92 in the Shade (1975) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Fonda and Oates are once again a winning pair.
Hey_Sweden26 July 2016
Author Thomas McGuane wrote and directed this noticeably laid back, fairly endearing combination of comedy and drama. Real life good friends Peter Fonda and Warren Oates set off sparks as Fonda plays Tom Skelton, a bum from a rich family who decides to get into the fishing guide business. He's soon locking horns with a world weary veteran of the trade, Nichol Dance (Mr. Oates), but vows to make a go of things, with his live wire grandfather Goldsboro (Burgess Meredith) helping a great deal in getting things going.

While the resolution to this film didn't really wrap up individual character stories to this viewers' satisfaction, "92 in the Shade" is overall a nice 91 minute long diversion, touching upon themes like class distinction and the generation gap. Shot by Michael C. Butler ("Jaws 2"), it's a gorgeous picture to look at. Set and filmed in Key West, Florida, it helps one to experience the flavor of this seaside environment. The music score by Michael J. Lewis also helps tremendously in this regard. The film gets serious without ever becoming overly melodramatic, and its comedy content is indeed pretty funny. Mostly, it works as a series of character vignettes, with an extremely rich cast making the most of their colorful roles.

Fonda and Oates are backed up by such sterling actors and actresses as Margot Kidder (as Toms' sweet and sexy girlfriend), Harry Dean Stanton (as Nichols' associate), Elizabeth Ashley (as Stantons' wife, an attractive but unbalanced woman given to parading around in front of others in a cheerleader outfit), William Hickey and Louise Latham (as Toms' parents), and Sylvia Miles (as Goldsboros' secretary). Among this bunch of heavy hitters, Meredith tends to steal the show - that is, until Joe Spinell turns up late in the film as Ollie Slatt, a goofy tourist looking to charter a boat for a day. He's also quite amusing.

Recommended mainly to admirers of the cast, "92 in the Shade" is uneven, but fun as well.

Seven out of 10.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Listless
ofumalow11 September 2020
Thomas McGuane had a little Hollywood vogue in the mid-1970s, with this movie and "Rancho Deluxe" the same year, then big-budget "Missouri Breaks" the next. The latter film was famously a victim of Marlon Brando's disinterest in following the script, which of course made the writer unhappy. All of these movies were commercial disappointments, so the vogue came to a fast end.

Today "Breaks" has its defenders (though I think it's still a very mixed bag), "Rancho Deluxe" looks like an underrated minor classic of the period, and "92 in the Shade" (which shares some of the same cast as "Rancho") remains a misfire you keep hoping will be better than it is. The typically blank, low-energy Peter Fonda aside, it's got a theoretically fine cast. But the movie just never quite works in translating McGuane's distinctive literary sensibility to the screen--and that is because McGuane as film director (for the first/last time) has no idea how to stage scenes or pace the whole. There's no variation in tone, no overall suspense or tension, which is unfortunate because the very heart of his writing is its loopy mixture of wacky humor and narrative intrigue. None of that comes across here, despite characters and incidents that ought to work.

The film just pokes along neutrally from one sequence to another, getting no particular flavor from the Florida coastal setting, generating no sense of peril even though it ends in violence (and both Warren Oates and Burgess Meredith in unusually negative, unsympathetic roles). The characters are superficially colorful but fail to come alive; Elizabeth Ashley's wife (to Harry Dean Stanton, much better used in "Rancho," which she was also in) never transcends caricature, and Margot Kidder's girlfriend is just The Girl. These are actors with so much personality, it's amazing that the film manages to make them uninteresting. It's not a terrible film, but McGuane's inexperience means the dominating tone isn't his eccentric authorial one, it's the default competence of his crew, who pretty obviously made most of the technical decisions themselves for lack of much directorial guidance.

Anyway, watching this in close proximity with "Rancho Deluxe" and "The Missouri Breaks" (both of which I'd originally seen in the 70s) underlined that "Rancho" remains the one movie that did Thomas McGuane justice. (Admittedly, I haven't seen "Tom Horn"--but I have seen "The Sporting Club," unfortunately, and that's as much a misfire as "92," although in a much more bombastic, self-important way.)
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
See the movie, but the book is much much better
laeva6510 January 2010
I was a bit disappointed, because 92 in the Shade was my favorite book of that period. I even lifted it from the library in Arizona. I found it later under the seat of my pickup when I was living down on the Gulf of Mexico.

I would differ with the other reviewer, in that I don't find a comparison between this film and Fonda's other Florida picture, "Ulee's Gold." That movie was simply the best performance Peter Fonda ever gave. In "92 in the Shade," we still come away thinking Fonda's mind was elsewhere while he was acting - and 'elsewhere' was far more interesting to him.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Someone Just Might Get Killed
hrkepler3 June 2018
'92 in the Shade' is only directorial effort for author and screenwriter Thomas McGuane, and that might not come as big surprise. McGuane is undoubtedly talented writer, but not much of movie director. Cinematography is beautiful and acting jobs are excellent in most part (perhaps not Peter Fonda, but he has put out much worse performances). Warren Oates is magnificent again as likable anti-hero. Two leads are supported by strong cast of character actors. Slow burning film where characters and dialogues between them are much more interesting than the overall story. This small film is definitely worth to look up.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Man's Inhumanity to Man
moonspinner5512 August 2017
Competition becomes grimly fierce between a young drifter, just returned home to his parents' Key West manor and wanting to get into the fishing guide business for tourists, and the established middle-aged guide and his partner who believe they rule the local waters. Atmospheric and seasoned to a fault, writer Thomas McGuane's character-oriented drama, which he adapted from his own novel and directed, overdoses on Florida's marinas and verandas, conch houses and local bars, salty denizens and tin-roof shacks. The accent should be on the eccentrics dotting McGuane's scenario (and the colorful group of actors in the cast), but the milieu overwhelms the proceedings to the point where the mini-war between Peter Fonda and Warren Oates seems irrelevant. There's still a great deal of colorful talk to listen to, but the plot as such doesn't build any momentum. ** from ****
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Shade of Blue
sol-kay3 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Somewhat different kind of movie-by its title- that you would expect to see with the focus being on this young beach-combing drifter Tom Skelton, Peter Fonda,in sunny and out of the way Key West Florida trying to start up a fishing guide business just to keep himself busy.

Tom soon runs into trouble with those fishing guides who are established in Key West Nichol Dank, Warren Oates, and Cart Carter, Harry Dean Stanton, who feel that he's cutting into their profits. It's when Nichol plays a dirty trick on Tom that left him both high and dry, and knee deep in the Key West swamps, that he retaliated by torching Nichol's fishing boat. The rest of the movie has Nichol trying to get even with Tom that leads to a major confrontation on his fishing boat that's more comical then anything else.

Both Fonda and Oates seem to be having such a real good time doing the movie that they have trouble convincing the audience that their really bitter enemies and willing to go so far, at least in Oates case, to kill each other. There's also William Hickey as Tom's bed ridden dad and Burgess Meredeth as his shyster lawyer grandpa Goldsboro. Both father and son have been at odds with each other for years ever since pop, Hickey, refused give grandpa, Meredeth, a freebie at the whorehouse he once ran in town. Gramps is also having a hard time with his secretary Bella, Sylvia Miles, who's mind is on how to screw him out of all his money, that's to go to his old lady, then in him keeping most of it.

To round things off there's also Cart's daffy wife Jennie, Elizabeth Ashley, who's shopping sprees are just about bankrupting him as well as Tom's teacher girlfriend Miranda played by a pre-Lois Lane and sexy Margot Kidder. It's Miranda's relationship with Tom that leads to a major cat-fight, in Jennie making light of it, between her and Jennie at a seaside picnic that livened things up a bit when the movie was stuck on neutral. Just when you thought that you've seen it all in pops Ollie Slatt, Joe Spinell, with a free coupon for a fishing trip that he, the way he acts, has been eagerly looking forwarded to for his entire adult life!

There's not much of a plot in "92 in the Shade" but the interaction between the films zany characters, especially Tom & Nicol, more then makes up for the films very simplistic storyline. There's also the added attraction of the scenic Florida location that gives the movie a travelogue-like effect. It in fact makes to want to get in your car or go to the nearest airport bus or train station and get a ticket for Key West and, if your lucky enough, run into the same kind of interesting and off-the-wall characters that you've seen in the film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average time capsule
merklekranz30 April 2007
If you are into bell bottoms, hipsters, and quirky characters, this is your movie. Peter Fonda as usual, sleepwalks through the scenery. Warren Oates is his off kilter self, and Harry Dean Stanton is along for the ride. The supporting cast is uniformly eccentric. Unfortunately the story plays like an instructional fishing film. There are more than a few tedious moments. If you have the patience to listen carefully, some of the dialog is amusing, but not enough to sustain momentum. Ultimately, the film must be regarded as nothing more than a curiosity, with absolutely no surprises from the plot, and a very predictable ending - MERK
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Most excellent
vjetorix28 January 2005
Don't miss this little treat of a film. If you liked The Hired Hand, this has the same laid back style that works great for a Southern story. But it's not so much the story. It's the ripe dialog and a cast of Great American Actors that make this one to catch. Warren Oates and Harry Dean Stanton make a great team of ornery fishing guides. Burgess Meredith has a great role and makes the best of it. Margot Kidder looks absolutely great here too. But Joe Spinell is worth the price of admission in a small role. The cinematography is experimental like The Hired Hand but is not as successful. Overall, this film is a gentle surprise and would be perfect for a warm evening. Recommended without hesitation.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Skeleton Kid.
morrison-dylan-fan8 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Talking to a family friend about movies he was after,I got told about a title starring Peter Fonda and Warren Oates which has completely appears to have fallen off the face of the earth.After not being able to find a Video or DVD of the movie,I was very happy to hear from a DVD seller that they had tracked down the film,which led to me getting ready to finally relax in the shade.

The plot:

Walking into a fishing town, Tom Skelton decides to set up his own charter fishing business.Being the owner of the business on all things fishing related in town, Nichol Dance decides to give Skelton a warm local welcome by trying to burn his business down.Getting shown the door by everyone in town,Skelton decides to step out of the shade and take Dance on.

View on the film:

Made as writer/director Thomas McGuane's life was in free-fall, (he got divorced from his first wife Becky Crockett, (who went on to marry Shade star Fonda)got married to Margot Kidder,and started an affair with Kidder's Shade co-star Elizabeth Ashley!)McGuane's shows a surprising level of confidence in his lone directing credit,thanks to McGuane & cinematographer Michael C. Butler basking the film in lush yellows and blues which turn the rivalry into a boiling hot affair.

Adapting his own novel, McGuane gives the screenplay a fever dream atmosphere. Following Tom Skelton's drift into town,McGuane gives Skelton's battle with Nichol Dance a sweet dreamy edge,as everyone around them appears unconscious over how deep their hatred for each other runs.Joined by wonderfully boo-hiss support from Burgess Meredith, Joe Spinell and Harry Dean Stanton,Peter Fonda gives a very good performance as Tom Skelton,whose laid-back grin is given a rough under-bite by Fonda,as Skelton finds himself getting caught up in a tough battle.Taking on Fonda, Warren Oates gives the title a striking rogue's charm as Nichol Dance.with Oates making Dance's one- oneupmanship on Skelton a delight to see,as Dance and Skelton fight in the shade.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I routinely use this movie as a example of a one on a scale of ten
joelafives11 July 2006
When I'm with a crowd and the subject gets around to movies, usually someone will ask, "What was the worst movie you've ever seen"? Well for me, this is it. I saw this in the theater when it was released in 1975 and have regretted it ever since. Wooden performances by a cast of actors that should have known better than to star in this poorly written and directed production. A complete waste of time and money. You would be better off watching a bass fishing show or bowling show on television than spending your time on this dog. If you're looking for a Warren Oates film pass this one and watch The Wild Bunch. That it was reedited and re-released in 1981 was amazing considering that no amount of editing other than a match would fix this mess
5 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A wonderfully wacky and idiosyncratic one-of-a-kind seriocomic hoot
Woodyanders17 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Brash, eager young turk Peter Fonda, the wayward scion of a wealthy family, comes back to his sleepy Key West, Florida home town and decides to become a river boat fishing guide, which ignites a bitter feud between Fonda and two fiercely independent, self-made working class fellow guides -- cantankerous, ferocious near crazy Warren Oates and his laid-back, but fretful buddy Harry Dean Stanton -- over some choice section of fish-infected water.

An authentically wiggy, amiable, frothy, if somewhat erratic character-based study of the classic rivalry between the bratty, lazy new generation and the crusty, hidebound old guard who automatically feel threatened by any hotshot young competition with an incisive grounding in the rigid parameters separating the hoity-toity, overconfident upper class from scruffy, fidgety blue collar folks, "92 in the Shade" makes for a disarmingly quirky seriocomic delight. Acclaimed novelist Tom McGuane's presentation of the nutty, enrapturing, intriguingly off-beat narrative tends to be pretty clumsy and unsteady, but there's a catchy, idiosyncratic, nicely relaxed rhythm to the eccentric proceedings which neatly ingratiates itself upon the viewer. Moreover, the sharply observed characters are an amusing, enjoyable, entertaining bunch of cranky, obstinate kooks, the dialogue is often riotous ("Take your hat off, will ya? Let your brains cool off -- you're thinking too hard!"), Michael C. Butler's bright, eye-catching cinematography gives the movie an attractive sparkling look, Michael J. Lewis supplies a pleasingly bluesy'n'woozy score, and there are plenty of hilariously wacky moments featured throughout.

The terrific cast includes Margot Kidder as Fonda's flaky, flighty school teacher girlfriend, Burgess Meredith as Fonda's crotchety, foul-mouthed rich grandfather, Elizabeth Ashley as Stanton's pregnant, terminally out to lunch wife (she has this annoying tendency to dress up as a cheerleader and do baton twirls in front of total strangers), William Hickey as Fonda's sickly, gloomy failure of a dad, Sylvia Miles as Meredith's loopy, sardonic secretary, Louise Lathom as Fonda's bored mother, and, in an uncharacteristically goofy role, a surprisingly uproarious Joe Spinell as Ollie Slatt, an insufferably smug and seriously obtuse businessman who professes to be a devout sportsman, but knows positively nothing about fishing. Fonda, Stanton and especially Oates in particular give funny, engaging, top-drawer performances. Although a bit rough around the edges, "92 in the Shade" generally succeeds with its keen depiction of everyday oddballs who are constantly at loggerheads with each other and overall rates as a leisurely paced, wryly humorous one-of-a-kind charmer.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What did I just waste 86 minutes on?
microx960026 March 2021
This film right here! Great cast, but the movie is a snoozefest, a total bore!!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Highly competitive fishing guides in overheated Florida
bunny-3126 June 2000
I rented this film one hot NYC summer night and fell in love with it. Some of the characters are a little cartoonish but overall it is a good piece worth seeing that exemplifies the beauty of a US state that I have never been to. Wonderful cast that includes Peter Fonda, Burgess Meredith and Warren Oates as an insanely territorial fishing guide. Also stars Margot Kidder when she looked good and Harry Dean Stanton as a melancholy side kick to Warren Oates. Classic all American cast from the seventies. I enjoyed this film because it is a fair portrayal of the working life of a fishing guide and the Florida landscape. It has the same qualities that I enjoyed from Fonda´s later effort Ulee´s Gold. Film is highly recommended.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Strongly recommend this idyllic eccentric oddity
PimpinAinttEasy11 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I watched a film based on the book around 10 years ago. It was on a video CD without subtitles. I didn't understand all of it. But I thought it was really charming. I liked the ensemble cast and the amazing background score. I kept postponing reading the book due to sheer laziness but ordered it on Book-finder recently and liked the book as much as I liked the film.

The film is set in the idyllic Key West. Mcguane (who also wrote the book the film is based on) creates these eccentric characters who have no real future. There is Tom Skelton who was a druggie and is now trying to move in on the guiding business of two regular skiff guides. This sets off a potentially murderous rivalry between him and the alcoholic and suicidal Nicol Dance. Carter, another guide plays them against each other even as he struggles with the promiscuity of his ex-cheerleader wife. Skelton's family is also quite dysfunctional with his rich, corrupt and powerful grandfather constantly bullying his bed-ridden father. There is even a character named Myron Moorhen!

I also love the film's idyllic score which makes you want to have a drink. The cast is stellar - Oates, Stanton, Fonda, Kidder, Meredith etc.

A scene that is unforgettable - Fonda following a fish that has bit into the bait of a loud unlikable couple and freeing it. Everything works in that scene - the surroundings and the music.

A dialog from the film that stuck with me: "The captain-or guide-experienced a sudden loss of interest-or ambition-and flaked out without warning"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed