"Married... with Children" No Ma'am (TV Episode 1993) Poster

(TV Series)

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Ads
bevo-1367817 March 2021
Pretty women make you want to buy beer. Ugly women make you want to drink beer.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Made in 1993 B.C.C. (before cancel culture).
BA_Harrison24 December 2022
Al is upset that his regular Thursday evening slot at the bowling alley has been turned into a ladies-only night, that all the films at the theater are geared towards women, and that the nudie bar has been turned into a coffee house that hosts readings from feminist poets. Al and his friends decide that enough is enough and form a protest group - No Ma'am (National Organisation of Men Against Amazonian Masterhood) - seizing control of the TV show The Masculine Feminist (hosted by Jerry Springer).

This episode makes one wonder how Al is coping in the overly-sensitive, politically-correct climate of the 2020s. I read a couple of articles recently (one for the Dallas Observer and one on ScreenRant) describing Married With Children as problematic and toxic, and calling it culturally insensitive, the writers of those pieces clearly missing the entire point of the show: the controversial and outrageous nature of Married With Children was deliberate, the programme a gross exaggeration of the ignorance and crassness of many a blue-collar family. The Bundys were never intended to be role-models: we find their behaviour funny precisely because it is so blatantly unnacceptable. It's the antidote to every wholesome family-friendly sitcom that preceded it. To be offended by the show displays a total lack of understanding, but sadly that is the way of the world today

Perhaps we need Al Bundy now more than ever...
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The beginning of the end
Der_Schnibbler31 December 2008
While some have rightly pointed out the slight change of tone the show took on in its fifth season, when it became slightly darker, this episode marks the true departure of any halfway worthwhile ideas. The arrival of mediocrity is signaled by no more appropriate a harbinger than 1990s bottom-feeder Jerry Springer. As for the episode's content itself, this was the first of many an uninspired, insipid and, most criminally, utterly irrelevant series of subjects centered around the imaginary concept of "female freedom" (freedom from what, you ask? you may as well ask a five-year-old what he means when he demands independence; both are silly and self-defeating notions).

In plain words, the show pretty much degenerated into celluloid manure after this.
1 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed