Timestalkers (TV Movie 1987) Poster

(1987 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
More than just a hobby.
lost-in-limbo12 May 2008
Time travelling with a gun slinging Klaus Kinski and western memorabilia nut William Devane? I won't have it any other way. "Timestalkers" is a playfully modest little made-for-TV production that's full of warmth and covers an interestingly ambitious concept.

The story follows Professor Scott McKenzie (William Devane), an old western memorabilia collector discovers in a photograph from 1866 a 20th century .357 Magnum revolver in the hands of a cowboy (Klaus Kinski). Scott soon starts questioning the possibility of time-travel and writes a paper on it. Then strangely a lady appears who claims that she believes him and he soon discovers that she's a time-traveller too. She wants him help her find out why this time-traveller has gone back to the old-west and eventually stop him from changing the face of history.

Early on the plot moves back and forth between the past and present. Some of the items that Devane's character looks at or purchases at an auction have a history that involves the magnum-toting gunman. Some foreseeable plot-holes creep in, but it's inventively told and works well with its collective gimmicks. The chintzy special effects create some charm, and so does the cheesy igniting sparks cutaways. The uncanny music is whimsically scored. There's a nice sense of humour in the script. Devane gives a winning performance and Kinski's glazed turn offers that venomously cold tinge. Lauren Hutton is fetchingly palatable. John Ratzenburger and Forest Tucker pop in with fun support parts. It looks cheap, but it's actually better than its limitations allow it to be. A smart, enjoyably harmless sci-fi yarn.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever time travel ...... a must see for Kinski fans ...................
merklekranz12 August 2011
The fast moving and clever time travel plot is greatly enhanced by the presence of the duster clad Klaus Kinski. He has a lot of screen time, along with a fine performance by William Devane. After his wife and boy are killed in a car wreck, Devane purchases an old western trunk, which contains the intriguing 1886 photograph, that sets the story in motion. A chase ensues across 100 years to reverse history, and the tale never falters. One memorable scene involves Kinski entering a fence protected compound. The film holds interest throughout, and the ending is very satisfying. I bought "Timestalkers" because I am a big fan of both Klaus Kinski and William Devane. I was not disappointed. - MERK
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Laid back fun
harryplinkett141 April 2016
Keep in mind that this is a TV movie, with a rather limited budget. It is not meant to be a thriller or a marvel of science fiction. Nothing in it is original, and as most other time travel films, it asks you not to think too much about the logic of time travel. It's basically a nice little family film that you can watch with your kids on a lazy afternoon and have some fun. There are no scenes in it that contain real violence or that come off as particularly threatening. Our heroes breeze through the obstacles the plot throws at them with considerable ease. Granted, the absence of real tension and the fact that the antagonist is not truly menacing is a problem, but I am willing to disregard that problem because I find the overall experience of watching this quite pleasant. The cast is pretty good and it's a pleasure to watch them on screen. The female lead steals the show, though. There's lots of nostalgia here for those who remember the 80s.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great, Great Movie
aesgaard418 December 2000
There's few time travel pictures that I don't pick apart with fourth dimensional reasoning and this is one of them. There's a very wonderful scene as the time traveling bad guy wants into an Army base, so he travels back to before it was built, crosses where the perimeter fence will be and then returns to the present on the other side of the fence ! William Devane does a great job as the writer who writes the book that causes time travel to be invented. When he discovers an old tin-type with a man holding a very modern-day gun, he steps into an adventure with Lauren Hutton that leads him into fulfilling his greatest wish to be a gunfighter. John Ratzenburger forgets Cliff on "Cheers" to play a very likeable Army Colonel and Forrest Tucker appears too in his very last movie role as an Old West Collector (Shades of "F-Troop," perhaps). This wonderful movie is great for the whole family as Hutton repays Devane's kindness with an act that probably eliminates the entire movie from even occurring.You have to see it to know what I mean.
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The cast is crazy!
BandSAboutMovies16 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Somehow, CBS aired a movie starring Klaus Kinski and William Devane - together at least - on March 10, 1987. Even more amazing, the movie was written by Brian Clemens - yes, the man who created Captain Kronos - Vampire Hunter - and directed by Michael Schultz, the man who made Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, but also has Car Wash, Cooley High, Krush Groove, The Last Dragon and Disorderlies on his resume.

Dude, I love movies.

Based on Ray Brown's The Tintype, it has Devane's character losing his wife and son (Danny Pintauro from Who's the Boss) to a drunk driver. Later, he attends an auction with his friend General Joe Brodsky (John Ratzenberger, yes Cliff Claven was in a movie with Kinski, wrap your brains around that nugget) where they buy some of Joseph Cole's (yes, Kinski) trunks from a century ago. Devane believes that Cole was a time traveler, a fact backed up by the appearance of Georgia Crawford (Lauren Hutton!), who travels with him to Crossfire, CA to get to the bottom of everything.

At this point, a plot to kill President Grover Cleveland - yes, really - emerges and Forest Tucker, James Avery, Tracy "Bob the Goon" Walter, Tim Russ (Tuvok!) and Terry Funk - again, what is going on with this movie - all appear.

I really think that the real time travel in this movie is me going back in time and making it happen before my bedroom is crushed Donnie Darko-style.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
80's classic cheese-balls
vsswift18 January 2013
Loved it in that 'Spaceballs' sort of way. Super cheesy, but entertaining. Lots of really cliché lines. You will laugh, squirm at the awkwardness, and if your a child of the 80's have a bit of nostalgia. Don't take it too seriously. Actually, it would probably make a really great drinking game now that I think about it.... 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Ten lines of text, there you go IMDb (who made up that quota "10 lines of text" -- also I'm keeping my heading as Cheeseballness!one two three, your requirements to post reviews suck, four five, six, congratulations after this I will never use IMDb again. Am I to ten lines yet?
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Just give me back some time.
michaelRokeefe27 July 2002
This is a haphazard Sci-Fi western that is hard to build interest in. For a TV movie the special effects are pretty decent. The casting seems to be a grab-bag selection. A history professor(William Devane) and a time traveler(Lauren Hutton)try to foil a mad scientist(Klaus Kinski)from among other things prevent a presidential assignation. At times Hutton is quite fetching, but her appeal easily wears thin. Devane and his ever present hammy smile can also be tolerated. Kinski is excellent as the long white haired loose cannon of a scientist. He is not frightening, but evil indeed. Also in the cast are: John Ratzenberger(from TV's "Cheers"), Forrest Tucker and John Considine. At least, Hutton fans will be pleased.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Decent Time Travel Adventure
tabuno19 January 2019
25 January 2010. Though dated and low-budget with sometimes awful sixties electronic music that periodically resonates nicely and some questionable effort at time-travel special effects that are both different but sometimes tacky, this particular time travel movie has some pretty decent and intelligent storyline tidbits that most of this genre omit. In the beginning there is some nice time displacement English dialogue though it fades eventually during the movie (unlike the more previous comedy version - DEMOLITION MAN, 1993) and there is the relatively rare use of detective work that is fairly prominent in this movie a bit like though not as intense as the contemporary public television HISTORY DETECTIVES. As another post revealed there is a nice use of time travel within time travel to great effect by Klaus Kinski as well as the ending being a rather up to one's interpretation of how the movie really circles around or does it. Overall this is a relatively predictable but decently presented time travel scenario without particularly the overblown action. This is a more educated, though not totally believable low-budgeted time travel entertainment. 7/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
dated and dull
grnhair200126 July 2012
Kinski hams his way through this time travel adventure as the Cardboard Cutout Bad Guy, yelling half his lines, and he made me want to smack him every time he does. Lauren Hutton seems so confused by the content of her lines you suspect she was born speaking another language--Urdu, maybe-- and had to memorize them phonetically. Clichés abound, the science isn't believable, they never made me care about the time travel "adventure," and the result is William Devane was trying to sisyphus this thing up a hill made steep as an Alp by its shortcomings. As bad as it is, the Casio keyboard music and cheesy credit sequence manages to make it worse. And then someone starts singing twangy country songs: kill me now. A star for Devane, nothing for everyone else.
5 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Magnum Killer in the old west
bkoganbing18 July 2011
In Timestalkers William Devane plays a professor with degrees in physics and history and a passion for the lore of the old west who gets to see some of his theories actually come true.

It all starts out quite innocently enough as he and fellow western buff John Rafsenberger purchase a bunch of items at an auction and Devane gets a photograph with gunslinger Klaus Kinsski showing what he believes is .357 Magnum in his holster. He writes a paper on it and that brings Lauren Hutton in from the future. She's hunting Kinnski down as he's the number 2 time traveling guy from 500 years in the future, Hutton's father being number one.

Devane's got a lot of issues on his own and he joins Hutton in on the hunt because whatever Kinsski's got planned it's going to change history in a big way. We do learn of a secret trip that President Grover Cleveland made to the west in 1886 and Kinsski's going to do something there possibly. By the way don't dwell on the obvious.

Timestalkers marks the farewell performance of Forrest Tucker who plays a rich western history buff who provides a valuable clue to Kinsski's intentions.

The film is a far fetched idea with some presidential history that never really happened. No more far fetched than a Three Mesquiteers western of a couple generations earlier where President Garfield secretly goes west and agrees to help the Mesquiteers save their ranch, but his real assassination gets in the way.

Timestalkers is a nice family film and for those who don't like seeing the laws of time and space violated, it's OK if Lauren Hutton does it in a good cause.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Almost 20 years of searching...
blais8631 July 2006
I have been looking for this movie for almost 20 years, since I first viewed the movie & Finally! Here it is. It made such a huge impact on me that I never forgot it or stopped looking. Great actors, action & story plot. Time & time travel has always been a big part of my life & every movie pertaining to time-travel peaks my interest and gives me new ideas and ways of looking at thing & life around me. Does this really exist? Could this really happen? To go back and find out & be the only one who knows Leonardo De Vinci's true last name or to just know him personally would be awesome. Or to experience the old west to sit with the Indian's in peace. Thank you for a wonderful movie & even better actors to go with it.
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
entertaining, enjoyable science fiction movie
myriamlenys3 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Having lost both his wife and his son, a history professor refuses to remarry. Instead he pours all of his energy into his job and his hobby, both of which betray an enduring interest in the Wild West. While attending an auction of Wild West memorabilia, he buys some pieces of luggage. The luggage contains a most intriguing find...

"Timestalkers" is an agreeable science fiction movie of the time travel variety. Some time travel movies delight in intellectual games about topics such as paradoxes or the unravelling of Time itself, but here the emphasis lies on emotion, suspense and action. The plot flits to and fro between the past, the present and the future. The respective evocation of the past and the present is well done, but the evocation of the future lacks in imagination. More thought could have been spent on the creation of a society that looked and sounded really different. Thanks to advances in computer technology and the like, some of the visual and special effects look dated anno Domini 2023. Still, this may constitute part of the charm for those who enjoy 1980's and 1990's science fiction movies.

Klaus Kinski, as the malevolent villain, seems to be enjoying himself hugely. (I hope that he got to take that duster home after production was wrapped, it looked a million dollars on him.) However, it is hard to shake the impression that the villain is going to a lot of superfluous trouble in order to achieve his aims. Presumably he's one of those insanely complicated souls who, when asked to cross the English Channel, start building a life-sized replica of an Elizabethan galleon out of matchsticks.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic
goldfinger2a-215 June 2002
"Timestalkers" is without doubt the very best of all time travel films, it`s well acted, and directed, and it is not spoilt by OTT special effects.

Bill Devane is great in the lead role, and it`s nice to see Klaus Kinski in a more commercial type role.

The basic plot centres around an old trunk and it`s contents picked up at a car boot sale (garage sale in the US), a photo revels in the distance a man with a very modern gun, and so our journey starts, and it`s edge of the seat stuff all the way....

See it if you can. Score: 10/10
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good movie for remake
FAJNYFILM9 April 2022
The idea and plot are perfect. All stands together and is very interesting.

All sums up to the beginning with a tragedy and after the whole story the tragedy is avoided.

I am sure the remake in good hands will make a great movie.

The casting in the film is odd. And act play is mediocre. Yet I gave high number because of the concept potential.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cowboys, time travel & Klaus Kinski
norwell-services30 December 2014
Cowboys, time travel and Klaus Kinski, it doesn't get much better than this. This film is one of those little gems that should be watched every Xmas along with The Great Escape and Its a Wonderful Life. Like all good films it starts with tragedy, then a small mystery. The back story is well presented and not complicated; like many I could mention. Also, the story doesn't jump back and too; as is all too common these days. Happy endings don't come any happier, that's all I'm going to say, but is not predictable. Klaus Kinski is a joy to watch with his rolling eyes and tough talking and big cowboy coat. The time traveling is cool and does not involve a Tardis; another bonus.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
*Guilty Pleasure* My Favorite Time Travel Flick
A_Different_Drummer17 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I have scrupulously checked out all the net "lists" of time travel movies and I believe I have seen over 95% of all the listed films, which ain't bad. I have seen TIMESTALKERS twice, no mean feat considering how hard it is to find a copy. It is my favourite. Why? Well let's start with the weaknesses. It has a "made for TV" feel, clearly some budget limitations, no major stars aside from deVane, and relies on a heavy-handed plot device -- the near-magical appearance of a beautiful woman (Hutton) from, of all places, the future. (As if we don't enough beautiful woman in the past and present, and we need to borrow some more from the future...?) I have written a lot of reviews for IMDb and usually at this juncture I would usually be explaining how the producer should consider another career, or deVane's agent must have been desperate when he signed for this...? But, no. This is, oddly, my favourite time travel film and I will try to explain why. Leaving aside the production standards, leaving aside the aforementioned bizarre plot device, I was hooked by the core story of a man who loses his wife and tries to carry on, as best he can, without her. But never for one moment does he forget or ignore his loss. To keep busy, he even takes up a strange hobby -- practising his "fast draw" with an old replica western revolver. And there you have it. In spite of all the negatives, those two specific plot arcs, and the way the writer ultimately resolves them both, captured my fancy and moves this to the top of my list. Klaus Kinski was a strange casting choice. An actor who never, even once, managed to speak English without an accent, he wandered through the 70s and 80s basically playing bad guys. But again, this is not about Kinski. This is about the way the writer resolves this story and frankly it is the best resolution I have ever seen. No more spoilers. You are on your own, and best of luck to you, if you can find a copy!
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A film to be remembered for the ages
MartialArtist175 April 2010
I watch westerns on a weekly basis, and one day i was browsing through the internet looking at Sci-Fi westerns when i saw Timestalkers. I did some research to find that it is a rare film. Afterwords i bought it on VHS off eBay. When i watched this film i found it had a good storyline. William Devane plays to role of a man with an obsession for the old west. He finds and old photo from a trunk bought at auction, in the photo he sees a man holding a man holding a 1980 magnum. He encounters a lady from the future and they travel back to the old west. William Devane plays a great role in the film,and it is very well shot. This film is a rarity in the Sci-Fi western section, apart from Back To The Future 3 i have only seen this film as being great.It is worth watching alone or with the family, it will leave a fond memory to last forever burning in our hearts.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well Done and Fun To Watch.. Really Enjoyed it!
lblanks6 January 2003
I watched this for the first time last week on TV. Really a well done film with a real twist to the plot. Good action and interesting build up to the finale. I found it very entertaining... which is what I like in a film.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great show had hoped it was pilot for series
gerryo-320 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
My wife and I both loved this TV episode, acting, plot, and action. A key plot concept was that one could not normally alter the future by changing the past and the finding of the antique photograph of a modern pistol supports the idea that if time travel to the past has occurred the effects are already part of our history. At the end of show when the time travel device was run over by the wagon wheel, it appeared that it was undamaged and we assumed it was to be found by Devane at some later time to lead into a TV series. We waited for a sequel, but it never appeared. Every time we see Devane in a film or TV show, we are reminded of "Time Stalkers". This show should be revived as a TV series.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
question
rp_roger25 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
So you have the ability to travel in time but you don't go back and stop your friends murder? He knew the General was going to be killed and he was his friend but he did nothing to stop it or go back in time to change it. What kind of friend was that? If he was a friend why did'nt he stop it? Or at least go back in time to stop it?
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is a good time travel movie
jtkjlp-083058 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Another reviewer stated that the professor could not have saved his family... i disagree because of the fact that the woman took him back to right before it happened so therefore he could easily have known that the speeding car was coming because he heard the police sirens ... This movie is one of my all time favorite time travel movies and was well written and well played in my opinion.... One thing I do not understand is the professors car.... I have never seen a car like that before.

Also when the blacksmith noticed the woman just disappear would he not have gone into the barn and looked around? And also she came out of the barn and he KNEW nobody had been in there Seems logical to me that he would....
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
80's strangeness again.
HyperPup27 July 2004
I probably wouldn't have commented on this film. After getting into a discussion about 80's sci-fi movies with a friend, this title popped up. Wow, I thought I was the only one who remembered this flick. Having originally seen this waaaay back in 87' I can say it didn't really get much better with age. That is okay however, as this was blip on the radar. Just one more failed pilot for a series that CBS couldn't avail itself to try producing. It was however a enjoyable effort but one that most viewers could probably see being skewed into a "Voyagers" type programming pigeon-hole had it gone to full series. From what I understand, "Scholastic", the mass media educational powerhouse was to help with the franchise. Alas, it could have not just been entertainment but educational too!
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Time Stalkers And history
lippylip269 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I originally saw this movie on TV Years ago and loved it As a Time Travel addict (I love anything to do with time travel and alternative history) this movie was a must I have seen it several times afterwards and found the story to be interesting and entertaining But there was one part of the movie that troubled me the most All the action was taking place both in the present, past and future A man Coke goes back in time to kill his partner whom he invented the time cube with But not just satisfied with just going back into his partners past and killing him when he was born he decides to go back even farther to kill his partners father in the 1800 Interesting theory Grandfather Paradox If I kill the father the other person will not be born however if that person is killed how could he go back in time to kill his grandfather.

Baffling thought Now the show starts when mommy is in a hurry to go with her son to buy something Daddy is busy so he just bids them farewell and goes back inside Suddenly he hears a horrible sound as a criminal been chased by the police rams into the car in which his wife and son are in killing them both in a horrendous fire Now they don't say how long the next part takes place but it's enough for dad to write a thesis about time travel A strange girl appears saying tgat she believes in his thesis on time travel and wants to do research into something They set out and look for a particular town called Crossfire What also happened in the intrim dad and his friend go to a western auction and buy several items With flash backs we see the connections between the items and the past In the one truck there was a photo of three people on display in coffins and just behind them is a man watching and holding a gun in his holster that was not one around at that particular time A far more present time gun This leads our hero to think that he has been gyped but farther analyst proves that the photo is genuine from that time period He then discovers that this woman is from the future and is trying to stop Coke from killing her great grandfather They hunt him down in the past and then return home It is at this point that something goes very much out of kilter and left me very perturbed because there was something inconsistent with the ending Other reviewers have also commented on it The future woman decides to reward him for his services by dropping him off a few minutes before the fatal accident A real case of Deja Vou He saves his wife and son and the movie ends Now this raises a whole lot of questions He started investigating time travel after his wife and son were killed He then writes a thesis on time travel which becomes a hit many years later in the future The woman goes back in time to meet him and try track down Cole They eliminate him but there are some lose ends The Time machine gets squashed into the mud after Coke is killed Very lose end because there is a big possibility that that might be found and used for time travel The second one is his Deja Vou His wife and child are saved Does he still go and do his thesis on time travel and coke then travels into the past to kill the girls grandfather Something does not ring true here A commentator wrote that makes a farce of the whole movie But after very careful deliberation it does make sense Different time lines Let's refer to BACK TO THE FUTURE Marty goes back to 1955 and changes not only his parents past but his own as well Applying this to Time Stalkers it makes sense In the Original time line the movie takes place as shown While they are in the past they change (or Cole changes history) creating a new time line When they get back to the present her allowing him to save his family creates a farther new time line in a new dimension Looking at it from that point of view the three timelines can co exist in three different dimensions The TV series SLIDERS demonstrates that point where they travel to different dimensions Same time same place but different time line changes (Ignore the Kromags story line there) My apologies for not naming the characters in the Time Stalkers movie except for Cold but my memory is very faulty with names (old age LOL)
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Laughable
Miles-1021 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Hate to be a naysayer--No, actually, I don't--but this is a laughable time-travel story. The gimmick of coming up to a fence, going back in time to before the fence was built, crossing the future perimeter, then returning to the present, is a ridiculous waste of time-travel energy. However, the fact that the good guys don't go back in time to warn the general about his killer does not bother me. As Robert Silverberg proved in his great time-travel-novel-cum-thought-experiment, "Up The Line," if you try to go back five-minutes to change what just happened--and you fail--you will only get into more trouble, especially if you run into yourself five minutes ago! A plain silly, highly implausible movie. Nobody's performance is their best. (And I do like Lauren Hutton.) A much better movie is "Back to the Future 3"--or, for that matter, any of the three BTTF movies.
5 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very pleasant, enjoyable film. Worth 10 stars
tavasiloff26 April 2020
I have watched this movie many times and each viewing is like watching it for the first time. Pure escapism enjoyment and you can overlook the 80's special effects. Who cares? The characters shine and casting is excellent. No over-the-top histrionics. Not needed. Sit back, relax and enjoy!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed