Tom Thumb (1909) Poster

(1909)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A little special
Rodrigo_Amaro12 October 2014
This is a pleasant though rushed narrative based on Charles Perrault's novel. What's presented in two and a half minutes is the story of a little kid who saves his parents and his older brothers and sisters from complete despair after their forced leave from their house due to impossibility of paying their debts.

Segundo de Chomón's experiment is a fine work considered the many restrictions back in his day, the cinematography was quite good, the story or what's left of it are interesting though lacking in better explanations (the title cards are in French with no translation and I had to force myself to understand what was said, specially the very last quote but thank you Google Translator - still don't get it why those white rocks are so special). Three great acts and there you have a movie.

Best of the show is the quality actors - too bad they're all uncredited - specially the main kid, the title character, with his impressive and strong expressions, evidenced by the scene he overhears his mother and father talking about being forced to leave their house. Priceless. 6/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thanking the Pathés
deickemeyer30 December 2014
Every child who sees this pictorial adaptation of Perrault's fairy story will first believe implicitly that Tom Thumb was, or is, a real personage, and next he will feel like thanking the Pathés for producing such a faithful and satisfactory rendering of the story. From the time when Tom Thumb's father decides to lose all the numerous ringers and thumbs, or the seven boys in the wood, through the experience in the Ogre's castle, the appropriation of the magic boots and the reward from the fairy, there is a convincing quality about the character which will appeal to the children, and will not be refused by the older ones. The picture is beautifully tinted and the staging is a marvel of faithful reproduction of the story. It is a thoroughly satisfactory reproduction of a favorite fairy story and deserves long and enthusiastic patronage. - The Moving Picture World, September 25, 1909
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tom Thumb review
JoeytheBrit11 May 2020
Although IMDb lists this as a 2-minute movie, the version I saw on YouTube was 11 minutes long, and the full version is terrific. While it's light on camera trickery, De Chomon does pull off one stunt with perspective in the home of an ogre that is truly stupendous. The story is pretty gruesome, with kids having their heads cut off as they sleep, but it's engaging stuff. Can't think why those kids aren't trying to find the nearest Olde Worlde Police Station rather than going back to the parents who dumped them to presumably die in the wilderness...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very confusing--not Chomón's best film
Tornado_Sam19 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is a very strange and incoherent adaptation of the story of Tom Thumb by the Spanish filmmaker Segundo de Chomón. In fact, it is so confusing I didn't really get what was happening at all. There were subtitles included--but unfortunately they are in french! So I really did not get, either way, what the story of this weird film was supposed to be.

In all honesty, the story of Tom Thumb isn't even here at all. It begins with a bunch of children going out for a walk with their parents. The parents then abandon them (doesn't that sound like Hansel and Gretel??!!). However, because Tom Thumb knew their plan, they find their way home. Then, a giant comes out of nowhere and starts ordering the mother around. As for Tom himself--he's normal size! What happens next is even more confusing. The giant starts chasing them because of something Tom did--then he falls asleep and Tom steals his boots. Then there is a shot of Tom FLYING THROUGH THE AIR!!! He reaches home and that's the end.

The whole thing is eleven minutes in all, and it's so strange that I can't find much reason to recommend it to a modern audience. I have no idea where the giant came from, what Tom did to madden him, or how Tom got superhuman powers. It's not a bad watch but is so incomprehensible that there's no real reason to watch it today. Sometime I'm going to have to translate those subtitles so I can understand it a little more.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fee Fi Fo Fum
kekseksa7 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The summariser and original viewer appears only to have watched a tiny portion of this film and is therefore not surprisingly confused by what it is all about. But as the contemporary review provided by another user makes clear, it is the full story of Tom Thumb (after Charles Perrault), survives more or less in its entirety and is over ten minutes in length (with about half of the film hand-coloured.

To continue the story from where the hapless Amaro seems to have got to, the young Poucet lays a trail of stones so he and his many brothers can get back home, but the poor parents simply take them back again into the woods and this time they are good and lost. Poucet however continues to take the lead and brings the whole gaggle of them to the ogre's castle where, as those who remember their Perrault will know, they are befriended by the ogre's wife and put to bed in a bedroom shared with the ogre's little daughters (although they are in a separate bed)who, by chance, happen to be just as numerous as Poucet and his brothers. The ogre of course intends to eat them eventually.

When the ogre awakes during the night with a whimsical notion of cutting the little boy's heads off, Poucet fools him - ogres are not very bright - by swapping all the nightcaps round, so that, instead of decapitating the boys, the ogre decapitates his own daughters. Which is not very nice, but then Perrault was often quite harsh and children nowadays tend to be told rather pathetic, sanitised versions of these tales.

Anyway, the boys run away and the ogre gives chase, but, rather foolishly, pauses for a nap. Poucet seizes the opportunity to steal his four-league boots (the fairy-tale equivalent of plane-travel) and so leads everyone back home.

He seems however in this version to have forgotten to rob the ogre (or if he does we don't get to see it) so the family risk being as poor as ever....but it is a pretty good telling of the story, the boy playing Poucet is excellent and some of the effects are fun. Altogether, a cracking good yarn and well worth looking out the full version, which is around on Youtube somewhere.

Is this a spoiler? Is it possible to talk about a spoiler where traditional fairy-tales are concerned? Oh well, I'll tick the box in case.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed