Brother (2000) Poster

(I) (2000)

User Reviews

Review this title
141 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very enjoyable (a quick review)
antony-11 January 2005
Normally I like to give more detail in a review, but this is a quick one.

I enjoyed this movie a lot. I'm not entirely sure why. I think mostly it was just plain fun. 'Beat' Takeshi was just brilliant in the role of Aniki. It's a sign of a great actor when he can command your attention without really doing anything.

I loved its thoughtful pace and purpose, and how there was a real symmetry in the story. In terms of introduction of the characters and their interactions, the story closes in reverse really nicely. I won't say much more, as I don't want to spoil it; it's not major, just nicely done.

All in all, I highly recommend it. It's quite violent at times, but if you're okay with that (and hell, perhaps even like it in a Kill Bill kind of way) then definitely check this out.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Least Interesting Of Kitano's Films, But Still Good
I am a huge fan of the brilliant cinematic genius Takeshi Kitano, his films "Hana-Bi" (1997) and "Violent Cop" (1991) are two of my all-time favorites and I also found several other Kitano films such as "Zatoichi" (2003) excellent. "Brother" of 2001 is in my opinion Kitano's weakest film up to date, which does not mean that it's bad. It is just not quite as brilliant as Kitano's other work. Kitano is once again director and leading actor, and he once again delivers a great performance in the lead.

Yakuza Aniki Yamamoto (Kitano) flees to America after his death is ordered by a Yakuza clan. Yamamoto goes to LA where his younger brother Ken is supposed to study. Instead of studying, however, Ken deals drugs with some American friends. And it doesn't take Yamamoto long to plan some drastic improvements for his little brother's gang...

Takeshi Kitano's performance is once again superb, this guy certainly is one of the greatest cinematic multi-talents who ever lived. I found the Japanese characters great in general, and if it was only for them, "Brother" would have probably almost reached Kitano's masterpieces in brilliance. I personally didn't like the American characters though. Omar Epps certainly is a good actor, but his character of Denny is just not very deep, simply the very stereotypical African American street gangster seen in two out of three cheesy Hollywood blockbusters. And that counts for the other American characters too. It wasn't actually that bad with Omare Epps, simply because he is a very good actor. Besides the flatness of the American characters, I found the movie very good. It is once again beautifully and imaginatively filmed in typical Kitano style, and it has the typical Kitano humor that I love. The movie is also very violent, so it's probably not for people who are easily offended by brutality in films. What I also really like about "Brother" is the fact that at least half of the movie is in Japanese. The Japanese characters also talk Japanese when they are in the US.

"Brother" is arguably Kitano's weakest movie, and definitely my least favorite of his movies, but that doesn't mean it's bad. We're talking about a great cinematic genius here, and "Brother" certainly is a good, suspenseful, entertaining, stylish and interesting film. In case you don't know Kitano yet, i recommend to watch "Hana-bi" or "Violent Cop" before watching this, but in case you're already familiar with Kitano "Brother" is certainly worth watching. My fellow Kitano fans should not miss this. Recommended 7/10
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Absolute genius.
zombieman197815 May 2006
When I rented Takeshi Kitano's stunning masterpiece brother, it was simply because I wanted to get myself further immersed in Asian cinema. Although, I'm was a little bit iffy because of the fact that Omar Epps was in it, and I was worried that it would be some piece of americanized garbage. But when I watched it,I was completely blown away. It was intelligent without being terribly confusing, and it was violent without being overly gross. This is one of the best movies I have ever seen, and is quite possibly one of the greatest films ever made. The story concerns Aniki Yamomoto (Takeshi kitano, under the name Beat Takeshi) who joins a very well-to-do yakuza family in japan. But when a price is put on his head, he flees to America, to set up shop there with his younger brother Ken (kuroudo Maki under the name Claude Maki) and his gang, which includes a black man named Denny (Omar Epps). They run into trouble with other mobs in the city, but Aniki's style of war brings them on a steady inclination to the top. Underrated and under-appreciated, this little gem is definitely a good one to own, as it is truly a cinematic masterpiece.
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lyrical genius in love with savage violence?
Manicheus9 July 2002
"Brother" makes the "Godfather" trilogy look like a kindergarten Christmas production. Kitano is definitely glorifying gratuitous violence, I am sorry to say it but it's true. He's smart and chic enough to know that he could be making wonderfully poetic films for the artsy crowd but perhaps he wants to offend on purpose. However, he ends up making beautifully directed odes to brutality in which japanese contemporary society appears only as backdrop against the vicious and callous homicidal maniacs obssessed with serial killing. Here, Kitano ,expatriated in LA, quickly manages to practically wipe off entire Cholo (Chicano) mob population: dozens of bodies mowed left and right with an aide from three inept street hustlers (one of whom is his americanized half-brother)... Of course, "Brother" does have Kitano's trademark scenes even if not nearly as elaborate as those in "Sonatine" or "Fireworks": a brief long-shot scene at the beach and a GREAT roof scene with the paper airplane...LOOK, OF COURSE, FOR SOME CHOPPED FINGERS ETC.

I am perhaps rambling a little. It shows you how ambivalent my feelings about Kitano in fact are. On one hand I like him a lot and consider him a rarely gifted film maker. In fact, one of the finest. On the other hand I deeply deplore his basic premises: death and misogyny. I can't make up my mind. I keep wanting to stay away from his films and I end up seeing them one after another. A strange experience for me.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant gangster picture sliced to ribbons by the M.P.A.A.
Captain_Couth3 December 2003
Brother (2000) marks the English language directorial debut for Takeshi Kitano in this cross over gangster film about a deposed Yakuza living in exile on the streets of L.A. This entertaining and surprisingly fast moving picture (for a Kitano film) release date was delayed in the United States by more than a year. When it was finally released the film played mainly in Art houses and was heavily edited by the old cronies that sit on the M.P.A.A. board. It's impossible to see this movie how it was original meant to be show. Sadly, prior releases (even on video) were the same old prints that were used during it's theatrical release. Ho-hum. I recommend the director's/international version of this film. The M.P.A.A. cut lacks the punch of the original.

A+ (International)

B+ (american)
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Kitano´s best, but still a good movie!
DJ Inferno26 May 2002
"Brother" may be Kitano´s most well-known and successful movie, but after all it´s just another sign that success at the box offices doesn´t make the perfect movie, because it lacks in many respects: the story is too one-dimensional and delivers nothing really new, the characters are not developed enough, excluding the brilliant play of Omar Epps and, of course, Kitano himself. However, if you like heavy gunfight violence in the style of "Reservoir Dogs" or Takeshi´s elder "Violent Cop" this is the right film for you! The body count is higher than in all Quentin Tarantino/Sam Peckinpah films together and even some gore like cut off fingers and heads is brought on here and there. Once more the violent pictures are laid under with beautiful piano music what gives some disturbing aspects as well as emotional rollercoasters to this film. Definitely one of the better gangster movies of the last few years, but not the best as often said. A good film which is a little bit overrated... Can´t await to see Kitano´s "Battle Royale" - this one must be really brilliant..!
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun for some of the family
politic198329 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Takeshi Kitano's career can be broken down into a series of loosely-connected trilogies. His career started with what could be described as the 'Violence Trilogy', with his yakuza/cop dramas "Violent Cop", "Boiling Point" and "Sonatine" in the early Nineties. This was followed in the latter half of the decade with three introspective, considered and more intimate films "Kids Return", "Hana-bi" and "Kikujiro". There is also the autobiographical "Takeshis" trilogy, looking at his career as a celebrity ("Takeshis"), director ("Banzai! Glory to the Filmmaker") and artist ("Achilles and the Tortoise"). And the straight yakuza drama of the three "Outrage" films.

But after the increased international success that he experienced in the Nineties, he tried a trio of more experimental films, taking himself a little out of his comfort zone and trying new things. All had elements which had been seen from him before, but placed in a new context. All would have good international recognition, but also served as a turning point for his career. Following this more experimental trilogy, his films became less readily-available in the West, as well as a decline in their reception, as he struggled to re-find his voice as a filmmaker.

The starting point was - riding on the wave of international success - the Tokyo-LA crossover "Brother". But, despite being an international co-production, this is very much from the perspective of a Japanese in America, rather than a Japanese director making a Western film.

The title is an obvious play on Kitano's role as Aniki, the Japanese term for an older brother or senior, and the African-American culture in which he finds himself. With his family in Tokyo about to be absorbed by their rival after the death of their boss, Aniki's refusal to co-operate makes him a dead man walking. He has to leave the country, and so heads for LA to stay with his younger half-brother Ken (Claude Maki).

Sent to study in America, Aniki is less than impressed to find him a low-level drug dealer. But knowing only one way to live, his natural yakuza comes out, and he is quick to turn Ken's crew, led by Denny (Omar Epps), into a more organised crime unit. Working in drugs, they unite with the local Japanese of Little Tokyo and take over the Mexicans, but when the mafia get involved, their demise will be as fast and their rise.

Whether or not trying to win favour with a Western audience, the violence on offer here is much more in your face (quite literally in Denny's case), with guns firing at will from all angles. Aside from the dark alley scene, where the flashing of machine gun fire temporarily lights up those getting riddled with bullets as in "Sonatine", most of the gunplay is straight point-and-shoot mass murder. Perhaps Kitano is playing with us, however, as you feel his tongue in his cheek in the final showdown, where an unnecessarily large mafia firing squad choreograph their act. Maybe he feels America is a more gun-loving society!

But the editing is not as clever and well-worked here. Things are shown, more than implied, and there is even the use of montage as a storytelling device to chart the rise of the crew, making this a slightly lazier film. The script also feels a little awkward in parts, notably Aniki's handling of tips with the hotel porter and their meeting with the Mexican bosses. It does feel written by an outsider.

The fish-out-of-water setting also allows Kitano to fall back into his standard character with elements of the stone-faced, shades-wearing man of few words; a step back from the more lively and expressive portrayal of Kikujiro. And this is very much a Kitano film, with moments of play frequently incorporated bringing with them humour as the Japanese and African-Americans bond; and the heavily male-orientated cast and its hierarchical structures. Again, women are left out of this male bonding, with female characters very much on the periphery.

But, despite its flaws, "Brother" has that fun air of an American action film and is an easy watch. This is a more simplistic, blatant and entertaining film than much of what came before it. Less rewarding, but serves you well on a Saturday night in. Not exactly a jump over to Hollywood, this is a film set in another country, made in a style the director felt reflective of the host's style. Indeed, Katsumi Yanagijima's angled cinematography shows the scene being viewed from a different perspective.

Politic1983.home.blog.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another masterpiece from Kitano
Bogey Man29 June 2002
Takeshi Kitano's Brother is Kitano's masterpiece among his other films. I really haven't seen bad film from him. Brother is set in America as Kitano's character travels to US from Japan, and starts new life there. He has his half brother living there so he has a place to live in. Soon he starts to have new friends and become a leader and member of their new gang/yakuza. Violent confrontations with other gangs and mafia take place as everyone is willing to use violence and vengeance in order to settle things.

Brother has all the usual and breath taking Kitano elements we've learnt to see. The flashbacks of events, long shots without editing, character's faces that say more things than 100 words, images of beauty and peace and wry humor, among others elements. The main theme in Brother is loyalty and friendship that becomes even love. The last scene is fantastic and very unusual for Kitano; never has he underlined his message this clearly as he does in Brother's finale. It is so purifying scene and really makes the point clear, but still, most people don't understand anything about Kitano's films, because they are so personal and different compared to Western mainstream films.

Brother is like a combination of Violent Cop and Hana'Bi. It has Violent Cop's bleakness and Hana-Bi's beauty and sadness. Brother is very sad film at times, and only last scene gives something really positive and also optimistic. Hana-Bi is very sad and beautiful film, and these two, Brother and Hana-Bi, have much in common. Both were composed by the same guy, Joe Hisaishi, who did fantastic job especially in Hana-Bi and also Sonatine. Violent Cop is very gritty and also pessimistic film, and is very similar to Brother in its overall look of life. Both films are also very calm and restrained and not as visually stunning as Hana-Bi and Sonatine. All these films are masterpieces of Japanese cinema, and it is interesting to see how Kitano mixes elements from his other films and creates always something new and immortal.

The violence is very brutal and challenging but definitely not gratuitous or exploitative. Kitano's violence is always very symbolic and sudden, and not necessarily realistic. These films analyze many aspects of violence as a tool of communicating for weak souls. Kitano definitely doesn't justify violence or praise it; he just shows what most people or film makers probably wouldn't even dare to think of, and once the viewer may be thinking "yeah, kill that b****rd!" the film turns against the viewer and makes him think what he just said and accepted. The more emotionally challenging film is, the more noteworthy it becomes and Kitano's films are perfect examples of that.

Brother is also occasionally filled with Kitano's wry and personal humor which was at its taunting in his Boiling Point. Brother has many great personal touches of its creator and every time Kitano's character laughs here, there is something very twisted in his mind and going on. Brother is not thoroughly cynical film after all, and these humoristic touches only add to the great purification of the last scene.

The film criticizes yakuza also pretty much and with the director's personal style, as there are numerous scenes involving yakuza rites and codes of honor. Also, there is a great scene involving basketball and yakuza member's attempt to get the ball and be king of the game and have a feeling of being somebody. Boiling Point has plenty of these scenes and tones as the gangsters play tough guy with big guns and thus try to get acceptance. These films really should make yakuzas ask themselves, why?

I am totally stunned by cinematic styles Kitano uses in his films. The editing and photography is so incredibly smooth and stylish, and creates the atmosphere of the film. The faces are among the most important details in Kitano's films as there are so many things to be read from characters' faces. For example, there is awesome scene in Brother's beginning where Kitano "sees" the death of a yakuza boss. Kitano has totally unique sense of beauty, sensitivity and expressing emotions that has no comparison from other films. His character doesn't talk too much in his films, but anytime he says something, he says and expresses more than thousand words. His films are immortal and can be seen over and over again, and still they have plenty of things to offer for the lover of this unique cinema.

Brother is among Kitano's greatest films and I definitely give this ten out of ten, because there are absolutely no negative aspects in this film, and this proudly stands in Takeshi Kitano's filmography.
42 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Symphony of deaths
valadas19 October 2005
This movie has got the highest deal of violent deaths per square meter I have ever seen in cinema. And many of them totally gratuitous. The movie is well directed and quite solid in technical terms but in terms of content it leaves much to be desired. As a matter of fact it's only the story of a Japanese Yakuza gangster who goes to Los Angeles and after becoming the boss of a small group of petty drug dealers to which his younger brother already belongs, strengthens it and starts a war against other gangster families first also Japanese, then Latino and finally the Italian Mafia whose gun power is much higher since they use machine guns against Yakuza's pistols. We have the opportunity to watch also the Japanese code of honour in action even among Yakuzas and this is perhaps the most interesting feature of the movie. The rest is rather uninteresting, showing a succession of killings which happen almost every minute with lots of blood spilled everywhere and bodies jumping like puppets under fire. A weak story though told in an efficient style.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Guys in suits and sunglasses murder one another.
jzappa11 October 2006
Beat Takeshi is a filmmaker so distinct and so completely different from any other filmmaker that you have to be prepared before seeing one of his films to watch something differently than you normally would. Brother is his first overseas production, and to this day his only one, and perhaps its minimal success and marginal fan base is due to its seeming lack of plot, its evasive editing, or something else that Takeshi customarily draws attention to, whether purposefully or not.

Brother is not quite his best film, but you will realize that the focus is not on the story but on the themes of its story. Completely unlike its characters, especially Takeshi's stone cold killer, its story is something to feel your way through. These characters do not feel much. They do. The movie is mostly made up of deadpan scenes of bloody violence, occasional dialogue, and quiet medium closeups. The music, which like in all Takeshi films is lush and emotional, directs our feelings.

Brother is great for fans of crime movies, gangsters, violence overall, Asian cinema, and even action fans, but Takeshi Kitano's style is a strangely deadpan and very personal approach. It's an acquired taste.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hard to keep track of all the deaths and bloodshed!
planktonrules21 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. According to IMDb, the body count in this film is a whopping 78! Had I known this ahead of time, I probably wouldn't have watched this film. I am usually turned off by overly violent films, as too often there isn't much of a story and it's just an excuse for gross-out special effects that appeal to our lowest instincts. So did the film win me over or was it just another blood-fest? Well, it did impress me--that's for sure.

Takeshi Kitano (also known as Beat Takeshi) wrote, directed and starred in this film. It begins in Japan and two rival yakuza clans are at war with each other. Eventually, to end the conflict, the surviving members of one clan officially join the other--all but one hard guy (Kitano). Instead of killing him, however, they send him overseas--to an exile, of sorts.

Kitano arrives in America to stay with his younger half-brother. However, the younger guy is a punk drug dealer hanging with low-lifes--not a yakuza big-wig like Kitano. One of the younger half-brother's friends (Omar Epps) meets Kitano--and the meeting is very memorable! In fact, EVERYTHING about his dealings with Kitano turn out to be memorable. Kitano soon decides to take out the half-brother's enemies and starts a gang war with the Mexican gangs thanks to his crazy macho ways--and Kitano seems not the least bit concerned during all this as his face is quite deadpan and cold throughout. After all, in his mind, if people hurt you, just kill them...as well as their friends. He is truly a scary guy here! And, a scary get bent on taking over everything. At least it's nice to see a man with ambition! Following Takeshi's example, his small band of punks quickly grows. And, so does their ambition and love of violence. Among all this is a weird suicide scene (in fact, there was another really weird one later). I guess it makes sense, in a way...but man is it weird. And so the body count rises...very quickly. And the younger half-brother soon sees himself as a really, really bad guy--and it's easy to see that he and his friends are setting themselves up to fall.

After seeing this film, I noticed it bore some resemblance to an earlier Kitano film--"Sonatine". Both have very similar themes, a similar deadpan performance by Kitano and feature some oddly surreal scenes of mobsters at work and play. And, both have ENORMOUS body counts. While good films and I certainly could respect how they were crafted, they also were both pretty unpleasant viewing and I can't imagine watching more of these! Well made but yuck! By the way, it was nice to see James Shigeta in this film. He was once a very popular actor but hasn't been as active in recent years. Also, during the course of all the killing, did you notice that NEVER did any police respond to any of the gunfire?! Maybe it's just too common an occurrence in LA...or the film just forgot about this.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Kitano invades LA - almost succeeds
gray430 November 2003
This is the 4th Kitano film I've seen recently. It has most of the characteristics of the other films - the sudden, shocking violence, the impassive silences, the same supporting actors, the obligatory seaside scene. But the shift to an American location weakens it, despite the excellent contributions of the US actors, especially Omar Epps.

But the core, unmissable qualities of a Kitano film remain. Takeshi Kitano must be the natural successor to Clint Eastwood as an anti-hero. Most of the stylised violence takes place off-screen, with a flash of humour, then the after-effects vividly on display. The sound-track from Joe Hisaishi matches the screen action perfectly, at times an aggressive supplement to the violence, at other times hauntingly peaceful.

The ending is the film's weakest part, as though Kitano pandered to imagined (or real) American requirements. The out-of-town setting and road movie elements fit uncomfortably with the rest of the film. But if this is the compromise needed to get Kitano to make more films out of Japan, it must be worthwhile.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you've yet to see this film, seppuku is an honorable choice.
KingM2122 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Takeshi Kitano. He's the man. Brother tells the tale of a Yakuza gangster who is forced to leave everything behind in Japan and start anew in America. And boy does he know how to build up his organization! Within a very short time, he assembles and controls the second most powerful group of organized crime in Los Angles, second only to the Italian Mafia, who is not happy about it! Filled with calm moments and explosive violence (a Kitano trademark), Brother is a very cool gangster flick indeed! Mixing the two cultures together worked out well and made for some interesting, and humorous, viewing. If you've yet to see this film, seppuku is an honorable choice…or you could just rent it. I do have two questions, if anybody cares to answer them. What did Takeshi do wrong that he had to leave Japan and whose body is shown near the end lying on gravel?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disjointed
mrchrisgreen23 March 2002
I hadn't seen any of his previous work, and I went into this film with no idea of what to expect. As far as a film goes, it lacked interest, depth and structure. The acting is mixed, in that some actors perform well and others terribly. Violence is obviously key to the director's style, but it is neither slick nor clever despite being presented in short, horrific bursts. The story is poor, loosely strung together, and collapses at the end in a heap of self-pity. I am confused as to how anyone can find merit in this film. Avoid if you can, although if you're reading this it's probably too late.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Violent but decent film
sandspider15 August 2002
I am a fan of Omar Epps ever since I seen the TV movie First Time Felon so I decided to purchase Brother on DVD. I was shocked by the great quality of the film although it is extremely violent I feel it is necessary to get across the severeness of the yakuza. I recommend this film to anyone who likes gangster movies or violent flicks. Takeski Kitano is an extremely good actor/director. I rate it 4 out of 5. I also recommend Kitano's film Sonatine.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bloody, foul-mouthed, stylish gangster pic with heart
m1000112 April 2010
I like gangster movies. I like Japanese movies. You see that Beat Takeshi stars, directs and edits the movie and you may fear that he's an egomaniac and the film will be self-indulgent. It's not. It's got a unique point of view. It's got nobility. Takeshi's character is noble. One of his followers is noble. One would say that the family feeling in this movie is sweet, if it would not be weird to talk about the sweetness of a movie as blood-spattered as this one is. And this one is blood-spattered. My wife, whose taste in movies is usually much more sanguinary than mine, stopped watching it before it was over, so violent were the obeisances made to show faithfulness. This movie would be utterly unsuitable for children because of blood and guts and language. But it's funny. It's funny and honorable people gain moral victories and family members as well as people unrelated by blood show each other brotherly love. I fear for this culture-- our world culture-- that the only movie where I have seen honor and brotherly love lately is this film filled to overflowing with buckets of blood.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Oh, Brother
biffertron20 May 2003
Sweet Daddy Jones said it all - the best gangster film since Goodfellas. Go beyond that and you have one of the best, most economical pieces of film making in years.

Someone in the thread moaned about the lack of dialogue, did they feel the same way about Eastwood's spaghetti films or the Unforgiven? You either understand that level of economy or you dont. Like the best music, somtimes its what artists leave out that speaks volumes, and creates art. Its the space 'inbetween', not chucking the kitchen sink, that pulls you in.

This film is excellent, if you like Tarantino or Scorsese - watch this and see someone who actually manages to bring Eastern film making to Hollywood with the utmost panache. Unlike John Woo, who I love dearly, but was comprehensively f***ed up the ass by Hollywood (Mission Impossible2, Face Off, Hard Target) in the process.

'I may not understand American, but I DO understand Jap motherf***er' There's a quote, there's a fact. If, like previous respondents you dont get minimalistic action (which is also mega hardcore),this is not for you. Those of us who like our action slick, sleek and to the bone, sign up now.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad, but then again didn't offer anything memorable!
Khwaj27 February 2002
This was the first film of Tikeshi Kitano's I saw back in August last year. It started off pretty well, especially with a back story as to how events came to be. However towards the second half things started to fall apart as it seemed to cliche itself with the Yakuza rising to power only to suddenly and abruptly lose it.

The only highlight for me was Omar Epps a very convincing performance I might add.

The film would've been better if more thought/emotion for characters had been portrayed, but in the end all you seem to get is everyone getting disposed of in a variety of brutal ways (i.e. dismemberments, finger cuttings, cars exploding and chopsticks being stuffed up noses).

For me the second half began to get a little pointless, although I might be wrong about this it didn't offer anything surprising.

Since "Ring" (or "Ringu" as it's called) I thought there were going to be other quality flicks from various Japanese film makers.

Not bad though, but too extreme with the violence. 6/10
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Outstanding
whoTheFuqRyou19 March 2003
to say that this was good is a complete understatement. I had heard about this movie before but never saw until one night it popped up on HBO Zone. I was like "what the hell" and figure it wouldn't hurt to watch, but when I did - I LOVED IT!! there isn't much English dialogue in this movie, but there's enough - it's understandable as it's about a Yakuza gangster(Kitano) who is Exiled from Japan only to form an American Yakuza overseas in the U.S. - He collaborates with his brother(Miko) and his crew to form the organization. Omar Epps is in this as Denny, he is pretty good in this but it was the Japanese in this movie that really made this worth the watch... VERY Good mafia flick

10/10
23 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uneven attempt to Americanize Kitano's oeuvre
fertilecelluloid16 February 2006
Kitano's attempt at an Americanization of his unique world view is uneven, but not without merit. His usual composer, Joe Hisaishi, helps preserve the familiar tones, and Kitano plays his signature laconic gangster, but the LA setting and presence of Omar Epps as a low level hood who forms a friendship with the Japanese visitor feels wrong. Combining black culture with Asian culture may have seemed like a good idea on paper, but it comes across as cynical. The violence is graphic, explosive and frequent. For reasons difficult to fathom, the last shot of Epps driving away from a bloody climax is out of focus. Sporadically excellent, but compared to such incendiary works as "Hanna-Bi" and "Violent Cop", it is a poor cousin.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Takeshi Kitano's finest , one of my All time favorite ( A+ Movie) My Ratings 10/10
THE-BEACON-OF-MOVIES-RAFA17 February 2020
I can never understand why critics want depth of story telling and character development in gangster films. Why do we need to paint a picture of drug dealing murderers as conflicted men on trying to find the proper path? Brother is one of the few gangster films that doesn't try to create a moral high ground for killers to stand on, and that's what makes it great. THEY KNEW HOW THIS HAD TO END! Because the had the samurai spirit they faced their end like men. Too many people don't understand samurai spirit though and will never understand...
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nobody does it better!
stefant24 August 2001
No body does it better?I tell my self,Takeshi Kitano only gets better and better during the years,The movie´s plot is about a yakuza member(Takeshi)who goes to the U.S in the search for is younger brother who now a days is in the drug business Instead of what would happen in a U.S gangster movie,Takeshi dosn´t become mad when he finds out about is brother´s whereabouts.He declares war against every drug seller he can get is hands on.He wants to rule it himself.I must have seen about 3000 movies in my life(33 years old) and nothing is as violent as this one.It´s over the top Ultra violence during all the movie,it had a slight similarity to the greatest movie of all times Brian De Palmas Scarface. Thank you Takeshi!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Kitano's best
leavedabox28 November 2023
Yakuza x Scarface set in LA, 2000

Look i've watched my fair share of crime/kitano movies, with this amount of talent bustling through the making of this movie, I genuinley feel that they could've gotten better actors in on this.

On paper this sounds amazing, exiled yakuza flees to america and tries to make it in L. A. Yohji Yamamoto, Joe Hisaishi and Omar Epps working on the same movie! But with so much talent bustling throughout this project you would expect something a lot more memorable, something that makes you wanna watch it again, smomething more meaningful - a classic, but instead I get something not as interesting as it could be, so much could've been done with these idea's presented which inevitably had little to no pay off like if they gave us more time to be more attached to these characters the consequences would have been impactful the viewer would have actually felt the pain. Some of the acting was questionable, except for most of the Japanese actors, it didnt feel very real it didn't inspire much emotion, it seemed forced sometimes, the writing was boring so was the music both not as dynamic as the usual Kitano you know what I mean?

The cinematography and editing was good which is expected from Kitano, the story was middling at best still it felt like it was being carried by the few people who were passionate, the concept in my opinion was even better, maybe I had too many high expectations for this movie I dont know I just feel that this couldve been amazing if exectuted better, When you watch a Kitano movie you'll expect brotherhood, interesting visuals, creative cinematography, cold hearted bloodshed, memorable set pieces, dark/odd humor, strange scenes etc. Overall your getting a memorable movie stamped in your head, this was missing many of those elements the humor was soft inoffensive and safe, the bloodshed was tame and at times boring or weak, it felt like he was holding back with the visuals it wasn't as free as I'm used to, it was watered down Kitano at best, a mediocre crime movie at its worst.

All in all this seemed to be missing the Kitano touch, I feel if they had a bigger budget, better actors, a longer runtime and a more memorable story this would've been a masterpiece, it was missing most of what makes Kitano, Kitano. The aesthetic, editing, ending and cinematography was very good, some ideas were vintage Kitano, which was held back by the overall blandness of some of the actors and writing. If anything I can see this being remade in the future with a more meaningful story better actors and an overall memorable film, till then this movie is a shadow of what Kitano can do, a mediocre crime movie that reminds me of Scarface, I would recommend you watch Boiling Point, Sonatine or Outrage if you wanna watch a better Kitano film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Kitano's failure
Angelus22 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Yamamoto is a Yakuza boss who is exiled to America and forced to live with his half-brother, but the life of a Yakuza seems to follow you everywhere as Yamamoto begins his violent rise to the top once more.

Sanotine and Outage are perhaps two of Kitano's finest and if I had to pick between the two, Outrage would come on top...Brother is Kitano's transition to the States because apparently you're not a good director if you don't make a Hollywood movie! Brother is missing many Kitano's personal touches, his weird humour and his dark personality. The film seems to be just like all the other weak gangster movies that are churned out, with pointless violence and not a story to be told, I didn't find myself making any sort of connection with any of the characters unlike Murakawa in Sonatine and Otomo from Outrage.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
brother, one in its own
boomt_bo22 December 2004
As i read most of the previous comments most of us agree that this film is one of a kind. We all enjoyed it on some other level, above and beyond the regular. It shows certain characteristics that we find most interesting, honor,loyalty. Good acting, strange plot, unpredictability. I hope there are more films like this one out there, but its hard to find. I watched this movie as an accident, I hope if someone that reads this knows of another similar movie that is JUST as good or better (if thats possible), this movie has been one of those movies that I will never be able to forget, it has been 1 year since i have seen it last, and every moment sticks out clear as day. Excellent movie, great job Takeshi! Good comments everyone, well said...well thought, pros and cons.

cheers
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed