Shen tui mi zong shou (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Everything a 1982 kung fu movie should be.
zafner6 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is one silly old kung fu movie. It's loaded with more clichés than you could shake a red-tufted spear at. Absurdly overacted voices (as in, the main bad guy sounds like Beavis)? Check. Blindingly colorful costumes? Check. Woman dressed as a man, and none of the other characters seem to notice, and this is so glaringly obvious that it seems almost like it must be part of the plot somehow? Check. (Actually one of the characters eventually figured it out, so that's okay.) Lack of pan-and-scan resulting in a medium shot of two noses in profile conversing? Check. Glaring plot holes? Characters appearing out of nowhere with no explanation or back story? Old man character played by a young man wearing a long white fake beard? Equally silly 70's wigs? Semi-Rambo-esquire headbands? Gratuitous restaurant interior demolition? Check, check, check, and double check. Evil moustache-twirling villains? Well, they don't actually twirl them; I guess that wasn't in fashion in the Olden Days.

Categorically silly fighting moves? The woman/man shoves food in people's mouths during the fight in the restaurant. People posing without attacking in the background of a fight scene, looking awkward? Galore. Ultrahokey knife-throwing effects? "Whimsical" music? Armies of extras mowed down by the slightest tap on the shoulder? Location shooting in nature ... because that's the cheapest set money can buy? Abominably-acted "drunken" fighting scene? Painfully untranslatable jokes? Hopelessly non-sequitur swearing? Cheesy night-filter effect that almost makes you wonder why people are acting like it's night when it's clearly day? Lightning made of negative scratches? A dungeon with flying snakes? Titillating non-nude bathing-in-a-creek scenes?

Thismovie has got it all. There are some chop-sake flicks that are better, and a lot that are worse. But if you want everything that goes into making a classic kung-fu movie from 1982, you could do a lot worse than to go to WalMart and drop one dollar on this classic of the genre.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
South Korean attempt succeeds and fails simultaneously
ckormos15 January 2017
It starts with a group of monks carrying scripture are stopped by a group of phony monks demanding said scripture. The abbot calls "Bullcrap" and they fight. Abbot is forced to retreat. He escapes with the paid (by Carrie in man's clothes) help of a boat man, Mike Wong Lung. He has good kung fu but is dumb enough to hide inside a bell being rung.

This movie was made in South Korea and that makes me change my mind set while watching it. Movies made in South Korea at that time were not made to show the world their version of what a martial arts movie should look like. The South Koreans made these movies to look exactly like the Hong Kong and Taiwan movies. They were made to copy what was being done in those two cultures. Success was measured by if you could not tell the difference. In this movie that mission was accomplished but that doesn't mean it was any good.

Making the movie becomes like this – "Let's do a scene like that one in Come Drink with Me". So they put Carrie in a large tea house. Then they decide "Let's set up a fight like that scene in that Taiwanese movie". Boring exposition dialog has to be added to try to thread all this together. That's what you get for the whole show. They forget the gratuitous nudity unfortunately. Plus Mike Wong Lung cannot act at all so he starts to copy Bruce Lee.

What you get in the end is a total mess. Sometimes we fans of this genre watch movies that we know are bad because we get a kick out of how bad they are. When you are in the mood to do exactly that this movie fits the bill, otherwise it is useless.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fantastically Awful Kung Fu Film
leur_chaton28 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The reason I bought this film at Walmart was mainly because, at one point on the summary on the back of the DVD, there was the mention of "magic kicks". Now, I've watched this quite a few times with friends and beers, and I have yet to see any "magic kicks". However, this is not the point. The point is that this is an absurdly ridiculous Kung Fu movie. I have yet to decide whether or not this was intentional, but what I do know is that it is a whole lot of fun for a buck. The awful dubbing is particularly entertaining. Also, there is a somewhat adult scene in which a female character "steals" the "essence" of a fellow after some love-making, rendering him temporarily useless. But do not fret, he recovers. Enjoy!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely Absurd. But I love it.
moptoptony23 September 2006
I really don't know what to think about this film. I don't know if it's a lame attempt at a serious kung fu movie or a low-budget parody. But I do know that I've rarely laughed as hard as I did when I saw this movie for the first time. It's a shame that the movie is so rare. My friend found it in Wal-Mart (ha, of all places...) and bought it for less than two dollars. But, good Lord, what a find. If anyone ever finds this film again, and happens to read this review before watching it, let me say this: Do not take this movie seriously. Whether the humor is crafted or unintentional (or both, for that matter,) just regard this movie light-heartedly. It's a blast.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed