The Legend of Suram Fortress (1985) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The legend continues-The Legend of Paradjanov
LE02014 October 2003
In his first film since his release from the Gulag system, Paradjanov demonstrated that he was wounded, but not killed, that his soul didn't atrophy, and that he was still seeing in color. Needless to say, this is a visual masterpiece, as is everything that bears his name. Although his best works were either behind him or in his head, it is more of a testimony to the magnitude of his talent. Photographed in niello silver, "The Legend..." reflected Paradjanov's state of being-an aging and ailing artist, who have suffered, but, to some extent, lived to tell about it.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another visually ravishing, thematically incomprehensible masterpiece
alice liddell20 December 1999
Paradjanov's sequel to THE COLOR OF POMEGRANATES. This is more accessible than COLOR, more narrative driven, with a greater use of outside locations. It is still as obscure, with legends, allegories, characters and symbols all weaving into a culturally specific tapestry. It is not as jaw-droppingly gorgeous or formally astonishing as COLOR, and seems much more pessimistic. It is a story of exiles, poverty, serfdom, murder and the supernatural, with stories within stories, and an almost buoyant ending celebrating resistance and culture.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Patriotism
canperincekster24 March 2017
It's a great film which has scenes like paintings. The music is remarkable. Therefore, both visually and aurally it is a marvelous journey to the Georgian folklore. It also conveys very good messages. The main theme is the suggestion that the patria could only be defended, if some sacrifices their lives for its defense. Blood becomes the cement, in other words. The fortress constitutes a metaphor of the patria, which was vulnerable at that time to the invasions of the two major empires: Ottoman and Safavid. In this context, religion is the main theme of patriotism, which differentiate the majority of the Georgians from the outsiders. There are also so many connections to the folk tales of both Turkish and Iranian culture. One is the character Zurab who rebels against his father because he leaves his patria, thus, his religion. This reminds us the character Zohrab in Shahname of Firdawsi, who fought against his father.

On the other hand, the political context and the director's position in that context is also felt in the choice of making such a movie. The Soviet system was disintegrating and the director is also one of the victims of the Soviet regime long before this movie's production.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
vision
Okada_Toru26 November 2003
Paradjanov made four films for which he is best known: Shadows Of Forgotten Ancestors and Color Of Pomegranates in the sixties; Legend Of Surami Fortress and Ashik Kerib in the eighties. In case you don't already know, between the sixties and the eighties he spent over a decade in a Soviet prison. I find this to be the strongest and most hypnotic one of the bunch, made soon after his release. One should take advantage of any opportunity to see these on the big screen.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Parajanov -- an inspiration to other creative artists
fwmurnau14 May 2012
SURAM FORTRESS has a bit more narrative than some of Parajanov's films but, as with the others, I still don't always understand what's going on or why. Still, his very eccentricity, breaking every rule of narrative and filmmaking, inspires me in my own work as a playwright and composer.

His use of striking, associative images -- powerful, even when they don't make literal sense -- recalls the great Tarkovsky, who does something similar in his films, in his own very personal style.

Parajanov, like Bresson -- another director who can fascinate and baffle me at the same time -- does everything differently from the way it's usually done, infuriating viewers expecting believable characters and comprehensible stories. With both directors, the results can be uneven, but at their best, they really inspire, stimulate, and get your creative juices flowing.

Bresson, Tarkovsky, and Parajanov prove you can truly try ANYTHING while following your own artistic vision. But, unlike some overpraised fraudulent directors, they are never pretentiously avant- garde for its own sake, phony, insincere, or "different" just to come across as cool, perverse, or faux-profound.

Parajanov and Bresson's boldly individual styles embolden me to be fresher, more original, and think outside of the box in my own work.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Visual Masterpiece
max4movie5 July 2020
Full review on my blog max4movies: Ambavi Suramis tsikhitsa (international title: The Legend of Suram Fortress) is the fictionalized retelling of an ancient Georgian tale about a fortress that could only be built with a human sacrifice. Visually, the movie looks wonderful with vibrant colors, perfectly arranged set pieces, and a striking choreography. And while the plot remains mostly simple and central aspects and characters even seem obscure, the heavy use of symbols give the movie a dreamlike quality. Certain scenes - although aesthetically pleasing - seem to lack a clear connection to the plot, which is why the overall allegory about political oppression will remain vague for some viewers.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another masterpiece from a great director
Red-12514 July 2020
The Georgian/Russian film Ambavi Suramis tsikhitsa (1985) was shown in the U.S. with the translated title The legend of Suram Fortress. The movie was directed by Sergei Parajanov. (Co-directed by Dodo Abashidze.)

Parajanov's muse, Sofiko Chiaureli, stars as Vardo, a young slave whose lover departs and doesn't return. She becomes a fortune teller, and communicates an old folk legend about what will be required to build Suram Fortress. (Ms. Chiaureli starred in every one of Parajanov's films from 1965.)

There was actually a Suram Fortress in Georgia, which was built in the 12th Century. However, this movie isn't really about historical events. It's a drama of passion, revenge, religious conflict, and courage.

This was director Parajanov's first film after he was released from prison. No one could prove that he had actually committed a crime. He was imprisoned because he refused to make films in the Socialist Realism style. Instead, his movies are splashed with intense colors, and almost dreamlike in quality.

The film is divided into about a dozen segments, which don't necessarily follow in chronological order. Flashbacks abound, and everything looks exotic to our eyes. The haunting music adds to the the exotic quality.

I've written quite a bit about Parajanov in my review of his earlier movie Sayat Nova/The Color of Pomegranates (1969). Please check out that review for more information if you're interested in this creative genius.

The Legend of Suram Fortress would work better on a large screen. However, we saw it on DVD, where it worked well enough. The movie has a solid IMDb rating of 7.4. I thought that it was better than that, and rated it 9.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
more than beautiful
Kirpianuscus20 March 2016
a Paradjanov. surprising for its force. and as part of a terrible fight against political system. a fairy tale. preserving the light, the pain, the fascination, mystery and force of the source. and the desire to present a testimony about sufferance. that fact transforms The Legend of Suram Fortress in more than beautiful film or embroidery of symbols. because, using motifs who are parts of a folk chain from Balkans to Caucasus, it gives to the sacrifice new connotations. it is not exactly a revenge or expression of sketch of artistic freedom but precise definition of relation who remains basis of power.each theme of Paradjanov's cinema is present in this bitter, delicate gem. like colors of a portrait who redefines the spaces from a drawing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More a series of "tableaux vivants" than chapters of a story
frankde-jong8 March 2024
Sergei Parajanov has the most personal style of all directors I know of. He firmly established this style with his films "Shadows of our forgotten ancestors" (1965) and "The color of pomegranates" (1969).

The leaders of the Soviet Union didn't like his style. It didn't fit in with their opinions about (the role of) art (in society). Parajanov spend the '70s and early '80s mostly in jail and labor camps convicted on diverse false accusations.

When he was released in the '80s Parajanov started a second phase in his career. "The legend of Suram fortress was the first film in this second phase. In a book about the history of film I read about this second phase "and he made another three films". That is in my opinion too short a summary and does not do justice to "The legend of Suram fortress. It is true however that "The legend of Suram fortress" is not an artistic break from previous films. Parajanov does not break new grounds in the second phase of his career.

Just like in earlier films "The legend of the Suram forttress" is visually hypnotizing. His images are deeply rooted in old mythical and religious stories and icons. This also means that the plot is hard to follow for Western eyes. The film is more a series of "tableaux vivants" than chapters of a story.

In the films of for exampls Sergei Eisenstein you can sometimes guess that underneath his hstorical stories there was criticism on the current situation. "The legend of the Surem fortress" is plotwise too inaccessible to conclude that it contains hidden criticism on the way the Soviet Union had treated Parajanov in the past decade.

From all the "tableaux vivants" in the movie I was charmed most by "The prayer" and "The passage of time". The way Parajanov uses the close up in these tablaeux is really beautiful.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Amazing
BandSAboutMovies3 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I've never seen a movie that looks like The Legend of the Suram Fortress.

Directed by Georgian SSR-born Soviet-Armenian director Sergei Parajanov and Georgian actor Dodo Abashidze, this was the first movie that Parajanov had made in 15 years after being censored by Russia and 4 years in jail for "lewd acts and bribery." That's because he was bisexual and he was sentenced to five years in a hard labor camp despite a letter from Andrei Tarkovsky to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine, which stated, "In the last ten years Sergei Parajanov has made only two films: Shadows of Our Forgotten Ancestors and The Colour of Pomegranates. They have influenced cinema first in Ukraine, second in this country as a whole, and third in the world at large. Artistically, there are few people in the entire world who could replace Paradanov. He is guilty - guilty of his solitude. We are guilty of not thinking of him daily and of failing to discover the significance of a master." The letter was also signed by Robert De Niro, Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, Leonid Gaidai, Eldar Ryazanov, Yves Saint Laurent, Marcello Mastroianni, Françoise Sagan, Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Luis Buñuel, Federico Fellini, Michelangelo Antonioni, Andrei Tarkovsky and Mikhail Vartanov.

This is not the first tragedy in his life, he was married to a Muslim woman who converted to Eastern Orthodox Christianity for him. Her relatives saw this as blasphemy and killed her. Knowing this will make this movie even richer for you, as he lived the pain that his characters do.

Much like The Color of Pomegranates, this film uses tableaux -- a static scene containing one or more stationary actors who poses with props and scenery, combining theater and visual art to tell the story -- to create a surreal effect as it moves from dramatic image to image, filled with actors who each speak their part within these pieces of motion art.

This is an adaption of a traditional Georgian folk story of Durmishkhan, who has been freed by his master and now wants to buy the freedom of his lover Vardo. He is told another story by a merchant who lost his mother because of the cruel nature of his master. He killed that man and became a Muslim to escape the law.

Durmishkhan works for this man and marries a woman and has a son named Zurab. As his boss retires, he gives the business to him and converts again, this time to being Christian and dreams of the Muslims killing him for his crime.

Vardo becomes a fortune teller who is called upon when the Muslims invade their country. Despite all their efforts, the Suram Fortress is falling. She fortells that a blue-eyed young man from the countryside must be walled inside the fortress alive and it will stand. The bou who she be her son, Zurad, volunteers and gives his life to save the country and Christianity.

The band Voidcraft used this movie for one of their videos, "The Vertical Mammal."

The Legend of the Suram Fortress feels like a movie that was made before cameras were invented, if that makes sense, something captured through time and delivered to us in the future. Filmed in the grassy scenery of Georgia with all actors facing the camera as we study the frame for its many meanings. It's presented plainly but holds many secrets, literally the most pure expression of the secret and the occult.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magical Georgian tale
TheDonaldofDoom20 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to say which one is more visually impressive, this or Colour of Pomegranates. Like Colour, every frame of Suram Fortress is a work of art. It's hard to even find words to convey the mastery of what Parajanov does, but one of the many things that some of his unmoving shots incorporate is movement. Specifically: graceful, flowing movement. The movement of blade of grass as a man pours a bucket of eggs. The movement of blue ribbons like flowing water. The movement of sheep in the background as two dancers leap in the foreground.

The other thing, like in his two previous films, that he uses wonderfully is colour. Humans, animals and objects are used for the visual aspect they add to the scene and are placed in ways that are pleasing to the eye. All this is done in ways that display elements of Georgian culture. There is dancing, there are flamboyant clothes.

The clearer narrative (although still not that clear!) of this film compared to Colour leads to a genuinely quite stirring final act in which the prince chooses to sacrifice himself so the fortress can be built and the invaders stopped. It draws on the importance of belonging to a 'people', a group wider than yourself, but doing so by individual choice, as opposed to the lack of choice in being a serf.

Parajanov gives screen time to the Muslim invaders that are the enemies of the Christians as well as to the culture of the native Christians. There is no strong moral condemnation, just an equal fascination with their culture. What makes the world culturally rich is the breathtaking variety of cultures, each with its own customs and traditions that are precious. This is why there is much more focus on the Muslims' culture than on presenting them as enemies, especially when all civilisations have done evil at one time or another. Indeed, it is Osman's masters in Christian Georgia that display the most evil acts we see in the film. One of the most visually stunning but harrowing scenes is him dragging his mother's body.

This film, like the one before, has an almost mystic quality that makes it feel like more than just history and culture. Then again, that speaks to how otherworldly Eastern Orthodox Christian culture can seem to those used to Western Christianity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
the film goes off on digressions
feelinglistless28 August 2005
Tonight's film course film was The Legend of the Suram Fortress and during its 87 minute running time it managed to quickly jump into my top five most difficult films of all time. That's difficult to watch; films so different to everything else that you're seeing something totally alien. A brief synopsis would be: a group of Georgians are trying to build a fortress to defend themselves from invaders, but every time they are about to put on the finishing touches, for no readily apparent reasons it collapses. So they go and see a fortune teller who advises them that if they want to get the fortress to stay standing, they need to find a youth, a tall blonde blue eyed boy to be buried into one of the walls during the construction and his presence will ensure that the construction job will be completed smoothly. And sure enough in those closing moments there he is gladly being smeared in cement and eggs, giggling as he's buried alive, with only his mother to grieve.

It actually a fairly simple story. But the director, Sergo Paradjanov, working in Soviet Georgia in 1984, not too long after leaving a fifteen year jail term, doesn't follow any of the film making rules we are used to. There are very few close ups. Very often the action we need to be following is hidden in the bottom left hand corner of a landscape shot, extra-ordinarily easy to miss. There are very few close ups and at times its hard to tell whose doing what to whom and why. Every now and then the film goes off on digressions which have no relevance to the main plot and generally serve to confuse the viewer. The music is utterly mad, with found sounds, on screen instruments and church organ dropped in seemingly at random. At times when nothing seems to be happening, someone will break into a jig, almost playing time until the next scene comes along. But infuriatingly there is an obvious cinematic voice behind it all so you're compelled to try and understand the message whatever it is. One of those times when your eyes are glued to the screen simply because you can't believe what you're seeing.
26 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boat as bridge
Vincentiu3 January 2012
Way. Search of essence. This world against faith. Death. And the way is not over. Sacrifice as soul of a city. End of circle. Gift of reconciliation. Result - movie as amber sea.Every wave - part of a ladder. Every beach - skin for ambiguous dreams. Every boat - bridge to understand roots of gestures and happiness. An experience and golden peach. As each film by Paradjanov. Basic truth and force of love. As parts of a fairy tale in which end is more than happy. It is fly of soul, leaf of peace, finish of a long trip, answer to old questions, testimony of innocence and rain for new crops.The death of Zurab is same than Manole's Ana sacrifice. The hero is only crumb of huge bread of saints and ancestors. His body is proof. For motherland love. For God sage, For things who must exist behind particular lives . For lost dramas. A film about religion as reflection of a family history
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed