(2001 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
The date the footage was shot is not 2001.
wonnroppots25 February 2007
The footage in this film was shot in the late 1990's, not in 2001. Perhaps the original footage was edited and resold individually, but 2001 was not when this footage was originally shot. Kimi Gee was no longer in the adult video industry in the 2000's. She had retired from the adult industry in 1998. Kimi had only been back in the industry for about a year and a half. I think that films should be required to state when footage in films had originally been shot rather than just when that particular film was released. Films could be shot years before and released many years later. Yes, she's a great actress who is very pretty and sexy, but to be fair the film company should not deceive the public into thinking Kimi was still in the adult film industry for many years. Her career in the film industry was short and sweet, and she moved onto better things as she is talented enough to do so.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed