Les caprices d'un fleuve (1996) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A talented actor's second effort.
dbdumonteil27 June 2003
Bernard Giraudeau has always been one of the most ambitious actors of his generation,but his parts were sometimes below par.Fortunately,Scola and Ozon provided him with roles worthy of himself.He tackled directing with a very interesting work "l'autre" ,some kind of Wilder's "the big carnival" in reverse ."Les caprices d'un fleuve" is ,at least to my eyes, not as moving as his debut,but it nevertheless displays a demanding side which we already felt in "l'autre".

Adapting himself the account of a noble who lived circa 1789,Giraudeau makes an endearing if sometimes dragging movie.When this gentleman was exiled in 1987,it was the end of an era,and like La Fayette some years before,the hero discovers wider horizons which make the enclosed atmosphere of Versailles -see the first sequences which feature Jean-Claude Brialy,Lambert Wilson,and other luminaries in cameos- stifling.

A marvelous cinematography makes up for the slow progress of the story.Time seemed to stand still in this Africa and his inhabitants whose main wealth stemmed from slavery ,whereas in France,it moved at the speed of sound.A revolution happened in the country of Voltaire and Rousseau..And yet ...we learn that one of the" heroes "of this revolution dabbles with slaves trade!Giraudeau's hero ,who does not believe in the values of the European "civilization" anymore,has a child with a black woman,and braces himself to an uncertain future.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Giraudeau's humanist nature
GrandeMarguerite20 July 2010
Although I don't want to write a tribute to Bernard Giraudeau with this review, I have to say that his death three days ago (on July 17, 2010) has affected me and it is not without some afterthoughts that I write this. One of the leads of French cinema in the 1980s, Bernard Giraudeau was never satisfied with his persona on screen: cast as a seducer in his first films, he later played more tortured characters. Jean-François de La Plaine, the main character of "Les caprices d'un fleuve", belongs to this category and is certainly a complex one. In 1786, after a duel, this French aristocrat is exiled to a French colony in West Africa on the banks of the Senegal river. There, as governor, he presides over a thriving slave trade. He takes a Mulatto woman as his lover and slowly awakens to love for a young local girl named Amélie.

Giraudeau, an actor/director/writer noted for his humanism, apparently wanted to tell a sort of philosophical tale. Indeed, there is a parallel between the distant tumults of the French revolution and its aftermath and La Plaine's experiences in Africa, as he moves from a world where slavery and privileges go unquestioned to wider horizons; yet as France is in turmoil, time seems to stand still on the coast of Senegal. Giraudeau had definitely something to say on the color of love and prejudice. His film conveys nicely his message, but not always in the best way. On the positive side, "Les caprices..." has a good and concerned supportive cast (after shooting this film, Richard Bohringer took the Senegalese citizenship), a sumptuous cinematography and a beautiful score, a superb mix between 18th century music and African music. But unfortunately the weak characterization and the languid pace turn the film into a rather cold piece of work, when this universal story should have been more touching and moving to allow the viewer to reflect on human condition. In spite of a good and original script, I have to say that Giraudeau did not fully attain his goal. However, "Les caprices..." is worth watching, at least for some valuable lessons in History.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
dare the beauty of the dark continent !
etoukesteph3 July 2004
This story tells of the encounter of many Europeans with the 'Black Continent' in the late 19th Century, and of lessons drawn from this. Much came as a consequence of this encounter between both cultures; quite often children were left behind and the traces of an oppressive invading force left as a souvenir, the indisputable effect of the Whiteman's coming is that of deeply transformed society.

A rare contrast as compared to the often one-sided pictures on the early European arrival on Africa, this story describes the unfinished love story between the 'Old Continent' and the 'Black Continent'. What emerges is a race haunted by quite eternally unanswered questions on the choice of Europe or Africa as home, or on the colour of love.

A brilliant cast, with Bernard Giraudeau and Richard Bohringer.

The art work is quite an impressive; a beautiful capture of the local folklore and its reaction to European invasion.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
african fascination
dromasca17 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
A well-known actor writes, directs and stars in a lavish historical production. No, it's not about Bradley Cooper. Others have done it before him and among them is the French filmmaker Bernard Giraudeau whose film 'Les caprices d'un fleuve', made in 1996, represents an ambitious undertaking with quite spectacular results.

French cinema has quite a rich tradition of confronting the colonial past. The 90s were probably a period of maximum interest for these themes, if we think for example of Régis Wargnier's 'Indochine'. 'Les caprices d'un fleuve' explores the more distant past of French colonial adventures, setting its story in the years immediately before and after the French Revolution. The main hero is a French nobleman, Jean-François de La Plaine, who is exiled by Louis XVI due to his involvement in a duel and sent to the post of governor of the French territories in West Africa. His African exile resembles at first Ovid's exile almost two millennia earlier (weather excluded). He adapts with difficulty to the local morals and is disgusted by the slave trade, practiced both by the ships to the Americas but also by the Arabs coming from the desert, with the complicity of the local tribal chiefs. He exchanges desperate letters with his lover left in France but also finds a local mistress, a gorgeous half-breed. His life begins to change when he receives from a tribal chief a gift that he cannot refuse due to the local customs - a 12-year-old slave girl, whom he names Amélie. Gradually, Jean-François begins to be caught by the fascination of Africa, and at the same time to fall in love with the girl he educates and who grows into a woman. Meanwhile, in France, revolution breaks out. The triumph of the Enlightenment ideas that he had supported means the loss of the privileges of nobility and the position of governorship. What will happen to the relationship between Jean-François and Amélie?

The narrative starts off rather slowly, but viewers who survive the first half hour will witness an increasingly interesting plot, both romantically and historically. The approach is not without its problems, and there will be enough viewers who will feel uncomfortable with the love story between the refined and powerful French nobleman and the teenage African slave. We can also see this connection as a symbol of the asymmetrical relationship between settlers and locals ('civilized' and 'savages'). Screenwriter Bernard Giraudeau tries to avoid paternalism and preconceived judgments and gives the actor Bernard Giraudeau the opportunity to create a complex and not without contradictions role. Director Bernard Giraudeauu relies a lot on the excellent cinematography created by Jean-Marie Dreujou, who manages to convey to the viewers something of the fascination of the African landscape, but also the heat, dust, sweat that constantly surround the heroes. The film's cast is very well chosen, with several well-known actors appearing in cameo roles. Technically, it is a very well made film. Intellectually, it asks some interesting historical questions without guiding its viewers towards one answer or another. For me, the problem with 'Les caprices d'un fleuve' is on the emotional side. The romantic story and historical melodrama are intense, but the film failed to engage me. Maybe it's my fault, maybe the story is too far back in time, or maybe the author's self-imposed detachment to avoid reopening old historical wounds comes at a price.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed