. When his daughter suddenly awakes from death, the gamekeeper stabs her. She stumbles to her chambers and rats out the thief to her father. Who then unleashes his wrath on them both. But he's not merely angry at this devious duo. No, he's furious with the rest of the peasants and villages and sets about their downfall by creating an invisible beast to do his bidding. The concept is sound and offers plenty of possibilities to generate an engaging and absorbing story crammed with credible and intricate characters. Sadly that doesn't happen. The individuals are so flat and dull that I began to dose off. There's a lot of nothing going on in the story. Utilising this emptiness to expand the concept or the folk on the pages would have been ideal. Or the director could have used the void to generate an eerie atmosphere or to add action, etc. - A missed opportunity to achieve a great deal in these spaces of nothingness. And then it gets worse when the performers start to recite their dialogue. It could be down to the translation and the vocal talents employed to do the dub-over, but I don't think so. Some of the lines are dreadful - and they're more noticeable thanks to the hammy overacting of the cast.

Chevalier isn't much better behind the camera. Though he attempts to throw in some stimulating camera angles, they fail due to the scene's content. When the good doctor manages to procure a carriage to transport him to Orloffs Castle, he decides to take a snooze. Chevalier composes this in a head and shoulders shot. And we watch Doc catch some Zeds as he's jostled about on the rough road. The trouble is that Chevalier holds the shot for too long, making it awkward and boring and giving the audience time to analyse what's wrong with the visual - such as nothing is happening in the scene and that the light inside the cab is too bright because it's growing darker outside. Giving the audience time like this is terrible as it draws them out of the movie in an unwarranted way. But then you get the outlandish management of scenes. When the Doc arrives at the castle, he's greeted by the caretaker, who slams the door on him. Luckily, he knows the foot-in-the-door trick and pushes his way in, only to be informed it must have been the maid who sent the message. Then we watch one of the most bizarre conversations I've witnessed in a movie. It's unnatural due to the poor writing and oddball because of the directing. Now, when handled well, strangeness can be a wonderful thing. Sadly, The Invisible Dead, it's not directed well.

Lamentably, the cast has to try and cope with these pitfalls. And, respectfully, most of the performers try to do right. Evane Hanska playing the servant maid, and Fernando Sancho portraying the gamekeeper, are the best of the bunch. Brigitte Carva is okay as the daughter Cecile, though she does tend to go off the rails with hammy gusto. However, the two male leads let the film down most. Both Howard Vernon, as Orloff, and Paco Valladares as the Doctor are dreadful in their tediousness. They appear fed up and uninterested in the movie wherein they're starring. However, Vernon appears to augment a little anger and pride when recanting the history of his daughter and the creature. Regrettably, he falls back into banality when it slips over to a narration. These are not the leading men Hammer would have chosen.

I would recommend digging out a Hammer movie instead of watching The Invisible Dead - you'll be better entertained. This picture is one to miss unless you want a crash course on how not to make a good film.

Jump into the nearest horse-drawn carriage and come over to review my Absolute Horror and The Final Frontier lists and see where I ranked The Invisible Dead - or to find better entertainment.

Take Care & Stay Well.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Who is This Jess Franco Pretender?
gavin694216 May 2013
An evil scientist (Howard Vernon) creates a murderous, invisible ape-man.

Another reviewer said this was a standard Jess Franco film, by someone other than Franco. Yep, that pretty much sums it up -- we even have Howard Vernon as Dr. Orloff, a role he has filled well in the past, and the poor quality filming of people being tortured (by an unseen force).

I actually rather liked this one, and would say it exceeded the average Franco attempt. The special effects are a bit cheesy, but not bad for the time it was released and the presumably low budget. I am not sure if I could have done any better myself.

Now I want to learn more about Pierre Chevalier... he might have been a hidden gem. I will have to track down "Human Cargo" or "Panther Squad".
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I adore this coffin-creaky, resplendently goofy, garlic garlanded example of vintage Gallic gothic!
Weirdling_Wolf23 January 2024
While frequently lugubrious and unlovely to look at, I adore this coffin-creaky, resplendently goofy, garlic garlanded example of vintage Gallic gothic! Indirectly inserted into Franco's iconic the Orloff cycle, 'Orloff against the invisible man' finds devilishly suave euorocult icon, Howard Vernon on mesmerizingly macabre form as the maniacal professor Orloff. Quite rightly maligned for its sluggish pace, rudimentary FX, and lurid lapses into garish ineptitude, nonetheless, there's plentifully skewed entertainment to be found in Chevalier's bizarro psychotronic gem. Lashings of hot Euro-poon, doomy, rain-splashed dynamics, and a surprisingly robust score by, Camille Sauvage make Orloff against the invisible man such a kooky-spooky, eminently rewatchable, pseudo-science run bloodily amok disasterpiece!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed