The Gypsy Warriors (TV Movie 1978) Poster

(1978 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Surprisingly Enjoyable Given How Low Grade It Is
gavin694218 June 2008
World War II has plenty of stories that can be told, some real and some mere fantasy. This tale, false but possible, takes place in France, 1940. The Germans are occupying the country and begin to take control of Paris, a time-consuming process. Beneath a winery lies a secret lab with chemicals that could contain a "Satan bug", a compound that would kill half the world in six months. Can the Americans smuggle out the compounds before the Germans use them? Only with the help of the local gypsy population.

This is not a thinking man's movie. The gypsies serve no clear purpose in the film beyond perpetuating a stereotype that they're all thieves and swindlers (with one woman ironically saying that the Europeans are always trying to cheat her people). The compound for the "Satan bug" is written on a clearly-visible note and seems to be a recipe for a harmless combination of carbon and other basic elements. And it's apparently easy to get a Nazi uniform, fake a German accent and be accepted as a superior officer in a secret base. (That's right, the Germans don't speak German -- they speak English with bad accents.) Another reviewer said this is a movie for Tom Selleck fans and no one else. I think that's a fair assessment. I love Tom Selleck, and as such I really enjoyed him as a womanizing spy disguised as a Nazi. He was a poor man's James Bond and pulled it off well. This film deserved a sequel or even a dozen sequels. Would I have liked it without Selleck? Perhaps, but I suspect not nearly as much. It's a made-for-TV movie that is as disposable as any other. Selleck's presence was the defining factor.

I recommend this to all Selleck fans. I think it's one of his better performances, even if the movie as a whole isn't that amazing. Everyone else, you may want to pass on this one. It's good to see if you happen to catch it on television during a rainy afternoon, but probably not worth a purchase and only possibly worth a rental. I own a copy, and I am proud of it, but I don't think this is the route that will work for everyone.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
shoddy, with little merit
Marlburian12 February 2007
Two Americans do unbelievable heroics just as France is being occupied by the Germans in the Second World War - and before the United States had entered the conflict. This is the sort of film that irritates some of us sensitive Brits, though your reviewer didn't mind Tyrone Power being in the RAF and Humphrey Bogart being at El Alamein. The duo depart on a highly dangerous mission (apparently involving a "Satan bug")with the minimal of briefing, exchange wisecracks as they descend into France by parachute, and link up with several gypsies, including a redundant girl.(Oh yes,the two are seen off by a senior officer who is driven up to their plane in a car with headlights blazing; presumably the Yanks didn't think the blackout applied to them.) The two manage to penetrate a high-security laboratory - and I do admit that they have a novel way of getting their explosives in. Everything then seems to go off with clockwork precision.

The only redeeming features are some pleasant countryside and some good props - a couple of old vehicles and an impressive drainage system.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really bad background
disnut814 June 2008
This film lost all appeal for me when I started laughing about five minutes into it. Was that really the New York city skyline being used as a French seaport in 1940? The World Trade Centers were even there! We rewound and yes, that was supposed to be a French seaport in 1940. The film was made in 1978, the Towers completed in 1976. Really, really, really big mistake. I guess the audience wasn't supposed to be intelligent enough to know the difference.

And that announcers' voice! What was up with that? I know he was providing background information but it was just plain annoying. We bought this for $5 thinking it was a good Tom Selleck movie. My comment to my husband was actually "it's a Tom Selleck movie, it can't be all that bad". It was that bad and even worse. Although after seeing the New York city skyline as France, we turned it off after we stopped laughing.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stupid, stupid, stupid...
mmarr-116 March 2008
I have to say that I did not watch the whole movie - I just couldn't! What with US army personnel parading around London in uniform before the US had entered the war; the stock footage of the 1970s era London Ambulance rushing the agent to the hospital; the "military" DC3 in civilian paint scheme; the Rolls driving around with headlights full on in the blackout; the "French Port" with lights blazing, also in the blackout; the "Social Club" in London that had both male and female members; the two "heroes" jumping out of the aircraft without a jump-master; and... Well, I could go on and on but I think you get the point. I just could not take this seriously and, in all fairness to the writers, I don't think it was meant to be taken seriously. But, you would have thought that they would have tried to make this wartime "buddy" movie a little more authentic. My advice is to not waste your time on this movie. Your time would be better spent sorting your sock drawer.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Pre-World War II Version of "The Wild Wild West" in France
zardoz-1313 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In this uninspired, made-for-television, buddy picture, James Whitmore, Jr., and Tom Selleck portray two U.S. Army/Air Force officers ordered to destroy a winery in France that conceals a laboratory for the development of a lethal toxin that could wipe out half of the world in six months. Well-known writers Stephen J. Cannell of "The A-Team" and Philip DeGuere of "Simon & Simon" have contrived a formulaic, half-baked World War II secret mission behind enemy lines that is neither convincing nor exciting. The gimmick that the heroes rely on to deliver the explosives is the best idea in this lackluster adventure opus.

This 77-minute melodrama spends its opening 14 minutes providing exposition to set up its plot. During that opening quarter hour, we are treated to an "Untouchables" style narrator and loads of second-unit shots mixed in with artwork and stock footage. We see a German E-Boat—or what passes for one—off the French command intercept French radio signals. A fight between two agents ensues over possession of the toxin and the vial crashes into the floor and releases a nasty plume of smoke. The Allied agent suffers terribly while the German escapes. Eventually, doctors in England treat the Allied agent but he

Our brash, fun-loving heroes parachute into France. Actually, Selleck's character boots Whitmore out of the plane and follows him down. A colorful band of traveling gypsies picks them up and serves as their cover during the trip to the winery. Our heroes have no money to pay for their escort so the gypsies appropriate Selleck's West Point ring—yeah, right, what was he thinking when he brought it on this mission—and Whitmore's watch. Little do they know that the Germans are racing ahead of them for the same destination. Perennial bad guy Albert Paulson commands the Axis intruders as a German colonel. Selleck masquerades as a German officer in order to enter the grounds of the winery. Whitmore taps into the communications line and calls ahead to German headquarters in the winery and inquires about an officer. The radio operator reports that no such officer is available. Whitmore complains that he should be notified to report back to him as soon as possible. This clever ruse helps Selleck effect entry since the Germans are expecting him. He fixes up things so that the plumbing backs up. The German colonel demands that the problem be dealt with in short order. Whitmore pretends to be a plumber taking a roadside break when German motorcycle troops discover his presence and escort him to the winery. As it turns out, this is exactly what our heroes want. Meantime, the Germans discover the gypsies in the woods, but they miss the strong man. He opens the water lines and sends metal tubes streaking through the lines. Inside the tubes are explosive devices. After he sends Whitmore all the explosive tubes, he drives his wagon off, only to be intercepted by German troops that take him prisoner. In the winery, Whitmore enters the vault where the vials of toxin chemicals are stored. Before he fiddles with the vials, he slips explosives to Selleck who has relieved the guards in front of the vault. Selleck and he set their charges and on the way out of the winery, they spot the gypsy father and daughter as well as the Germans escorting the strong man in the wagon.

The last quarter hour involves their predictable heroics at rescuing the gypsies. Whitmore and Selleck succeed in their mission and the winery is blown sky-high. The "Untouchables" narrator furnishes us with a history lesson about the Italians declaring war on France and the Germans marching on Paris.

Whitmore and Selleck play reasonably well off each other, but they are thwarted by embarrassing dialogue, especially when they are voicing themselves over in long shots. Veteran TV lenser Enzo A. Martinelli makes everything look good in this otherwise forgettable fare. Among the many anachronisms present here is Tom Selleck's haircut that was right for the 1970s but all wrong for 1940. I don't think that I've ever seen a German officer with a mustache the size of the one that Selleck wears. "The Gypsy Warriors" plays like a World War II version of the "The Wild, Wild West" with Whitmore doing all the dirty work and Selleck striking tough guy poses.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dull as dishwater WWII secret mission involving Gypsies and a deadly toxin
Wuchakk1 June 2019
Before America enters WWII, two Army captains (Tom Selleck and James Whitmore Jr.) are aided by a couple of gypsies (Joseph Ruskin and Lina Raymond) in a covert mission in northern France to destroy a toxin capable of killing half the globe in six months located in a secret lab beneath a winery.

There were a lot of good TV movies in the 70s, even great ones, but "The Gypsy Warriors" (1978) isn't one of them. It comes across as a more serious episode of Wonder Woman, but without the fun spirit and Lynda Carter in her scanty costume. Yes, it's that bad.

The movie shows that acquiring Nazi uniform, faking a German accent and being recognized as a Nazi officer at an important hidden lab is easy as pie. But the protagonists are likeable and raven-haired Lina Raymond is beautiful. The last act finally works up some interest.

The film runs 1 hour, 16 minutes and was shot at Universal Studios.

GRADE: D
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"THIS IS REALLY BEGINNING TO GO DOWNHILL""
richardwoodford-244158 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
What a sloppy, contrived, and poorly executed project. Embarrassing for all those involved- and really a waste of some great character actors [Paulsen, Ruskin].

Was Stephen J Cannell trolling or just bored when this was made? Laughably inaccurate portrayal of OSS & WWII operations. Comedy? Not much. Drama, nonsensical! They kill off the leading French scientist before learning what the Satan Bug is and what else he was working on?

Its Ironic that Tom Selleck's character delivers that quoted line about 30 minutes into this - he really sums up the film, as it goes downhill in laborious fashion early and picks up speed... Only watch for die hard TS fans or for use as a drinking game for whenever a Nazi bites the dust.

If it were possible to rate a movie less than 1, this is a prime candidate in the War drama category.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I am a die hard Tom Selleck Fan
iepw1215 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I have been a die hard TS Fan since the heady days of Magnum being 'the Watch' of the week, ,when VCR's were just beginning to become household items and most films(unless designated'horror) showed no blood as a consequence of gunshot wounds.... Clearly there was a whole range of superb war films produced by 1978 , even along similar themes to this film(Heroes of Telemark, Operation Crossbow, to name but two around that time,) . Putting this film in that context it would be quite kind to say it is 'Poor' by comparison but that said , lets not forget , it was made for TV, the production values matched most ordinary children's TV adventure shows. There is nothing accurate about it at all except for Toms moustache but on the other hand it has a fascination rather like the knitwear ads (stills) featuring a very young Roger Moore, note I use the word 'fascination'. For me the entertainment value is high simply because Tom Selleck's charisma still shines through despite the odds being stacked so high against him. That communication with the audience which became such a feature of the later made Magnums does emerge in this' no' budget cliché ridden piece of 'drama'. I love the 'el lo, el lo'(Uk French resistance comedy, sitcom) aspect of the English spoken with German accents, most hilariously by Tom himself. Suffer from no illusions, 'Where Eagles dare' it isn't, but it held my attention for that Selleck magic consistently all through the 72 minutes . I didn't think the image quality was that bad, certainly ignorable for the entertainment value of the performance by himself. I am one of those fans who find that TS becomes more entertaining with every project he gives himself to, a bit like Sir Michael Caine, I'd enjoy him reading a dictionary !So, taking all that bias into account, if you collect him , then spent a couple of quid and add this to the collection, it is, when all's said and done a piece of very simple 'boys own' adventure yarn-age... it isn't 'Plattoon' or' Born on the fourth of July' but it is a very early performance by probably the most underrated actor of our time(recommend 'Countdown to D-Day' and 'Quigley Down under' as bench marks for their genre). I enjoyed it, what have you got to loose!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Give me "Daughters of Satan" over this TS garbage
REESE6364 May 2017
When in 1940 was America in the war? I could have sworn we didn't enter it until after Dec. 7, 1941.

We didn't even have a reliable intelligence organization until well after that. They built the Twin Towers just for that movie in 1940 and tore them down again? The gypsies were some of the first in all countries the Nazis went after to put in concentration camps, they hightailed it out of France as they as they could. It was almost as horrible as watching "Santa Fe Trail" with screwing up history. Except they didn't have Custer saving the day at Harper's Ferry instead of Robert E. Lee, as actually happened and having all the officers of the Civil War at West Point in the same 4 year period. Tommy should have decked out of this one and Jimmy never lived up to his dad's talent.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
OMG! I was literally embarrassed for the actors.
sudburyiii7 July 2013
I am a big fan of Tom Selleck and WWII movies but it was a chore to make it through this one. The made-for-TV movie storyline is like something from an old B-movie serial.

The Germans, while occupying France, have a secret chemical lab in which the Alies want to take the chemicals and destroy the lab. They plan to do this with the help of local gypsies; whose characters are heavily stereotyped.

So what's the plan: get Nazi uniforms, fake German accents, and just go right on into the secret base without anyone realizing. I honestly think Colonel Hogan and the men from Stalag 13 did it better and with much more flair.

If it wasn't for Tom Selleck, I would have turned it off; but my commitment to Mr. Selleck forced me to finish it, all the while praying for the credits to show up.

OK, at the price it's being sold and if you are true Selleck fans go ahead and buy the DVD. However, It is as close to a "one time watch" movie as it can get... even starring Tom Selleck.

PS: If you insist on getting the movie, try getting the "Murder 101/Gypsy Warriors - Double Feature!" You still get the Tom Selleck movie, but you also get "Murder 101" with Pierce Brosnan, which isn't too bad.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed