Drink (1908) Poster

(1908)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Ahead Of Its Time.... And Not Up To Its Task
boblipton22 February 2021
Here's a very ambitious, very early feature from director Albert Capellani. Thirty-six minutes may not seem like much time for a feature in 2021 -- and indeed, it isn't -- but in 1908 it was as long as any movie anyone would see, divided into three chapters. In 1908, eight minutes was a long movie, so to go four times that long, it needed to be a major subject, and in Emile Zola's novel about the curse of drinking, Pathe Freres thought they had it.

Alas, they did not. A feature requires a lot of work and intermingled plots, and while Hugo's work had that in plenty, it required words to explain what was going on; in the silent movies, there were never enough words. So while the opening sequence, when Jacques Grétillat abandons the straight-laced Eugénie Nau for the harum-scarum Catherine Fonteney, we get it. When Mlle. Nau finds consolation and happiness with Alexandre Arquillière, we get that too. When Mlle. Fontenay tries to kill Arquillière every four or five years.... well, I don't get that.

I'm sure it's in Zola's book, and in the stage presentations, and that the people who saw this movie were familiar with it, or had friends who were happy to explain. That means, however, that this is not a self-contained work of art, and so it was back to shorts for another four years for Capellani. Eventually he would get it right, and continue to direct movies until 1922. He would die in Paris in 1931, at age 57.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Drink review
JoeytheBrit11 May 2020
Something of an epic for its era thanks to a 35 minute running time, this adaptation of Emile Zola's novel examines the lives of habitual drinkers, and focuses in particular on the efforts of one man to exploit the fondness of alcohol of the husband of his former partner in order to ruin both his life and that of his wife. The motivation seems pretty thin, particularly as it was he who walked out on the woman, but it's an engaging story nevertheless. The actors occasionally lapse into exaggerated gestures, but are also quite restrained for the era.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good (but not great) movie
ostia6669 October 2011
Greatly surprised no one has commented on this movie yet. At the time of its release, L'Assommoir was hugely successful. Based on Zola's novel, this movie is about the free fall of human beings, deals with degradation, alcoholism and it is, in short, a very pessimistic story.

Reading the book first would help a lot understand the plot since the film is a little old-fashioned when it comes to introducing the scenes (very few intertitles explain the action rather than speaking for the characters). Dialogs wouldn't be introduced till the 10's, by then only a few years away, but despite its flaws at story-telling, the camera shots are quite complex for its day and it was beautifully filmed. If it were a talking picture, it certainly would be a great movie.

Director Albert Capellani was one of the greatest at the moment. The movie runs for over 35 minutes making it one of the longest released up to its date (10 to 12 minutes one-reelers were just the norm). Besides, it was the beginning of film d'art, and taking plots from famous novels would dignify the film industry. All this proves that L'assemmoir was a pioneer in many different aspects. Hence I can't even figure out how no one has commented on this one yet.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absinth drama
dbdumonteil3 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This novel was the seventh in the Rougon-Macquart series ,and along with "Germinal " ,the writer's most popular work;today ,only René Clément's "Gervaise " (1955) is well known ,although it might be too clean ,at least to my eyes.The other versions have fallen into oblivion.

This one transferred a dense novel ( about 400 pages) to a 38 min medium length feature,which was quite an achievement ;later,Cappelani would adapt "Germinal " ,but it would be a very long silent movie.

For many readers ,the main difference is Virginie's role ;she sabotages the scaffold and causes Coupeau's fall;she brings Lantier into Gervaise's house during her birthday feast;she substitutes a bottle of alcohol for a bottle of wine ,causing Coupeau's death.

These invented events were necessary to plunge Gervaise and her family into misfortune ,given the running time of the film .

The Lorilleux family and Maman Coupeau are absent ,but blacksmith Goujet is featured ,probably to assure a (relative) happy end :people not familiar with the novel will assume he will marry her )

All the great moments of the novel are featured :

-the wash house and the women's fight ,although no spanking.

-the wedding (the subtitle reads "engagement" ).

-Coupeau in the "Assommoir" (grogshop).

-Gervaise' s birthday feast ,my favorite chapter in the novel,which is at once the heroine's apex and the beginning of her fall.

-Coupeau 's final fit of delirium Tremens (which does not take place in the hospital ).

Zola's readers may be interested in this silent movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed