Blood Beach (1980) Poster

(1980)

User Reviews

Review this title
62 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Come on, 80's horror at it's best!
abdiver11 February 2005
It may not be great but, it's got John Saxon in it, it's got a bit of blood and hell, it's not any worse than all the rest of the flicks that had Blood in the title from this period. And it must have been at least a pain in the ass to do those "sinking in the sand" effects!

Maybe if they release this thing on DVD (why are most of the Vestron flicks still not out?), may be then it'll get at least the same attention and cult like favor that My Bloody Valentine and other such crap gets.

All in all, a drive-in classic. After all that's what it was made for!

See it and judge for yourself!
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This sandpit will swallow you whole!
lost-in-limbo11 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
On a popular California beach line, passers-bys and beach-goers are suddenly being sucked into the sand without much of a trace. What is it? Maybe a serial killer or it could be some sort of a monster feeding on unexpected victims. So now everyone is looking at the local police force to figure this one out and find a solution quick to prevent more people disappearing from this beach. But along the way, David and Mariana who have got together to find out what caused the death of David's friend and Mariana's mother help them out.

No matter how bad this film is, I actually found to be a marginally amusing failure. Hmm, but I can say that it doesn't live up to its title though. It must have looked great on paper and the movie poster is quite striking, but this neat idea doesn't translate to the big screen with flying colours. This incredibly, low-budget b-grade schlock goes for that 50s style type of monster feature and don't forget an obvious influence from "Jaws". With those things in mind it's not as fun and charming like it should be, and even the cheese element feels half-baked by being very clammy and blunt in its direction and overall handling. What really pumped up the film's slack energy was a couple of delightful support performances from the always-reliable John Saxon and very cynical Burt Young, who both played officers investigating the case of the ominous beach killer. Even though the script is dreadfully static with a lot of ponderous wallow, but amongst those stretches are sprinkles of poignantly dark, witty humour that's actually quite humorous. But what really hurts the film is that it's quite unspectacular, the main leads; David Huffman and Marianna Hill are truly bland and the pacing limps along with only a few pockets of thrills until it reaches its all-to-easy, anti-climatic showdown.

The creaky plot is pure, junky nonsense by providing the usual run-of-the-mill avenues and with some redundant scenes that just tread water for far too long. The origin of this monster lurking under the sand is never mentioned and the material doesn't blossom by skipping on many plot details. Some sharper editing could have made this a far better effort than it's overall drawn-out feel. Although, I quite liked the concept behind this flick and while it slowly grinds away with many repetitive shots and loose suspense. It didn't bother me too much, but I just couldn't stop thinking - only, what if the director entwines some verve and blood to the attacks. That's right it does skim out on the gore, although there's one attack mid-way through which showed some promise, but other than that - they are quickly done within a matter of seconds with very little in the way of any build up and blood. Most of the deaths are just people getting sucked under the sand. Which, is fine by me because the opening attack sets the mood quite well, but you couldn't help but think there could have been some more creative juices flowing within those moments, as it just falls into the same trap and pattern. As usual tacked onto the film is an open-ended conclusion that's surprisingly effective and maybe who knows, a sequel, which could have brought to the table the things that, this film was lacking. Across the broad is a forceful synthesizer score that just has that moody, but more so mechanical feel about it and the monster effects are immensely tacky when we 'finally' see a glimpse of it in the final 10 minutes. It's something cross between a large plant and clam.. Well, that's what I think. But with the lighting it's quite hard to see clearly in the dark sequences and that's when our monster friend makes it's appearance. The photography is pretty much the norm with the traditional killer's POV shot.

This obscure picture is a pretty limited and rather bungled production and it simply shows in the final product. But if you're in an undemanding frame of mind for some mindless 80s gruel, you might get something out of it to make it worthwhile. I found it to be mildly tolerable for what it was.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flower Power at the Beach of Blood
Vomitron_G20 February 2010
This one had been on my wish-list ever since I saw a few fragments of it when I was a little kid. But being a sober guy, I wasn't expecting much of it. And that was a good thing . Basically where "Jaws" made the water an unsafe place, "Blood Beach" tries to do this for the beach. But "Blood Beach" is very much inferior to Spielberg's classic. Mainly because "Blood Beach" is rather slow and boring. "Jaws", at times, also wasn't all that about action & horror, more about the characters really, but it had a fine plot structure, good dialogues and decent acting to keep things going. But I shall not just dismiss "Blood Beach" as a bad B-monster movie (though it certainly isn't a good one). The main attraction amongst the cast is John Saxon, who is the best actor of the lot, injects a nice amount of sarcasm in his role and simply has the best lines of the movie. Then there's Burt Young, who's just great as Sergeant Royko, bragging about Chicago all the time, eating various sort of junk-food in almost every scene and referring to someone's brain as "vegetable soup". The music was pretty memorable too, with a dark cello theme and some jazzy saxophones. And the beach-monster was just too weird. It looked like a giant, dusty, plastic flower. But unfortunately it's only shown in a few shots when it emerges from the sand near the end. The shots over the end credits leave room for a sequel ("Blood Beach 2: The Offspring", would have been a very appropriate title, I believe), but that never happened. "Blood Beach" could have been a cult classic, but unfortunately the movie feels just a bit too mainstream (and too uneventful also) for it to be one.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A UNIQUE HORROR FILM!!!!!
jseneca7816 October 2001
This movie has an interesting story and you're not likely to predict what it is that is taking the lives of the characters in the film. The story takes place on a beach and when people begin to disappear it haves you wondering what it is. It will, however, keep you interested and the ending is not half bad either. To say that this is the best SCARY movie would be incorrect, however to say that it is the most unique is quite true. I really enjoyed this movie and I can honestly say that it had it's own unique style. See it if you haven't and if you can find it. It is a rare one and they don't make horror films like this anymore!!! This was a suspenseful film that caught me off guard on a few occasions and I hope I never have to experience that kind of terror. Released in 1980 to movie theatres and to video in 1982, this movie had a strange story, but a good story as well!!!
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nothing here.
bombersflyup23 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Blood Beach is a bad film, in all aspects.

The dialogue's extremely dull, sleep-worthy. You got harbor patrol guy Harry like in "Jaws," he isn't the least bit memorable though. Also, here there are dull romances and friendships as well. You got Burt Young on set, walking around laughing and saying stupid crap. The creature or predator's almost non-existent and then briefly a blob of sorts. Then in the credits after it's been blown apart, the pieces regenerate all over the beach, I think. What was happening in the credits was the most interesting part for me.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another 'run-of-the-mill' 80's laugh-fest poorly disguised as a horror flick.
Aussie Stud12 December 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Those darn film producers of the 1980's were at it again! They were trying to scare us from going back into the water again! First Steven Spielberg got us with "JAWS" followed by the infamous inferior sequels, then we were treated to a double-dosage of "TENTACLES" paired with "ORCA", then there was the hilarious "PIRANHA" and its sequel that featured mutated Piranhas with wings(!!!) and then there was 1981's "BLOOD BEACH" - Hollywood's answer to all those endless 'monster-in-the-water' movies that were swamping our mega-plexes. Someone must have come up with the bright idea, "Instead of putting our monster in the water... how about we put it in the sand!", hence the catchy tag-line to this cinematic gem, "Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water - you can't get to it", which is about the only smart thing connected to this movie.

The premise to "BLOOD BEACH" is typical of the 80's horror-film movement. Unthinkable monster + a cute little dog becoming hapless victim of said monster + helpless girls and women either disappearing or being attacked by said monster + one male to solve the mystery and destroy said monster + questionable ending. The funny thing is, I haven't seen this movie on television for many years and it is pretty much obsolete from most video stores. Whenever I happen to see a copy floating around, I get a nostalgic feeling about the times when it was fun to see movies like this.

"BLOOD BEACH" opens with those 'all-too-familiar-scenes' - a young woman jogs along the beach at that time of early morning when there never seems to be anyone around... the sand begins to suck her in as she screams helplessly (reminiscent to the brilliant artwork featured on the poster of this movie) and while the viewer never actually gets to see the monster at this point, we're left to wonder about what it might actually look like.

Police detective Harry Caulder, (portrayed by David Huffman) is assigned to investigate this particular case. The only evidence left on the sand is an eyeball, possibly belonging to that of the victim. The next victim happens to be an old lady who ALSO happens to be the mother of his ex-flame, Marianna. Accordingly, the strange happenings and Caulder's investigation will bring these two characters together to try and solve what it is that is munching on these helpless victims and also give them time to rekindle that old flame as they become a modern day 'McMILLAN AND WIFE' detective team. A further 80's cliche' here would be the scene involving a night-time 'beach party', complete with frat boys and slutty girls and the obligatory couple who wander off to 'make out' but instead meet a grisly demise.

It isn't until the last 5 minutes of "BLOOD BEACH" that you actually get to see the monster. It's this huge papier-mache 'sea cucumber'-like creature that lets out a roar similar to that of a tiger and an elephant combined. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why is it there? We don't know. All we do know is that our hero and heroine manage to blow it up and leave the scene thinking that the terror of this creature will reign no more.

Wrong. Enter cliche number 158 when the film draws to a close. The beach that remained deserted due to the frequent 'disappearing acts' is now flooded with tourists and beach-bums. A mother turns her back on her young child who is playing with the sand. The next moment when she turns around to check on him, he is gone. If "BLOOD BEACH" was a box-office smash hit, perhaps they could have green-lighted "BLOOD BEACH: THE OFFSPRING", but alas, it was not a hit and ended up being a guilty pleasure to those us who like to watch bad 80's horror films on video, complete with the grainy imagery and 'worn out' sound-track.

There is something still very appealing about "BLOOD BEACH". Perhaps it is the appearance of Burt Young as a police sergeant (better known as Paulie from the Sylvester Stallone "ROCKY" movies). Or perhaps it is the value of the genre itself. 80's horror movies will always be regarded as cinematic treasure. Good or bad, we needed those movies - and in today's politically correct climate, "BLOOD BEACH" is the perfect anecdote for a Saturday night viewing with all the lights in the house turned off. Just prepare yourself for the unintentional laughter!

My rating - 6 out of 10!
16 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Textbook B-grade horror, sometimes slow, but has its moments.
Muldwych3 September 2007
'Blood Beach' is a fairly typical example of a B-grade horror film. The acting is just competent enough to keep the plot going, but no-one would scratch their heads wondering why these artistes aren't better known. There's the stoic male lead doing his best to look moody despite the early 80s low lighting. There's the predictable love interest, the sceptic, the comic relief, and the wise all-knowing scientist who no-one listens to. All the boxes have been checked here. The plot is straightforward and threadbare, and the budget would be equal to what Spielberg spends on a typical lunch.

However, I really enjoyed this thing as a kid, and watching it again recently reminded me why. For one thing, the film-makers know their financial limits, and the menace threatening the sleepy Southern Californian beach is wisely kept out of sight until the very end, and even then, you don't get a truly good look at it. This is a wise approach even when you do have money to play with, as it builds suspense, and avoids disappointment. Additionally, 'Blood Beach' is mostly filmed on-location, so there are few desperately cheap-looking sets. Finally, the film ends the way all good horror films do, though I just wish it hadn't been made so obvious earlier on.

I think the main reason 'Blood Beach' gets a low score is probably that it gets a little slow in places. This isn't helped by the two-dimensional characterisation, that if developed in a better script, could probably have alleviated the problem.

Nonetheless, it has its redeeming features as mentioned, and it's a good bit of late-night disposable viewing if you like horror and there's nothing better on.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Just when you thought it was safe to think it's a horror movie!
emm6 February 1999
Sure, BLOOD BEACH sounded like a cool title to sell some tickets, but what are you expecting? It's more of a joke to consider this a horror movie because there is meaninglessness to why people sink in the sand. Is this my imagination or is it the film's fault? The true effects of horrifying chills and shivers are absent, making this cheesy beyond belief. Interesting about this one is the mystery behind what lies underneath the sandy beach, and until you finally discover WHAT the thing really is, you may be asking to yourself, "WHAT IS THAT THING CALLED?". Bloody scenes are fairly gruesome, but there's too little of them. Noteworthy is Jerry Gross, who distributed B-movie films, including the gross-out X-rated horror flick I DRINK YOUR BLOOD. Maybe things aren't so bloody here after all. Blecchh!!!
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
As useful as whiskers on sausage
latherzap17 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS? The above summary is a prophetic quote from one of the movie's characters. There really is no reason to watch this film. As one positive-thinking reviewer below noted, the soundtrack isn't too bad. And even the acting isn't very bad, but it's all so dull.

A monster lurks beneath a Los Angeles beach. Sometimes it sucks people down into the sand, the victims never to be seen again. Burt Young plays a cop from chicago, the whole depth of his character defined by a lame ongoing gag referencing his devotion to his former hometown ("this never woulda happened in chicago").

The woman who played the third housekeeper (Pearl) on Diff'rent Strokes has a cameo.

Nothing much happens in Blood Beach. It really drags. The monster appears at the end for LESS than one minute. That would be ok if BB had been building suspense. But it built nothing. So it's really not ok.

Oddly, about the only scenes I found to be somewhat effective happen during the end credits. The camera lazily pans around the beach. We see children playing, delighted with the funnel (the monster's tell-tale sign) growing in the sand. But by then it is waaay too little too late.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This film was great when i was 13 and is still great now!
Godzilla44420 July 2004
Blood Beach rocks, it has everything a Saturday night movies needs from a giant phallic monster to a scene where every few moments the mic drops into shot. A popcorn monster flick giving a unique angle on the Jaws theme. Some good gore FX and a good few jumpy moments elevate this one above the usual rubber monster crowd and the sand FX are actually deeply scary.

I have been keeping an eye out for this one for a while but have as yet not found a copy. It could keep you away from the seaside forever, Jaws will keep you out of the water but Blood Beach will put you back in the car and send you home.
37 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Don't go near the sand for heaven sakes!
AppleBlossom2 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This was quite entertaining for a B-grade film (and I'm aware it has a cult following). It was a little drawn out at times but if you can override that hindsight it's a neat little film. At least the premise was different for a change; - a Californian beach has an uninvited guest that dwells beneath the sand and devours it's victims by sucking them under. With people disappearing one by one, and the body count ever growing - the police are desperate to solve the case. Finally the showdown comes when they locate the creature's lair….which gives rise to a possible sequel (though I don't think they made one). There were a few well known actors in the cast; Marianna Hill and David Huffman have both done a lot of TV work, sadly though Huffman was murdered in 1985, Burt Young (Rocky & sequels) and John Saxon (numerous TV roles and feature films).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An oddly appealing piece of cheerfully cheap'n'cheesy 80's horror monster schlock
Woodyanders10 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
How's this for a novel premise: a foul, carnivorous, subterranean monster whose exact origin is never properly disclosed feasts upon sundry teenagers, pretty young honeys, cops, bums and little old ladies who are all unfortunate enough to be treading on the beach when the sucker is on the prowl, thereby puzzling the local clueless and ineffectual authorities and whipping up a heretofore sleepy California coastal community into a frenzied tizzy. Boy, does that ever sound fairly similar to "Jaws," now doesn't it?

Although the threadbare story ain't much, this surprisingly fun cheapo fright flick somehow manages to be quite entertaining. Veteran B-movie flatfoot John ("Black Christmas," "Welcome to Spring Break") Saxon as the dour, irascible police chief who's disgusted with the whole bloody mess and the ever-coarse Burt Young (Paulie in the "Rocky" films) as the boorish, jocund homicide detective investigating the baffling murders both delightfully grouch it up while longtime favorite unsung character actor Stefan ("Blue Sunshine," "Spellbinder") Gierasch gleefully commits thespic grand larceny as a pompous, pipe-smoking coroner with a ludicrously protracted drawl (Gierasch talks as if he graduated with top honors from the William Shatner Academy of Studiously Affected and Mannered Overdone Hammy Elocution). Despite several glaring flaws -- writer/director Jeffrey Bloom's hopelessly all-thumbs cinematic technique, sometimes excruciatingly sluggish pacing, drab performances by David Huffman and Marianna ("The Baby," "Messiah of Evil") Hill as a pair of middle-aged seaside lovers who make a belated attempt at rekindling their extinguished relationship, Gill ("A Cold Night's Death," "The Ultimate Warrior") Melle's rather inappropriate, but still funky moody jazz score, Steve ("Dead and Buried," "Donnie Darko") Poster's peculiarly fuzzy photography, and the lamest, phoniest, most pitifully unscary beast this side of the killer walking carpet in "The Creeping Terror" -- "Blood Beach" nonetheless still rates as a weirdly winning low-rent creature feature, mainly because a certain sweetly misguided, but very palpable and thus engaging enthusiasm permeates every single fabulously fumbling frame. It's this unusual synthesis of earnestness and ineptitude which ultimately makes this baby so endearing. And any picture which boasts a scene where a nasty would-be rapist gets gruesomely castrated by the rampaging monster will always get my vote.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Before Tremors, there was Blood Beach.
BA_Harrison18 July 2012
After several people mysteriously vanish from a South Californian beach, authorities begin the search for whoever or whatever is responsible. Believing some kind of ravenous subterranean creature to be the cause of the disappearances, harbour patrolman Harry (David Huffman) and ex-girlfriend Catherine (Marianna Hill) begin looking for the beast's lair.

The cleverest thing about this predictable early 80s monster movie is surely it's amusing, Jaws-inspired tag-line 'Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water - you can't get to it.'; but even though Blood Beach displays very little else in the way of originality, rarely rising above routine B-movie fodder, there's just about enough fun to be had with it to still make it worth your while.

Huffman and Hill are forgettably bland, but the presence of seasoned character actors John Saxon and Burt Young more than compensate for the lacklustre leads, both guys giving enjoyable performances, Young as an uncouth copper from Chicago with zero tact, and Saxon as his tough but fair superior. Also worthy of mention is the lovely Lena Pousette, who shines as Marie, Harry's sexy blond air-hostess 'friend with benefits'.

The film also features several well executed deaths scenes, victims swallowed up by the sand in convincing fashion, and there's some fun to be had with the gore, including a would-be rapist having his junk chewed off by the monster and a cascade of dismembered body parts tumbling onto the unfortunate Catherine. Blood Beach's jump scares are about as clichéd as they can get (eg. a screeching cat leaping into frame) but they are still effective. Sadly, the monster is only revealed in the film's closing moments, and isn't all that impressive, looking like a giant papier-mâché plant (quite how that thing burrows underground, I'll never know!).

In an ending typical of 70s/80s monster movies, the creature is blown to pieces, but as the closing credits roll, new activity under the sand suggests that the horror isn't over yet (although a sequel has yet to surface).

5.5 out of 10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
5/10
Analog_Devotee27 April 2021
Yeah, this is pretty bad. None of the characters here are interesting or engaging. Horror icon John Saxon gives off a great performance (as expected) but it's nowhere near enough to carry the rest of the film.

The problem with an idea like this is that, if none of your characters are engaging, then you're pretty much guaranteed to be making a dud because once you've seen the first kill, you've basically seen them all. You can almost feel the screenwriter wondering if they should keep writing this thing around the halfway point or scrap it and move onto something else with a more broad-canvas possibility. The fact that said screenwriter decided he'd go as far as to direct this thing is surprising and a little gutsy.

I do love movies that are set on a beach, so I'll give this a generous 5/10 and say it's, at the very least, watchable for fans of Z-grade horror. A little pulpy cheese thrown into the mix could've done wonders for this flick. That, or they could've cut back on some of the swearing and tried the TV movie route. Either way, this flick took itself way too seriously and, as a result, it turned out to be pretty damn boring.

This was a multi-task watch for me. If I'd sat down and given this film my full, unbridled attention, I'd imagine I would've rated it much lower, generosity be damned.

What a great poster, though. I'm considering buying a print of it. It's a shame the film couldn't match its intensity.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A UNIQUE HORROR FILM!!!!!
jseneca7816 October 2001
This movie has an interesting story and you're not likely to predict what it is that is taking the lives of the characters in the film. The story takes place on a beach and when people begin to disappear it haves you wondering what it is. It will, however, keep you interested and the ending is not half bad either. To say that this is the best SCARY movie would be incorrect, however to say that it is the most unique is quite true. I really enjoyed this movie and I can honestly say that it had it's own unique style. See it if you haven't and if you can find it. It is a rare one and they don't make horror films like this anymore!!! This was a suspenseful film that caught me off guard on a few occasions and I hope I never have to experience that kind of terror. Released in 1980 to movie theatres and to video in 1982, this movie had a strange story, but a good story as well!!!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
John Saxon makes this a worthy horror viewing
Coventry12 June 2004
Blood Beach certainly isn't a good film, but it stands for nicely cheap and cheesy horror fun. It's an early 80's horror flick, so you pretty much know what to expect. A plot line that somewhat rips off an earlier made classic horror movie (in this case: Jaws), lots of screaming girls, tension few to none and bad-taste jokes. Blood Beach is about a little seaside town that lives of its tourism. All of a sudden, something evil seems to lurk in the sand…attacking people and sucking them into the sand, not to be found back. So, like it was the case in `Jaws', the tourists stay away and the local police department is under a lot of pressure to catch whatever horror lives underneath the sand. Blood Beach isn't that gory, actually. Since most victims are just sucked into the sand, no bloody messes overwhelm this film. The good old clichés are present as well, like for example the bizarre and lonely ladyfreak of the town… Or the return of a long-lost lover! The music is okay, but a bit too obviously influenced by Jaws and the film has got a very atmospheric open ending. I've got to admit that! The acting goes from bad to atrocious, but there's one exception! John Saxon…this amazingly cool dude stars as the stressed police captain who motivates his men with a great dose of sarcasm and charisma. John Saxon is a great actor and it's always nice to see him show up in little horror fun stuff, like this Blood Beach! Check it out when you have the chance! There are worse things to waste your life on, for sure
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie is a Horror Show. Crap all the way. Crappy story, acting, cinematography, music, etc
Bababooe31 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a Horror Show. Crap all the way. Crappy story, acting, cinematography, music, etc

Nothing is explained. No idea where this creature came from. The monster finally shows up near the end and it looks like crap. The main male and female characters and actors are a joke. We just basically watch them go on dates. The woman's mother is missing or dead and she just seems all happy/content. The man's neighbor and girlfriend is missing or dead and the same thing. Unreal.

The best part of the movie is when a few people get sucked into the sand. John Saxons character and acting was good. And the Rocky actor was there for comedy, waiting for the next Rocky movie.

The dialogue was the worst. Especially with the main male and female characters.

My rating is a D for effort, or 3 stars. 1 star given for balance. It took me 3 sittings to complete this mess. There was a decent idea, but the Screenplay was poor. They had a budget to do something, and this was the result. Crap.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Yawn!
preppy-311 January 2005
Silly horror film. At a California beach people are being pulled INTO the sand and are never seen again. Obviously there's something under there...but the police don't want to be bothered. Hunky lifeguard David Huffman and his whiny girlfriend try to find out what's going on.

I gotta admit this has a decent idea (people being attacked BY the beach) but is really poorly done. The story is totally by the numbers (it's basically "Jaws" on dry land) as are all the characters. The acting is awful, there's next to no gore and when you finally see the creature it's pretty laughable (I saw it at a theatre in 1981--the audience howled when the monster appeared at the end). The only bright spot for me was seeing David Huffman. He wasn't that great of an actor but he's VERY handsome and fills out the skimpy bathing suit he wears quite well. Sadly he was stabbed to death in 1985. And I do have to admit--this is one of the few horror movies that make the guy a sex object and not a female.

So, aside from his looks and body this movie has nothing to recommend it. I give it a 1.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More like Dud Beach
Cristopher_Jeorge15 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I can remember as a wee little guy seeing the posters for this at the theater and being completely freaked out and intrigued by it but still being scared pantsless to see it. Flash forward over two decades later and Blood Beach isn't available on DVD and VHS prints are pretty rare themselves. Folks there's a reason for this, anyone authorizing a DVD release of this would be stoned to death and I think a single kind soul bought up the majority of VHS copies and melted them down into guitar picks. Lucky for me my good friend in Texas locates and purchases one of the fossil few of the escaping tapes and we organize a midnite viewing while I'm visiting. Half way through she was asleep, two thirds through and I'm sawing wood myself. What a slow moving bore this movie is. Wooden acting (save for John Saxon), minimal gore, and the worst creature effect perhaps ever are all here. You really find yourself disliking almost everyone in the movie. The Adam Curry 80's VJ looking guy and the annoying hobo lady really knocked the needle off the get-on-your-nerves O'meter. We finished watching this movie only for completest sake the next day. A classic example of things better left a mystery of youth. Blood Beach is really bloodless, a girl gets scraped up legs, a dog is beheaded, and a rapist is umm... de-donged? That's it for the gore but a ocean of blood wouldn't have saved this thing. This movie is slower than molasses flowing up hill in February. I never even cared what was under the sand and when they finally unveiled it soda came out of my nose and I wasn't even drinking any. In the end I was more interested in Burt Youngs Chicago back story and why he would want to blame people being sucked into the sand and eaten on the Nazi party? Hi five* Heather! Burrrr Mowww!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Interesting Concept, bad Execution
This is a pretty forgettable horror movie that takes place on a beach. I like the idea of a creature that drags its victims beneath the sand because it's a creepy idea to sink into the sand where no one is around to help you. There are a few interesting things in the movie, like an underground storage facility where the monster lives have decent tension to them. No spoilers, but the creature is probably the most unique design that I have seen, but it only appears during the climax.

Unfortunately, the execution of the movie is done pretty badly. The scenes where people get stuck down or attacked happen way too quickly to be suspenseful, and there's a lack of tension in it. Also, there are a couple of filler scenes that have nothing to do with the main plot and are nothing interesting to talk about. The police investigation is pretty dull because it's repetitive with them going to the beach to look for evidence and encounter something related to the incident. It's also pretty boring most of the time since nothing interesting or suspenseful happened in the movie except for the monster attack scenes. And the movie has an anticlimactic ending to it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Incredibly silly, but also incredibly fun.
metalrage6666 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
For me, Blood Beach is one of those early 80's horror's that I can watch repeatedly and not get bored and It's one of the rare unintentional horror comedies as this is so poorly filmed and acted with almost no plausible special effects, that the seriousness in which this is shot comes off as hilarious.

Basically someone or something is making beach goers disappear. Initially the police either assume that they've either drowned or are the victims of a serial killer, however when a search of the beach turns up nothing, police are puzzled. More and more people go missing, but the attention of the police is renewed when a young girl is buried in the sand by her friends and is attacked in full view of everyone. She is pulled from the sand with bloodied legs. That coupled with a potential rapist getting castrated right in front of his would-be victim, has police realising that they are after something other than human.

A further search uncovers the beasts lair along with various dead bodies and body parts and they decide to set an explosive trap for it to blow it up. The monster is captured on camera and once it is in the right spot the charges are set off and the beast is killed. However as people start to return to the beach, sinkholes start appearing in different parts of the beach indicating that the beast either spawned or that blowing up a large carnivorous plant is not the best idea, but that's where the movie ends.

As said earlier the movie is very silly but it's a lot of fun. It's supposed to be a serious outing but it's almost as if the film-makers were deliberately poking fun at themselves. The monster itself looks like some kind of rubbery mutated man-eating cactus. The only actors I recognise in this is Burt Young from Rocky and John Saxon who seems to love being overly serious and angry in every B-grade movie there ever was.

Blood Beach is an 80's gem that is actually begging to be re-made by someone who will give it a proper budget and updated special effects as the original film is very grainy, it at least deserves to be touched up and re-released. Not many people know of this movie and those who do don't give it much consideration which is kinda sad as it's a great horror story. If you manage to track down a copy of this then grab hold of it.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible B movie
george-8512 March 2022
I just finished watching this atrocious movie. It was so bad. I guess the producers thought too many copycats of Jaws so they need it something new. Well, before Tremors we got this. At minute 34:30 you can see the boom mic on the scene, it's hilarious. There isn't enough gore and the flick it's just...boring. So do yourself a favor and leave this one out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Average horror flick.
Obituary998 August 2002
I saw this movie when I was ten years old and for growing up watching all sorts of horror flicks I can be safe to say I am use to anything. This movie has bad acting but there was something creepy about it. Every death was the same, someone gets sucked underneath the beach. But I pictured myself in that situation being eaten alive. There was only really one scene that got to me. Some old lady is walking by herself and sits up on this porch or something. Then following her is a cop, (If I can remember correctly) then he tells her to come with him and she looks at him like she knows whats gonna happen. Then he begins to sink in to the sand. He begins to scream and she just looks at him like nothing is happening. And he is sucked under slowly but surely. I have no idea why but for some reason everytime I watch that part it sends chills down my spine.

This is a rare horror flick, it's like "Tremors" (1990) but not as bloody, but if you ever see this movie rent it for the hell of it.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
up yours you fake horror fans
hellcat66612 February 2005
ya its kind of cheesy ya its kind of dumb but its better than today's pg 13 horror movie like boogieman and its not a slasher movie so its not a ripoff to halloween so what i liked it it does sound like a slasher movie and ya the monster is never explained why its there or where it came from who cares its a movie let it be a mystery its never on cable and on DVD well probably not compared to all these wussy pg13 horror movies blood beach is a classic and it does not deserve to get picked on and it has some decent gore not like todays horror movies so leave it alone if it is on DVD i would not pay 60 dollars for it but 15 i would
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A tedious Jaws knock-off with paper thin characters, a lack of focus, and not much exploitative value.
IonicBreezeMachine9 August 2023
At a southern California beach, Harbor Patrol officer Harry Caulder (David Huffman) witnesses the disappearance of Ruth Hutton (Harriet Medin), a friend and mother of a woman he loved Catherine Hutton (Marianna Hill) who returns once she hears the news. As Sgt. Royko (Burt Youngyko) and Lt. Piantadosi "Piano" (Otis Young) investigate Ruth's disappearance as well as several others on the same stretch of beach, it becomes clear something unheard of is behind these disappearances.

Blood Beach is a 1981 horror film directed and written by Jeffrey Bloom. Made in 1979 and based off an idea of Bloom's and producer Steven Nalevansky, Blood Beach was one of a number of independent horror releases that tried to ape the success of Jaws often prioritizing quickness and cheapness over quality. While critical reception was negative (as expected), the film was a decent financial success earning an estimated $6.5 million over its theatrical run. With a movie like this you don't expect anything too ambitious, just something schlocky with some exploitative elements. Unfortunately Blood Beach commits the greatest sin a movie like this can, being boring.

While actors such as John Saxon, Burt Young, and Otis Young bring some life and punch to their mostly underwritten roles (making them the best parts of the movie), the actual leads of David Huffman and Marianna Hill as Harry and Catherine respectively are so bland and so uninteresting that they serve only as a lead weight on the film making an already tedious slog even more so. But even if we're to forgive the characterization and remember this is a movie about a monster in beach sands, the actual creature feature stuff isn't that great either. Aside from a scene where a would be rapist gets his appendage eaten by the creature or the design of the creature itself, most of the kills in this movie are completely off camera with mostly scenes of people slowly sinking into the sand. For a movie called "Blood Beach" it's got a surprising lack of blood and I think Jaws despite being PG was bloodier.

Blood Beach is just a waste of time. It's not scary, not interesting, and not exploitative enough to provide much entertainment value even of the riffing kind. If you want to see a Jaws cash-in that's actually fun, stick with either Alligator or Piranha from around the same time.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed