Yes, Yes, Nanette (1925) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Jimmy gets no respect
bkoganbing23 July 2013
Yes Yes Nanette has Stan Laurel as co-director of a silent short subject that has in its cast among others Oliver Hardy and James Finlayson. The two are rivals for Nanette with Ollie as her former blue collar boyfriend and Finlayson as the elegant man about town that she marries.

Lyle Tayo plays Nanette, but it really is Finlayson who carries this short subject. The poor guy marries distinctly below his class and his elegant ways get no respect from Tayo's family. His toupee seems to be a prime target with even the dog having some fun with it.

The only thing this short subject has in common with the Broadway musical No No Nanette is the play on words in the title. But it still is a funny film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"What do you do with your old clothes - after they fall off?"
classicsoncall19 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
For me, this was memorable not only for having Stan Laurel direct future partner Oliver Hardy and James Finlayson in a comedy short, but there's also the added bonus of Little Rascal canine Pete the Dog! Can you believe it? I haven't seen a Rascals flick in a long time, but I remember Petey with the painted eye ring and he was always a trip. Now that I'm thinking about it, I wonder if that was the inspiration for Smiley Burnette's horse every time he teamed up with Gene Autry or the Durango Kid. There's probably a story in there somewhere.

As for this story, it blows by in a scant nine or ten minutes and packs as much as it can into it's short time frame. Basically, Finlayson's Hillory is the brand new husband of the title character (Lyle Tayo) and has trouble making that good first impression with everyone in Nanette's family. His hairpiece gets a real workout before former beau Babe Hardy makes the scene, and I was actually quite surprised when old Hillory makes a stand and dusts him quite handily.

There's a value in these old film shorts even if they're not very good. I enjoy seeing how these comics got their start and gradually developed their style and craft over the years. For my money, Laurel and Hardy wound up not only doing funny things in the movies, but even better, they did things funny.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Yes, yes, why not?
hte-trasme19 September 2009
As has been noted, this one-reel short does indeed have an impressive pedigree from the perspective of Laurel and Hardy fans -- directed by Laurel, starring their perpetual tormentor James Finlayson, and featuring Hardy. However, on this occasion the talented group produced what was really only a throwaway -- a pleasant and likable throwaway, but still a throwaway. Most of the jokes center around the situation that Finlayson is a new groom who just doesn't look up to stuff for his bride's low-class family. Not an Earth-shaking scenario but it works well, with some fun business involving Fin's toupee and a curious 1920s representation of a snotty, gum-chewing teenage girl.

While I love Finlayson's support in the films of Laurel and Hardy, Charley Chase, and other Hal Roach Studios stars, I don;t really think he had what it takes to be a star on his own. He tends to rely a little too much on mugging and freezing his features into an astonished or disapproving "funny face." "'Babe' Hardy," as he is credited, is good in a small role as the uncouth ex-boyfriend. He had a lot of versatility and while he often played "the heavy" during his solo days could slip into almost any type of role.

In all, a fun and enjoyable nine minutes, but nothing to make it stand out too much.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No, No, Jimmy
boblipton20 September 2020
Lyle Tayo brings he new husband home to meet her unprepossessing family. The groom is an equally unprepossessing James Finlayson.

This was during the period when Hal Roach thought he could turn Finn into a starring comic. Alas, despite the best efforts of the directors, he didn't have it in him, and this short is erratic, with an uneven pace of gags.

Interestingly, one of the directors was Stan Laurel. He was stuck behind the camera because he had a contract as a performer with Joe Rock. The one performer who came out ahead is Pete the Pup, making his Roach debut.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very likable silent short
planktonrules6 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This silent short has a very interesting pedigree. Not only do James Finlayson and Oliver Hardy appear in the film, but it was capably directed by Stan Laurel--making it very nice for Laurel and Hardy fans to see the three involved in a pre-teaming of Laurel and Hardy and their best nemesis in one film. However, the value in this film isn't just for the cast but because it also manages to be a very likable short film--one that I am glad I saw.

The film begins with a family learning that their daughter has gotten married and she's bringing her new husband (Finlayson) over to meet them. However, upon seeing him, they immediately assume he's not much of a husband and treat him pretty shabbily. To make things worse, their dog, Pete, isn't nice to him either. In fact, I really liked seeing this mischievous animal (of the Our Gang fame) as it attacked him and later stole the poor man's toupee! Finally, after taking a lot of abuse, things get worse when his wife's old boyfriend (Hardy) arrives and begins manhandling Finlayson. Pushed to the wall, the husband finally explodes and puts everyone in their place--resulting in a very satisfying conclusion.

Short, well directed and funny--this one is worth a look.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
James Finlayson is good in Stan Laurel-directed Yes, Yes, Nanette
tavm11 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I found Yes, Yes, Nanette on a Platinum DVD collection of Laurel and Hardy films. James Finlayson plays a man who meets his wife's family for the first time. There's plenty of gags involving Fin's toupee coming off that's hilarious each time. Oliver Hardy plays a former suitor of the wife who torments Fin. The exchanges between them are a good indication of what to expect when they eventually team with Stan Laurel in several Hal Roach films. I also liked Fin's exchange with the family teenage girl. Yes, Yes, Nanette is indeed produced by Hal Roach with co-direction by Stan Laurel. Well worth seeing for fans of Hal Roach, Laurel and Hardy, and James Finlayson!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Old Timesheets
tedg10 December 2006
Its hard to judge one of these old silent comedies apart from another. They were often made in one day, You watch them for overall effect unless there is some notable feature in them, or they were one of the elaborate projects by men we now think of as greats.

In the group of films that Laurel and Hardy made, or either of them, there are only few worth actually identifying by itself and singling out for a comment. All the rest are residue of timeclock punching. This is notable only as a rare example of a project directed by one of them.

In these cases, you usually look for some indicator into the nature of genius. "Oneyed Jack" is essential viewing, for instance, if you want to plumb Brando — and you need to do that to gain access to a huge corner of the cinematic world.

But this isn't of that ilk. Unless you need the fact that the mentality of both of these men was no nonsense workmanlike. That the humor comes from the casual and cheap, not the elaborate, unusual or even dangerous stuff we would see from others.

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed