The Queen's Necklace (1946) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A necklace that sparkles.
brogmiller26 October 2019
One of L'Herbier's best talking pictures. He had at his disposal of course some of the most illustrious names in the business: Hubert as cinematographer, Thiriet as composer, Douy as art director/production designer, Annenkov as costume designer and Spaak as dialogue writer. Viviane Romance is magnificent as Jeanne de la Motte as is Maurice Escande, for years a luminary of the Comedie Francaise, as the dupe Cardinal de Rohan. The scene where Jeanne is publicly whipped (though tame by today's standards) still impresses. Although the film finishes with her imprisonment she later escaped dressed as a man and sought refuge in that traditional sanctuary for crooks and fugitives from justice: England! The previous reviewer is mistaken in saying that 'there is no Cagliostro'. He does in fact appear in the person of Pierre Dux. As a postscript the last silent film to be shown in Paris was L'Herbier's 'L'Argent'. There are two films which vie for the distinction of being the first French talkie, one of which is directed by Tony Dekain and called.....yes, you've guessed it: 'La Collier de la Reine'!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
quite a good historical movie
myriamlenys29 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Queen Marie-Antoinette loves beauty, luxury and fashion, but not to the point where she becomes totally unreasonable. Offered an opportunity to buy a stunning necklace, she refuses. Instead the money will be used for a new warship meant to add to the power and glory of France. The queen does not realize that a minor noblewoman of dubious morals is about to exploit this little episode to her own advantage...

"L'affaire du collier" is based on a real-life scandal so shocking that it dealt a permanent blow to the reputation of queen Marie-Antoinette. This was deeply unjust, since the poor woman had nothing to do with the criminal shenanigans perpetrated in her name. The scandal may even have precipitated the French Revolution. Anyway, it can't have helped...

The criminal plot at the heart of the scandal was quite complex. The movie does a good job of introducing the various victims, dupes and conspirators, all of whom become living, breathing individuals with their own motives and ambitions. The acting is excellent and Viviane Romance, especially, impresses as crooked countess Jeanne de la Motte, who seems to have been the criminal mastermind behind all this.

The movie is also quite good at evoking the dangerously decadent and immoral environment of a place like Versailles, where even cardinals (supposedly princes of the Church and men of God) pursue wordly vanities and self-serving plots. These same princes of the Church think nothing of subsidizing sorcerers, fraudsters and alchemists, up to and including a man pretending that he's over 2000 years old and that he used to know Cleopatra and Jeanne D'Arc. Versailles may have magnificent chandeliers, but these chandeliers illuminate scenes strangely reminiscent of the casino, the lunatic asylum, the bordello.

The movie boasts opulent sets, magnificent costumes and stellar props. The reconstruction of the fabled necklace does indeed stun, although I've got to say that I've seen even larger reconstructions complete with giant bows. (One rather suspects that Marie-Antoinette was supposed to wear the thing while being supported by two or three unusually muscular court ladies.)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A strange affair
dbdumonteil24 August 2005
This is,by large, an accurate account of the famous story which was widely talked about during the years before the French revolution.The version featuring Hilary Swank was overblown,making countess de la Motte a romantic heroine .L'Herbier's version shows la Motte as she was: a smart crook who could put anyone on ,including the unfortunate Rohan.The part was tailor-made for Viviane Romance,who often played the bad gals (she was also "la voisin" in "l'affaire des poisons").In this version,there is neither Cagliostro nor la Motte's father-Robin-Hood.This is the one to recommend.Marcel L'herbier,one of the pioneers of the French cinema offers one of his best latter days works.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stunning and elaborately sumptuous reconstruction of the most scandalous affair in French royal history
clanciai11 January 2021
Viviane Romance is of course the star here who sustains the entire picture and who succeeds in even outshining queen Marie Antoinette who is ousted out into the shadows, which she also was in reality by this astronomical deceit perpetrated by Jeanne de la Motte (Viviane Romance) who succeeded in duping even a royal cardinal in outrageous manipulation. The tragedy of the story is that the queen got all the blame and never recovered from her sullied reputation, although she was completely innocent - she actually turned the offer of the necklace down, probably the most expensive jewellry ever manufactured, while others saw a great opportunity for personal greed and used it ruthlessly. Although Jeanne de la Motte was sentenced and justly punished by lashing and branding, she actually got away, fled to England and from there carried on a ruthless propaganda campaign against Marie Antoinette, claiming to be a victim of the queen and asserting her innocence in flamboyant and outrageous insolence. The film includes most of the very complicated turns of this mess of a scandal and even gives an excellent rendering of the perhaps greatest charlatan of all times, the Sicilian Count Cagliostro, also known as Joseph Balsamo and many other names, and ending up badly like all the others of this crooked game. Maybe the peak of the scandal was that the poor gullible cardinal de Rohan actually was aquitted, while he must be held accountable for having allowed himself to be duped and not even resigning as a cardinal from church. He was considered as much a victim of the court as Jeanne de la Motte, and although he was innocent in his naïve stupidity and a victim of his own folly of credulousness, he did have a heavy responsibility as a prince of the church, while the criminality of the woman Jeanne de la Motte will remain a wondrous mystery for all times as a most incredibly destructive and abnormal mind.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed