La hantise (1912) Poster

(1912)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not really about the Titanic
Beney11722 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Madame Trévoux is told by a psalmist that either her son or her husband is gonna tragically die, just before the husband travels aboard the Titanic. However, the husband survive the sinking, and nothing serious happen to the child, which means that the psalmist was wrong.

The real historical events concerning the Titanic are barely presented, and the sinking hilariously lasts less than 30 seconds. It's also weird to think that the movie was release only a few months after the tragedy. It feel very exploitative.

Once the movie is over, we realize that the main subject is not the 2000 innocent victims who died because of gross negligence, but rather the criticism of clairvoyants and belief in the occult.

Because of this bizarre mix of themes, the exploitative and historically inaccurate nature of the movie, and the very average cinematography, I recommend this short film only to those who are very interested in the Titanic and it's representation in the media.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Obsession review
JoeytheBrit24 June 2020
An early attempt to make capital out of the Titanic disaster, this Louis Feuillade drama was released just six months after the ship went down. The plot concerns a wife who is informed by a fortune teller that either her husband or son will shortly die, just weeks before hubby books a cabin on the shiny new liner. It's a decent enough tale for the era, but the use of the disaster as a plot device so soon after the event is distasteful to say the least. Only an incomplete print survives, with key scenes replaced by a descriptive intertitle.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Obsession
Michael_Elliott10 August 2010
La hantise (1912)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Extremely bizarre film that's pretty hard to judge because it's difficult to make any sense of it. A mother (Renee Carl) goes to see a palm reader who informs her that a loved one is about to die. The woman doesn't know if it's her son or her husband (Rene Navarre) but history buffs will know who it is as it's April 10, 1912 and the husband is about to board Titanic. This film was released in France in October so it was just a few months after the real tragedy so I'm really curious as to how people took this film when it was released. While watching the film it's hard to know if they were just exploiting the tragedy or if they were trying to show that palm reader was a major scam. In a way I feel that they were trying to show palm readers as frauds but if so why on Earth rub salt in what was probably still a tender subject for many people? The entire bit with the palm readers being brought down is sadly lost so the Kino disc just gives us some text as to what happened in the third act. I really didn't have a problem with this but you still scratch your head as to the Titanic stuff being used. We even get actual footage of the Carpathia bringing survivors back and even this is added into the plot of the movie. Personally, I think it was in pretty bad taste to use the Titanic subplot but then again, had they not used it then it's doubtful this film would be remembered today. The performance by Carl is a pretty good one and the supporting cast isn't too bad either. At 24-minutes even without the missing footage, the thing runs a tad bit too long and the psychological drama that the director goes for is never really captured. With that said, it's hard not to recommend this movie simply because of the strange story and what it uses a real tragedy to push it's message.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Perhaps the earliest film about the Titanic tragedy--it sure seemed a bit exploitative!
planktonrules3 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A man is going to cross the Atlantic, but his wife and child convince him to stay--as they are worried about his safety. Later, the worried wife goes to see a psychic--who tells her she is about to lose a loved one! The husband later learns that the ship is "practically unsinkable" and decides to take the trip after all--and it turns out that it's the Titanic!! The wife's worst suspicions turned out to be correct--the ship is lost! But, in a twist, you find that the man is quite safe. Now the worrying mother wonders if the one who will die will be her son.

Now the following portion of the film turns out to be missing (if I'd known, I might not have bothered watching it). Because of this, there is a screen with "Scenes Missing" and a paragraph explaining what happened in this section. I guess you can't blame the Kino folks that much for this--as most older films from this period have decomposed or caught fire due to the volatility of the nitrate film stock.

As far as what occurs next, the father sets out to reveal this palm reader to be a fake. I really wish it had all been included with the film, as it sounded like a great scene....that we'll probably never get to see! Overall, because of the missing ending, it's probably not worth seeing. However, people curious about the Titanic may find it worth seeing--though it seemed a bit tacky and exploitative to include this in the film!.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Astonishing early movie that even includes the Titanic
morrisonhimself11 November 2019
Though very old-fashioned in that most scenes are set as for stage viewing, that is, with the camera locked down and not moved, this 107-year-old motion picture is pretty amazing.

It's well acted and the intertitles do not intrude too much.

It's French and seems rather advanced for 1912, but then I need to be reminded the Lumiere Brothers were considered co-inventors of the motion picture.

And the "special effects" must have intrigued, if not shocked, audiences of that era, and genuine footage of one of the ships involved in rescuing survivors of the Titanic is also inserted.

Very well worth the time to watch, if only for the historical value.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed