Rabid (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
136 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Becomes Better with Time
claudio_carvalho25 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
In Camelford, while swinging his van across a narrow road to make a u- turn, a driver stalls the vehicle that does not restart. Hart Read (Frank Moore) is driving his motorcycle with his girlfriend Rose (Marilyn Chambers) and he drives off the road to avoid the collision. Hart suffers minor injuries while Rosie is injured and burned by the flames when the motorcycle explodes. The ambulance from the nearby Keloid Clinic for Plastic Surgery brings the couple and Rose, who is in coma, is submitted to an emergency surgery and to an experimental plastic-surgery technique by Dr. Dan Keloid (Howard Ryshpan) to retrieve her skin in the chest and abdomen. Hart is discharged but Rose stays in coma in the intensive care unit (ICU) to recover. Out of the blue, Rose awakens from her coma one month later and screams. A nurse helps her but is wounded by her and then he cannot remember what has happened to him. He is sent to a hospital in Montreal while Rose realizes that she needs to feed with blood. However her victims become zombie-like creatures. Rose flees from the clinic to Montreal to meet her friend Mindy Kent (Susan Roman) spreading her infection in the big city. Meanwhile Hart is seeking for her.

"Rabid" is a horror film by David Cronenberg that becomes better with time. In the present days, with so many news and unknown worldwide diseases, the idea of an infection that spreads in a geometric progression turning people into zombie-like creatures is totally feasible. Marilyn Chambers, from the cult adult film "Behind the Green Door", surprises with a good performance. The conclusion is deceptive and could be better, maybe due to lack of budget. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Enraivecida na Fúria do Sexo" ("Rabid in the Fury of Sex")
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Cronenberg's best but still worthwhile.
poolandrews16 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Rabid is set in Canada & starts as Hart Read (Hart Moore) & his girlfriend Rose (Marilyn Chambers) are riding a motorbike along a country road when they spin off the road & crash as Hart looses control of the bike while trying to avoid hitting a broken down camper van. The accident is seen by patients at the nearby Keloid Clinic who raise the alarm, with the nearest hospital miles away Dr. Dan Keloid (Howard Ryshpan) decides to operate at his private clinic but uses new experimental skin grafts on Rose who has been badly injured in the crash. Rose makes a full recovery but the skin grafts have an unexpected & unwanted side-effect as a mutant growth under Rose's arm has developed & drinks human blood to survive. Rose now needs human blood to live although anyone that she drinks from then becomes infected with a rabies like disease that makes the carrier go crazy & seek human blood themselves. As the disease spreads the military place Montréal under martial law...

Also known under the title Rage this Canadian production was written & directed by David Cronenberg & Rabid was his second full length feature film after the successful yet controversial Shivers (1975), while not one of his best films Rabid is still a pretty good horror film with that added depth that Cronenberg likes to bring to his films. The sexual metaphors that Cronenberg was fond of putting into his films are clearly here with Rose seducing & enticing her victims like lovers, the round bodily orifice that the predatory organ shoots out of looks like an anus & maybe Cronenberg was thinking about the spread of sexual disease as the imagery & themes all fit together, however Rabid isn't as deep or shocking or relevant as many of his other films & the ideas that are brought up are never really explored with the same sort of perverse fascination that he does in some of his other films. Rabid just feels a bit empty as a Cronenberg film & the dialogue is also a bit dull at times & without purpose or biting social commentary that Cronenberg can excel in even though it's still probably better than many films out there. At 90 odd minutes the pace is a little slow at times but the build-up & spread of the disease is well handled which eventually leads to mass panic & martial law during the last half an hour, I also have to mention the very bleak, sudden & downbeat ending which I thought fitted the tone & style of the film perfectly as Rose was tossed away like a piece of trash. I liked Rabid, I didn't love it or think it was great Cronenberg but his films are never less than interesting.

Shot on a fairly low budget Rabid looks quite gritty & raw at times which helps the tone & feel of the film & suits the story. There's not much gore here, there are a few bites, a guy is gorily gunned down, someone gets a pneumatic drill in his leg, a doctor cuts a nurses finger off, a strip of skin is sliced from a leg & there's some blood splatter. There's a pretty cool car crash as a big lorry smashes into a car that has just fallen off a bridge & the scenes of a panic stricken city are reasonably convincing although budget issues clearly had an effect here.

Filmed in Canada the production values are a bit rough at times with library music but it's more than watchable & adds a certain grittiness to the film. The acting is alright, no-one is amazing but most of the actors here are at least competent.

Rabid is a good film, maybe a little disappointing & empty if you are familiar with Cronberg & his other films but still more than worth watching for a Vampire zombie thriller horror film.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Attack of the bloodsucking armpit.
BA_Harrison25 November 2009
After a nasty motorcycle accident, a young couple, Hart (Frank Moore) and Rose (porn star Marilyn Chambers), are taken to a nearby plastic surgery clinic, where Rose undergoes a revolutionary skin grafting technique that results in the growth of a bloodsucking tumour. Driven by the lust for plasma, Rose flees the clinic and embarks on a series of attacks which leave her victims alive, but infected with a strain of rabies that causes them to react in a violent manner. As the disease rapidly turns into a city-wide epidemic and martial law is imposed, Hart attempts to locate his missing girlfriend, unaware that she is the carrier of the disease.

With crisper cinematography and more confident direction from David Cronenberg, Rabid is a technically superior effort to his 1975 film Shivers, but doesn't manage to be as satisfying an experience thanks to a script that becomes a tad too repetitive at times, strays a little to close to George Romero's The Crazies (1973) for comfort, and perhaps most importantly, fails to answer burning questions about the nature of Rose's condition: the needle tipped, phallic mutation, which emerges from a sphincter-like orifice from under Rose's arm, is as grotesque and unsettling as anything Cronenberg has conjured up since, but it's existence is never adequately explained, most likely because no amount of in-depth exposition could ever be convincing enough.

On a more positive note, Chambers does reasonably well in her first non-porn lead role, there are some genuinely nasty moments for which makeup guy Joe Blasco provides some pretty decent effects work (I particularly enjoyed the 'finger snipping' moment, and the impressive use of a pneumatic drill by one of the infected), and Cronenberg occasionally ditches his sober approach for the odd spot of delightfully twisted humour, such as the scene in which a mall Santa Claus gets accidentally machine-gunned by a trigger happy cop (well, I found it funny!).

Whilst Rabid certainly doesn't qualify as essential Cronenberg, it is still worth a look if you're a fan of the man's work and merits a reasonable 6.5 out of 10 from this viewer (generously rounded up to 7 for IMDb).
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cronenberg Keeps Me Out of Canada
hungadunga5 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Rabid or Rage ( do American's therefore not know what Rabid means ) begins and ends like Lawrence of Arabia: a motorcycle crash and a high body count. The similarity ends there.

Marilyn Chambers - the woman who occupies the dreams and fantasies of millions - seemingly recovers from this accident only to develop an appetite for blood.

Rabid is a modern, urban vampire film, and who better to direct it than Cronenberg.

In the hands of another, this film would be horrifically mediocre. The lonely country lane, the frozen body, the subway attack, the Santa shooting in the mall and the dark movie theatre - Cronenberg knows how to imbue a sense of emptiness and despair into each scene. The film is full of pathos and 70's paranoia. Fear of woman (especially such a sexual one - Eve and such like), fear of government and fear of those around us - Cronenberg feeds off such hysteria, just as Chambers feeds off her victims. The underarm worm is quite clearly a female penis.

I don't mean to make Rabid sound grand or profound. It isn't really. It's just Outbreak meets Vampire Circus. I do think, however, that Cronenberg always seeks to challenge Western values and boundaries by using hidden evils, distortions and deformed humanity.

Marilyn of course looks fantastic, and she is frequently topless. As an adolescent I was attracted and haunted by the idea of being attacked by such a woman. "No, no, don't go, it's freezing cold - hold me." You know that if you do, death will shortly follow, but who could resist?
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sometimes effective, sometimes dull
Joel I11 December 1998
This is Cronenberg's disappointing follow-up to the great "Shivers." Once again, the "monster" is a disease that turns the victims into crazies. The underlying subtext that sexual appetite makes you crazy is reinforced by the casting of porn star Marilyn Chambers in the lead role (she's not bad). There are some good scares and some great grotesque images (especially the frozen twisted corpse that was used in the film's poster). But the story is by turns confusing and, until the military is brought in at the end, repetitive. It feels overlong for what it is. Cronenberg had some nice directorial touches--I like the way he uses brightly lit, underpopulated buildings as a backdrop for the horror.
23 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good exploitation flick that acts as a precursor to many modern horror films
Quinoa19841 October 2007
David Cronenberg perhaps maybe didn't get too ambitious as he forged ahead in the 70s as a low-budget director of bloody, outrageous horror films in Canada, but it was probably a good chance to learn tricks of the trade he'd know for the rest of his career. And somehow, while watching it, despite the fact that it is not masterpiece, it has all the makings of being a real influential work. Like another film that it's obviously been inspired by, Night of the Living Dead (albeit the Crazies might be in there too), Rabid seems to have given rise (no pun intended) to films like Species (hot woman out on the prowl for beings to fulfill her), 28 Days Later (obvious), and even Planet Terror (outbreak in a hospital). It's rough and with a terribly bleak ending, and it's got a certain pizazz that should keep it humming on genre fans shelves in the years to come.

Marilyn Chambers is one of the reasons the film got made- Ivan Reitman chose her over Cronenberg's (more interesting) choice of Sissy Spacek- though it is and isn't her exactly that makes Rabid a little sleazier for some reason that it might be without her. To be sure, she's the catalyst for the outbreak of the not-quite-rabies that spreads out in Montreal after a freak skin-grafting operation following a motorcycle accident (very well filmed that is, by the way). But seeing her after she gets out of the hospital and for the bulk of the picture until she reunites with Hart is a little predictable, and adds an air to the film of being too exploitive of expectations as opposed to exploiting the primitive tools of storytelling Cronenberg has. A scene like when Chambers goes into the movie theater should be freaky, but it's just sort of ho-hum.

It's not even that she lacks a certain screen presence, though at the same time, as the protagonist, she's not even really all that interesting in context with what else is going on around her. The best parts of Rabid are the side scenes, the little moments like when Joe Silver watches TV with the baby, or when the mall cop accidentally shoots the Santa Claus and mutters "Christ!", or when we see the sudden moments of the characters like the truck driver out for BBQ chicken or the random dude at night jumping on Hart's car. Those are when Cronenberg strikes it best as a pure genre director, not going too deep into theme (aside from that of the unawareness of disease and infection, a theme that would grow stronger in the 80s to be sure), plus in the shock value of the actual creature that sprouts out of Chambers mouth, which is probably even *better* concealed and revealed than with the parasites in Shivers.

At the end of it all, Rabid only really gets profound towards the very end, as a tragic scene occurs, but by then it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Rabid is a warped little blood-soaked flesh-eater flick, and it's happy with being simple and dark in its low budget.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly decent
Jocey28 August 1999
I'm a fan of David Cronenberg, so I've gradually been unearthing his earlier work. I watched Rabid last week, and, too my surprise, it was a pretty good B horror flick. Sure, it had plenty of bad acting (though Marilyn Chambers was good-*gasp*), was a bit too long for what it was, and was uneven overall, but I could definitely see the genius that was too come from this very young Cronenberg. Interesting flick--give it a try. **Another interesting note--look for Ivan Reitman's name in the opening credits as a producer**
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A touch on the slow side...
sean-5784217 January 2020
Well then... a decent film, with a stunning lead (how beautiful was Marilyn Chambers?) but suffering with horrendous pacing issues. I enjoyed the story but was honestly bored for the majority of the film. A shame, considering the effects are pretty cool, and also considering the director's reputation.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creepy early Cronenberg
Nightman8510 November 2007
The second big-screen feature from Canadian horror genius David Cronenberg was this twisted well-done low budgeter.

Following a motorcycle wreck, a young woman receives skin grafts that cause her to have a murderous thrust for blood - which leads to a deadly plague.

Rabid is one nicely done little shocker. It has a clever storyline that's a unique take on the vampire/zombie genres. The makeup work is gruesomely good, the atmosphere cold and fitting, and the low-budget ambiguously well used to create a horror film that was a bit ahead of its time. In addition the cast isn't bad. Star Marylin Chambers, though better known as a porn actress, does a decent performance as the victim of the strange infection. Frank Moore is also good as Chambers' boyfriend who must save her before disaster strikes.

While granted that Rabid isn't as great as the films that Cronenberg would later unleash (The Brood, Videodrome, Dead Zone etc.) it is never the less a solid sophomore effort that well-foreshadowed the greatness Cronenberg would achieve in his later films.

*** out of ****
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A young woman mutated after an accident tries to escape a devastating pandemic she unwittingly started!
DanLives19805 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
David Cronenberg is undoubtedly on of the strangest success tales the world of film has ever witnessed. The creator of the 'Body Horror' sub-genre and producer of such titles as 'Shivers', 'Scanners', 'Videodrome', the remake of 'The Fly', 'Naked Lunch', 'Crash' and his final venture into fantastical horror 'Existenz' is now known and loved by audiences and critics for suspense thrillers and crime dramas such as 'A History Of Violence' and 'Eastern Promises.' From the beginning he was a brave writer and director that tackled the issues of sexual deviance and perversion, dangerous fetishes and the fear of bodily change, something which undoubtedly drew younger and more mature audiences to his works without truly understanding why. His works in horror were most openly and frankly sexual although often repugnant and were often the result of many nightmares and newfound phobias; a writer and director with the power to affect jaded horror audiences, yet tell a vitally moral and heartfelt tale about the lesser desired individuals within our societies.

'Rabid' was his second venture into film and was maybe a lesser moral tale although watched closely delivers many messages for the modern man and woman, the so-called liberated and free to choose.

The main character Rose was portrayed by then and now legendary porn star Marilyn Chambers whom Cronenberg placed great faith in as a relatively inexperienced actress and to everyone's surprise, she delivers on so many levels, giving the viewer an unbelievably beautiful but deadly, calculating but no doubt lost and scared Typhoid Mary who spreads a plague of mutated rabies across Canada.

Rose is involved in a motorcycle accident. Her boyfriend walks away relatively unscathed and is forced to pick up the pieces of his life as she lies in a coma after revolutionary surgery just about saves her life. The only side effect being that a mutation occurs and she becomes a vampire of sorts, sleepwalking her way from victim to victim within the confines of an isolated hospital for plastic surgeons.

But when Rose one night wanders off the beaten track into a farm and draws blood from an infected cow, she does not know that everyone she drains of blood from then on will contract a deadly disease that will turn them into raving, bloodthirsty lunatics.

So when Rose's boyfriend receives a distress call from her and rushes to her aid, he is dismayed to find her gone as her secret has been exposed and several patients found dead or infected. From there on, a cross country chase sees her go on to infect anyone who comes into contact with her as the blood-thirst becomes ever more uncontrollable.

What results is a national crisis, Rose slowly becoming aware that she is the cause and cannot escape her urges or her guilt and the streets filling up with contagious madmen.

Cronenberg uses past familiar faces over famous ones, which works in his favour as only everyday people can portray the everyday people look and feel. Only Chambers provides that stand-out stunning beauty that is essential to the telling of this tale in a seedy time where the sexual liberation of the '60's had only resulted in the incessant gratifications of a nation left perverted and never able to feel satisfied. In perhaps what can be seen as a fateful twist, Chambers goes on to pick out her victims from the shadows of porn theatres, pick up men off the street looking for a danger thrill and learns to use her feminine sexual power to her advantage; the literal deadly siren calling a sinking ship towards its doom by mesmerising her lustful victims.

The horror scenes are singled out in isolated incidents throughout, so to give the film a rhythm to work to as it escalates to full-on chaos and those scenes are sometimes comic, sometimes grimly trashy but then hideously dark and uncompromising and like George Romero's offerings at the time such as 'The Crazies' and 'Dawn of the Dead' it helps to affect the audience by leading them into the false security of a film that doesn't take itself too seriously before shocking the unwitting crowds. Cronenberg's sense of humour lies within his gift for freaking out his audiences with surreal moments we do not think can get any stranger before they do and in that sense, this film is golden.

Watch it on a cold rainy night when you have nothing to distract you and appreciate the horror genius of a mind that will never be equalled!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Watch something of Romero's instead!
king_jack_the_wicked27 September 2003
Cronenberg has always been one to make interesting films with unique stories but at the same time they are always boring and useless.

A friend argued that David's films are original and I gave him that, I also added a movie about killer ducks would be original too, but who would want to see it.

This movie was very boring and didn't have any good scares nor will it stick with you. Five minutes after you finish with this film you will have forgotten it, unless you remember it for porn star Chambers tits which were wisely casted to make up for the fact the film was gonna suck. We all know by now though that sex sells in Hollywood.

Once the movie got to the point where many people were getting infected and going wild it did grab my attention. I have to admit I was really locked into the whole nightmare of what if people did suddenly go mad like that, it would be a lot like represented here in this film. Not only would a person be scared of leaving the house for fear of being bitten, but also the way killing the crazies and disposing of them would be carried out.

The fact is though that I watched a movie that had several things happen that ultimately resulted in random people turning mad and attacking people and kept thinking it has been done so much better in other films. It was poorly done and I was thinking 'god, I wish I watching THE CRAZIES or DAWN OF THE DEAD right now, something that is scary, gory and can be considered a horror movie

RABID - 1 1/2 stars out of 4
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good, ambitious low-budgeter.
capkronos20 June 2002
I really enjoy gritty, low-key horror films like this one. The story revolves around Hart (Frank Moore) and Rose (porn queen Marilyn Chambers), a young couple involved in a motorcycle accident. Rose undergoes an emergency experimental skin graft operation and emerges as a plague-spreading pseudo-vampire who extracts blood via a syringe-style growth that has developed on her body. It's an interesting, original take of vampirism, especially the aspect that her victims get sick and turn homicidal ("Rabid," I guess).

In my opinion, this is Cronenberg's best 70s movie (I enjoyed it more than THEY CAME FROM WITHIN/SHIVERS and THE BROOD, also good horror films). The story is intelligent, very well thought out and full of political and social context if you want it. The horror scenes are creepy and effective. Chambers is beautiful and has a killer body, for sure, but she also delivers a surprisingly good performance. You can tell she was savoring this non-hardcore role and probably hoped for more of the same after this, but it just wasn't in the cards for her. Too bad. The rest of the cast was acceptable.

I wish they made more films like this nowadays!
26 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Be careful who you trust
TheLittleSongbird31 May 2019
If compiling a list of favourite directors, David Cronenberg if to be honest wouldn't be on it (having only properly started seeing his work fairly recently). If compiling though a list of the most fascinating and unique directors, he would almost certainly be on it and high up the more work seen of his. A vast majority of his films disturb in his use of imagery and make one feel uncomfortable with his tackling of challenging subjects, but as said in some of my other reviews for his films there is much more to his work than just full on horror as seen with him moving away from it in later years.

While nowhere near close to being one of his best (not one of his worst either, 'Cosmopolis' for me is a contender for that title) and do prefer 'Scanners' and 'The Brood' as far as his early/body horror films go, 'Rabid' is an interesting and more than decent effort. For so early on and with limited resources, for all its obvious faults, 'Rabid' impressed me and admired it for its ambitious premise (like with 'Shivers'). The rest of the films that are part of his filmography are far more refined visually, explore their themes/subject much deeper and are far better written and acted, but there is a good deal to like here.

Admittedly the low budget is obvious, with 'Rabid' making for one of Cronenberg's worst-looking films. It does look better and less amateurish than 'Shivers' though. The effects and make-up are well done and pretty freaky, but 'Rabid' does have a drab look and looks simplistic and unfocused, and like a low budget television film made by an experimenting student.

The script is also very clunky and too often vague with too many parts not going into anywhere near enough explanation. It did feel that a lot of time went into most other components and the script was left at the bottom of the pile.

Do think that the acting is quite a lot better in general than in 'Shivers', which only had two good performances while most of the performances were acceptable (if not always much more than that). But Frank Moore did have ropey moments from personal view.

'Rabid' has a lot of things worth praising. As said the special effects and make-up are freaky, surprising as one does expect for minimal budget for the effects to be the worst part when it comes to production values.

Cronenberg gave himself a lot to take on and does so admirably, even if his style had not fully formed yet. Yet his style can still be found all over 'Rabid', with the famous themes and ideas often re-visited in later films present but much deeper and with more subtlety later on. The story is interesting with the ambitious concept not wasted, with the pace being slicker than before.

Especially good here in 'Rabid' are two things. One being the atmosphere. The other being the horror. 'Shivers', 'Scanners' and 'The Brood' (which also all had the better scripts) to me were more disturbing and stomach churning, but that is not to say that 'Rabid' isn't either of those things, quite the contrary, with the violence still being shocking today. There are some genuine chills and shocks and the sense of dread is handled very suspensefully. The threat is scary too and the imagery does churn the stomach in typical Cronenberg fashion. Enough of the acting is acceptable, with Marilyn Chambers being a surprisingly good lead (was honestly expecting her to be a disaster).

Summarising, decent film. 7/10
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor acting and script, left a lot to be desired.
Snake-66614 May 2003
I recently watched Rabid for the first time. I found this to be an average horror film with some good moments, however bad acting and a poor script ruined parts of this film.

The film involves Rose (Marilyn Chambers) and Hart (Frank Moore). At the beginning of the film they are involved in a motorcycle accident and while Hart escapes with minor injuries, Rose loses a lot of blood. This leads Dr. Dan Keloyd (Howard Ryshpan), a plastic surgeon, to try some experimental surgery on Rose. The surgery works but Rose remains in a coma for a month until the time she wakes up, and she is hungry.

In my opinion the worst actor out of the lot is Frank Moore. He spends the film talking in the same monotonous tone, as if he is completely detatched from reality. He speaks during scenes which should be dramatic as if he was at home with his pipe and slippers. It really was an abysmal performance from him.

Marilyn Chambers put in possibly the best performance of the film. Many of you may remember her as the famous X-rated movie actress, well you'll be happy to know she spends quite a large amount of time with no clothes on. Her acting was far from perfect but easily the best in this production.

The story moves quite quickly as far as the events in the film go, but a bit slowly in telling you why events in the film happen. This is a problem of the script....there seemed to be a lack of dialogue which would make things clearer to understand, and there are a few points where "how?" or "why?" questions happen about the films events.

All in all it's worth a watch...an average movie with some good moments, but it is the type of film that I won't be watching again in a great hurry. 6/10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Plague on all Your Houses
BaronBl00d24 October 2004
Two bikers careen and crash in the Canadian countryside very close to a cosmetology clinic. The girl biker has received serious injuries and needs lots of surgery involving skin grafts. After that there is virtually no scientific or general explanation for how this young lady develops a blood-sucking mouth in her armpit, that after having bitten its victims transfers the same desire for blood; thus creating a plague in Montreal of all places. Now, the story has some obvious holes that needed to be filled and were not, but writer/director David Cronenberg can make even the most absurd stuff seem real and scary. This was his real second feature after Shivers, and he delivers the goods with some artful direction, more than ample suspense, and a pervasive mood of uneasiness in a city being besieged by a viral plague. Money constraints seem obvious as well. Whatever happened to the French detective? I found his character rather interesting.

Cronenberg made me jump from my seat more than a few times, and his style really absorbs all elements of the film even when you know what is going to happen - the shock is still there. A lot of people haven't ever been fond of Cronenberg's work, but I think that in the world of horror he is definitely one of the underestimated craftsmen. As a final note it would be remiss of me not to mention Marilyn Chambers. She does a pretty good job acting here. I found her very believable and beautiful. After all I guess there are worse ways to go then being sensuously cradled in Ms. Chambers arms as she caresses your hair and her carnivorous armpit dweller locks into your bloodstream. Perhaps. Perhaps not. I don't know - guess I'll chew on it a bit.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Effective Early Shocker From Cronenberg
Theo Robertson3 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The word " auteur " is readily made for the Canadian film maker David Cronenberg and his brand of what is known as " body horror " . RABID is an early example of this and isn't unfortunately considered one of his best films . It lacks the laugh out loud funny twisted humour of SHIVERS , the mind bending cerebral prophecy of VIDEODROME , the polished mainstream feel of THE FLY , and the ready made controversy of CRASH

In its favour RABID is a fondly remembered film by people of a certain age when video recorders were becoming accessible in the early 1980s . It was one of these films that always heavily trailed when ever you hired an exploitation movie in that period. It contains gore and female nudity so what more does a teenage boy need from a film . Let's not be too low brow because it contains all the hallmarks of Cronberg's style and of heavy Fraudian symbolism . Effectively the premise revolves around nature being changed where a woman suddenly spouts a penis and has the instinct to use it at every opportunity whether the victim of her desire is willing or not

What drags the film down to a slight extent is that it's pretty obvious that the budget is limited . The director does the best he can but you're left feeling that he wants to create the sort of high budget scenario seen later in a film like 28 WEEKS LATER where literally hundreds of extras run a round infecting one another . There's also an aspect that this austerity extends to the gore itself and it could even more graphic but this is not a criticism since it contains a scene where a character goes in to his home to find his new born baby has been devoured by his wife . The fact that it's not spelled out is what makes it so shocking . As a footnote because of the low budget much of the score comes from a musical library and if you've seen a bleak depressing documentary in the last 35 years you'll recognise the track being continually played throughout this film involving a few bars on the piano

RABID probably isn't a horror masterpiece but it's made with enough care and intelligence to lift it above the vast majority of films that teenage boys watched on video recorders away back in nineteen eighty something . It certainly doesn't deserve to be dismissed as exploitation cinema but at the same time it's rather flat and conventional storyline combined with its low budget really stops it from being a classic horror from the 1970s
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A marginal improvement over Shivers
charchuk3 December 2007
It's only marginally better than Cronenberg's earlier work Shivers and in some ways, it feels like a sequel to it. It takes the hyper-sexualized, extra-gory zombies that the first film utilized and expands them over a wider area. No longer just contained to an apartment complex on an island, these bad boys are free to roam around downtown Montreal. The slices of apocalyptic action near the end of the film elevate this one above the earlier film, as it's a much darker consequence to the story's identical problem. Basically all the technical aspects remain the same, from amateurish acting to dated sets to a distinctive atmosphere, and the warning against scientific tampering is still there, but the aforementioned wider scope and subtle nods to the sociopolitical environment of 1970s Montreal make this one just a bit better. Cronenberg was just warming up, though.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not as Infectious As I Had Hoped
gavin694220 April 2006
The story is that of Rose (played by porn star Marilyn Chambers), a woman who gets into an accident and is severely burned. She requires a skin graft to fix her burns. Miracles! They fix her up perfectly. But two things happen: she develops a taste for human blood while infecting those she eats with rabies. Also, she starts appearing nude in every scene (maybe this is where they got the inspiration for "Species").

David Cronenberg, to me, is a director specializing in two things: insects and science experiments gone wrong. This film, unlike "The Fly" and "The Brood" and "Naked Lunch" had nothing very insect-like about it. However, like "The Fly" and "The Brood" it certainly kept the aspect of science with unexpectedly deadly results.

The plot is decent with just one problem: it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell, they never explained how getting a skin graft makes you develop blood-sucking stingers (which look, in my friend Jason's opinion, like dog penises). Also, there's no twists or anything. It's pretty straight-forward: girl eats people, people get rabies. Repeated over and over and over.

This film is very typical of David Cronenberg's earlier period, with such films as "The Brood" and even works like "Stereo". He had a very dark vision, very unique, and he turned a cynical eye to science and medicine. Perhaps cynical is not the word, but he showed us some of the worst possible effects.

Mike Mayo actually sees this as something of a transitional piece, showing the themes Cronenberg "would explore more fully in other films" -- there are "thematic and symbolic links to the later, more serious work." I see how these themes could be picked up again later, such as in "Videodrome" or "The Fly", but really, this just as much shows signs of his first films. It's Cronenberg, all the way.

According to Howard Maxford, this film has "only the gore to sustain it for anyone other than Cronenberg anoraks." I'm not sure what an anorak is (my dictionary says it's a jacket), but if Maxford means acolyte or devotee, he may be right. My girlfriend and I recently watch this one, and I've seen it before and have enjoyed it on multiple occasions. She didn't incredibly dislike it, but felt it was dragging on longer than it needed to.

If you like Cronenberg, check this film out. It's not one of his better films, but if you like his style you'll be familiar with how this film flows and probably get more out of it than the average person. If you don't like Cronenberg but love horror, keep this on the back burner for a rainy day - it's not urgent. Everyone else, rent something else like "Ernest Goes to Camp".
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK for early Cronenberg
ecatalan9820 November 2007
I always wanted to see RABID and at last I got a hold of a copy and just finished watching it. My opinion? Well, this is definitely "early days" for David Cronenberg, of whom I became an admirer of his 80's output (SCANNERS, THE FLY, DEAD ZONE, VIDEODROME, etc...). What attracted me to this film were basically 2 things: seeing Marilyn Chambers in a "mainstream" role, and seeing one of Cronenberg's earlier works.

RABID sets a premise expanded on future films such as SCANNERS, THE BROOD and THE FLY, where science goes berserk, although in this film we clearly see David Cronenberg acquiring the skills he became so known for in those latter day movies. Rose (M.Chambers) and his boyfriend suffer an unfortunate motorbike accident. Lucky for them, the crash takes place near a medical clinic and thus are quickly looked for. The boyfriend suffers some minor injuries, but it's Rose who suffers the most damage, to the point of going through some reconstructive surgery. Oddly enough, the surgery is performed by Dr. keloid, the owner of the medical clinic that saved the lives of the 2 young motorbike riders. Dr. Keloid uses Rose accident as an acid test for a radical new surgical procedure that uses sheets of the patient's own skin to cover badly damaged flesh. As it turns out, the procedure turns Rose into a sort of vampire, with a bizarre protruding spike coming from under her armpit as a blood sucking syringe.

The premise is interesting; Rose develops an insatiable lust for blood (and not sex, ironically enough, given the actress's porn background!) and turns the majority of the townsfolk into ravaging, rabid zombies. Unlike THE BROOD or SCANNERS, there is no clear explanation as to why Rose turns out the way she does. We only know that she went through an experimental surgical procedure, but no background is given as to why she becomes a sort of vampire. This to me, dampens the impact the movie could have had. It seems that there is no real reason for all the mayhem in the movie. For the gore audience, RABID is quite tame, although make up maestro Joe Blasco did the FX. There's very little blood per Se, compared to say, THE FLY or even SCANNERS. As for Chambers' acting, the little acting she does she's OK. I must confess that I find her extremely attractive in the movie and, had she chosen to go mainstream she would've gotten somewhere, since she did have presence. Overall, RABID is sort of a bleak movie the leaves a lot of questions unanswered and one that would benefit from a re make by a talented new director (maybe Rob Zombie???). Still, RABID manages to entertain and you could do no wrong in checking one of horror's greatest director's earlier work.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
David Cronenberg's second feature film!
Captain_Couth14 October 2004
Rabid (1977) is a strange film about a parasitic virus that inhabit's the body of a young woman (Marilyn Chambers). She receives this strange mutation after a new experimental procedure is performed upon her after she and her boyfriend were involved in a motorcycle accident. The doctors at a plastic surgery clinic save her life but her body revolts and mutates against the new cellular structure. The staff at the clinic and it's patients must answer for trying to defy nature.

A very good film from David Cronenberg. He further explores the topic of man fighting mutations from within or trying to change human nature. it's a topic that he returns to from time to time. He started off from Shivers and continued it in Rabid, The Brood, Scanners and Videodrome. Like most of his earlier films, this one was shot in around around the province of Quebec. Partially funded by the Canadian government, this twisted low budget wonder is a must for cerebral horror fans and Cronenberg devotees. Rabid benefits from the director's trademark clinical and cold aura.

I have to highly recommend this flick. the one I saw clocked it at almost 92 minutes. I haven't seen this film in awhile. I watched it on a D.V.D. import from Canada. I don't know how long the U.S. release was but this version seemed to have a little more blood than the one I watched seven years ago on an old V.H.S. copy. The Canadian Disc had a feature length commentary by David Cronenberg, a twenty some odd minute interview and a few other extras. The movie was restored and in it's proper film format.

Highly recommended.
34 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Madness
kosmasp11 November 2019
Over 4 decades later a remake of this was made - a good time to revisiti this or in my case watch it for the first time. This does show its age a little bit, but it still is disturbing for all the right reasons. Cronenberg made quite some strange movies and depending on your taste you will love them or be annoyed by them and what they are showing.

This is not for the faint hearted and for the time it was made, it has quite some gruesome effects. We may not get to know the main character in this before the incident happens, but we get to see a lot of and from her after the fact. Cronenberg does also like to give some shout outs to Giallo or female vampirism and generally sensual or even sexual (or rather lethal) penetration. So again, I'm sure some will be outraged (understandably so from their own moral viewpoints), but if you can stomach that, you are in for a treat
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Not Bad Sci-Fi/Horror Flick!"
gwnightscream26 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
David Cronenberg's 1977 sci-fi/horror film stars Marilyn Chambers, Frank Moore and Joe Silver. This begins with woman, Rose (Chambers) riding a motorcycle with her boyfriend, Hart (Moore). They get into an accident and Rose goes into a coma, but needs immediate surgery. A month later, she awakens with a lethal appendage craving blood. When she starts feeding on strangers, an infectious, epidemic spreads. The late, Silver plays Hart's friend, Murray. This isn't bad, the late, Chambers was good in this and there's gruesome make-up effects. I'd give this a try.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fascinating second feature from the master of body horror
Red-Barracuda17 September 2012
A biker called Rose crashes near an unorthodox surgery. She is taken there for emergency treatment which entails a new experimental skin graft operation. Rose develops a phallic appendage that she uses to attain human blood, the only thing that can sustain her new biology. In doing so she maims her victims, transmitting a form of rabies onto them.

David Cronenberg's debut feature Shivers was extremely bold, original and visceral. He followed it up with Rabid which explores similar territory. In some ways it's a more expansive film but overall less intense. In this story the virus affects a whole city, so Cronenberg is able to incorporate more locations and action. On the other hand it's less claustrophobic than the Ballardian nightmare that was the apartment block in Shivers. It would only be fair to say that the science is somewhat less clear and more ambiguous in Rabid too. We never really know how it comes to be that Rose develops the vagina/penis mutation. All we know for sure is that it's an unexpected side effect of the experimental skin graft surgery. We also never really understand Rose's motivations, although it does seem like she is unaware of her blood lust. What is for sure though is that Rabid is another extremely interesting entry in Cronenberg's cycle of body horror movies that underlines his genius. When the director was informed once that he was the king of venereal horror he replied 'it's a small field but at least I'm king of it'.

In order to give their movie an angle over the multitude of other low budget horror films, the production company Cinépix suggested Marilyn Chambers for the lead role. At the time she was the world's number one porn actress, so her presence would guarantee the film some automatic visibility. As it turned out, she was very good in the lead role and certainly suggested that she could have done more proper acting. The film itself is an interesting twist on the vampire myth, with the influence of George Romero never far from the surface with some references to the likes of The Crazies. Pleasingly, as well as being as idiosyncratic as Cronenberg is, Rabid also works as a pure horror film. There are plenty of gory set-pieces and grotesque rabid lunatics. The Canadian setting provides other value too. The cold landscapes and sterile urban architecture really accentuates the feel that Cronenberg is going for, while the ending is very nihilistic and just perfect for this story.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Accomplished early horror from Cronenberg
tomgillespie200210 January 2015
After a near-fatal motorbike accident, Rose (Marilyn Chambers) undergoes experimental skin-graft surgery to help her recover from the horrific wounds she had inflicted. Luckily for her, and surprising to most of her doctors, her body takes to the transplants and starts an immediate recovery. However, the surgery has left her with a strange orifice under her armpit which contains a stringer. She is soon seducing men and infecting them, leaving her victims in a shocked state and unable to remember anything. An outbreak is soon on the cards as the infected go on a biting rampage, spreading a strange disease which causing the host to turn rabid and zombie- like.

Only his fourth feature, and only his second horror after Shivers (1975), this is not Canadian director David Cronenberg's finest achievement. But thankfully, a bulk Cronenberg's filmography is outstanding and Rabid is still an extremely effective little horror film. The infected are a mixture of zombies and vampires, although they aren't really either by definition, but Cronenberg uses them as well as anyone could hope for. The film is little more than a series of set-pieces, but one in particular, involving a woman on a packed trained slowly coming to the realisation that one of the infected is on board, is as good a scene depicting sheer terror and panic as I've ever seen.

Of course, this being Cronenberg, undertones of psychosexuality run throughout. It's no coincidence that the orifice underneath Rose's armpit looks like a vagina, and no surprise that it attacks with a phallic stinger. Rose's sexuality is her real weapon, as it lures her victims close enough for the attack. Whether it be a fear of women or a warning about progressive plastic surgery that her character is trying to articulate, ex-porn star Marilyn Chambers handles her role extremely well. Though she is naked for the most part, she convinces as a seemingly nice girl turned sexual predator. Cronenberg would translate similar themes into better films and he would go on to develop body horror into a true art-form, but Rabid is an accomplished early effort.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Non-essential Cronenberg
martinrking24 August 2017
Too similar to Shivers, which has superior special effects and builds tension with more skill. Of the nine Cronenberg features I've seen, Rabid is easily the worst.

Rabid contains a scene that denigrates Native Canadians for no point other than a cheap and lousy gag.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed