User Reviews

Brad Armstrong could of done a little better.The plot is about gangsters bank robbers ,prohibition, extortion.It suppose to take lace in august of 1930.The problem is that it has no story or plot or dialog.It's a Brad Armstrong low budget,shot on film.The styles in the costumes and the art direction are accurate,except for Some other stuff.The women hair dos were stringy long.that wasn't the style.It was wavy style short hair or shoulder length ,like Lilian Harvey's hair style, or even longer some time styled up in a bun in the back.The molls of the gangsters were dressing up in men clothes.Women molls wore feminine dresses and hats.Their crotches were bushy back then.Their lingerie the actresses were wearing were not1930's style.The presentation was crummy .Jessica drakes narrates what the characters did before the character showed up in front of the camera and began to pose for it,then preceding the sex.That's the problem. there are some things good about it .The cinema photography and the sex and the shot on film and the music.The sequence of the poorly made version of the cotton club,the sex was good.Old stud performer Hershel Savage makes an appearance, he's a legend ,like Ron Jeremy.The other best sex scenes was the recreational room.This was not too bad.But it could of been better.I rented this from local adult rental book store Love stuff.04/13/13