User Reviews

It is hard to see why this didn't sell, while the Dick Van Dyke show did. It is basically the same well-written characters, plot and style of a typical Dick Van Dyke show.

It was very possibly the casting that made the difference. Barbara Britton and Carl Reiner were fine in the leads. They were perhaps a bit old. Both were around 40 years old. Dick Van Dyke was 35 and Mary Tyler Moore was 24, which gave the series a more youthful feel. Still, there isn't much difference in the acting, Britton and Reiner are quite professional. Sylvia Miles and Morty Gunty as Sally and Buddy were actually a marginal improvement over Rose Marie and Morey Amsterdam. They get laughs without being overly broad, as Marie and Amsterdam often were.

The real problem was Gary Morgan as 6 year old Ritchie. He tries hard,but overacts his part, he comes off as hyper-active and more obnoxious than charming. Larry Matthews who got the role in the series was much more natural.

This is fun to watch for anybody familiar with the Dick Van Dyke show. Anyone else will just find it mildly amusing.

This is the pilot episode for what later went on to become "The Dick Van Dyke Show". In this pilot, an entirely different group of actors are cast--with Carl Reiner playing Robert Petry (pronounced 'Peetry' in this show). The setup for the show is very similar--the family lives in the suburbs, Rob writes for a weekly variety TV show, etc.. The biggest difference is chemistry. Like most pilots, the chemistry hasn't yet been established. Additionally, there were a few things that really stood out for me as needing improvement. The biggest was how obnoxious and annoying the kid was who played Richie. In many ways, his high-pitched and adenoidal whine was like a little Jerry Lewis--and I can sure see and hear why he wasn't invited back after the show was re-tooled. It was even more obvious than it could have been, as the plot revolved around this brat. Also, the laugh track was very bad--very intrusive and often blasting out laughs when nothing funny was occurring. And finally, it just wasn't particularly funny or enjoyable overall.

This show was a bit of a bust and I could see why it was remade with an all-new cast. However, for fans of the show and the history of TV, it's a fascinating look at the germ that later grew into one of the great shows of the 1960s.

This nascent version of The Dick Van Dyke Show is fascinating on many levels-- however, it isn't an entertaining show at all.

It's not good because we know all these characters subsequently with different actors who in every case are superior to what we see here.

It is not good because even if we didn't know these characters we would not want to get to know them: Rob (Reiner) is flat and plays every line with the same tone. Laura (Britton) is passable, but always "on stage." Ritchie is downright awful-- unpleasantly loud and unattractively toothy. The worst of the lot are Buddy and Sally (Gunty and Miles) who come across as unfunny and uninteresting to the point of being sullen and mean.

The reason to watch this show-- and watch it you should if you ever enjoyed TDVDS-- is to see that this mess somehow morphed so marvelously. Reiner took a seat behind the camera for the most part writing and not starring in the show. They got good actors to portray interesting characters. Moreover they put Dick Van Dyke opposite Mary Tyler Moore and the magic began to flow.

So watch this program, but don't expect much of it-- except to be amazed.

In trivia you wrote: "A surviving Desilu Production Schedule for the week of Jan. 16-21, 1961 is believed to include a slot for the filming of the pilot that was later reworked into "The Dick Van Dyke Show". It says "Carl Reiner Show" - "All in a Day's Work" - Pilot. Unit Production Manager is listed as "Myers"; Assistant Director is "Sandrich". It shows that it was filmed at Desilu Cahuenga Studios, Stage 5 on Jan. 20, 1961. "

Not Correct! "Head of the Family" was filmed in New York at the Bronx Gold Medal Studio (at the site of what had been the old Biograph Studios.) In 1959 as I recall. I worked on the show and even have a credit as sound editor.

It's only interesting because it became The Dick Van Dyke Show. Otherwise, this was just blah. Carl Reiner as Robert Petrie was mediocre, Laura was tolerable, Buddy was annoying, Sally was fair, and Richie was a jerk. They stuck some canned laughter in here and there in pointless spots. If this was best of the nine replacement episodes, then the others must have stunk.

I gave this a ten because it showed the seed planted that eventually grew into the timeless classic "Dick Van Dyke Show". I was amazed at the similarities yet I was also amazed at the differences. The trick to watching this is to not compare it to the "Dick Van Dyke Show" but to watch it as its own work. This is difficult because the names draw you to be reminded of "The Dick Van Dyke Show". However this is also kind of a good thing because you can see the similarities and how they were changed as a result of shaping it into the eventual award-winning situation comedy. Carl Reiner did an amazing job writing and starring in this as he is (in my opinion) a creative genius that can actually act. If you are a fan of the "Dick Van Dyke Show", this is a must-see. Some may not like it as much but again, remember that it isn't the "Dick Van Dyke Show" but the original creative bulb that went off over Carl Reiner's head for the idea of a sit-com. It's great to see where things came from.