The Sugarland Express (1974) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
92 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Boy, did this get great press in 1974
Varlaam9 October 1999
Critics at the time were impressed by this new director, Steven Spielberg, who had previously directed Dennis Weaver in that spooky TV movie "Duel", but they were really impressed with Goldie Hawn, still mainly known as the blonde nitwit from "Laugh-In". She had been quite respectable in "Butterflies Are Free" in 1972, but she turned in a beautifully nuanced performance in this one.

I would certainly argue with any notion that this film is "underrated". It's always been well regarded, even back in the days when Spielberg was known as the clever kid who made "Jaws". That doesn't mean it has ever been easy to see.

Now, with the passage of time, "Sugarland Express" looks even better than it did in the 1970's. One still has no trouble at all getting caught up in the quixotic mission of these characters.
63 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early Spielberg is just as fun as any Spielberg
KnightsofNi118 August 2011
There's something so incredibly fascinating about watching the humble beginnings of a director as renowned as Stephen Spielberg. The Sugarland Express is one of his earliest films and it is not of the calibre of films like Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and the Indiana Jones franchise, but it still remarkably entertaining. It tells the story of two lovers who go on a mad run from the law in order to kidnap their son from his foster parents. Lou-Jean, played by Goldie Hawn, breaks her husband, Clovis, out of jail in order to do so and this sparks mad paranoia in the two. The run from the law doesn't occur until the two kidnap a policeman and his vehicle, forcing him to drive them to Sugarland, Texas in order to find their baby boy. This is a wild, exciting, often hilarious film, and to top it all off it's based on a true story.

I think what defines this film more than anything is the distinct new Spielberg smell. It has all of the things we recognize from the bigger Spielberg films, just on a much smaller scale. The dialogue flows so naturally and fits right in with the action and camera work of the film. There are lots of familiar camera techniques in the film, especially the fluid camera movement that goes on within the confines of the police vehicle, where a lot of the film takes place. Nothing is as grand and widespread as Spielberg's classics, but anyone who respects the genius can respect this film for what it is because, like it or not, this is where it all began.

But not only is The Sugarland Express a fascinating look into how Spielberg got his start, it is also just an incredibly fun film. Goldie Hawn plays the border line psychopath mother perfectly. She wants nothing more than to see her baby boy again, and she won't let anything stop her. The film hits both ends of the spectrum very nicely. A lot of it is very comedic, ranging from cleverly hilarious to downright goofy at times. Yet there are also moments of sincere dramatic tension. Through all of the offbeat wackiness, the film never forgets the situation it is dealing with. Despite everything, it is still two convicts running from the law, a subject that the characters must handle with care. And the film brings this to light very well, as it is very gripping at moments, and almost touching at others.

The Sugarland Express isn't much more than a very exciting adventure story with some enticing moments of drama thrown in, but you have to love it for that. It doesn't try to be much more and it pulls off everything it wants to deliver with a lot of talented finesse and grace. This is not a film to miss. It's only mistake was coming right before Jaws, a masterpiece that overshadowed it greatly, hence why we know that name, but few of us have heard of the pleasant little gem that is The Sugarland Express.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Must Watch....
namashi_124 April 2010
'The Sugarland Express' is a very special film, it stands out. Here's why: It's based on a true story and it is the first theatrical feature film directed by Steven Spielberg. Now, 2 ACES, can never disappoint?

'The Sugarland Express', based on a true story is about a husband and wife trying to outrun the law, they want their life back, they want their Baby Langston back. It's a joyride! The incident has been made with ease, the Legendary Filmmaker never disappoints -- as simple as that!

Coming right away to the acting department, Goldie Hawn steals the show with a magnificent performance. The Legendary Actress delivers a performance of a lifetime! William Atherton is superb, this is his most mature performance to date. Ben Johnson is, as always, terrific. Michael Sacks emotes the helplessness and support remarkably. Others are satisfactory.

On the whole, this Superb Piece Of Cinema cannot be missed by Cinema-Devotees. Thumbs Up!
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A minor classic!
alexanderdavies-9938227 June 2017
I wasn't sure what to expect from this film. Fellow fans of Steven Spielberg advised me to see "Sugarland Express," so I bought the DVD. I'm glad I did it as it is one of Spielberg's best. He should have made films more along the lines of "Duel," "Jaws" and the above film. Being based upon a true story is a Feather in the films cap. The two main characters - played by Goldie Hawn and William Atherton - are very sympathetic in spite of their circumstances. She is planning to find their baby boy so they can be re-united. He is a convict serving a light sentence. They both help his breaking out of jail and after taking a police officer hostage, they lead the police of Texas on a state wide chase. The wife and her convict husband race against time so they can find their son. This has thoughtful moments and it isn't a hard- hitting film. There is some violence but it's fairly mild and minimal. The pace is good and the tension is sustained throughout. Ben Johnson does well as one of the senior police officers who leads the Dragnet. He is a tough man but he isn't totally lacking in compassion. The direction is some of the best from Steven Spielberg.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Quality Work Of Passionate Filmmaking.
CinemaClown2 December 2014
Steven Spielberg's theatrical feature film debut is a smartly crafted, expertly composed & skilfully executed adventure drama that clearly exhibits the legendary director's penchant for turning an on-screen moment into a larger-than-life event without ever going over the top and is also significant for marking the commencement of one of cinema's greatest collaborations.

Based on a true story, The Sugarland Express tells the story of a young woman who successfully breaks her husband out of prison to help her assist retrieving her child, about to be placed in the care of foster parents. Things soon take a turn for the unexpected when they're left with no choice but to take a patrolman hostage & are pursued by the police throughout their journey.

Directed by Steven Spielberg, the film wonderfully introduces many of his trademarks & themes that would continue to recur in his later works and is a solid work that has enough style & substance to keep the viewers engaged for the most part. Camera-work is dynamic, makes excellent angle choices & remains consistent throughout while editing steadily paces its narrative.

Coming to the acting department, the cast comprises of Goldie Hawn, Ben Johnson, William Atherton & Michael Sacks amongst which it's Hawn who chips in with the most impressive performance. Marking his first collaboration with Spielberg, John William provides a score that beautifully reflects the film's tone with tracks that are adventurous, light-hearted & at the same moment, slightly poignant.

On an overall scale, The Sugarland Express is one of Spielberg's highly underrated flicks & although far from a masterpiece, it's still a quality work of passionate filmmaking that's admirable for a number of things. Full of crowd-pleasing elements, presenting the then-young filmmaker refining his craft & an indication of greater things to come, The Sugarland Express is a must for Spielberg's fans as well as critics.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Shoot, jest a couple of kids.
rmax30482315 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Spielberg has constructed and shot his first feature film with skill. The camera seems to be exactly where it should be in every shot. The editing is done with skill, and Vilmos Zsigmond's photography vividly evokes a bare and wintry day in southern Texas. The musical score is a kind of whimsical folksy harmonica solo smacking of a Christmas carol. It was written by John Williams, he of the bum bum bum bum shark theme from "Jaws". His scores are usually orchestrated, fully and fulsomely, but you'd never know it from this spare tune.

The director got a fine screenplay out of Hal Barwood and Matthew Robbins. Most of these good folks sound dumber than they are. And the performers really get into the characters. Sometimes they ARE the characters.

Here's an example that always cracks me up. Ben Johnson is a captain in the Texas Highway Patrol (or whatever) and has brought Goldie Hawn's wrinkled old father down to talk to his daughter over the police radio, urging her to surrender. Johnson has just given the old timer instructions on how to use the microphone in the police car. Hawn's father listens intently. Then we expect him to say something like, "Gimme the mike." Instead, in his cracked and weathered voice, he repeats Johnson's instructions word by word: "Press -- this -- button -- and speak -- in a NORMAL tone of voice." It's as if he's trying to memorize all of the instructions for getting the most out of Windows 8. And Johnson plays the scene straight and convincingly, showing a total respect for the man, being sure to call him "Sir", probably as Johnson would in real life. The father is played by George Hagy, who never made another appearance on any screen and who was probably picked out on the spot from the crowd of extras.

The story is simple. Goldie Hawn talks her prisoner husband, William Atherton, into escaping from pre-release, planning to kidnap their baby and flee to Mexico. The police soon catch on and the pair take a highway patrol officer, Michael Sacks, hostage and ride off to the baby's home in Sugar Land, followed by a string of police cars a mile long.

There are numerous comic incidents, and a few scenes involving gun shots and action. I hope the stunt men were paid well for the scene in which the news van flips over into a puddle. In some ways, the movie follows a trajectory illustrated by "Bonny and Clyde." As the scenes of action progress, they get more serious until they turn tragic. The couple are also lauded and helped by the ordinary folks of the towns they drive through. Spielberg has kept an eye on the size and response of the audience.

It's not an art film. Hawn's and Atherton's first escape vehicle is an old clunker that steams and bangs at its full speed of twenty miles an hour, but when the escapees spin around to elude the police, the sound of the engine changes from a loud knock-knock-knock to that of a Formula V Maserati. And, for my taste, too much time is given to cute Baby Langston, a habit Spielberg has rarely been able to shake. In ninety percent of respectable movies, all children should be stomped. Their appearances tend to cheapen the film, except in W. C. Fields' movies.

Goldie Hawn is sexy and delivers a fine performance as the mercurial screecher with the IQ of a head of broccoli. Whose breath blew out the light within this brain? Atherton, with his vacant face, is okay as the submissive husband. Once in a while, a pale beam of reality shines through his antics, but generally his character prompts one to ask whose was the hand that slanted back this brow? As the police officer who is their hostage, Michael Sacks is earnest and although he gets to like his captors and play games with them, he at least is in touch with the outer world. Ben Johnson is simple but reliable, and I miss the guy.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You look like a pea picker to me."
utgard1423 July 2014
Based on a true story, a woman (Goldie Hawn) helps her husband (William Atherton) escape from prison so they can kidnap their child from the foster family he's been placed with. Along the way the duo takes a state trooper hostage and are pursued by police while their story gains media attention. Steven Spielberg's first theatrical film (Duel was made for TV but released in theaters later). Also his first collaboration with John Williams. It's a fun dramedy with some great performances from Goldie Hawn, William Atherton, and the rest of the cast. Especially good are the colorful supporting characters, many of which have an authenticity about them that gives the film some nice flavor. An under-appreciated gem in Spielberg's oeuvre.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
True Story A Bit Erractic
DKosty12315 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Normally when you put Spielberg, John Williams, and a great cast together, you get a super mega hit adventure. This one does not fit that mold because it is based on a true story with some Hollywood embellishments. While it is well directed, it is not on a par with this famous directors later films.

The are 2 major assets in this movie. Goldie Hawn is great, as she plays the role of the mother who wants he child back perfectly. She is obsessed and yet a little cracked. There might not be as much of Goldies skin in this one compared to some films, but there are several sequences which do use her figure to great advantage.

The 2nd major asset is Ben Johnson. His role as the major lawman in pursuit of the escaped boyfriend and his wife in pursuit of their child who was placed with foster parents is very well done. While this is not everyones best, just Goldie and Johnson make this one worth watching.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Dog Days of Texas
bkoganbing6 March 2017
Although The Sugarland Express has been compared to Thelma And Louise most often, there was a film that came out the following year from Stephen Spielberg's first big screen classic that it most resembles in my mind.

Goldie Hawn's Lou Jean might not have all that much in common with Al Pacino's Eugene in Dog Day Afternoon except for two things. Neither are the sharpest knife in the drawer and both concoct a really whacked out scheme that gets them in way over their heads.

Unlike Pacino who put a little thought into his bank robbery plan, on a visit to a minimum security prison to her husband William Atherton who has only weeks to go on his sentence, she persuades him to bust out to kidnap their baby who foster parents are looking to adopt. The parents are in Sugarland which is West Texas near the Rio Grande.

They actually bust out quite easily. But then during a routine traffic stop they misread signals and take rookie state policeman Michael Sacks a hostage.

Just like Dog Day Afternoon anyone with a working brain knows that this crazy thing is doomed, but the adrenaline rush for Hawn and Atherton is out of control. The two become popular cult figures one way or another.

Hawn, Atherton, and Sack are fine in their roles. Kudos also go to Ben Johnson for his role as the man in charge of the hunt, the chase, and the hostage negotiation.

Stephen Spielberg started his big screen career with a winner.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Spielberg's Forgotten First Film
joshbaileynch6 June 2008
After the success of Duel (which was really a TV movie) Sugarland Express (Spielberg's first feature film) flopped at the box office, though it received a reasonably warm critical response. In fact this is a great little movie for all kinds of reasons.

If you're interested in Spielberg as a director this is fascinating as it begins to lay out most of the themes that have driven his work ever since - family (especially divided and dysfunctional families), childhood, parenthood, outsiders, America and Americana etc. It's also a really interesting piece in terms of his developing style. This is the first Hollywood film in which panaflex cameras were used allowing Spielberg to produce fantastically elaborate and fluid shots even in the confines of a car (see the superb 360 pan fixed on Ben Johnson's car when he first talks to the Poplins)- a kind of cinematography that has become a hall mark of Spielberg's, as have the rising crane shots and extended tracking shots that pepper the film. Spielberg skies and "God Light" (his term for shafts of light in mist/at night) also feature heavily.

It's also a really interesting if somewhat unrecognised influence on films like Thelma and Louise which seems to lift its basic structure and characters right out of this film. The way Ben Johnson's Captain Tanner equates to Harvey Keitel's police officer in Ridley Scott's film seems particularly close.

Fantastic performances all round too. Johnson, Horne and Atherton (a much under-used actor who has been largely wasted since, playing roles like the self serving journalist in the Die Hard films)particularly shine.

It's also very funny, sad and engaging from beginning to end. Can't recommend this one enough - especially if you're a Spielberg fan.
63 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ambling into Film History, Young Spielberg Starts Out
Bogmeister1 March 2006
The first theatrical feature by Spielberg, his last as just another director before "Jaws," this story is saddled by what I call an 'idiot's resolve' plot. This means the main characters behave like complete idiots and, in real life, wouldn't get two steps in the direction they're going, much less the miles of roadway managed in this pic. But - and this is an important point - the story is supposedly based on a real life incident, which means such theorizing may not apply here. It all depends on how much Spielberg and the writers exaggerated events, which I tend to think was quite a bit. The story is jump-started in that a 2-year old baby is placed in foster care; the real parents (Hawn & Atherton), small-time criminals, won't have it and break the father's incarceration to set out for the foster home. But, from the outset, these two are presented as such obvious losers, I was hoping they'd never reach the kid. The father, for example, has only 4 months remaining of post-prison time to do; in short order, the idiot couple's transgressions escalate from auto theft to kidnapping of a cop (Sacks). In essence, they quickly sabotaged any chance for themselves of getting the kid back in a happy fashion.

I also got the impression Spielberg was poking a lot of fun at Texas and Texacans in general, where this takes place. Besides the two idiotic so-called parents, most everyone else is also presented as a buffoon, a country hick with no clue. The more sinister examples are those who live for the opportunity to shoot someone - this is gun country, after all. The only one who escapes with his dignity intact is the police captain, well played by Ben Johnson. There are traces of the imagery and poignancy which many of Spielberg's later pictures would be laced with. There's the absurdity of that long, very long line of police vehicles, lights flashing, following that one car with the fugitives (I guess no other crimes needed attention in the county that day?). And the sudden look on Atherton's face when he watches a Road Runner cartoon is amazing. But these are a few instances far and between in an ambling picture. Hawn is immensely likable, of course, but in the end she comes off as an idiotic screaming shrew who directly causes bad stuff to happen. Maybe it's just me, but I don't really like women such as this. But then, if this is true-to-life, Spielberg captured some sense of an unpleasant reality we have no control over. It just didn't retain such a consistency through the entire movie.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spielberg's sleeper- a tragic-comedy that delivers what it proposes
Quinoa198419 August 2005
Before Jaws propelled Steven Spielberg to the moon, he was a television director, often on episodes of Columbo and Night Gallery. Then came Duel, his taut, experimental feat of man vs. man in machines thriller that made him notable, if not bankable, in the Hollywood eye. His first theatrical release, The Sugarland Express, is to me still one of his ten best (maybe not top five, but up there). Along with his screenwriters (whom would all go to win at Cannes), Spielberg brings a true story with a sense of the tragic realism, but also the sense of adventure and fun that goes into Spielberg's most entertaining films. There's usually a sense of excitement, but one can sense this is not the kind of story that will end up as the main characters think.

Goldie Hawn (as pretty as she is dramatic and chippy) and William Atheron (later impressionable in Ghostbusters, very much so here), are a husband and wife- the husband is in jail at the start of the film, and Hawn breaks him out with little trouble. They have a custody battle, literally, going on with their son, who is away at a home. They have to go through Texas- aka the 'Sugarland Express'- but it won't be easy. Soon there's a pursuit across the state, as the couple becomes rather famous in their simple pursuit of getting the one they love. Hawn and Atherton play off each other well, and Spielberg even at his young age as a director here gets very good performances out of them, especially out of Atherton who has a kind of urgent, tense, but focused way about him throughout. Hawn here isn't totally in the kind of mode like in her vehicle comedies- she's playing the worried mother, as determined as her husband, but her performance still contains a kind of naiveté that's crucial to the character.

And in full widescreen glory Spielberg flexes his technical chops to a full capacity. He doesn't make the film as a thriller like with Duel, but it still drives suspense on in its road movie way. There are a couple of shots that are done for the first time (see trivia) to great effect, and there is a scene in a small town I still remember very well due to the amount of people that are in it, and how Spielberg directs this wonderfully. In some ways this is like one of those Lifetime movies crossed with Smokey and the Bandit only played more for realism; there's something very interesting that we don't get to see much with the son, he's always in a world of his own inside the house, as the situation builds on the outside.

This all builds up to an ending that some have said doesn't work, or (like with some of Spielberg's other films, War of the Worlds for example) is too abrupt. I found that it worked just as well as with the opening scenes. It's realistic, at least for the period, and its important to remember this is based on a true story, and in these establishing and closing scenes the audience gets the real meat of the story (Catch Me if You Can did this too, though in a different way), and then in the middle some of the more dramatized parts come in. It wasn't a smash success on its first release, but it made enough of an impression with its win at Cannes and its writers guild nomination (ironically it was nominated for Best Comedy) to get Spielberg his next gig, which ended up being the real test of his career. As a nifty tale of overly concerned parents on-the-run, its really very impressive.
35 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hawn Could Have Been A Fine Dramatic Actress
slightlymad223 April 2018
Following Duel, movies heavily featuring cars were what Spielberg seemed to be offered, as he was set to direct Burt Reynolds in the action film White Lightning. He worked on it for a few months before quitting to take on this movie. "The one thing that I almost made was White Lightning the Burt Reynolds picture," Spielberg said "I spent two-and-a-half months on the film, met Burt once, found most of the locations and began to cast the movie, until I realized it wasn't something that I wanted to do for a first film. I didn't want to start my career as a hard-hat, journeyman director. I wanted to do something that was a little more personal." Reynolds was hurt by him quitting saying " He wanted out and it really hurt me, I felt like he just didn't want to work with me, and that was the reason. And he didn't."

Shot in perfect continuity (for financial reasons) The majority of this movie is filmed in a car. But there was no rear view projection or shoot it and then have the actors lip-sync later. Spielberg's timing was just right Panavision inc had recently developed and the Paraflex, the first totally noiseless camera, compact enough to be handheld or shoulder rested. Virtually the entire movie was shot in sync dialogue with only 10 lines a looped later. The Sugerland Expressis one of the first fiims to be shot in this then revolutionary style, though shortly, all filmmaking would follow suit.

This movie shows that Goldie Hawn could have been a fine dramatic actress had her career gone in that direction. Hawn's plan, slightly mad as it is, in fact does have an inner logic. I expected her infedelity (She prostitutes herself to a male neighbour for $65) to become a bigger issue. But it's surprisingly dropped pretty quickly.

There is no villain in this movie. Captain Tanner certainly isn't one. I also like a tender scene involving a Wile E. Coyote cartoon which was probably my favourite scene in the movie. This film marked the beginning of Spielberg's friendship with John Williams and we get a Spielberg trademark (images seen in a side mirror)

This is one of the few Steven Spielberg films that ends on a downbeat note. And boy what a downbeat note it is!!

Sugerland Express grossed $7.5 million (against a 3 million dollar budget) at the domestic box office.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
For a road movie, The Sugarland Express is surprisingly pedestrian
jimbo-53-18651126 October 2017
Lou-Jean (Goldie Hawn)visits her husband in prison with the sole intention of helping him escape from prison. Lou-Jean informs her husband Clovis (William Atherton) that she has lost custody of their son and asks her husband to assist her in kidnapping their son from his foster parents. Initially, the plan is working until they take a police officer hostage...

Based on a true story, The Sugarland Express starts out quite fun and Spielberg gives the film a mostly light-hearted and playful touch to it which makes it moderately enjoyable. Unfortunately, the screenplay does little to develop the main characters making them rather one-dimensional, thinly-drawn and rather uninteresting as people. Presumably this is intended as part road-movie and part character-study, but it isn't fun enough to be classed as a good road-movie (a lot of the film sees the couple being followed round Texas very slowly which hardly makes for an exciting picture). It also fails as a character study because there is precious little to study - the film occasionally mentions the state determining that Lou-Jean is a bad parent and her argument to the contrary, but this is never really explored or given any focus which is a shame because this probably would have made the narrative that bit more involving.

Later in the film, there is almost a Stockholm syndrome scenario developing between the kidnapped cop and the couple which again was an interesting direction to take the story in, but again it never really developed into anything; in fact this aspect of the story started out interesting and grew more and more ridiculous as it progressed...

The Sugarland Express isn't all bad and does have a few good points about it; Goldie Hawn once again puts on a good show and is great fun to watch here, the supporting cast are all OK, but Hawn easily outshines everyone. The film also has some amusing moments - the car being pushed to the petrol station was one such example.

Whilst it starts out well, unfortunately The Sugarland Express has already stretched its thin plot beyond breaking point by the midway point in the film and it starts to become repetitive, tedious and a tad boring. The Sugarland Express once again proves that having Steven Spielberg's name against a film isn't always a cast-iron guarantee of a good quality film.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spielberg's first film is wonderful, a classic.
vic-1210 November 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Haven't heard about "Sugarland Express" till recently and I had to see it because it was vintage Spielberg, and I'm a fan. And I wanted to see the young Goldie Hawn. I was not disappointed. It was one of these road-chase movies, bigger than life, but it was unique, especially because it was based on a true story. That fact made me incredulous throughout the film, but everything in Texas is supposed to be bigger than life.

Goldie desperately wants to get her baby back. She was in jail for some minor crimes and was found to be an unfit mother and her baby was put in a foster home and the foster parents were going to adopt him. Despite being a young girl, or maybe because of it, she was desperate to have her baby back. It was a love-child and the mother-love was passionate and obsessive. Hawn played the part to the hilt and used her sexuality and femininity to overcome the objections of her husband who was in a pre-release facility with low security.

She had a plan to help him escape, but he didn't want to risk it, take a chance of being caught and being incarcerated again. He only had four more months to serve. The other inmates were incredulous as they disguised themselves and got an old couple to give them a ride.

From this quiet beginning the film proceeded to repeated crescendos of drama and excitement. Try to imagine the young couple, young officer in tow, leading a chase of police cars, first a few, then a few dozen, then many dozen and ultimately hundreds, law-enforcement officers from all over the state and then snipers and a helicopter.

Lucky for the young couple an old-hand cop realized they were just a couple of kids and he staved off snipers with telescopic long-range rifles and a couple of vigilante gun-nuts.

You know something bad is going to happen at the end, because these kids didn't know what they were doing; they were madly in love and in a fantasy-land of getting their little boy back and living happily ever after in Mexico. Something bad happened, but something good happened. It will be worth your while to see this little classic from one of the greatest directors of the 20th century.
38 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A moving portrait of a couple's desperation to save their son from adoption
ma-cortes27 November 2023
Classy chase and intrigue thriller being the first movie directed by the great Steven Spielberg .Nice film with fine performances from Goldie Hawn, Wiliam Atherton, Michael Sacks and Ben Johnson giving one of his best ones as an understanding, tough police chief. Clovis Poplin is serving the remainder of his one year prison sentence in pre-release at the TDC Pre-Release Facility for petty larceny. His wife Lou Jean is also newly released from prison and comes to visit him with the intention of breaking him out because she just lost their child to foster parents that intend to adopt Baby Langston. She threatens to leave him for good if he does not go along with her plan. Clovis and Lou Jean are uneducated and not playing with a full deck; Clovis is naïve and easily manipulated and Lou Jean is beautiful, but annoying, ignorant, impulsive, and borderline sociopathic. She helps her husbabd break out of prison. In their flight to freedom, they hijack a police car, holding the policeman hostage. It's Not Every Day You Take a Ride Like This!.A girl with a great following. Based on a real life event which happened in Texas in 1969. The true story of a girl who took on all of Texas...and almost won. Every cop in the state was after her. Everybody else was behind her.

This Spielberg's first feature film contains thrills, emotion, pursuits and spectacular scenes. The real incident took place in May of 1969, this one is about February of 1973, just west of Houston, Texas (Sugarland in actuality), in which a young woman helps her husband break out of jail; in their flight to freedom, they hijack a police car, holding the policeman in hostage. A chase film in which the mechanics of the thing are devilishly well achieved, and this one really ramble a bit. There's a well-wrought storyline and on-the-ball filmmaking by Spielberg: it's just too darned long though. Goldie Hawn's sympathetic acting, it's all show and no heart. Pretty good William Atherton and Michael Sacks. Ben Johnson is magnificent as the head of the pursuing cops. And somenotorious secondaries appearing here and there Gregory Walcott, Steve Kanaly and Louise Latham.

It displays a sensitive and evocative musical score by John Williams. As well as colorful and brilliante cinematography by Vilmos Zsigmond. Based on a true story, adapted by Hal Barwood and Matthew Robbins; the motion picture was very well and superbly directed by Spielberg, being his film debut. Although his first one was sactually ¨Duel¨ with Dennis Weaver while in US it premiered in Television, it was released threatically in Europe . Here Steven maintains the whole nightmarish situation at total tension and fever pitch. Spielberg successful film to be continued by a series of hits, such as : Jaws, Close encounters in third phase , Raiders of the lost ark, ET, The color purple, Amazing stories, Empire of the sun, Hook, Jurassik Park, Amistad, Schindler list, Lost world, A. I. , Minority report, The terminal, Munich, War of the words, Indiana Jones and the last crusade and many others. Rating : Notable, better than average, 7.5/10. An absolute cracker that will keep you on the edge of your seat.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Much Ado About Very Little
preppy-312 June 2009
Based on true events. In Texas Lou Jean Poplin (Goldie Hawn) breaks her husband Clovis (William Atherton) out of a pre-release house. It seems their baby was taken from her and she is determined to get him back. They kidnap a police car with its patrolman (Michael Sacks) and order him to drive to the town of Sugarman where their child is. Head of police Captain Tanner (Ben Johnson) wants to settle this without any blood or shooting...but can he?

Steven Spielberg's first theatrical film is still largely unknown...and it's easy to see why! The basic story is OK but the film just gets more bizarre as it goes on. At first it was kind of fun but then it got annoying. I mean are we supposed to take seriously the entire force of Texas police following this one car? After a while it just became an endless series of car chases and shootouts. By the end I could have cared less if they got the kid or not. Also Atherton (a wonderful actor) gives a rare bad performance here (but his part WAS difficult to play). There are some good points about the film--Sacks (who has since retired from acting) is good in his role, Goldie was charming in hers and Johnson is just incredible. The stunning wide screen cinematography by Vilmos Zsigmond and great direction by Spielberg help--but they fail to totally cover the fact that this is an overdone car chase film. Also the veering from surreal to reality at the end is jolting (and depressing). Worth a look if you're a fan of Spielberg and Hawn but overall a disappointment.
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Steven Spielberg messes with Texas
lee_eisenberg9 July 2005
"The Sugarland Express" is the sort of movie at which we have to look in retrospective. It's about Lou Jean Poplin (Goldie Hawn) who gets her husband Clovis (William Atherton) to break out of jail so that they can retake their baby who has been put in a foster home. From there, they lead every law enforcement officer in the Lone Star State on a crazy chase.

When this movie came out, Hawn was well known for "Laugh-In" and had already won an Oscar for "Cactus Flower". I think that Atherton was unknown, although he would later become famous as the EPA agent in "Ghostbusters". And of course Spielberg made his mark the very next year with "Jaws". I guess that this movie is sort of a before-they-were-famous situation. But it is worth seeing.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Brilliant debut - One to watch but far from a masterpiece
sean-ramsden24 November 2021
In Spielberg's first cinema released feature film we watch a well put together car chase movie starring Goldie Hawn and William Atherton as the married hijackers.

This is a very solid, entertaining, and emotional film with a sense of innocence streaked throughout it. The couple involved are obviously doing something very wrong but at the same time the screenplay has helped us to feel a connection to them or at least an understanding to why they're doing this criminal act. The couple are in pursuit of their baby after Hawn breaks her husband, Atherton, out of prison. Our understanding comes from our primal instincts of love and survival which the hijackers have set their objection around.

Although we come to have an appreciation for Hawn and Atherton's characters, ultimately, we do not want them to succeed. If anything, we simply wish that they might come to a resolve or realise the wrong that they are doing. Spielberg shoots close up to the people in the car (Hijackers & policeman), helping to build a relationship between the audience and characters. Gradually the shots become more elegant and beautiful too as the relationship builds. William Atherton's character creates a link between the extreme hysteria of Hawn and the solemn morality of the police.

Spielberg is constantly moving the camera, which you could argue is a must for a road movie. However, he is sure to sustain our interest by moving the camera forward with the story, only stopping its movement when the journey stops or when character's debate. Looking at an early example - The camera tracks back with the couple as they attempt to leave the prison undercover. Facing the camera at first until finally with their backs to camera by the end, leaving this place behind, leaving the camera behind. In the same shot we find ourselves in an unexpected close up as Hawn leans into the shot and kisses a threatening snitch. With one take Spielberg has moved the story forward while creating obstacles for the characters to overcome, which they do in close up to exaggerate its importance in the moment.

As early as 1974 Spielberg is incorporating one of his signature shots. A reflection in a window showing us what the character is looking at. This avoids cutting 2 shots together, making the moment smoother and all about the expression on the character's face. This time, reminding Atherton of the threat of the situation. The foreshadow of his future spread over his face.

Overall, a good movie and a brilliant debut for one of cinema's greatest film directors. One to watch but far from a masterpiece.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Well-Acted, Slow-Motion Chase Movie
seymourblack-127 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This well-acted chase movie was a box office flop when it was first released and is now most significant for being the first feature film that Steven Spielberg directed. Its story, which Spielberg also co-wrote with Hal Barwood and Matthew Robbins, features enough car chases and stunts to illustrate that his ability to choreograph action sequences was already well developed at this early stage of his career, as was his skill at creating shots that are beautifully composed and visually impressive.

Based on a real-life incident that took place in 1969, "The Sugarland Express" is an account of what happened when a young married couple, who had both spent time in prison, decided to embark on a long trip across Texas with the intention of kidnapping their child from its new foster parents.

Having recently been released from a prison sentence she'd served for shoplifting, Lou Jean Poplin (Goldie Hawn) visits her husband Clovis (William Atherton) at the minimum security prison where he has only four months of his one-year sentence to serve and insists that he should break out immediately (with her assistance) so that they can head to Sugarland, Texas to take back possession of their son who the welfare people had fostered out to a middle-aged couple. Clovis initially resists the plan but gradually gives in to Lou Jean's forcefulness and they simply walk out of the establishment together before travelling away from the place, courtesy of an elderly couple who travel along the highway at about half the speed limit before getting pulled over by a highway patrolman.

When Patrolman Maxwell Slide (Michael Sacks) talks to the elderly couple outside of their vehicle, Lou Jean becomes convinced that he's actually pursuing them and so the young couple drive off at high speed and are soon followed by Slide. The chase ends when Lou Jean crashes the car she's driving and the couple then surprise the patrolman by taking him hostage and hijacking his vehicle. From this point on, the two fugitives and Slide continue their long journey to Sugarland during which they're pursued by an ever-growing number of police and media vehicles that follow them at a very slow speed. Police Captain Harlin Tanner (Ben Johnson) is put in charge of the whole operation and becomes determined to avoid any harm coming to Patrolman Slide or the misguided couple who he regards as being simply foolish and naïve rather than dangerous criminals.

During their journey, an unlikely friendship develops between Slide and his captors and they're also met by crowds of well-wishers as they pass through various towns on their route. Lou Jean, who always acts on instinct without ever thinking about the repercussions of her actions, clearly has no idea of how much trouble they're in and foolishly expects that when she and Clovis are re-united with their baby, that they'll all be able to live together, as a family, and be happy ever after. The fact that the media attention has made them into celebrities and they get lots of public support only reinforces her delusional thinking and strengthens her determination even further. All the chaos and activity that characterised their journey suddenly ands' however, when they get to Sugarland and the police convoy comes to a halt some distance before they reach their baby's current home.

This movie is brightened up by its action sequences, some moments of droll humour and an amusing example of Stockholm syndrome but otherwise its pace is too slow, and there is none of the exhilaration that would normally be found in a road movie or the excitement that a chase movie would usually provide. This is because the fugitives are only out of sight of the authorities for the first few miles of their journey and the remainder of the pursuit is played out in slow motion with the police even staying back at a respectful distance when the fugitives have to stop to refuel their vehicle.

Goldie Hawn is brilliant as the loud and not-very-bright, Lou Jean and William Atherton is marvellous as her obedient husband who's prepared to do anything she wants even though he doesn't share her belief that everything will turn out fine. The remaining members of the cast also provide consistently solid performances with Ben Johnson and Michael Sacks standing out in their important roles.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early Goldie, early Spielberg, both first-rate...
moonspinner5522 April 2001
Petty crook is busted out of pre-release jail by his determined-yet-reckless wife; seems their infant son has been farmed out to a wealthy foster couple while the two were behind bars and the Mrs. wants her baby back now. Director Steven Spielberg's first theatrical film has a scene midway through that still takes my breath away: Goldie Hawn and William Atherton take refuge in a mobile home parked in a lot behind a drive-in movie theater, a cartoon is up on the screen and Atherton supplies the sound effects--but, as the cartoon descends into violence, he stares out the window while his wife giggles on, oblivious to the parallels between the film and the paths their lives have taken. It's a miraculous moment in a high-spirited comedy-drama about trying to get what you want--even at the expense of the law. I'm surprised most Spielberg fans turn their noses up at this movie, it's one of his best. The finale doesn't really work (the picture switches gears too many times and eventually leaves us eating dust), but Goldie Hawn's performance is brave and funny and wonderful. In fact all the acting is excellent, right down to the last two-line player. *** from ****
28 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sugarland Spice
Lejink24 May 2021
I'm a bit hit or miss with Spielberg's filmography, perhaps unsurprisingly, considering how wide a range he's demonstrated over his long career. Here we are almost at the very beginning of it, with his first theatrically released feature (there had been a TV movie prior to this) and what a surprise it is. Based on real-life events, "The Sugarland Express" finds him making an offbeat, contemporary road-movie, admittedly at a time when there was a plethora of similarly themed movies coming from predominantly young American directors although it has to be said, he does a good job.

Both the title and early scenes are deceptive in that they lead the viewer to think they are in for a light, comedic vehicle allowing Goldie Hawn to play for cheap, kooky laughs but the tone of the film grows progressively darker, the moment Hawn and her ex-con boyfriend William Atherton commandeer a police car and its young driver, all to serve the purpose of reuniting them with their young child who has been placed in foster care with a wealthy middle-aged couple.

We're in the Deep South of America and Spielberg sharply contrasts the white-trash but well-meaning demeanour of Hawn and Atherton with their double-dealing, single-minded pursuit by the local police force. As the two plus one wind their way to their destination, the number of police cars on their trail grows exponentially but along the way word gets out to the general public so that they become local heroes and indeed media celebrities despite being wanted criminals.

Spielberg leaves us in no doubt as to where his sympathies lie, especially as there's never any doubt about whether they'll even try to take Atherton in alive. He demonstrates skill in marshalling his resources, particularly the crowd scenes and the armada of chasing police cars whilst inexorably moving the story along. Naturally, there's some humour involved too especially when they drive through a fawning local populace who come out to support them, some effective stunt work but most of all he Impresses with his handling of his characters especially the deepening relationship that develops with their policeman hostage, played by Michael Sacks. To this end, he draws out winning performances from his three leads as well as the duplicitous police chief Ben Johnson who will spare no effort to nab his prey.

It seems to me that there were as many road movies of this period as there were cars on Goldie's trail but this one does stand out for its attacks on the state attitude towards social welfare, police brutality and the use of firearms.

This unsentimental social drama perhaps shows a different road the soon-to-be famous director could have travelled or even have periodically returned to down the years rather than his something-for-everyone blockbuster approach in the future.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun movie!
Boba_Fett11389 November 2004
Man, I forgot how much fun this movie actually was. In my mind it was a heavy drama but on my recent viewing (finally it's on DVD!) I rediscovered this movie and found out how fun it was. It kind of has the same fun feeling the other 'based on a true story' Spielberg movies: "Catch Me If You Can" and "The Terminal" have.

The movie is made with lot's of profession and very little money. The small budget does not stop Spielberg of making a good movie. This movie was also the first Vilmos Zsigmond/Steven Spielberg collaboration. They later worked together on "Close Encounters of the Third Kind". But more importantly; it also was the first collaboration of John Williams and Steven Spielberg, one of the most successful collaborations in movie history, as later turned out.

the movie features a young Goldie Hawn and William Atherton who I really like as an actor. Atherton is probably best known for his role in "Die Hard 1 & 2", "Ghostbusters" and the more recent movie "The Last Samurai" in which he has a small part early in the movie.

It might be a bit too slow and probably boring for some people but I still recommend this movie. It has both action and substance. In a way also a must see because it was Spielberg his first real big hit and can be regarded as his breakthrough.

8/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad, for Spielberg's first
jmgiovine14 June 2019
The film progresses with a certain premise that starts off as a bizarre crime-comedy and it maintains itself on that frame for the majority of its run time, but at times it stops playing with the goofs and pretends to be self-aware of what else it may accomplish in different territories, but even when Spielberg's direction is not always on point, Goldie Hawn maintains an enjoyable-naive presence throughout the whole film, adding plenty of its comedic element
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Criminal Style Mother/Child Reunification
view_and_review7 June 2019
A young distraught mother, Lou Jean (Goldie Hawn), breaks her husband out of a pre-release prison camp in Beauford, Texas to help her get her child back from foster care. Her husband, Clovis Poplin (William Atherton), had four months to go and she broke him out. Ugh. I don't know who was dumber: her for breaking him out or him for going along. Anyway, a story such as this would normally tug at the heart strings. Who can't get behind a mother trying to get her baby back?

In this case, I can't.

For me to get behind such a mother I'd have to have some type of reason. Any reason. I had none. Besides her being some young petite blond with an annoying accent there was nothing to establish that unbreakable bond between mother and child. She was thrust upon us from the outset wailing about her baby lost to the system while she served time. I had no reason to feel her pain. I had no reason to get behind her. It was all academic but there was nothing concrete. So, from that vantage point all I saw was an extremely stupid girl with an extremely stupid plan. And it didn't even stop with a stupid plan, she genuinely thought that there was going to be a happy ending to it all. Like, holding a police officer hostage and leading an O.J. style chase through Texas was going to end in her being happily reunited with her child. She had the mind and emotional constitution of a five-year-old.

I suppose it was all supposed to be comedic. I wasn't laughing. I just saw a young, dumb, felonious couple thinking that it was all fun and not once realizing that their actions had real life consequences. But, then again, they were an all-American couple: young, white, southern and the added bonus that she was a nubile blond. Maybe that had good reason to believe they were going to be alright. The state of Texas can't go that hard on them right?
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed