Sheila Levine Is Dead and Living in New York (1975) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Sloppily-made, but ingratiating little film
moonspinner5516 March 2001
Adaptation of Gail Parent's celebrated novel about a quirky young woman who heads to New York City in search of a husband, but "finds herself instead" (as they say). Despite soupy production, bad editing and godawful music, Jeannie Berlin manages to shine as Sheila (she's utterly unpredictable and unconventional as a leading lady); Roy Scheider is also terrific in support as an eligible doctor (his spin-the-bottle monologue near the end is gorgeously done). Dated to be certain, but I got many laughs from sad-sack Sheila's predicaments. It's an offbeat, be-true-to-yourself serious-comedy, though hurt overall by a lack of restraint and a jerky narrative. **1/2 from ****
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A film that sticks in your head
handtek27 March 2010
I have to agree with the other reviewers about the song in this film. It sticks in your head. I saw this film only once some 20 years ago and I have never forgotten it. I could not remember the name of it and I finally discovered it here. The parts I remember the most are the scenes with the song and the scene near the end when Roy Scheider has a monologue talking about a childhood party where he was rejected by a girl, a story he tells in an effort to win back the Sheila Levine. The movie has stayed with me all these years. Its one of many films from the 70s that you catch on a late Sunday night or lazy Sunday afternoon and you watch and realize you have seen a memorable film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The big apple always welcomes quirky people.
mark.waltz26 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The delightfully odd Sheila Levine is the type of person that New York City thrives on, and for the shy but wonderful young Jewish girl from Harrisburg, getting away from her overbearing mother is a necessity so she can find herself. Jeannie Berlin is completely captivating as Sheila, reminding me immediately of her real life mother, Elaine May, yet quite her own person. The first scene has her showing her mother the filthy building she is moving into, as well as introducing her to the bohemian roommate who runs around in nothing but panties. An encounter at a party with confirmed bachelor Roy Schneider is a complete disappointment, but further meet ups with him bring on further feelings and amusing situations, particularly an enamored neighbor who has lesbian feelings for Sheila.

Okay, so I quickly got tired of the theme song "Love Me or Love People", but not knowing anything about the original book allowed me to judge the film on its own merits. Berlin should have been nominated for an Oscar for this (the 1975 best actress went to Louise Fletcher in a supporting role), a year with very few memorable female lead performances, but the film was an odd little artsy film that didn't do well. It's a fun slice of life black comedy with typical quirky 70's characters (especially with her coworkers at the children's record company where the office staff are the artists) and some great party sequences. I don't think it's the type of film I'd watch more than once, but I truly enjoyed it with no regrets about the two hour running time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Where is this movie? its an unsung New York classic.
ep19357717 February 2003
HBO in the 1970s kindled my still vibrant love for movies in a powerful way. Being able to view movies you never heard of or wouldn't have ventured out to see even if you had gave this young guy a thorough education of film.

SHEILA LEVINE IS DEAD AND LIVING IN NEW YORK left an indelible impression on me. I still - 27 years later-remember certain scenes, especially Sheila dancing with a broom to a song I think was called "Love Me or Love People" and her talk with Roy Scheider. Every review I've read of this film lambasted it and called it the death of Academy Award nominee Jeanne Berlin's(for THE HEARTBREAK KID) career. To this impressionable 12 year old Italian boy who was a sickly child. Ms. Berlins shattering, stammering performance is burned ion my head. She was as alien a creature to me as E.T. was and like that little rubber puppet made me feel sorry and commiserate with her plight of being an outcast so strongly that it inadvertently helped ms cope with my own problems. Its a great, full fledged performance. Its as if Jeanne Berlin's character of the pathetic wife in HEARTBREAK left to be on her own in the big city. This and HEARTBREAK KID should be watched in tandem to get the full effect of an incredible one two acting punch.

Of course my review here is based on feelings and I would love to watch it again through 39 year old eyes and review it again as a film rather than as a memory. I may than agree with the critics about its screenplay(which I remember as being thin) and its murky look(very dark cinematography) but will positively not budge on my perception on Ms. Berlins landmark performance. I would love to see it as a film and experience its charms all over again. Me and my broomstick are waiting. Hopefully Paramount will reunite me with a dear old friend.

Amazon Instant Video (a great resource for 70s film buffs)had this up for sale about 2 years ago. I purchased it immediately (sadly it-like vLOOKING FOR MR GOODBAR and LITTLE DARLINGS are no longer available)-and have it permanently in my pc. The Paramount transfer is good-and while I still do not think of this movie as the diisaster critics of the day thought-I do see its shortcomings. Roy Scheiders zombielike performance makes you wonder what Levine saw in him. Or was it the old "marry a doctor (or fill in blank)" scenario? His lackluster performance nearly kills the film more than Berlins (the critics interpretation-not mine). The song still stays with you-and upon hearing it for the first time in over 30 years-its everything about the song I remember. I was pleasantly surprised how nice the score in general was. The cinematography, the ratchety editing and the thin screenplay add to this films myth of being one of the worst of its year. I still am not of the critics thinking, and now that this film is part of my collection-I haven't seen THE LAST OF SHEILA-but thats for another review.
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Humorous and sad at the same time
Gypsy-405 July 2000
I saw this on television in the early eighties on late night television. Strange but interesting film. As noted in the synopsis on this page, the song "Love me, oh love me, baby won't you love me" stays with you FOREVER. It's the one thing I remember most about the movie, that and the scene where Roy tells Sheila about wetting his pants in gradeschool... Odd film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Storyline Hard to Believe
PretoriaDZ2 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The part about the naïve young woman coming to New York looking for love and success is believable. The part where she finds success is believable. The part where 'Sam' dumps 'Kate' is believable. The part where 'Sam' decides he's in love with 'Sheila' is unbelievable. It's not because the actress Berlin is rather plain - it's unbelievable because 'Sheila's' personality is so obnoxious, what's to love?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
love this movie
opie12324 March 2004
I haven't seen this movie in years but I remember it well and have been looking for it on video. So far no luck. Jeanie Berlin is so fabulous as Sheila. Of course if you are a New York single jewish woman (as I am) you would relate to her better, but she is just so perfectly "looser finds herself". The story is much different than that of the book but some of the character remain. But the movie is so 70's it's fun. And you can't help but fall in love with and root for Sheila. Someone out there get this to video!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The best books don't make good movies
emylye-139-3207933 June 2023
The novel was one of the funniest, sharpest, best-written things I ever found-and I wasn't surprised when Gail Parent made a name as the creator of witty, memorable dialogue, because I had read this many years before "The Golden Girls" hit TV. And there is FANTASTIC, hilarious, brilliant dialogue in the book. Forty (or more) years later, I could probably recite some of it verbatim, I reread the novel so many times.

BUT... the inner narrative of Sheila-her super-insightful take on the world around her, complete with prejudice that even the first time I read it made me cringe (Sheila/Parent is often so homophobic I wanted to punch her... but then she would add a detail that showed what she really was was jealous of people who knew and liked themselves more than she did... and I guess that obnoxious language is how people other than my super-liberal extended family actually thought and talked, to their discredit), is what worked on the page and never would on the screen.

I hated every change they made to the book for the movie, but since I was, even as a kid, the original annoying, 'the book is so much better' critic, it didn't surprise me that this version was a tremendous disappointment. It is, however, years later, an EXCELLENT reminder to stop hoping they'll ever make a movie of my counterpart favorite novel (Wilton Barnhardt's "Emma Who Saved My Life"). Some stories are only meant to 'come alive' in our imagination while we read. This was a movie I wished I had never seen.

The two stars are because I devoutly hope some people who'd never read the book did so after trying the movie. But, really, what a waste of money, effort, and time (including mine).

It's a cliché, but... 'read the book instead'. REALLY!!!!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Jeanne Berlin is one of the most underrated actresses!
SimchaNu4 August 2005
Jeanne Berlin (daughter of Elaine May) is perfect in this movie! What a funny, brilliant woman! The movie reminds me of My Big Fat Greek Wedding. All women are not beautiful and rich. You go girl! Another wonderful aspect of this movie is an early role for Roy Scheider who plays her love interest. My favorite part is the main character's job at a children's recording studio, Wha Wha Records. Everyone does a rather mundane job until a musician needs "backup". All the employees jump up and become the chorus. Gail Parent is one of my favorite writers (remember Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman on TV?) and she develops wonderfully real women in her comedies. Great movie for then and now.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb 70's NYC drama/comedy/rom-com
duaneincali18 September 2021
This is a highly, highly recommended film. Very difficult to categorize it. Does not easily fit into the categories of chick flick, rom com, or even comedy vs. Drama.

It is that rare film that can be truly heart warming without being sappy. It is not a retread.

Jeannie Berlin absolutely deserves high praise for this. As great as she was in the 'heartbreak kid', the slays in this.

I have no idea if it is 'in print', etc. But if you are alone one evening, your plans fell through, etc. Watch this.

This film made the film co-op rounds in the mid to late 70's and I probably saw it 3-4 times in college.

As a heterosexual male, just 'getting started', this helped me take the first view into the female psyche.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent 70s flick
Engine_Ear5 February 2017
A really good movie. Much better "young woman finding herself in the big city" than was "Frances Ha," or even "Breakfast at Tiffany's" (thought that obviously has other qualities). Patient, intelligent, warm, and funny, with enough conflict and growth to make it interesting and rewarding. I have an advantage in that I haven't read the book, so I can take the movie at face value. And from that vantage it works. Jeannie Berlin is wonderful, with the same ability to own the camera whenever she's on screen that she displayed last year in "Café Society". When she wants to look like a fish out of water, escaping an overbearing mother by moving to NYC, that's what you see. Awkward, unsure of herself, without any real outward appeal. But when she's supposed to be beautiful, indeed she is - you can't take your eyes off of her.

I happened to live in NYC at the time that this movie takes place, and the feel is just right.

My wife has been looking for a copy of this for years, and finally our daughter hunted one down on the "Loving The Clasics" label, whatever that might be. And it's in its original aspect ratio!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gritty NYC timepiece, a young Roy Scheider.
XTC-226 July 1999
This movie is funny in places, bitter in some, too. The song they play (over and over) when she's at the party will stick in your head so far you'll need a songectomy.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A classic ...
steven_torrey2 June 2016
This is one of those under rated movies that really is a classic in disguise. Like "Penny Serenade" or "Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day." Jeannie Berlin (as Sheila Levine) recites her lines in a stylized Jewish manner, just as Frank Sinatra did in "Guys and Dolls" to create that sense of identity that Damon Runyon intended for Nathan Detroit. So too Jeannie is Jewish and the movie is not about 'female' but Jewish. And all that female Jewish implies. Sheila, like George Costanza, a nebbish and charming for all that.

She falls in love with Sam (played by Roy Scheider), the Doctor, who hates himself for performing an abortion. But Sam the Doctor has a wandering libido and is not ready to stop philandering.

Like so many picaresque novels and films that unfold over a period of time, various and sundry adventures and mishaps occur before the denouement. (Girl gets boy, girl loses boy, girl gets boy...) It is a quintessential New York story for those who like quintessential New York stories.

I didn't find Vince Canby's objections relevant; he seems to have missed the whole point of the movie as a Jewish story. If the viewer misses that, then an important part of the story is lost.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doesn't work as a comedy or a drama
Wizard-817 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
For years I've wanted to see this movie despite (though maybe because of) it's bad reputation, but it didn't seem to be available anywhere. But it aired on TCM recently, and I finally got to see it.

After watching it, I can say it's not as bad as it's been made out to be... but all the same it doesn't work. The biggest problem with the movie is the character of Sheila Levine. It's frequently hard to get into the head of this woman. The movie seems to start at chapter two, not giving us an explanation as to why she decided to move to New York or what her ambitions are. Later in the movie, she all of a sudden is seen living elsewhere and with a new job. Huh? What happened? Further problems with the character include that she often comes across as dumb, which makes her unsympathetic. It doesn't help that Jeannie Berlin, who plays this character, has pretty much no charisma.

The script can't make up its mind as to whether the movie is a comedy or a drama. That by itself is not an instant problem, but the movie's level of humor is mostly lame, and the serious portions aren't that much better handled. With all these bad ingredients, it's no wonder director Sidney J. Furie can't do much, though he does manage to portray 1970s New York in an appropriately dingy and dirty look, which is how it was before it was cleaned up. And he does occasionally throw in extremely long takes without any edits, which are effective and must have been very hard to rehearse and set up.

I admit that I wasn't bored by what I saw despite the almost two hour running time, which in part does save the movie from being called one of the worst movies of the 1970s. But the movie just doesn't work as a genuine comedy, an unintentional comedy, or as a drama. You can safely skip it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I've been looking for this movie for years
gfinister17 May 2017
Loved it! I thought it was a comedy, romance, sad and happy. Haven't we all been there? I presume it was low budget, but it certainly got the point across. As one reviewer on this site put it "it sticks in your head". So true to life for the 1970s. I loved this movie. I could relate to how Sheila felt. I really enjoyed the plot. The mother was wonderfully casted. I gave it 10 stars. It's certainly worth watching for those romantics at heart like me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed