Bump in the Night (TV Movie 1991) Poster

(1991 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Reeve shines
slightlymad2224 July 2014
A separated, former New York Newsreporter is passed out drunk on her sofa, when her 8 year old son gets himself ready and leaves for school. She is woken by the telephone saying he has not arrived. He has been abducted by an impostor posing as a friend of his Dad's.

In a very difficult role as a paedophile who abducts the boy, Christopher Reeve is absolutely superb as creepy Lawrence Muller.

Don't be put off by the made for TV tag, Reeve brings his A-Game and Meredith Baxter put in a shift too.

The first half of this movie is the best, the second act where a drunk friend of Baxter's draws an incredible likeness to Reeve in under 60 seconds after seeing him for a couple of seconds, the Police allowing Baxter to interrogate witness's, check registration plates, and have her own police escort without cautioning her for interfering with a police investigation gets a bit implausible, as does the fact that Social Services are never called, and at the happy ending Baxter is allowed to take the boy home without any repercussions for her gross neglect.

But Reeve's performance more than makes up for any other short comings, and it will stay with you long after the move has finished.

I can only guess there must have been some seriously strong contenders for male performances that year, as the fact that Reeve did not even garner a nomination of any kind for this movie is ridiculous.

It's a shame Reeve's performances as Superman (still the best Man Of Steel/Clark Kent for me) over shadowed everything else he did. As he is a damn fine actor.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Christopher Reeve is Terrifying!
Sylviastel6 December 2009
This film is about pedophilia and well-done for the time. The first rate cast includes Meredith Baxter Birney as a single mother and alcoholic whose young son is kidnapped by a pedophile played eerily well by Christopher Reeve in one of his dramatic performances. We know him better from his Superman films and "Remains of the Day." Sadly before his accident, he was truly a gifted actor and is missed today. In this film, we have appearances by Shirley Knight as the friend who tries to help the mother out and the boy's time is running out before he's abused by the pedophile. The story is set in New York City but is filmed in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The horror of the exploitation of children is a huge operation.
mark.waltz29 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
There's no denying the intensity of the performances of Christopher Reeve and Corey Carrier in this expose of the world of pedophiles and their victims and the world beyond, going as deep as the disgusting world of child pornography. The child of a broken marriage, Carrier ends up in the hands of the very troubled Reeve, an unemployed college professor who manipulates Carrier into going with him which sets off a string of violence when alcoholic mother Meredith Baxter tries to find her son. Ex-husband Wings Hauser and Baxter have a contemptuous relationship and can barely look at each other without accusations and threats. This takes the audience into the dark world that is a pedophiles' mind as well as a huge operation of perversion, represented by Terrence Mann playing a truly vile character.

With Reeve, you see the psychological damage growing as Carrier hides from him, with Reeve breaking down over his failure to gain the little boy's trust. He obviously has his own past of abuse, and as easy as it is to feel sorry for him, you can't help but despise him for not getting help. Veteran actresses Geraldine Fitzgerald (as an eccentric cat lady) and Shirley Knight (as a drunken friend of Baxter's) adds detail to the frightening situation that is often far too depressing to watch unfold.

As I began to watch this film, I wondered how the writers could portray without truly disgusting the audience the actions of a pedophile. There is no molestation, just the threat of it, and as gentle as Reeve is with Carrier at the beginning, he gets even more threatening and angry as his inability to get what he wants starts to fail. Certainly the brave decision of Reeve to take this character to the farthest depths of despair makes watching him mesmerizing and it's impossible to hate him even though his intentions are sinister and sick.

How can you resolve this problem for his character yet give closure to his victim becomes a tough detail, and of course, there are three victims: an innocent child of course and the troubled and flawed parents who show their own breakdown approaching as they realize the true terror going on that they have no control over. It's a difficult film to like but it's an even more difficult film to turn away from.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad, not great.
Analog_Devotee14 October 2021
Sometimes I get in the mood for a made-for-television movie, what with their predictable plots, completely unknown cast (in this particular case, however, Christopher Reeve plays a pretty believable scumbag), point-and-shoot cinematography, and overly-dramatic dialogue that's only there to fill time rather than add depth to the characters -- you know, all that good stuff. Hey, say what you will, but I find them to be pretty nostalgic.

Going off title alone, I assumed this flick would be riding firmly in the horror lane. Not the case -- this is definitely a thriller through and through, though you could make the argument that because of the dark subject matter at hand there's some slight crossover. And while it's not a good movie, I think that dark subject matter is actually handled quite tastefully.

Feels kind of like a Richard Laymon novel was tamed down and adapted to screen.

There are better ways to spend an hour and a half, and there are worse. In 1991, it would've been a treat to see something like this at home. Nowadays, not so much.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed