Flannelfoot (1953) Poster

(1953)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Plodding detective tale
Leofwine_draca13 November 2015
FLANNELFOOT is yet another detective thriller from director Maclean Rogers, who also handled the similarly-themed Paul Temple films and MARK OF THE PHOENIX. This one's about a notorious jewel thief (the oddly-monikered 'Flannelfoot') who turns to murder to cover up his crimes. The police are in hot pursuit in a chase that takes them across Europe.

There's really nothing about FLANNELFOOT that makes it stand out from the crowd; everything about it is distinctly ordinary, not least the lead performance from Ronald Howard (son of the more famous Leslie). Ronald Adam is better even if he's once again typecast as a detective, and there are supporting roles for Ronald Leigh-Hunt and Graham Stark, but it's all so, well, ordinary, that you won't really care.

The plotting is chock full of the usual twists and turns and red herrings and it only really starts getting lively for the climax (and Rogers once again can't resist utilising a rooftop setting for the ending). But FLANNELFOOT has a cheap, workmanlike quality to it which saps the viewer's enjoyment.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So who is the well known face in this smudgy British noir?
trimmerb123410 August 2017
It's TV's Diana Coupland (1928-2006) '70s sitcom star and TV regular, appearing in her first film as a night club band singer. What is noticeable is how well she sings. So she should - that was her first career IMDb notes.

Ronald Adam was an excellent actor, frequently cast, and at his best, as an authority figure (Prime Minister in "Seven Days to Noon"). Once at least as baddie mastermind. Here though he is a detective, old enough to be his boss's father. The sight of him apologising to his younger boss "Sorry, Sir, I don't know what came over me" is strange one. I am guessing that this was the only in his career.

Graham Stark plays a convincing professional nark.

The film tries too hard to model itself on its American noir predecessors. Comedy band Bonzo Dog once lampooned slavish imitation of the genre: "Have you got a light, Mack?" "No but I've got a dark brown overcoat" The print shown unfortunately is very soft - if the print had been sharp and sparkling and photography seen to better advantage, I think viewers would have a better opinion of it. As it is, it is the cinematic equivalent of a long rainy afternoon, the sound track even sounds like one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More red herrings than in the North Sea
malcolmgsw22 July 2015
This is the sort of mystery film where there are more red herrings floating about than in the north sea.It is a complicated,not to say over plotted film.Probably more suited to the cinema than the TV.That is because if your attention is distracted for more than a few seconds then you loose the thread of the plot and it then takes you minutes to catch the thread again.This what happened to me whilst watching this film.I did not manage to guess who the guilty suspect was,so credit to the screenwriters on that point.unusual to see Graham Stark playing a crook,albeit a rather comical one.The film is really not better nor no worse than many similar thrillers that were being made at the same time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Very Poor Man's 'Ringer'
richardchatten18 October 2019
The title suggests a comedy, but is actually the alias of an arch criminal who occasionally kills someone to keep things interesting; presumably inspired by Edgar Wallace's 'The Ringer', the most recent film version of which had hit cinemas the previous year.

Set mostly in the stately home of newspaper baron Lord Wrexford, in which people spend most of the film pedestrianly lined up by director Maclean Rogers discussing the case; Rogers occasionally showing a modicum of visual imagination when somebody else gets murdered (there's a remarkably graphic shot of a dead man with his eyes open), and in the prologue set in Berlin which begins with a close-up a very young Diana Coupland as a leggy nightclub singer languidly lighting up (less surprising than it at first sounds to those who know she later dubbed Ursula Andress's singing voice in 'Dr.No').
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flannelfoot review
JoeytheBrit29 June 2020
A host of suspects fail to enliven this British cheapie in which a police detective searches for the titular master criminal. Some familiar faces amongst the cast, but it's otherwise totally forgettable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mediocre B Film fails to ignite interest.
geoffm6029530 June 2020
A successful jewel thief and murderer keeps Scotland Yard on its toes, as well as on the back foot, as he continues to elude their clutches!! Enter languid, pipe smoking detective, Ronald Howard and his senior colleague, Ronald Howard. Both men seem disinterested and lacking in energy, hence the film plods along, and generally there is far too much talking and a conspicuous lack of action or tension. Most of the scenes are only enlivened by the amount of smoking and drinking which goes on in sitting rooms by various middle class men in suits and the ladies in their cocktail dresses. The storyline meanders aimlessly along, with the result that it robs the film of any direction or purpose. There is no attempt to flesh out any of the characters, who thus come across as unconvincing and one dimensional. This is a dull, low budget B film, which was made as a time filler.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than usual British B mystery of the early fifties
robert-temple-129 April 2015
There are lots of interesting location shots in this film showing early fifties London, with the scars of bombing still apparent. 'Flannelfoot' is the name given to a jewel thief because he makes no sound with his feet as he slips in and out stealing priceless gems. No one knows who he is, except that he is 'one of us', i.e. of the smart set. There are lots of red herrings, some darker red than others, swimming around in this story, where we are kept guessing until the last. My goodness, the manners and mores of yesteryear! There is one hilarious shot where four men in white dress scarves and black overcoats, clearly men of fashion out on the town for an evening, say 'We had better not call attention to ourselves,' as they seek to investigate the mystery incognito and mix with ordinary folk. Calling Michael Arlen! But this film is amusing and worth watching for those interested in old British movies and what things were like back then.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyably old-fashioned mystery
wilvram12 May 2011
After some melodramatic title music, we open with that near obligatory scene of 1950s crime films, a woman singing in a nightclub to an audience of heavy smokers, in this case it's Diana Coupland in her film debut. In fact she lights one up herself as she goes into her rendition of 'fascinating man' It is post-war Berlin and Inspector Duggan (Ronald Adam), is apparently on the trail of a notorious black marketeer, who then makes an unsuccessful attempt on his life, seriously injuring him in the process.

We now switch to London, where Duggan, assisted by Detective-Sergeant Fitzgerald (Ronald Howard) is put on to the case of Flannelfoot, a ruthlessly successful burglar and jewel thief whom is believed to be connected with the events in Berlin, though Duggan claims he has lost his memory of much that happened there. Assisting the police is a newspaper proprietor and his ace crime reporter Frank Mitchell (Jack Watling). Attempts are made to trap the eponymous villain, but it is only after two murders and several more robberies that he is finally caught.

Though there was a notorious burglar in the 1930s known as Flannelfoot, whose sordid crimes took place far from the high society background depicted here, and the story is attributed to Ex-Inspector Jack Henry, it owes a great deal to authors Edgar Wallace and Francis Durbridge. A small-time cockney crook and informer (Graham Stark) is murdered right under the noses of the police and an outwardly respectable doctor is a fence of stolen jewels. There are shoals of Red Herrings, enabling the identity of the villain, 'a master of accents and disguise' and portrayed in classic stage fashion, wearing a slouch hat, dark glasses and muffler, to come as a satisfactory surprise. It all ends with a fight on a roof, a conclusion that director Maclean Rogers was so fond of that he used it in at least two other thrillers, PAUL TEMPLE RETURNS, and ASSIGNMENT REDHEAD, the latter incorporating footage of Ronald Adam by the ruins of the Berlin building. Like most of Rogers' films, FLANNELFOOT is silly at times, preposterous at others, but great entertainment for fans of British second features.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"£500 is a lot of money to an old lag"
hwg1957-102-26570417 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
There's quite a lot of plot and a lot of characters to keep tabs on in the film as Scotland Yard, a newspaper and a crime novelist get together to track down 'Flannelfoot', a prolific jewellery thief. After many turns in the plot the culprit is eventually revealed which was a surprise but the rushed ending didn't really explain the background of the surprise. So one just thought, oh it was him, OK. The film does keep one's interest throughout though and there are some likeable performances; Graham Stark as a low-level stoolpigeon, Ronald Adam as a traumatised police inspector, Vanda Godsell as a flirty wife and Mary Germaine as lovely love interest Kathleen. A pleasant mystery yarn.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Record this you need to watch again
acwilson-5512613 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Great little Brit mystery thriller with a story that you have watch very carefully, there are a some plot drops that throw you the leads and then no, they are there to put you off the real sent . As others have said you got to be good to get the real man/woman that has done the real crimes.

I myself was thrown way off the mark and the end was a great surprise to my plot workings .

It was written by a real retired police officer, and he did a bag up job of writing a supremely good thriller that you want to see again after the great reveal ending . I wanted to see if I could work out -now I know who the crook is - through watching carefully the real criminal in this mystery crime picture as the film unfolds.

You could make a great remake of this thriller.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed