Chocky (TV Series 1984) Poster

(1984)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Intelligent and well made.
Rueiro22 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I first had a glimpse of this excellent series in Spain, when I was a boy, although I didn't follow it at the time because science-fiction didn't appeal to me then. After I came to England, I learnt that here it was a big success in its day and has become a cult classic ever since. A couple of years ago, I bought the John Wydham novel -I was quite surprised to learn that he was also the author of the book on which "Village of the Dammed", a favourite film of mine, is based- and read it, and quite enjoyed it because the story is engaging and easy to follow and the scientific jargon is not unintelligible and boring like it happens very often with this kind of stories. So I decided to take a gamble, and bought the DVD of the first season, discovering by the way that is what the novel is about and the two sequels were completely created by the screenwriters. I found the adaptation a very good one and surprisingly faithful to the book, and both James Hazeldine -a very fine actor, sadly gone- and the boy Andrew Ellams are excellent in their parts. I saw all six episodes in one afternoon and I enjoyed them as much as I had hoped. Now, those were the days when British TV was making good quality children's shows with good story lines and aimed to teach some moral and human values to young audiences. Nowadays it is all about fancy special effects and absurd stories that insult children's intelligence instead of stimulating it. However, I guess that to very young audiences "Chocky" can be very hard to follow and even less to understand, sounding rather like mambo-jumbo and resulting tedious, but I would recommend it to youngsters from twelve or so onwards.

The second season is decently good, providing a more satisfactory explanation to Matthew's abduction in the previous one and developing the plot line in that direction, although the Albertine character is rather pompous and becomes quite irritating at times.

But the third season is DREADFUL, TERRIBLE and a complete waste of everything. Fortunately,I began to watch it only in YouTube because it wasn't available on DVD, and I couldn't get beyond the third episode. It has nothing to do with the original idea any more, the whole thing rests now on Albertine shoulders and she has become more childish and arrogant than before, in other words: a spoilt brat and a total pain in the arse. And the new kids are even worse! I wonder what Chocky saw in those half-wits as to want to educate them. Please!! The idea is so silly that it is insulting. The whole thing should be flushed down the drains.

But what matters is the brilliant first season, and I will always regard it as one of the most intelligent and worthy shows for children ever made.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A slow paced, often dull, but ultimately captivating classic.
BrickNash6 February 2020
I, like many here, first saw this show and it's sequels when I was a child in the 1980s. It was memorising, mostly because of the visual effects for Chocky herself and the sparkly vocal effect that was put on actress Glynis Brooks' voice.

Watching it again as a 42 year old adult it's surprising that they ever passed it off as a children's show. It's writing is advanced and far more complex than I think any child could really comprehend. In fact, I do recall not really knowing what the show was about when I was a boy as a lot of it flew over my head. Regardless, it's well acted and well written. Andrew Ellams is superb as Matthew, the boy who is chosen by the Alien entity to be a pupil. He shows a wide range of emotions and puts everything into his performance. It's amazing that Ellams never had any real acting experience previous to this, and also very sad that he never did any more acting after the Chocky saga.

The show isn't without it's problems though. It's a very slow affair, and the pacing feels drawn out - almost to the point where I felt that my attention was waning in certain parts (and that's my adult brain talking). Most of this first series involved the parents just sitting around talking, and I can't quite see how that would be entertaining for a child.

The second (my personal favourite) and third series have much better pacing and more focus on the children which makes for a superior watch I feel. However, despite it's sometimes turgid (some might say dull) pace, there is a better sense of authenticity to this first series.

Regardless of any shortcomings, this is a classic of it's genre, and part of the many "creepy kids shows" which were common at that time and helped to fire young imaginations.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intellectual sci-fi
Leofwine_draca21 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A very different kind of kid's TV show from the 1980s. Based on a book by John Wyndham, this takes a literate and intellectual approach to the material, so no budget STAR WARS heroics or ray gun action here. No sir. Instead we get a quiet, thoughtful and often slow exploration of extraterrestrial intelligence on earth. Well acted by the kid throughout, not much in the way of action or peril, but lots of drama and occasional melodrama.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
80's classic sci fi "kids" TV
cr542 August 2004
I've managed to find these to download and i am amazed by the depth and complexity of what is essentially a children's TV show. this handles the subject of a childs "invisible" friend to another dimension with matthew's friend being some sort of aid to his life, helping him learn to swim to save his sister, helping him paint photo realistic portraits and other miraculous feats.

I cant understand how this was ever classed as children's TV, programs with such subject matter would never make it into the 4 o clock slot on todays TV and its mind boggling it ever did in the early 80s.

Anyone who has any recollection of this would love to see it again, indeed a lot of well slept memories were awoken by the sights n sounds of this series.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another amazing 80's kids show
peter-stoneham6 September 2006
The last time i saw this i was 8 years old, now at thirty i've just seen the first series in it's entirety for the first time in22 years and was blown way.

I remember very little from childhood only a floaty alien thing that talked to a kid. I remember it was eerie o, well i'm not sure what i remember, on a rare occasion I still have in-jokes with my sister to this day.

What struck me was how innovative it was for it's time, an alien entity from another galaxy comes to Earth to find a soul about a better alternative fuel source. Although it finds many things about Earth primitive, it finds humans highly intelligent and uses young Matthew, who is 12, to steer into the direction of science and influence him into discovering this new fuel source through Chocky.

Unfortunately i never read the books but the complexity of the show as someone else said it unique. And for me the boy playing Matthew (Andrew Ellams), stole the show. These days kids shows are full of wannabes who have drama lessons, whereas in the old days they plucked kids off the street who were right for the part and Andrew has it in Bunches. Especially in Ep.2 when Chocky offends him when making fun of him about how primitive cars are, Matthew has a full on tantrum, a complete explosive rage and this kids taking the lead really pulls it off! The show also stars James Hazeldine (of TV's London's Burning) as the father.

If you're a kid of the 80's you'll love it too, seeing Atari's, old school life, and the 80's life, they heyday of our childhood! This series excels and is worth buying on DVD if it's out (I think i did see it once in the UK). I can't say enough good things about it.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Sci-Fi-Drama Classic
kroniskkreativ7 March 2016
I first watched this as a kid, back in 1985, I believe. It struck my as a fascinating and intelligent story, unfolding slowly and perfectly, and Andrew Ellams does a perfect job as the adopted boy Matthew Gore, who one day starts hearing a voice communicating with him. But unlike his little sister make-believe friend Missy, this entity seems to have a separate existence outside of Matthews imagination. It is British, in the sense that it is both well played and quite slow in it's build up. I, for one, enjoy the slowness of it, compared to todays pacing. Don't get me wrong, the series is not at all filled with dead time, but whenever something significant happens to take the story forward, it actually means something. Considering this was more or less a children's show, it is quite complex. My guess is the plan was to make a show that the whole family could watch together. And the fact that season 1 functions so well on several levels seem to support that idea. For any fan of Sci-Fi themes beyond space-westerns with laser guns and spaceships, this is a gem!

I have to briefly mention that there were two more seasons made, season 2 «Chockys Children» and season 3 «Chockys Challenge». Season 2 is far from the quality of season 1, though watchable. Season 3, on the other hand, is dreadful. It clearly shows how much Andrew Ellams carried the first season (he's out of the picture in season 3) and there are just too many things bad about season 3 to even start a rant here.

If you haven't, do watch season 1 of Chocky, it is a true sci-fi- drama classic! Highly recommended.

Fun fact, the opening title music is more or less a rip off of Brian Enos "Sparrowfall". How they got away with that, is beyond me.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best TV show of my childhood
Chockys15 December 2003
I have not read the book, and I took much years in knowledge that existed, but the TV series is simply a masterpiece. The idea that the alien at issue projects her mind to travel by the universe (It seems to me that thus it traveled to the Earth) is innovator, and years later, It conserves Its enchantment. The cast of actors is skillful (in special the child and starring Andrew Ellams). I've got much TV series what love in my life, but this is for me the number one of the number one. I saw It when I was 7 years old, and I couldn't never forget It. "Chocky", the series, would have to show It in TV during years and years. Nothing equal exist.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unpretentious and Enjoyable.
mwstone-702-79494013 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It is always with a bit of trepidation that I approach the film or tv version of a book I liked, wondering whether it will come over so well on the screen. "Chocky", I am glad to say, is one that did and does.

I first read it not long after it was written, and always liked it. Its theme, which has seen quite a bit of use both before and since, is that of "first contact" with an alien being made by a child. 12-year-old Matthew Gore starts hearing "voices" from an alien life form, and the rest of the book is largely his and his adoptive parents' attempts to come to terms with the phenomenon.

The characters, though perhaps better educated than the average, are basically a pretty ordinary lot, and are completely bewildered by what is going on. Matthew's mother, in particular, takes a very good part as she is driven almost hysterical in her attempts to deal with what is happening to her son, and one of my regrets about the sequels is that she did not appear in them. The father manages to stay a bit calmer, and gradually comes to accept that Chocky is real and not a psychiatric phenomenon, but he too is as out of his depth as one might expect in such a situation. As for Matthew himself, to my mind he looks and acts a bit younger than his supposed age, coming over more like a bright ten-year-old, but then his original was a 1950s (or at most early 1960s) twelve-year-old, not a 1980s one, so perhaps the makers of the serial were being true to their source.

In this they were consistent. The serial sticks very closely to the book, which means that it is all very low key and "cosy", with almost no melodrama until we get to the kidnapping at the end, and even that is played down, without violence or much sense that Matthew is in danger - though the parents are convincing as they worry about their missing child. Otherwise, the focus is how matthew's involvement with Chocky impinges on his otherwise pretty normal sort of life, with his teachers raising their eyebrows about the sudden enhancement of his academic and artistic performance.

All in all, the was a good read, and the serial is a good view. If you like it unpretentious and enjoyable, grab this dvd.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic!
notail9912 April 2001
Based on the novel by John Wyndham, this is a great, a sensitive and absorbing adaptation! Two sequels followed (one Australian I believe), but none surpassed this excellent piece of British children's television.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed