Don't Answer the Phone! (1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
59 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Seen much worse.
miratec12 April 2005
To get a movie made is not an easy thing to do, let alone get it distributed. Many things could have been done better but knowing the situation it's amazing this was made in the time it was. With the small amount of money they had to make it with. There was the Actor's strike at the time the movie was made. As well as an all too familiar lack of gas situation going on at the same time. So lighten up, it was a hoot if you like the kind of scary movie that has an edge to it, you will get a kick out of it. Break through film that used real locations rather than studio sets. First film to use the hand held camera work, and it was great in that genre. Many films followed using the hand held camera, so this is to the director's credit. You just have to love this kind of creepy, nasty horror film to get through it.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't Answer the Phone:the Uncut Edition.
morrison-dylan-fan18 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Talking to a family friend about Horror movies that they were searching for on DVD,I was surprised to hear them give details about a film,which sounded like a more extreme take on an under rated Slasher Thriller called Eyes of a Stranger.Searching round on Amazon UK,I was pleased to find,that along with the cut UK edition of the movie,a completely uncut version of the film had also come out on DVD in the US,which lead to me deciding that this would be a call worth listening in to.

The plot:

Hearing on the news about the police discovering his 5th rape/murder victim,serial killer Kirk Smith decides to celebrate by phoning up a local radio station,and talk to the host of a psychologist program called Dr.Lindsay Gale.Putting on a fake voice and using the name "Ramone",Smith is thrilled to hear Gale give him a nervous reaction,until Lindsay begins to ask "Ramone" if he has taken the medical advice that she gave him,when "Ramone" last phoned up the show.Angered over Gale ruining his fun,Smith decides that is time for him to start searching for a new victim.

Being placed by their chief officer as the investigators of the mysterious serial killer's spree,Lt. Chris McCabe and Sgt.Hatcher find themselves completely out of their dept in predicting the killer's next move.Focusing on doing extensive evidence gathering at the murder scenes,and also knocking down a number of doors,McCabe and Hatcher begin to suspect that the killer might be a fan of a local radio show…

View on the film:

Before getting to the movie itself,I first have to give a special mention to the Scorpion Releasing DVD,which along with offering a terrific,clean uncut print of the film,also fill the DVD with a number of very informative extras,which include a great commentary by Co- producer/Co-writer/ (along with Michael Castle and actor Nicolas Worth) director Robert Hammer-who sounds like one of the most mild mannered directors of the last 20 years!.

Shooting his first,and only film in 18 days,Hammer impressively overcomes the tired,misogynistic Slasher elements of the movie,by turning the second half of the film into a GrindHouse Slasher!,with Hammer and Castle giving McCabe and Hatcher's search for the killer an unexpected comedic edge,whilst also making sure that the blood of Smith's victim's solely runs in the gutter,thanks to Hammer illegal filming on the dirty,grime-covered streets of Las Angeles,which lead to this phone call being one that you wont forget for a good while.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Exploitation Lite.
BA_Harrison27 July 2009
Snickering Vietnam vet Kirk Smith (Nicholas Worth) is one hell of a sicko: for a living, he shoots obscene pornographic photos, and in his spare time, he strangles pretty young women BEFORE raping them. LA detectives Lt. Chris McCabe (James Westmoreland) and Sgt. Hatcher (Ben Frank) are hot on the maniac's heels, but can they catch him before he kills his latest target, radio psychologist Dr. Lindsay Gale (Flo Lawrence)?

With such a sleazy premise, Don't Answer The Phone looks set to be a classic slice of extremely offensive exploitation, but with director Robert Hammer reluctant to go that extra mile to offend, the film falls short of the high (or should that be low?) standards set by his contemporary William Lustig, whose similarly themed film, Maniac, goes all out to shock the viewer.

Worth's character, Kirk Smith, is an undeniably repugnant fellow, and what he gets up to certainly ain't nice, but Hammer's approach to his patently sensationalist material is surprisingly cautious: whilst he doesn't mind showing the audience a little nudity (for example, all of the victims have their tops torn off before being choked to death), he doesn't quite seem to possess the cojonas necessary to present his sex and violence in the no-nonsense manner the genre demands.

Instead, his characters simply fill us in on the salacious details through conversation: a psychic gives a graphic account of the murder and rape of one girl, offering lurid tidbits of info about Kirk's modus operandi, and several characters pass comment on the particularly explicit nature of his photography. At the risk of sounding like a dangerous psycho myself, I ask 'Where's the really good stuff?'. A few throttlings and some tits only qualify this as exploitation lite!

To be fair, Don't Answer The Phone does manage to deliver a couple of scenes that almost make the grade—Kirk strangles a junkie hooker whilst she is live on air with Dr. Gale, and one topless victim is subjected to scalding by melted candle wax— but with too many other scenes pulling their punches, this film is most likely going to disappoint fans of degenerate cinema.

5.5 out of 10, generously rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's going to make you feel filthy!
Krug Stillo1 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS AHEAD ... A film requiring little sensibility, Don't Answer the Phone, joining Maniac (William Lustig, 1980), He Knows You're Alone (Armand Mastroianni, 1980) and Nightmare (Roman Scavolini, 1982) where no mystery surrounds the killers identity, is one strong dose of offensive medicine. It can get quite harrowing, especially in scenes where the killer pours hot wax over a pleading naked victim.

After a sudden name change to cash in on the Don't cycle (Don't Ride on Late Night Trains, Don't Look in the Basement, Don't Open the Window, Don't Go in the Woods, Don't Go Near the Park, Don't Go in the House…etc.) The Hollywood Strangler became Don't Answer the Phone. Basically, an overweight ex-Vietnam vet, with a fixation for leather and weightlifting goes nuts and strangles girls in the Hollywood area. He also has some father issues and frequently rants aloud about his abusive old man. Killing women he believes are in need of a moral lesson, playing a cat and mouse game with an agony-aunt-type DJ after tuning into her radio station and screaming at himself in the mirror, this is one psychopath you won't forget.

The lead performance by, Worth (Darkman, Dark Angel: The Accent…etc.) goes so OTT in his role as Kirk Smith it makes this film worth seeking out, although Don't Answer the Phone certainly is not for all sensibilities. The sleaze-o-meter here runs very high, making the viewers feel as sweaty as the hulking killer himself. It doesn't come as a surprise that such a film comes with its bad points. The direction is quite uneven, occasionally mixing bizarre humour with violence. The script can be considered quite inept, there's the expected macho-cop buddies' banter; it's one of these awful lines concluding the film. After Worth has done his Michael Myers indestructible killing machine impression, he is shot repeatedly, falls in a pool and has the tough cop stating over the tinted red pool - `Adios, creep!' Some can say, a bad end for a bad film. Check it out for yourself
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty Gross
michellegriffin-0498914 July 2020
An ugly, ugly film about a psycho who goes around raping and strangling random women. There's a good central performance by Nicholas Worth as the psycho, but the film drags with no tension or suspense whatsoever. It's just an endless series of attack scenes with no style and nothing to say.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Worth a Look
BaronBl00d19 December 2005
Don't Answer the Phone is yet another film from the late 70s and early 80s about a psychotic, demented, socially awkward killer who brutalizes women because of his "problems" - whatever those problems might be. This time around we have a muscular, fat Vietnam vet who was never good enough for his father butcher pretty girls just after they have stripped from their little clothing. Nicolas Worth plays the wheezing, maniacal killer with a bizarre almost interesting quality. He is not a good actor yet is able to hold your attention throughout. I wish I could say something pleasant about the rest of the cast, but none of the rest are very competent. The police detectives who are looking for Worth - one which falls in love with the pretty radio psychiatrist that can shed light on the killer's identity - were particularly bad. The girls are pretty but the misogynistic flair devoted to their deaths is particularly degrading and unpleasant. The film is at least not overtly gory and had me interested until the end. The story was compelling enough and Worth is worth a look if nothing else.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't Answer The Phone ? Don't Watch This Movie !
smudged6819 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
When you watch an exploitation horror movie you sit down with a certain expectation of what you're going to get. To put it bluntly, sex and violence. It's what you watch films like this for. And yet, why did I come away from this film with such a nasty taste in my mouth ?

Well, to start with, this film was made by a misogynist. Okay, it's a film about a rapist-murderer so there's obviously going to be violence towards women but every female character in this film is either damaged:- drug addict, victim of abuse, potential suicide or completely ineffectual (more of that later).

There is also here a screenwriter who has a serious problem with psychiatrists. The police psychiatrist is shoved out of the way during a briefing ("we don't need any of this psycho mumbo jumbo") and the main protagonist is not only a psychiatrist but also - whisper it quietly - a woman!

There's a scene that highlights this misogyny and hatred of psychiatrists. In fact, it is otherwise irrelevant to the plot.

A woman is on the top of a tall building threatening to jump when the police arrive. The woman psychiatrist, Dr. Gail., is trying to talk her down. "How long's she been there ?" asks the cop. "Two hours" says the patrolman. "How long's Dr. Gail been talking to her ?" "15 minutes" "Is she doing any good ?" "No."

So the cop pushes Dr. Gail aside and basically says "Stop it. Behave yourself. Get down." At which the woman rushes into his arms. He then, of course, ends up in bed with Dr. Gail.

Even the killer, who has severe mental problems, ridicules the psychiatrist when she tries to reach him. Oh, he happens to be tying her to a chair at this point.

Which brings me to the policemen. There are two main cops, Lt. McCabe and Sgt. Hatcher, and they are complete idiots. I couldn't work out whether they were supposed to be taken seriously or not. I'm still not sure. They seem to ignore anyone who has any insight or actual information on the case, saying they're just doing their job. And when they 'do their job' - well...

They arrive at a suspect's house. Hatcher wants to break in but McCabe says they haven't got a warrant (why not ?) and if they break in anything they find would be inadmissible as evidence. Hatcher: "I wanna do it anyway" McCabe: "okay". Eh ?

So does this film have any redeeming qualities ? Well, maybe. Bizarrely it's The Killer or The Strangler. He's billed as both though his character has a name and more of a personality than anyone else in the film. Nicholas Worth in this part gives something close to a performance which sets him head and shoulders above anybody else in this film although his is a totally repellent character.

Having said all that, this film is not particularly graphic. Though that may just be the print I saw as there seemed to be some very abrupt edit points. However, I have absolutely no desire to see an uncut version.

Let me be clear. I'm a fan of the genre. I enjoy Friday 13th movies (even the duff ones), the Halloween series, and a lot of other stalk 'n' slash stuff so I'm no horror prude. But this is a film that hits you over the head with a sledgehammer to make it clear that women have no place in the world and are only good for sex. Avoid.

PS: Don't think this film sounds so bad it must be good. It's not. It's so bad it's bad.
25 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dvd vs. VHS
thenodradioshow15 January 2020
For collectors just a heads up, The DVD is exactly the same as the original VHS.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't expect too much
Chase_Witherspoon11 October 2016
Okay-at-best psycho on the loose pic is pretty standard fare with few if any surprises. James Westmoreland does a serviceable job in the lead as a composed detective hunting a certified nut-job who's strangling (and then some) vulnerable women and phoning in his conquests to a local psychiatrist's (Gerrish) radio programme.

Worth is hyper-maniacal in the antagonist role, his hulking appearance fulfilling the intimidation quotient well, whilst a few familiar faces (Haze, Frank et al) round out a capable cast. Contrary to other reviewer's remarks, I personally didn't have a problem with Westmoreland's performance nor did I think Worth was especially remarkable in his characterisation; they and the rest of the cast manage with some fairly drab dialogue padding out what is essentially, a paper thin plot (if you excised the pointless scene fillers, DATP would barely make theatrical length).

DATP just seems like a run of the mill slasher pic with all the typical elements, including nudity, sadism, nurse stalking, PTSD, some occasional light humour (check out the brothel scene which was a laugh) and every other cliché you've ever seen in films of the ilk. A pretty good example of where the title attracts attention that the film itself can't sustain. Very average.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Groundbreaking PTSD Drama Still Shocking Today
amityvillehighschool19 March 2008
With the '07 passing of Nicholas Worth, we lost an actor whose work on Don't Answer the Phone (DATP) informed a generation of the dangerous psychological effects of war and the horrifying results of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in American troops.

Still as intense as when it was first released on the gritty 42nd street trash houses of the day, DATP, though dated in respects to its treatment of women and psychology, still delivers some hardcore death scenes, not to mention a "killer" (if not repetitive) soundtrack.

James Westmoreland (of "Undertaker" fame) leads a cast in what ultimately is the most scene stealing of his career (in that he has the most scenes, by number, than any other movie of his career). Here he is at his cheesy best.

In conclusion, the lesson of war's tragic effects continue to go unlearned by a society that will be host to many more young female victims, victims of cinema's PTSD wrath.

I weep for a better tomorrow but if our reality creates more cinema in the vein DATP, I welcome it with open arms.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Don't Answer the Phone
Scarecrow-8828 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Psychologist Dr. Lindsay Gale(Flo Gerrish) who operates a free clinic for troubled women, also working as a radio personality for those with emotional baggage and drug abuse, realizes that a caller, going by the name of Ramon(..speaking in a ridiculous accent)could be behind a series of strangulations towards women that is plaguing the police force who have exhausted themselves trying to catch him. That killer, Kirk Smith(Nicholas Worth)is actually a skilled photographer, but suffers from head aches and emotional trauma possibly stemming from his childhood, hinted at throughout as he pursues female victims in Hollywood. AS a lot of killers do, he's quite elusive, at first, but with each passing victim, Smith makes mistakes, leaving things(..like drug paraphernalia, and even his photographic equipment)behind at the crime scenes. The film follows this nasty psychopath, and his methods for finding and killing women & the detectives, McCabe & Hatcher(James Westmoreland & Ben Frank)trying to catch him. The film also establishes Gale's role as a care-giver to those who need assistance with problems/weaknesses plaguing their everyday lives, with her kindness setting her up as a potential victim for Smith.

I think the film's main asset is the tour-de-force performance of Worth as the mental case. He runs the gamut of emotions, crying at times, even quite pleasant when he approaches unfortunates who have no idea that they are to suffer the wrath of his mental trauma. Worth also has this bulky menacing figure which works well as an object of fear. Those poor women he chooses to strangle are frail in his monstrous hands. Smith often wears a stocking over his face which only adds to the ferocity of his attack scenes on women..we can see the rage even present through the stocking. I felt the more impacting scenes display a seemingly trustworthy Smith, soft-spoken and smiling cheerful, being invited by models/hookers hoping to make a splash on magazines..he uses his photographic strengths to take advantage of women, vulnerable to an attack they are not aware is escalating in Smith's mind. There's some tasteless humor put in the script, mostly for the detectives who find time to joke with each other..it's kind of a release valve for the horrors they must face everyday. The film probes the seedy side of Hollywood, Smith's hunting ground.

Alas, I watched the scissored version by Rhino which hacks away at the final product. There's at least 9 minutes I've not seen, so my rating is towards the cut version where even profanity is blanketed. You can clearly see how badly cut it is, blatantly obvious which annoys me to no end. There are even fade-outs right during a scene as if the censor police were making it quite clear as to their clipping methods. I realize a film like "Don't Answer the Phone!" will not appeal to everyone, or even most people. But, the audience that does watch this kind of film, wish to see it in it's entirety. I think it's rape, to be honest, when you strip away scenes meant for a film, just so you can grab a wider audience. A wide audience isn't gonna rent this film anyway. The film's low budget provides a raw feel that bodes well for the type of characters, plot, & setting featured. Michael Castle portrays a coroner who likes to sickeningly crack jokes about his cases, and Chris Wallace has an amusing scene as a legit traveling psychic, booked by McCabe because he knows way too much about the case!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nicholas Worth is a genius
ColonelPuntridge15 January 2010
This was obviously meant to be a standard late-70s total-waste-of-time movie, an excuse to show topless women squirming and thrashing while being strangled, but Nicholas Worth turns it into a must-see. Actors-in-training and stage-vocalists, especially, can learn from his vocal prowess and from the way he uses his size. He is a huge, hulking basso with the ability to near-totally relax his inhibitions, and he uses his entire range, from resonant, snarling low tones, through a thundering midrange up to a piercing, blubbering whimper at the very top which has to be heard to be believed. He should have been an opera-singer. He could have sung Wagner.

The women dress beautifully in late 1970s casual summer-wear, and they get undressed equally beautifully by Worth's character, after (sometimes before) he strangles them to death. (One of them is future PLAYBOY-centerfold Pamela Jean Bryant.) As the other reviewer said, James Westmoreland (Detective McCabe) and Flo Gerrish (Doctor Lindsay Gale) act extremely badly; however, Ben Frank (Detective Hatcher) delivers some very funny lines with excellent cheesy deadpan. Like when McCabe tells him that the strangler has stolen some of the victim's clothes, and he replies: "That's great! Now we got him on petty theft, as well as murder!" Also, Chuck Mitchell, one of the few actors even bulkier than Nicholas Worth, plays a small part as a porno publisher. (If Mitchell looks familiar, it's because he played the Warden in PENITENTIARY and the title character in PORKY'S.)

These folks have created a masterpiece in spite of all their best efforts to the contrary.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Scuzzy serial killer outing with one saving grace
Leofwine_draca17 December 2015
DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE! is a serial killer thriller that makes up for a lack of gore and bloodshed with a really sleazy atmosphere that gives it a low-down gritty feel. This is one of the most interesting films to be released by low budget purveyors Crown International Pictures, and it's the first one I've watched from the studio that has real power.

It's reasonable to expect DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE! to be a dud, because many of the elements in the film simply aren't very good. The plotting is haphazard and the police investigation stuff is really boring. The majority of the cast give stilted performances and the scripting is sub par too. The whole film has a scuzzy, on-the-street type look to it that makes it very much a product of its era.

The film has a single saving grace in the form of Nicholas Worth, who plays the killer. Worth was a long-time B-movie veteran and this is the performance of his career. His crazed maniac goes around slaughtering women while at the same time praying to the spirit of his stepfather and going off on incredibly entertaining spiels that were by all accounts ad-libbed by the actor. I've always liked Worth and his performance here is the stuff of greatness; sad, then, that due to the film's subject matter it is a role that remains unseen and unappreciated by most.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the Worst Films of All Time
S.A.B.18 September 1999
I wasn't planning to dignify this film with a review, but when I saw that 1980's DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE was about to be rereleased on VHS and DVD, I felt compelled to speak out. For if there's any film that isn't begging for a rerelease, it's got to be this one. In a nutshell, this film's "plot" revolves around mentally deranged Vietnam veteran and porno photographer Kirk Smith (Nicholas Worth), who likes to ritualistically torture, rape, and strangle to death hapless young women. For some odd reason, he becomes obsessed with radio psychiatrist Dr. Lindsay Gale (Flo Gerrish), and he soon starts knocking off her patients until he comes to her.

Although it is classified as a horror film, DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE should not be compared to FRIDAY THE 13TH or HALLOWEEN. There is no real suspense to speak of, few scares, and very little gore. Don't be fooled by the title: the classic slasher movie theme of phone stalking plays almost no role in the film. What this film is heavy on is misogyny and sexual sadism. For that reason, DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE should be classed in with "horror" films such as I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE and NEVER PICK UP A STRANGER, films which unfairly discredited the horror genre as a whole with their emphasis on the torture and degradation of female characters.

Very rarely, a film without any redeeming qualities whatsoever comes along. This is one of them. The acting by all in this film is absolutely atrocious, with Gerrish particularly uninspiring as the movie's "heroine." As if the plot and acting weren't awful enough, this film is saddled with a horrendous, porno-grade score, which is well below average even for low-budget schlock like this. At the same time, this isn't a "so bad it's good" movie, because its nasty themes (torture, rape, misogyny) are just not things that should be laughed at. The only good thing that can come with this film's rerelease is that many more people will see it and give it the vote (1) that it deserves, so that it can join the list where it so rightfully belongs, the IMDb Bottom 100.

If you're looking for a much better executed film with similar themes, try 1981's EYES OF A STRANGER.

No * out of ****
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DVD was cut
lecblue16 August 2001
Don't buy the DVD. It has been heavily cut. If you have previously seen this movie, the DVD will seriously disappoint you. Check your local video store for the original VHS tape if you want to your own copy of this film.

If you haven't seen this movie, rent it. It only appeals to a small group. It is standard fare of the late 70s to early 80's horror movies. Mindless killer terrorizes town (Hollywood). Police can't buy a clue.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Excuse me, am I boring you?" - Yes, actually...
poolandrews4 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Don't Answer the Phone! is set in Los Angeles & starts late one night as a nurse (Dale Kalberg) arrives home, there she finds a masked killer named Kirk Smith (Nicholas Worth) & she quickly becomes his fifth victim. Inept cops Lieutenant Chris McCabe (James Westmoreland) & his partner Sgt. Hatcher (Ben Frank) are on the case but going nowhere fast, when Kirk murders a prostitute on-air during psychiatrist Dr. Lindsay Gale's (Flo Gerrish) radio show she teams up with the two cops to track the killer down before he strikes again...

Originally shot under the title 'The Hollywood Strangler' only for the distribution company Crown International to change it to Don't Answer the Phone! for commercial reasons this was co-written, co-produced & directed by Robert Hammer & remains to this day his only theatrical directorial credit which isn't surprising given the quality of this film. The misogynistic script by Hammer & co-producer Michael D. Castle is as threadbare & basic as they come, even for a simplistic Halloween (1978) rip-off to cash in on the late 70's & early 80's slasher film craze Don't Answer the Phone! is seriously lacking in all departments. The slasher film is a limited sub genre as it is & films like Don't Answer the Phone! don't do it any favours, this one tries to be exploitative as it's set in the seedier side of Los Angeles like porn theatres & featuring supporting character's such as drug dealers, pimps & prostitutes while all the killers victims are busty young women. As if the film wasn't unlikable enough there are some truly pathetic attempts at humour & slapstick which just look totally out of place amongst the sleaze. The killer has little motivation, he never really interacts with the rest of the cast until the end, there's virtually zero gore as the director seems more intent of showing naked female breasts & Don't Answer the Phone! is unbearably slow going at 95 minutes in it's uncut state which is the one I'm basing my comments on.

Director Hammer films things in a dull sort of way & the film doesn't have any style although some of the location footage from the seedier parts of Los Angeles which were obviously obtained by just driving down regular streets with a camera pointing out of the passenger window are quite atmospheric. Other than though Don't Answer the Phone! is very short on style or imagination. This isn't scary at all, the killer never stalks his victims & the murder scenes are voyeuristic in tone rather than frightening. This has literally no gore apart from a few bullet wounds, the violence is also tame & disappointed me even in this so-called uncut version. The killer strangles a few women who happen to be in state of undress, that's as graphic as it gets. I suppose the mixing of nudity & violence gives this film a sleazy reputation it doesn't really deserve. Even the nudity when taken on it's own is rather restrained.

Technically the film is OK, it's competent although the music sucks & I always like that 70's & 80's horror film feel which Don't Answer the Phone! has, it's just a pity it doesn't do anything with it. Shot on location in Los Angeles. The acting sucks, no-one is going to win any awards here that's for sure.

Don't Answer the Phone! is maybe the worst of all the horror flicks that start with the word 'Don't' & considering we are talking about films like Don't Go in the Woods (1982), Don't Go in the House (1980), Don't Go Near the Park (1981) & Don't Go to Sleep (1982) that's no small feat. Exploitation fans might like to check it out but as far as everyone else is concerned this is definitely not recommended.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Complete garbage.
gridoon23 February 2003
Maniac killer strangles women at random; two cops try to track him down. That's about it, as far as the "plot" is concerned. Usually, these movies at least make an attempt at dime-store "psychology" (the killer became this way because his mother used to lock him in the closet, that sort of thing). Here, we simply get a killer who talks to himself, grunts, whines, lifts weights and apparently wants to prove to his (nowhere to be seen in the movie) father that he "measures up". It's a career-killing role, and Nicholas Worth gives an appropriately career-killing performance in it. Totally unredeemable movie. (*)
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Weak movie, wrong title (spoilers)
lthseldy118 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know why this movie is called "Don't answer the phone" first of all. What is it about not answering the phone that should be the focus in this movie? Sure, there are a couple of people answering their phone while having a casual conversation with someone they knew but there was nothing disturbing about not answering the phone. The only connection I found about the phone was the numerous phone calls to a local radio doctor answering calls from a man named Ramone who then turns out to be the killer and a very weak killer he is. There is nothing so silly and so humorous as seeing this powder puff go around crying like a baby to his unseen daddy and vowing for revenge for some unknown reason that is never revealed in the story except maybe he and his mother may not have gotten along. And what is the purpose of putting a coin in a pair of panty hose and chocking the victim? Who came up with this idea? The movie would then fade away between annoying love scenes and the two cop stuges who couldn't find a clue if it bit them in the face. This movie was terrible! It could have been a little bit better is the killer would have just shut his fat mouth and had not showed his ugly face.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pure filth (awesome)
BandSAboutMovies27 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If any movie has earned being on the video nasty list - this one is on the Section 3 group of films, which couldn't be prosecuted for obscenity but were liable to be seized and confiscated under a less obscene charge - it's this movie.

This is the scummiest movie I've ever seen outside of films like Waterpower and Bloodsucking Freaks. Every single character is a horrible person, even the protagonists. It feels like you could take a Silkwood shower after this and it wouldn't be enough. You'd still feel dirty.

Former paratrooper and powerlifter - who would later become a born-again Christian - Nicholas Worth plays Kirk Smith, who is also a veteran and bodybuilder. He has talent - well, when it comes to the lighting and composition of his pornographic photos, which have the ability to offend everyone, even scumbags like, well, everyone else in this movie. When he's not grunting and lifting weights, he's calling the talk show of Dr. Lindsay Gale (Flo Lawrence, who is also in Schizoid, Over the Top and The Lords of Salem). When he gets on the air, he speaks in fake accents and complains that he has migraines and blackouts.

All of that would be fine if he wasn't stalking and killing women right and left, not unlike the Hillside Stranglers of real life. That makes sense, as this movie was shot under the working title of The Hollywood Strangler. None of this was shot with permits, either.

It gets worse. He not only kills women, he has, well, intimate relations with their dead bodies before conducting religious ceremonies, trying to talk with his dead father and crying.

Two detectives - Hatcher (Ben Frank, Death Wish 2) and McCabe (James Westmoreland, who was in Stacey and was married to Kim Darby) - are on the case, but it feels like they're just as horrible as anyone else in this movie, overworked and on the edge.

There's also a porn dealer named Sam Gluckman, played by Chuck Mitchell, who would one day by Porky himself from Porky's, a role that is packed with more class than this movie. The sheer amount of salaciousness and scum in his scenes nearly fills the scene with bile.

Dr. Gale and McCabe quickly go from love to hate. Neither actor liked one another much, so Lawrence - who played Gale - ate a bunch of onions and Westmoreland - who was McCabe - didn't shave on the day that their tender and romantic scene was shot.

Of course, it ends with Smith attacking Dr. Gale and McCabe saving her, shooting the strangler many, many times before he falls into a swimming pool, upon which the hero - such as this movie is - says, "Adios, creep!"

Director Robert Hammer is a one and done wonder. Sure, he made documentaries on Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young and The Steve Miller Band, but that's it. Otherwise, he became a CFO for several companies.

It was written by Michael Castle, who acted in films like Galaxina and Gas! -Or- It Became Necessary to Destroy the World in Order to Save It. It's the only movie he ever wrote, working from the novel Nightline by Michael Curtis.

Keep an eye out for April 1978 Playboy Playmate of the Month Pamela Jean Bryant as Sue Ellen. She's also in all manner of late 70's and early 80's films that probably only I care about like H.O.T.S. and Lunch Wagon. Dale Kalberg, who was in scumtastic flicks like Mistress of the Apes and SexWorld, is another victim. And Susanne Severeid, who was a former model, plays yet another prostitute who ends up in Kirk Smith's list of crimes. Interestingly enough, her husband was a WWII Dutch resistance fighter who was hired by the Simon Weisenthal Center to hunt Dr. Josef Mengele in real life.

Gail Jensen is another victim in this movie. She also performed the song "Sweater Girl" from the movie of the same name, as well as two songs on the Maniac Cop soundtrack. It gets crazier - she wrote "The Unknown Stuntman," the theme from Lee Majors' TV series The Fall Guy, along with being married to David Carradine, who she starred alongside in Future Zone.

Despite my warnings of the sleaze quotient of this movie, you should know that I loved early single moment of it. I'm ashamed, but isn't that part of the fun of lurid movies like this? If you're of a similar mind - let's say you're a maniac - you will probably feel the same way.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad: don't bother with the cut version on DVD; perhaps don't even bother with it at all
FieCrier12 July 2005
Not a very good movie at all. I watched it on DVD in Rhino's Horrible Horrors Vol. 2 box set, and I would have done well to note that they cut, or used a cut version of, this movie. It may have been Rhino, since they've even cut tame movies like Robot Monster. The murder scenes in this version are not terribly violent, and the only nudity I recall seeing were nude photos at the killer's apartment, a photo buyer's office, and a "massage parlor."

A killer, who we see in the first frames of the movie, barechested in front of a large crucifix, is strangling women. He uses panty hose with a coin put it in, which was never explained (and he also leaves it at home when he goes to his last victim's house, for some reason). He likes to call in to a radio psychologist, faking a latino accent and calling himself Ramon, complaining of a headache.

At least half of the movie seems devoted to the cops trying to learn who he is and stop him. They're not very interesting. The lead cop, credited as James Westmoreland, sounds a lot like one of the guys who dubs Italian zombie and giallo movies. If he is, that might help explain why he never did any movies after this one. Of course, this movie could have put an end to his career (although the killer is a prolific actor, still active today).

I would definitely say don't bother with the cut version of this movie. As to whether the uncut version would be much better, I don't know.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How to enjoy This Movie...
NickNameNotAllowed-23 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
1) Obtain a copy of this movie in a format in which you can watch it. (IE if you own a DVD player, but a DVD copy) 2) COme to IMDb.com and COme to this Page for "DONT ANSWER THE PHONE!" 3) While the movie is playing, read the comments and reviews made by people who have watched this film.

Seriously, it is one of the Funniest things in the world(Especially with shots of whiskey). While going through reviews of people who love this film to those who hate and detest everything about it, this movie tends to bring out the comedian in everyone.

Trust me, if you do this, you'll never be more entertained.

MY REVIEW: It is a movie so bad it's good and one to be seen by those who can appreciate a trashy film that is horrific and bad. There are few of us, but we do exist. Its over the top disturbing, not terrorfying disturbing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why Not?
thesar-24 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, I'm going to assume that since there were so many Halloween rip-offs in the few years following 1978 due that slasher film's success, just as there were a lot of "Don't" movies, because, um, I guess people were scared to listen to…advice?

1980's Don't Answer the Phone! certainly had tons of phone calls. In practically every scene, someone was answering a call – and this was the pre-cell explosion, but never once was there a reason to NOT answer the phone. Sure, "The Killer" (as hilariously labeled in the opening credits, but later referred to as "The Strangler") calls one of his targets a few times, but then, she ran a call-in psychology radio program. I guess there was one time he was planning on killing, er, strangling, a woman and he had her telephone the on-air doctor, but that was her job: to answer the phone.

Other than the odd and no-reason for film's title, The Strangler kinda wanders aimlessly around town looking for his next female victim – even though he claimed to had done "a lot of research (on his victims.)" All the while, two cops run around, also randomly, to catch this bad man, but in the process they mouth off the most hideously bad and intentional jokes. I'm guessing in 1980, it was okay to make light of and joke about a man who rapes and kills women – sometimes the other way around.

Now, if I didn't have such a odd thing for the mostly shirtless "the Killer/Stranger" actor, Nicholas Worth and the surprisingly good acting and depth from the obvious final victim, Flo Lawrence's Dr. Gale, this movie would be a solid 1/5 Stars.

Okay, beyond my attraction, this horrible throwaway movie shan't be seen by anyone for it has no real redeeming qualities. That is, if anyone were to even find a copy like I stumbled upon.

* * * Final thoughts: Do answer the phone, just not by the agent responsible for putting you in such crap.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nicholas Worth gives a gloriously gonzo performance as a severely deranged Vietnam vet psycho in this choice chunk of early 80's horror exploitation trash
Woodyanders12 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Beefy, plug-ugly character actor Nicholas ("Swamp Thing," "Darkman") Worth hits marvelously messed-up maniacal mondo disgusto wacko paydirt with his juicy starring role as Kirk Smith, an impotent, psychotic, misogynistic, schizophrenic and utterly unhinged 'Nam vet rapist/strangler photographer who viciously murders assorted luckless lovely young ladies in this terrifically tawdry'n'trashy low-budget Los Angeles-set exploitation psycho horror howler. Crying, bellowing, hefting heavy weights in grunting'n'grueling slow motion, insanely ranting over the phone to female talk radio shrink Dr. Gale (the very pretty and appealing Flo Garrish) in a hysterically phony'n'fulsome Mexican accent, and savagely throttling hot babes with a coin-filled stocking in a warped, desperate attempt at appeasing his deceased abusive father (Worth's single most sublimely screwy moment occurs when he cuts loose in a massive let it all hang out rant and roars in a monstrous scream, "Are you proud of me now?! Do I measure up?!"), Nic's gloriously gonzo eye-rolling hambone portrayal is an absolute hoot and a half that's in equal degrees hellishly riveting and rather uncomfortably riotous. James Westmoreland gives a similarly strong performance as the ramrod homicide detective who's determined to nail Kirk, a hard-nosed sort with a brutish and fiercely amoral "you gotta bend the law in order to enforce it" attitude that makes Dirty Harry seem like a soft'n'sappy bleeding heart liberal (and nicely blurs the fine line between good and evil as well). Better still, writer/director/producer Robert Hammer goes whole hog on the seedy atmosphere, really pours on the gratuitous nudity, graphic violence and full-bore profanity, and doesn't show a shred of either subtlety or restraint, thereby making this sensationally slimy, gritty and downright nihilistic grindhouse nugget a total tacky treat for hardcore sleaze cinema buffs.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nicholas makes it Worth it!
Zeegrade22 April 2009
You need to go into this movie with the right frame of mind. Mainly it's an exploitation movie about murdering women. Of course it's misogynist! What the hell were you expecting Thelma and Louise? That being said Don't Answer the Phone has everything you would expect of this early eighties sleazy slasher. Bad Acting. James Westmoreland is more wooden than a forest. Bad Dialogue. How about ending a movie with "Adios Creep!". Plenty of topless women. It's got that in spades my friend. What separates this movie from the rest is the totally gonzo performance by Nicholas Worth as Kirk Smith the Hollywood strangler. Whether calling in to the local talk show as the thick accented Ramone or his racist diatribe with his "father" Worth goes above and beyond portraying a deeply disturbed Vietnam vet that has some issues with women. Every scene with him is fun to watch especially at the end when he has his prize, Dr. Gale, tied up and pretends to repent and let her go. I actually believed him for a second. This is truly a once in a lifetime performance that should be viewed by any fan of the exploitation/grindhouse genre of films.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful! Don't see this movie!!
Michael_Pilkington2 June 2002
Awful horror film about a Vietnam veteran (Nicholas Worth) posing as a photographer who stalks Los Angeles by strangling (and sometimes raping) young women and taunting a radio psychologist (Flo Gerrish) afterwards. A detective (James Westmoreland) is obsessed with tracking this woman hater and bringing him to justice. Terrible acting by Worth and Westmoreland (he's certainly no Clint Eastwood), writing, directing and unpleasant violence towards women sinks this trash. Don't see this movie! My evaluation: (no stars).
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed