The Chaplin Cavalcade (1941) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Re-visiting 1916
TheLittleSongbird12 July 2018
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

From his post-Essanay period after leaving Keystone, the short films from 1916 that form 'The Chaplin Cavalcade' ('The Rink', 'The Pawnshop', 'One A.M.' and 'The Floorwalker') showed a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay and Mutual periods were something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. Something that can be seen in all four shorts forming 'The Chaplin Cavalcade', 'One A.M.' being the best and the still pretty good 'The Floorwalker' faring least.

The stories are more discernible than before and are never dull, though sometimes a bit too busy and manic. Perhaps a bit episodic too.

On the other hand, 'The Chaplin Cavalcade' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious here in 'The Chaplin Cavalcade'.

While not one of his most hilarious or touching, all four, especially 'One A.M.' are still very funny with some clever, entertaining and well-timed slapstick and has substance and pathos that generally were not there with Keystone. 'The Chaplin Cavalcade' moves quickly and there is no dullness in sight.

Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet in this period. He also, as usual, gives amusing and expressive performances and at clear ease with the physicality and substance of the roles. The supporting cast acquit themselves well in all four, particularly a charming Edna Purviance and their chemistry is sweet to watch.

In summary, very enjoyable. 8/10 Bethany Cox
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Silent comedy, beautiful like a ballet.
mark.waltz13 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
At least when starring and directed by Charlie Chaplin. Whether being a drunk just trying to get upstairs and get a good night's sleep, a clerk in both a pawn shop and a department store who can't get a break, or a man on rollerskates, he always makes you wonder how he did it. This isn't one of those times when it looks so easy on screen that you have to try it, quite the opposite. But how can someone be so clumsy looking on screen yet so graceful in falling down? That's the magic of Chaplin.

One of two Chaplin compilations released in 1941, this starts off so good in a way that it can never improve on itself, and with a solo act of Chaplin being intoxicated and dealing with getting out of a cab, getting inside, and dealing with all of his paraphernalia that prevents him from getting up the stairs and into his bedroom, followed by a battle with a Murphy bed. Who'd expect to see a Murphy bed in a glamorous apartment like this? This segment last half an hour and isn't just excellent. It is sheer perfection.

From there, we get the pawn shop and the department store, and while there are some very funny moments, they are not anywhere near as funny as Chaplin when he's by himself. But like the first segment, he makes use of every single prop and every opportunity to make you laugh, and often, just the sight of the imperious tall man is comical magic. So you take the good with the bad (or at least the not so excellent), and then you top it off with the rink which is equal to the opening in excellence. Fortunately I saw an excellent print of this with a terrific musical score, and once again, it is one that should be seen in a museum or revival house with an audience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed