I Want to Be Famous (1976) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Realistic slice-of-life
Groverdox28 March 2020
"I Want to Be Famous" is an example of the kind of made-for-TV British films that were produced in the '70s and early '80s. It feels realistic almost to a fault to our modern eyes. There seems to be no direction at all, nor much of a teleplay. The movie just goes on for a while, depicting a slice of life, and then ends.

But it is, of course, quietly effective. It gives us a window into the unhappy life an an 11 year old who is isolated by his small size and lack of interest in sport. He has one friend, but even his dad shuns him for his lack of athletic ability: he would rather paint pictures.

The movie doesn't have much of a plot, it just shows scenes from this boy's life. Some are quite strange and surprising, like a game of strip hide 'n seek in which the boys end up in their underwear, and another scene where the obviously prepubescent protagonist appears to masturbate while his parents fight in another room.

This was given something like a PG rating at the time ("A" in '70s Britain), but now seems like it wouldn't pass the censors. Actually, I can't imagine how anyone would take this movie now; it feels like a strange relic, which, of course, is reason to recommend it to anyone looking for something different.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A bleak look at the life of an unhappy boy.
seeker323 January 2002
"I Want to be Famous" is a "lost film" that is finally resurfacing after more than two decades of neglect (although not yet on video or dvd). It concerns Steven (Steven Bratt), an 11 year old British kid who thinks football (soccer in the US) is "rubbish," preferring to paint pictures or just daydream. His unsympathetic dad is disappointed in his son's lack of interest in sports and denigrates his artistic inclinations. His mum defends her child and Steven must listen to many arguments about which he is the topic. His only solace is his friendship with another boy (Stuart Elliot) who is good at football but still likes to hang out with Steven. They get involved in various kinds of mischief, such as having a mud fight, harassing a band practice and playing "strip down naked" hide n' seek." A comparison has been made with this film to the movie, "If...," because of the boy's violent fantasies. There is virtually no plot, just a brief view of an unhappy childhood.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb British short film from the mid-1970s...groundbreaking in its day.
DavidW19478 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"I Want To Be Famous", starring the then 11 years old Stephen Bratt as Steve, is an excellent little film that was filmed in 35mm Eastman Color in Hanley, Stoke on Trent, during August, 1975 and, as I was living there at the time, I recognised the locations immediately. St Luke's Primary School in Wellington Road; the huge council high rise tower blocks of flats and maisonettes off Bucknall New Road and Hanley Park in Ridgeway Road, with its bandstand.

11 years old Steve just doesn't fit in at home or at school, where he purposely misses PE lessons because he doesn't like football and would rather paint or write poetry, much to the disgust of his father, a sports lover who thinks his son is a wimp and goes out of his way to make his life a misery. His home life is also not very happy because his parents are always arguing, usually about him. This leads to Steve having violent fantasies in which (in scenes obviously inspired by similar scenes in the 1968 film "if...") he opens fire on his father and other authority figures with a Sten machine gun and enjoys killing them.

Although he has his own bedroom, the walls are thin and in one groundbreaking scene, he is lay in bed at night trying to masturbate but is distracted by the sound of his parents arguing loudly in the next room. Sexually frustrated, he shouts "SHURRUP!" ("Shut Up!") at them through the wall. They are so surprised that they do indeed shut up. A more true to life scene involving a young schoolboy is hard to imagine. Steve often talks to the camera in the film to carry the narrative onwards. He is your typical mid 1970s youngster, with long hair and flared, bell bottom trousers.

Although only running around forty minutes, the film is so unusual that it holds the attention throughout and shows what a lot has changed since 1975. It was passed with an 'A' certificate at the time by the British Board of Film Censors, denoting that it was more suitable for adult audiences (equivalent to a PG today), probably because of the Sten gun scenes, although it's doubtful that the masturbation scene would be allowed through by the censors these days.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed