KatieBird *Certifiable Crazy Person (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
This is not a horror movie
horrormovieguy2 July 2005
More like an artsy/fartsy psychological drama. I get that the multiple panels are suppose to represent the girl's fractured psyche. But, darn if it wasn't annoying as heck.

It might have been an enjoyable movie if they had just settled down a bit in the editing room. I liked the actors, especially the guy that played the dad. The story wasn't exactly uninteresting. The torture scenes are unforgettable.

Overall, it was just a chore to watch cuz of all the crazy editing and cumbersome pace.

Still, I'll be looking out for this director's next movie. If he can lay off the technical posturing, he might craft something great.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Extreme Horror
twelve-house-books12 May 2019
I've seen this one about three times in late 2007, when once was more than plenty. I give it 5 stars because of its Horror elements and good acting. I don't recommend it to anyone at all. Yes, it is that gruesome.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Certifiable Crazy Director
juliankennedy231 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
KatieBird* Certifiable Crazy Person: 2 out of 10: On the surface Katiebird has a lot of redeeming qualities. The story while not original is somewhat fresh (female serial killer mixed with Frailty like family touch) the acting is well above average for a low budget horror film (even a poor performance such as Todd Gordon's stiff (this is not a pun) psychiatrist is still better than most.) and the make up effects and original musical score, again despite some small faults, are well above average.

So what went so horribly wrong?

Well the film is a talky affair with not nearly enough plot to fill the 100 minute running time. For a serial killer Katiebird seems a couple of victims short. The main (only) victim's killing is graphic but goes on way to long and lacks punch. Those scenes almost resemble a tedious Japanese snuff film (Devil's Experiment for example) rather than a proper movie.

Oh and the entire film is shot with split screen shifting windowpanes that take up maybe three quarters to as little as a third of your screen. Do not adjust your set. No really spend all the time you want fiddling with the aspect ratio on your remote it won't help. If you don't have a nice large screen plasma TV the film is simply unwatchable. If you do have a nice big screen the film is headache inducing. Even Woodstock didn't use this much split screen (and that was a concert film for God's sake) and Brian DePalma seems like a restrained TV sitcom director by comparison.

This is a shame because what little we can discern of cinematographer Josh Fong's works seems top notch. But it is lost in this look three places at once stylistic nightmare. Really you would have to be nuts to purposely torture your audience like this. Come to think of it you would have to be a certified crazy person.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really, really bad
saramgia20 February 2018
Bad acting, bad script, bad story telling. I'm sure the people who gave it high marks are the cast and crew.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
gruesome, unflinching movie
goatthought18 June 2005
An intriguing premise and strong performances set Katiebird apart from the usual low budget horror fair. In fact, it is an unfair assessment to even call this a horror movie. Maybe psychological thriller or drama would be more appropriate. There is some gore, but it's harsh, non stylized, unflinching violence. I have to admit that I was squirming a bit in a few of the torture sequences. The tooth pulling scene between the title character and non affection returning would be boyfriend, who also happens to be Asian, ranks right up there with Marathon Man. Only this time we are treated to every graphic detail. The sound design here made me cringe (in a good way). The performances, especially from Katiebird herself and Lee Perkins playing her father, are very strong. No over the top campy fun here. These are very thoughtful, tightly wound performances. The one thing that keeps this movie from achieving some level of greatness is the unwise editing decision to present 99% of the film in multiple panels. There are a few moments were the technique is used to good effect. Whenever it shows multiple threads of action, even within the same scene, it works well. But when it devotes two to four frames to the exact same action and sometimes shot repeatedly. It just becomes annoying. This was a very unconventional movie and i dig that. But I wish it had been presented in a slightly more conventional manner.

Either way, this is definitely a must see.

bob out.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Original And Quirky Psycho-Drama/Horror...
EVOL6664 April 2006
First off - I liked this film. I liked it more than I thought I was going to. I feel that there are several positive qualities about KATIEBIRD *CERTIFIABLE CRAZY PERSON that I wasn't expecting. That being said, there are some big flaws too that keep this film from being what I would consider and indie "mini-masterpiece".

The story follows the obviously psychotic Katiebird immediately after the death of her father. The film starts with Katiebird restraining her psychiatrist who is also a family friend and her lover, and telling her "story". Katiebird is a bugged-out and twisted chick with a penchant for sadistic torture and masochistic behavior, whose family comes from a long line of killers. When KB hit's her mid/late teens, her Pops shows her the ropes (so to speak) of the finer points of torture and murder. KB tells her psychiatrist pal of her first kill, and this sweet little story is shown in some graphic detail through flashbacks. During her "confession", KB employs the techniques that she's refined over the years to make her point to her shrink-buddy. This continues on up until the films "climax"...and KB's realization that "nothing lasts forever"...

First things first - yes...as others have mentioned, the overlapping and size-shifting "window-pane" editing technique is completely unnecessary and annoying. It was fine for the first five minutes but becomes distracting to the point of annoyance when it is used CONSTANTLY throughout the film. It could have been used effectively in certain scenes had it not been done through every frame of the film. I never feel that it's a positive thing when people talk more of the technical aspects of a film or how it was made than the film itself - and I already see that happening with KB*CCP. Also, the pacing IS a little off at times and certain scenes could have been shortened to allow for more "action". Being a sleaze-fiend myself, there was also a glaring lack of nudity that could have "helped" things, given that there were several strange "sex scenes"...but this is just a personal preference and didn't really impact the film all that negatively. I can't be quite sure that I'd really want to see the older KB nekkid anyway, as she looked kinda like a strange mix of Uma Thurman and Cloris Leachman - if you can picture that combo. But - the performances by all the leads are very notable. Both the teen KB (especially) and older KB are very believable as whackadoo psychos - without going too overboard. KB's father is also good in his role as the quiet and nurturing psychopathic "teacher". The psychiatrist role is handled well - but he's pretty much just getting either talked to or tortured the whole time, so his part ain't that hard. The "gore-level" is above average and well-done - and this will almost always get a "plus" in my book. Not nearly as rough as some stuff out there, but definitely stronger that the average horror film. I also liked the lighting (especially in the "shed") and the score was decent for this type of film.

Overall, KB*CCP is an ambitious and quirky film from first-time director Justin Ritter - and I'm interested to see what he'll do next. I think fans of some of the newer wave of off-beat horror films like MAY or LOVE OBJECT will dig this one - if you can get past the annoying editing. As much as I will be interested in Ritter's upcoming projects -FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, MAN - DON'T USE THE "WINDOW-PANE" TECHNIQUE ANYMORE!!!!8/10 for KATIEBIRD...
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Katiebird creeps up behind you and hits hard where it counts!
Streebo24 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
****Minor spoilers contained***** KatieBird *Certifiable Crazy Person is the first entry into the horror genre by writer/director Justin Paul Ritter. Katiebird *Certifiable Crazy Person joins the story of the eponymous Katiebird Wilkins on the day of her father's wake as she recounts the story of her baptism into the life of a serial killer at the hands of her father to her psychiatrist who advises her under extreme duress - and bondage.

Some people have been confused by the style and pacing of Katiebird *Certifiable Crazy Person. The immediately obvious stylistic difference of K*CCP is its use of multi-panels throughout the film. For anyone unfamiliar with the term "mutli-panels", it is the simultaneous use of multiple image frames with sometimes varying subjects appearing on the screen at the same time. Imagine a comic book page on the screen with moving pictures and you'll get the idea. Now this may bother some viewers immediately and I myself have been somewhat annoyed with this approach – in other films, but not here. I believe the use of multi-panels is justifiable within the context of the story. Whether or not this was writer/director Justin Paul Ritter's intent, I do believe that the mutli-panels help actualize the fractured thoughts and manic mindset of the schizo-affective mind as exhibited by Katiebird. This was a bold and daring decision and I'm sure more than a few viewers will be off put by this, but those that remain will be rewarded.

"I remember thinking that being a little girl was sometimes so hard. I wondered if life would have been easier as a little boy, but I wouldn't want to do that. Boys become men. And men…are scum."

-opening lines of Katiebird *Certifiable Crazy Person Katiebird *CCP is not your average "boo!" filled slasher flick. This film is a dark character study and psychological horror film that plays with the tension and terrors created by the skewed world view of the main character. It seems slightly reminiscent of Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer and could almost serve as a female companion to create serial killer bookends for your horror DVD's shelf.

At the core of the film is a set of amazing performances from Helene Udy and Taylor M. Dooley as "Adult Katiebird" and "Teen Katiebird" respectively. Both women showed vulnerability and viciousness in their portrayal of Katiebird at the two times in her life. Udy imbued her Katiebird with subtleties and voraciousness that made her seem like sleek stalking panther – beautiful to behold, yet dangerous to touch. Dooley's version of Katiebird balanced wide-eyed innocence with a girlish sinister glee. The film is really a character study and therein lies its strengths and weaknesses. The film draws us into the life and mind of this female serial killer – yet there are times when the pacing drags a bit in the middle as we watch her develop - slowly. I found the character of Katiebird to be infinitely compelling and watchable even when the film sagged, but that offered us more time to contemplate her inner workings and to recoil in terror at the darkness found therein. There are a variety of themes at play in the film and according to writer/director Ritter, the foremost theme is that of the struggle for power and role reversal. We see this theme play out between Katiebird and everyone she encounters throughout the film as she grows throughout the film and asserts herself time and again. My favorite example of this theme is when Katiebird exhorts her victims to "bite me". When they refuse, she proceeds to convince them to do so by pulling their teeth out. Yeaach!!! I also enjoyed the dark incestuous symbolism of the passing of power from Katiebird's psychotic father to her by the literal passing of the phallic symbol of power – the claw hammer.

The unsung star of the film was composer Daniel Iannantuono's score. It is nearly impossible to describe as it alternates between driving the film forward with guitar riffs to falling back to support the action with a bouncing bass solo. The music incorporates sometimes piercing and sometimes atmospheric guitar notes as well as sudden blasts of computer synth noises. At times it turns eerily reminiscent of the Suspiria score with it's use of garbled growls and sinister whispers that creep in at various times. The score even runs calm and beautiful like the film's star with gorgeous sounds of classical acoustic guitar. The score is as schizophrenic as the main character – and just as beautiful and dangerous to behold. I hope it finds release one day as a CD.

My only complaint about the film is the sometimes lagging pacing. It is not filled with Hollywood style "boo!" jumps and cheap scares – but gives us a deep dark look into the mind of a certifiable crazy person. It is a fascinating character study and fans of good character driven psychological horror such as Henry:POSK or May might enjoy this film. Perhaps 'enjoy' is not the right word to use as the film presents us with very little to enjoy, but it is worthy of contemplation as it chills and disturbs us.

Streebo gives Katiebird *Certifiable Crazy Person a 7 out of 10 screams on the Streebo Screamo-meter.

Check it out and decide for yourself.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Awesome, gruesome, memorable!
stefan-meier10 June 2005
If this movie plays in a theatre near you, you're up for a remarkable piece of cineastic art. If you can stand it. This film just crawls under your skin easily, cut by cut, and it won't let go - even days after you watched it. A lot of its incredible intensity stems from its absolute perfect cutting/editing and from a soundtrack that matches the pictures on the screen to the point. The movie use the split screen technique in a wonderfully orchestrated way, adding to the unique and in fact gruesome experience. This movie is definitely not for the faint of heart or weak of stomach ... but if you feel up to it, you'll have a great movie experience.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed