"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" On the Nose (TV Episode 1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"And there it is - cold, beautiful cash!"
classicsoncall14 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
You have to put yourself back in time to the late Fifties to appreciate this episode. A mob boss sends a Shylock out to collect a gambling debt of $26.40 from a suburban housewife! Now I know addiction to gambling is no laughing matter, but I thought the plot for this story was somewhat ridiculous. If she was in the lurch for a couple hundred bucks I could see it, but going out for this kind of small change seemed petty. And how about the guy who made the call on Fran Holland (Jan Sterling)? He was such an affable fellow that she called him Mr. Cooney (David Opatoshu). I wonder if he could have broken a leg for the money.

You know, I had to think about Mrs. Holland's strategy there with the bus stop requests at fifteen cents apiece. At that rate she would have had to approach a hundred sixty seven people to make twenty five dollars, probably more if more than one refused like the one lady did. There again, I couldn't see the logic of the story, even compensating for the price of things in the Fifties. Those couple of examples made the forty nine dollar compact look like a treasure by comparison. All of this contributed to an angst filled day for Mrs. Holland, on top of the stress of trying to give up her addiction to the ponies.

So it was with a large measure of fortitude and good luck that she recovered her pocketbook back from the crashed car by way of the police officer. It seemed to me that the store detective (carl Betz) should have come in for some retribution as well, he with the grabby paws who tried to have his way with the woman. After all she went through, you would have thought Mrs. Holland learned her lesson, but no. I wonder if Washington Flyer won, placed or showed.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The gambling lady
TheLittleSongbird4 December 2022
The main reasons for seeing "On the Nose" were that it was an episode of the inconsistent but very fascinating 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents', that it was the penultimate episode of James Neilson (in his second episode in a row after "The Equalizer", an above average if uneven effort) and above all the subject matter. Gambling was a big thing back then and still is a very relevant issue, that is still addressed in film and television but in my mind not enough if it is still a big problem.

"On the Nose" in my mind was very good. Not one of the best episodes of Season 3 or of 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents', but for me it is one of Neilson's better episodes for the series and the much better one of it and "The Equalizer" that came immediately before it. It may not be on the same level of "Reward to Finder" as far as Neilson's 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes go, but it is certainly and thankfully no "The Percentage", a lesser effort for the season.

Actually thought that there was very little wrong with "On the Nose", though the conclusion is a little too early to figure out too soon though the twist is cleverly executed.

So much is good and even great. Jan Sterling hits hard in the lead role and Hitchcock's bookending is suitably droll and doesn't jar with the dark subject matter. Neilson gives one of his most confident directing jobs of the series here and never shows signs of being taxed by the material. Which in itself is excellent. The script is on the talky side at points, but it is an intelligent script that flows and is suitably uncompromising.

Really appreciated how "On the Nose" portrayed gambling and addictions, which was very ahead of the time back then with it not usually showing the full horrors of it (psychologically, how addictive it is and what it does to people) to this degree. Gambling and any form of addiction is no laughing matter, and the episode certainly doesn't treat it as a joke. It is instead very uncompromising, sometimes uncomfortably on the nose but tactfully enough to avoid preachiness or simplistically just saying gambling is bad. It certainly made me think twice about attempting it.

It is competently made visually with some interesting shots when the gambling is in action. The pacing is always secure without being rushed. The theme tune is suitably macabre.

Concluding, very well done and close to great. 8/10.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite Engaging but Predictable
Hitchcoc27 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is a story of addiction. It's about a young housewife who has apparently been diagnosed with a gambling addiction. To the point where her husband has given her an ultimatum, stop the gambling or our marriage is over. She needs 25 dollars to pay off a bookie who will betray her to her husband. She ends up literally begging on the street. The fare for a bus trip is 15 cents and she pretends to have forgotten her purse. People oblige her but it is a slow process. Along comes Carl Betz who impersonates a police officer and takes her a way. He is, of course, after something else. He propositions her, offering her the 20 dollars she needs. They have an accident which she has caused, and while he is unconscious she races from the scene. The young woman is pathetic and certainly believable in most respects. She is an addict. It's interesting that in 1958 it was already referred to as a disease. The conclusion is pretty easy to figure out if you've watched enough of these. Still, it's nicely paced and keeps our interest to the very end.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Addiction is no laughing matter
melvelvit-130 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A pony-playing housewife (Jan Sterling), in the hole for $25, has one afternoon to pony up before bookies dun her husband who warned her they'd be through if she ever gambled again. The suspense factor is high as the lady pretty much panhandles before being reduced to shoplifting, eventually getting "arrested" by a fake cop who tries to rape her and even survives a car crash before obtaining the money in the nick of time. That night, her husband has to go to the nation's capitol on business and she immediately calls her bookie to put two dollars on "Washington Flyer" -on the nose, of course!

Back in the Fab 50s, the nightmare of addiction was often a joke but it's no laughing matter and this thought-provoking aspect gives the tale an unintended dark side. Destructively compulsive behavior reared it's ugly head again in the premiere episode of THE ALFRED HITCHCOCK HOUR entitled A PIECE OF THE ACTION (airdate 9/20/62) but this time the disease was dealt with in a somber manner. A professional cardsharp (Gig Young) posing as an investment counselor and married to a wealthy débutante (Martha Hyer) uses a deadly dangerous deception to dissuade his kid brother (Robert Redford) from following in his footsteps. HANGOVER (airdate 12/6/62), a later, more PC episode of the series, was a black riff on Frank Tashlin's WILL SUCCESS SPOIL ROCK HUNTER? that saw a manic Madison Avenue wunderkind's (Tony Randall) life spin out of control in an alcoholic haze as he loses his job, meets a fantasy dream-girl (a va-va-voom Jayne Mansfield) in a bar, and can't remember how or why his wife (Dody Heath) went missing. "Hitch" dispensed with his customarily droll closing wrap-up to say a few words about Alcoholics Anonymous. The obscure, demure Dody Heath would compete with flamboyant sex symbol Jayne Mansfield one more time in the noir-like European proto-giallo, DOG EAT DOG (1965). Disturbing.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I appreciate that it vividly illustrates how truly gambling addictions can be...and I loved the ending.
planktonrules1 April 2021
Fran (Jan Sterling) is a gambling addict. Apparently, some time ago, she got into a lot of trouble because of this and it appears that she MIGHT be gambling once again. The husband does what is probably the best thing in a case like this when he informs Fran that if she gambles again, he's going to leave once and for all. She denies strongly that she's been gambling....and as soon as he leaves for work, you see that she has been gambling again as well as lying to try to hide it. As a result, her bookie is mad because he owes her money and he threatens to go to her husband to get the money and she realizes this could spell the end of the marriage. The rest of the show is about the crazy lengths to which she goes to earn the money...as well as a neat twist ending. But what really made this a great show was what happens AFTER this twist...as it just illustrates how this is an addiction as strong as drinking or drugs. Informative, well written and pretty sad in a way.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A lot of respect for both series on how they put a spotlight on serious topics
glitterrose24 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I watch both Alfred Hitchcock series and never feel like rolling my eyes and thinking storylines like this one are on par with an after school special. So yeah, you're dealing with well told stories but you aren't being preached to. It's a magic that seems lost in today's times imo.

So this episode deals with a lady that's got a problem. It's true there's times I laugh at some of the prices mentioned on these old series (one example takes place from a few episodes ago when a character played by Phyllis Thaxter is told by her husband to get an estimate for a plumbing issue and the amount of 10 dollars is thrown out) I realize that more than likely was an accurate price scale for that time period but the amount seems comical in 2022. I really like the amount of money the lady owed her bookie. 26.50 isn't a large amount of money but I also think it shows how even a small amount of money can turn into a big problem if you keeping adding to that amount and losing.

Fran's husband knows she's got a problem. I reference what I said on my 'Sylvia' review that a lot of parents/guardians will keep trying to help their child instead of washing their hands of the whole affair. I called the behavior realistic but I can also flip the coin over and see Fran's husband is being realistic on the flip side. Fran's husband isn't a mean man, he's just fed up with all this and flat out tells Fran it's gonna be over if he finds out she's gambling again. The storyline doesn't mention how long Fran's been gambling and just how much she's lost previously.

Fran goes through a lot in this episode. She's got her husband's threats of their marriage being over and she's gotta come up with the money she owes her bookie before her husband gets home from work. She gets to a bus stop and she pretends like she doesn't have any money for bus fair and she asks various people for change in order to supposedly get her bus fair. She manages to stay out there long enough to get about 5 dollars worth in change. That's nowhere near enough and time's running out quickly!

Fran decides to try and shoplift a sterling silver compact but she gets caught supposedly by a man that's in charge of security. Fran ends up in the car with this man and he wants to put the moves on her. He's waving around a 20 dollar bill while this is going on. He ends up wrecking the car but Fran's okay enough to shakily get out of the car and go back home. She left her things behind in the car because she was so shook up. Cops trail her to her home to give her back her purse. The stolen compact is returned to Fran but she tells the men the compact isn't hers and to take it back. The men also mistakenly thought the 20 found on the floor of the car belonged to her but Fran stays quiet about that because that 20 is enough to pay back what she owes to her bookie. The bookie gets paid back and she tells him she's through making bets. Perhaps Fran got scared straight by her close call? Nope. The end of the episode features her talking to her husband on the phone and how he's off to Washington for business. This ends up setting Fran up for another gambling spree as she had caught notice of a horse to bet for in the newspaper called Washington Flyer. So she's on the phone placing another bet as the episode ends.

That ending isn't played for laughs imo. It's not an ending that makes you chuckle and say 'There she goes again!!' It's honestly an ending that's painful and realistic. My guess is there's lots of people in this world that are going through stuff, they're being warned that you're gonna lose everything if you keep this up. Fran's addiction is a sickness and if there had been a part two to this episode, well, Fran more than likely wouldn't have had a happy ending.

I know I'm getting long winded, I just truly enjoy these stories and they're so well told. Would highly recommend this episode and would especially recommend if you're a Little House on the Prairie' fan. Fran is played by the lady that ends up playing Charles Ingalls mother. Fran's husband will end up playing Lars Hansen and the bookie will end up playing the head of the blind school that Mary went to after losing her sight.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
ON THE NOSE AND IN YO' POCKET?
tcchelsey6 October 2023
Only a terrific actress such as Jan Sterling could play a meaty role of a compulsive gambler. She has it bad. Applause to writer Irving Elman, who was the senior writer for the soap opera SEARCH FOR TOMORROW for many years. Elman is to be credited for having put a woman in the lead, due to the fact that most stories about gambling addictions generally center around men. A great idea, no doubt applauded by Alfred Hitchcock, also because it is a disease that equally affects women of all ages too.

A super story that will hold your attention, albeit with a dab of Hitchcock dark comedy. Fran (Sterling) experiences one wild ride, and with a lot of lessons to be learned the hard way. Elman, to his credit, also moves this tale to the next level, hitting some taboo areas. Fran gets herself arrested in the process and is propositioned by a sly store detective (played by Carl Betz). Rare stuff back in the 50s.

Today it would be tagged sexual harrassment, but rest assured he gets his due anyway.

Well directed by James Neilson, who did some great work on ADAM 12 in the 70s. Watch this for Oscar nominee Jan Sterling strut her stuff and why she was so popular. At the time, Jan appeared in two top movies, SLAUGHTER ON TENTH AVENUE and the cult film, KATHY O (1958).

Look for Linda Watkins as Lila. She worked steadily for Warner Brothers/ABC tv (HAWAIIAN EYE, etc.) without too much surprise. Linda should have written a book. She tested for the role of Scarlett O'Hara in GONE WITH THE WIND, later hired by producers as a stand-in and script reader for the legendary film. Good trivia question.

Remastered SEASON 3 dvd box set. 2007 release.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed