The Tomb (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The Bore of Ligeia
lovecraft2317 August 2010
To put it mildly, most of the Horror genre owes a huge debt to the works of Edgar Allan Poe. So many of the genre's finest works of literature and cinema wouldn't even exist without writings like "The Conqueror Worm", "Masque of the Red Death" and "The Black Cat" just to name a few. Hell, there have been some stellar films based on his works, especially Roger Corman's absolutely essential 60's adaptations. Sadly, the adaptation of "Ligeia" from 2009 named "The Tomb" is not one of the great adaptations.

Jonathan (Wes Bentley) has a lot to look forward to. He's a respected professor, has a gorgeous girlfriend in Rowena (Kaitlin Doubleday) and so much more. Then Ligeia (Sofya Skya) enters his life. She's beautiful, tempting, and she has him under her spell, and they move to her castle by the Black Sea. That is, until he finds out that she's been stealing souls to defeat a disease she has and gain immortality. And if she can't have Jonathan, nobody can.

There are a few things "The Tomb" gets right. Some (not all mind you) of the performances are good, especially Skya as Ligeia, who plays the character as an Gothic beauty with the right balance between erotic desire and deadly siren. Eric Roberts aka "Mr. Straight to Video" is also fine in his role, though one wishes you had gotten to learn more about his character. Also worthy of note is the fact that for a low budget horror film, the CGI isn't too bad. Finally, the score by Patrick Cassidy is a lot of fun, and reminded me of the best work from Richard Band.

And that's where all the goodwill vanishes. While first time director Michael Staininger certainly has an eye for visuals, none of the movie captures the kind of dread and madness that makes the writings of Poe so great. Instead, many of the scenes that are supposed to be creepy instead come of as goofy. Some of the other performances in the movie are rather weak as well, particularly Bentley and Michael Madsen. Bentley is more wooden than a 2X4 here (the less said about his rendition of "The Conqueror Worm" in the end credits the better-though I guess it's more dignified than being in "Jonah Hex") and Madsen can't deliver any of his lines properly to save his life, not to mention that it feels too much like he showed up on the set a few days and then left.

The biggest problem with the movie is the script. There are too many lapses in logic (okay, so your boyfriend leaves you for a hot Russian girl, and he comes back, and you just let him back?) and plot holes to count, and it feels more like a rough draft. The really disappointing thing about this though, is that it was written by John Shirley. While he's mostly known for writing the original script for "The Crow", he's also written some fine Science Fiction ("City Come a Walkin'") and horror novels ("Wetbones", "Cellars" and "Demons" to name a few.) For an author I enjoy so much to write such a bad script really sucks.

"The Tomb" really has no reason to be watched. Sure, it occasionally resembles the kind of enjoyable Gothic yarns Full Moon Studios used to make, but more often than not it feels like a Lifetime Channel horror movie than an Edgar Allan Poe Adaptation. The movie should have just been called "The Bore of Ligeia."
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
meh
bluestemz13 April 2010
I always have high hopes for anything based on Poe's work or that of Lovecraft, yet always seem let down. If Dario Argento or any worthwhile Italian Director would have handled this poorly drafted script, it would have probably gotten the treatment it needed. I had to watch it in two parts because I fell asleep. Slow paced, wooden NPC style acting, and predictable character development and plot twists that are better suited for an adventure or RPG video game than a feature film.

But I did give it a few stars! One for beautiful art direction and locations. Another one for the actresses, they were all beautiful and pleasant to watch even during their worst acting moments. Another one for the cinematography and special effects used aptly within the budget, although the style of the film is predominantly visual and better suited for a music video production or in-game cut scenes. Tighter editing and either a revised or shortened script would have helped this film immensely. And finally one for the perpetual references to Absinthe, as it is one of my fondest libations.

To sum it up, it's worth a watch if you can catch it on cable at like a 2am time slot or perhaps a red box rental, but nothing to go out of your way to see.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
We will never have to pay that price. We can live forever.
lastliberal-853-25370817 March 2011
There is nothing that will get a movie downgraded faster than false advertising. If you are going to get an "R", then make the movie an "R", not a PG-13. There was nothing in this film that you cannot see routinely on broadcast television. It was a huge disappointment when you have someone as gorgeous as Sofya Skya, and all you see is her back. Sheesh!

There was no one in this movie to cheer for. Yes, I know it's a Gothic tale, and it really made the grade there, but I expect a little more emotion from the actors. Go back and watch the early Gothic before special effects and see what actors did then.

It was painful to watch.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poe is spinning in his grave....
innocuous29 October 2010
I would normally give "The Tomb" about five stars, if only because it was made in a competent manner (i.e., you can hear everything, the editing is reasonable, shots are framed, etc.). But I have to deduct one star for being so blatantly derivative and one star for being an insult to Mr. Poe. No, wait...I'm taking another star away because everybody is just so BAD in this film.

The story is only minimally based on Poe's short story. I can hear the producer's now..."What? No children in danger? Add one! No sex? Add some! How does she come back from the dead? Through strength of will alone? No good! Add some satanic rituals and symbols. While you're at it, go find out how much Michael Madsen and Eric Roberts want for small, crappy parts. Nobody else is hiring them, so we ought to be able to get them for a song." (Madsen and Roberts have two totally irrelevant and shoddy roles in this production, but I guess that Madsen has to buy black hair dye somehow.)

What is more fatal to this film than anything else is that we just don't care about any of the characters. We don't hate any of them, we don't like or sympathize with any of them. They just sort of exist to deliver their lines.

As far as excitement, forget it. There isn't any. No nudity (worth mentioning,) no gore, no mystery, no chases, no fights (of any length or quality,) no shocking or surprising moments. It's just drab.

Overall, a very stinky film. Don't bother.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Please don't make the same mistake that I did. Avoid this movie.
lewiskendell5 September 2010
"We will never have to pay that price. We can live forever."

I don't know why I watch movies like these. They're clearly going to be awful. All the reviews I read further reinforced the fact that it was going to be awful. But, I still felt compelled to see it, anyway. And yep, it was awful.

The problems were myriad. The scares and horror aspect of The Tomb were surpassed by most of The Goosebumps books I read as a kid. The story was silly and bland. The attempt to appeal to the audience with sex fell flat with scenes that would hardly earn a PG-13 rating and had no chemistry between the participants.

The absolute worst things about The Tomb, though were the acting and the script. The entire cast was uniformly wretched, especially Wes Bentley and Sofya Skya. Sofya is certainly a very beautiful woman, but she would be wise to reconsider this whole "actress" thing. And Bentley came close to achieving the feat of making me never want to see another movie that he's in, ever. As for the script, describing it as "amateur" would be an insult to everyone who has ever been an amateur at anything in the history of the world. The dialogue is abysmal, and I can't imagine that anyone spent more than a few hours writing this.

I don't know what kind of dire financial situations are responsible for Eric Roberts and Michael Madsen being in this dreck, but I'm willing to offer money out of my own pockets to help them never have to be in anything this terrible, again. The only possible entertainment to be gained from The Tomb is from making fun of it. It's hilariously bad, but still too boring for me to recommend even for a laugh with your friends.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More unwatchable nue-horror
boyd19558 April 2010
OK ... So it tried not to be a typical worthless neu-horror failure ... But it fell for all the usual things ... Drained colour flashbacks ... Naff unnecessary quick cut editing ( at times ) ... Acting that would make the local drama group blush ... And a storyline that could ( possibly ) have been interesting if it hadn't been written like a bad soft porn movie I have a feeling the budget on this was actually bigger than it looked ... Some of the settings were quite grand for a low budget film ... Unfortunately the director didn't know what to do with any of them How on earth do these awful directors and script writers get to make these films ... They are just a waste of time and money ... Everyone involved with the production I presume got paid ... Because that is the only thing this sort of junk does ... Pay workers As long as the financiers don't expect people to pay money to watch this dross ... THAT WOULD BE GOING TO FAR
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nice visuals...
bigdarvick7 September 2010
...but that's about it. I kept asking myself, "did they actually watch the movie before releasing it?" The thin plot line was all over the place and offered little explanation. Corny acting and dialog that could be barely spoken with a straight face. Confusing locations in the movie--tough to put your finger on where it was taking place. One minute they're in the USA, the next, they're in Russia. The electricity works fine, the suddenly it's not working and no one says anything. The movie is filled with tons of gaffes. Soundtrack consisted of a much too loud orchestra playing throughout every scene, (much like a Looney Toons cartoon.)

I'm sure the writers, producers etc, thought they were creating a masterpiece. Trust me,they didn't come close.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!
JoeB13115 August 2010
I don't know what the heck that was, or why people need to rip off Edgar Allen Poe for ideas, other than he's in the Public Domain and won't ask for a royalty! The plot, which kind of echoes Poe, is that an English professor is enticed from his engagement to a singer to a sultry Goth babe from Russia, and is convinced to use his immense wealth to rebuy her Russian estate while she looks for ways to extend her mortality through magic and science. What we get is a confused mess of body swaps and the kings of Direct to DVD, Michael Madsen and Eric Roberts, playing largely unnecessary supporting characters.

Other than that, some parts of the film look quite good for a low-budget made in Eastern Europe mess...
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK but not great
drama593 July 2012
Liked the cast. Too many credits as usual. OK beginning but lacked a sense of urgency. It just didn't move along like a good horror movie should. Interesting plot line but fell short. The ending seemed jumbled and disjointed. I wanted more. I would not go out of your way to rent this one, but if you are a alone and nothing else to watch then why not.Poe is one of my favorites but this is NOT one of my favorite stories of his. They tried to make it interesting but for true gore horror fans I would skip this one...I would say it was well cast. I would say the locations are lovely but as a great horror movie..I would have to say um "No". Once again this is NOT one of my favorite Poe short stories and did not make a great horror movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An interesting concept is undone by poor execution and bad pacing
Shattered_Wake15 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Jonathan Merrick (Wes Bentley) has it all: a beautiful girlfriend, a successful writing career, the respect of his colleagues. All of this is put on the line, however, when he unwillingly becomes entangled with a student, Ligeia (Sofya Skya), who has become unhealthily interested with him through his lectures on the macabre. Unbeknownst to Jonathan, his returned infatuation with Ligeia comes not from her Eastern European beauty or sexy accent, but from the black magic which she practices in order to seek the immortality that her ancestors before her could not attain.

In recent years, there have been a huge number of indie straight-to-video adaptations of Edgar Allan Poe stories & poems, including literally a dozen versions of 'The Tell-Tale Heart.' Poe's story 'Ligeia' has only been the source material for a few adaptations, though, with the most well known being the Roger Corman/Vincent Price matchup 'The Tomb of Ligeia' (1964). There are reasons why 'Ligeia' is not as popular to adapt as other Poe pieces like 'The Fall of the House of Usher' or 'The Raven.' For one, it's not as popular a story as some of those others. But, the real reason is that it's simply just a difficult story to adapt. The original source material does not spread far with plot and it's told, like much of Poe's work, within the head of our narrator. Therefore, there are a lot of additions that a screenwriter would have to make to be able to make this an interesting and entertaining film. Unfortunately, writer John Shirley ('The Crow') did not succeed there in the slightest.

To be memorable in the independent sector of horror, a film must either be very bad or very good. There are hundreds of horror films released each year and the wide majority of those will go unseen by even the most dedicated horror fan. This is why mediocrity is just about the worst curse for a horror film that wishes to be appreciated, or even remembered. For rookie director Michael Staininger, the graveyard of mediocrity is sadly where his first film will be laid to rest. This is because nearly every aspect of 'Ligeia' falls in the ranges of unimpressive or subpar. The acting is bland and boring, even from typically dependable actors like Michael Madsen, Eric Roberts, and Wes Bentley, who has performed well in the past with films like 'American Beauty' and 'P2' (though, his recovery from drug abuse may be a cause of this downfall). There is very little creativity with cinematography, even though the crew did have quite a few excellent locations which would have played nicely with talent behind the camera. However, the real reason for the film's lackluster quality is, without a doubt, the main creative components: the script & the directing. It's sad to see John Shirley, who started his film career with a bang penning the cult classic 'The Crow' in the '90s, sunk to the level of straight-to-video boredom like this film. Also, the rookie director's lack of ability to properly execute anything special with the mundane material also crippled the film's chances. These two components, as they would for any film, killed all opportunity 'Ligeia' had from ever reaching anything worthwhile.

To sum up, other than the intriguing concept and the various settings, there isn't much to see with this film. It's poorly executed, boring, and boasts some truly disappointing performances by a usually impressive cast.

Final Verdict: 4/10. Not a good start to the Fright Fest.

-AP3-
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
WORTH WATCHING
grahamvr11 December 2020
This movie is worth watching if you really want an intelligence story with lots of dialogue. Unlike today's modern movies it is rather slow moving but certainly has sex scenes as some viewers said, it has no sex. Why is it everyone wants sex, sex, sex these days? Obviously they have to watch it as they never get any. LOL. Unlike today's movies which are full of sex, usually from the opening credits this is very tastefully done. The actors suit their parts well in interesting locations.

All I can say again is it's worth watching as it's Edgar Allen Poe. Builds to a climatic ending.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beware of Absinth
adam-18946 May 2010
A professor, named Jonathan, in social arts notices a seductress that seems to appear at all of his lectures. He makes the mistake of approaching for she is much more menacing then Alicia Silverstone in "The Babysitter." She successfully conjures up a love spell on the Jonathan and convinces him not only leave his girlfriend, but to relocate to a Manor in the countryside. Meanwhile, the audience discovers she is secretly working on an Experiment to harvest human souls in order to achieve eternal life (a Tale From the Crypt episode comes to mind.).

Overall the movie deserves a C for it is fairer then poor, but doesn't scream in exclamation. The character Jon seemed awkward at times and a tidbit flatlined of emotions, Ligeia was represented well as the antagonist and gives a convincing performance. The manor doesn't disappoint and leaves a lot to the imagination; It has a Gothic touch that Poe fans will enjoy. I'll leave up to whether it's worthy of screening up to you, Dear reader.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Tomb
Scarecrow-883 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well respected author and professor, Jonathan Merrik (Wes Bentley) is drawn to the allure of exotic grad student( into the occult, her family alchemists), Ligeia(Sofya Skya), who has almost perfected the process of "seizing souls", extracting the lifeforce of victims so she can retain her youth and vitality. Young and rich (both his parents are deceased), Jonathan is engaged to a lovely young woman named Rowena(Kaitlin Doubleday), whose father is a pathetic drunk (Michael Madsen). Dark and brooding, Ligeia captivates Jonathan; he's overwhelmed by her haunting beauty and decadent nature. Rowena is an understudy singer who is charming, with a bright wattage smile, the perfect mate for a successful young professor with the world as his oyster, yet Jonathan has his doubts (he's further complicated by how smitten he is with Ligeia). Seductively capturing Jonathan by addressing the darkness inside him, Ligeia will not only attain his hand in marriage but convince him to purchase her old family's manor. Ligeia needs to find a means to keep her illness from overtaking her and this will drive and motivate by whatever methods are necessary. Meanwhile Rowena pines for Jonathan and will hope to win back his heart once Ligeia's true self emerges once and for all revealing to him that he had made a mistake choosing her as his bride. When Ligeia hurls herself from atop the manor to the sidewalk, Jonathan attempts to move on and does so with Rowena. But, Merrik hasn't heard the last of Ligeia who plans to take control of Rowena's body so she can continue to live on, absent a weakened fleshly vessel, but he will fight to win his second bride back. With Eric Roberts wasted in a nothing minuscule part as the manor's Russian caretaker and the vacuous Makenzi Rosman as his troubled niece who live near Jonathan and Ligeia. Ligeia will use Rosman and get rid of Roberts so she can get close to Rowena. Merrik will seek Rosman's help once Rowena has been possessed by Ligeia. In the silly plot of THE TOMB, the spirits are sucked from the bodies of victims, contained in little jars and held in a cabinet by Ligeia, who later stores them for safe keeping hoping they will assist in her experiments for immortality. The spirits of those robbed of their lifeforce appear in a green tinted mist(the face shown as an image within this mist). Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa has a small role as the University Chancellor who Ligeia must destroy in order to keep his knowledge of her diabolical experiments a secret. Bentley barely registers a pulse in his performance leaving Doubleday the task of garnering sympathy from the viewer. Skya is quite easy on the eyes and Doubleday's no slouch(and her transformation once Skya takes over is actually quite convincing)helping to give this movie some much needed juice.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Avoid
grantss30 September 2019
Edgar Allan Poe is probably the most abused author in history. While his works are regarded as literary classics, movies based on his books or short stories are often b-grade, at best. This movie is no exception.

I haven't read the Poe short story but I am sure it would be fairly unrecognisable from this movie. The central plot is okay but the sub-plots and detours are often nonsensical and random.

Direction is sloppy, while trying (and failing) to be clever. The whole movie feels like a late-night made-for-TV movie.

Acting is so-so. The presence of Eric Roberts should tell you this is crap. Michael Madsen must be desperate to be in this. Madsen and Roberts are minor supporting actors, however. The leads are unknowns, which says a lot.

Avoid.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
When the Deleted Scenes Are Better Than The Movie
lizhalexander8 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I bought this DVD years ago a now out-of-business movie store (Blockbuster? Movie Stop? One of those.) I don't remember how much I paid, but even if it was two bucks, it was far too much.

Unlike a lot of reviewers, I think the acting was okay. Not Oscar-worthy, but okay. I'm used to subpar to mediocre acting in horror films. What I think hurt this movie more than anything were the post-production edits. Too much "tense" music, too many weird jump-cuts to things that don't matter, unfinished and unresolved scenes, weird lighting effects...it just completely spoiled the movie.

I was even more convinced of this after seeing the cut scenes, which didn't have any of these kinds of edits in them. It made me realize that the acting and story would have been pretty good, if they had been allowed to take center-stage instead of the "special" effects. (The effects weren't very special..)

I also watched the original trailer, as is my wont to do after seeing a movie like this on DVD, and there were a couple of scenes in it I would have LOVED to see in the movie that weren't even granted cut scene space! Things like Ligea (sp?) dancing on the castle roof, and the dad going crazy in the kitchen.

All in all, there was a good movie in there somewhere, but overuse of effects - both visual and sound - and bad directing kind of ruined all of it. (It's surprising to me that this movie promotes the "writer and producer of The Crow". Where?! Because I couldn't see it..)

I would love to see a version of this movie without the weird effects. I would love to see a more vulnerable and "human" version of Ligea (sp?) that was presented in the cut scenes. The story of a desperate but witchy woman who is ill, and is terrified of death. That would have been a great story on its own. It didn't need all the other weirdness. Maybe some deeper build-up between her and the main dude, and a better break-up between him and his blonde fiancee before the movie forgets her entirely for like an hour.

These are the most frustrating kinds of movies: Ones that COULD have been good, but failed because reasons.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
SOON HE'LL BE MINE
nogodnomasters7 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The film opens with the losing of a spirit in Romanova Manor. It jumps to the present as Professor Jonathan Merrick (Wes Bentley) gives lectures on 19th century literature. He is engage (Kaitlin Doubleday) but his eye roams to the exotic looking Ligeia (Sofya Skya) and before long he is no longer engaged, drinking absinthe and buying a castle for our antagonist soul stealer.

The film moved rather quickly, never allowing for character build up. Indeed, I found myself rooting for evil, because that was the only personality in the film. The dialogue and acting were bland. This is one of the lesser offerings of Fangoria. with killer Bees, Michael Madsen and Eric Roberts.

Parental Guide: F-bomb, sex, and nudity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable but that's about it
kannibalcorpsegrinder2 October 2019
After leaving his fiancée for a mysterious woman, a man learns that she's a succubus looking to extend her immortal life, but upon rejecting her after learning of her treachery and hooking up with his ex, she launches a full-scale assault on his family to get him back.

Frankly, this one wasn't all that enjoyable. A lot of this one's problems stem from the film's overall pacing and tempo as this one is a very, very long-winded effort that takes an eternity to get to its good stuff. This comes off with the first hour feeling like a boring romance movie with the back-and-forth allegiance to each side as they both try to seduce him in various methods which are just inherently dull and boring. Seeing everyone trying to use whatever means at their disposal, from the supernatural hallucinations to their history together, for this part of the film especially due to the utterly dull lead they're fighting over who completely doesn't deserve that kind of attention. It gets even worse with the time in the mansion where even less happens and the film just utterly drags itself out with these scenes just being so dully executed that this one loses steam even further so that it's incredibly late in the film that it all makes sense. The fact that this one goes back-and-forth over who he eventually falls for and decides to settle down with really is the most troubling here by not making this feel like a horror film for so deep before the final half makes any kind of good standing amongst the time with a lot of good stuff about it. That is what does turn it around in the end because of who's involved turning it into a horror film at first which is what gives the finale some much-needed punch by going beyond the setup of the demonic temptress throughout here that it kicks up later on in the second half. Offering some fine work with the possession fueling an enjoyable series of stalking scenes throughout the mansion and into the latter half where all the behavioral tricks used to seduce him occurring in the new form only makes the ruse that much more obvious. Once again going back-and-forth on who's who within the confines of the possession as all the different personalities coming into play as this generates a fairly rousing and enjoyable series of scenes to end this on a decent note. The only other good part here is that there's a lot of work here done technically which does give this one some life during this somewhat dull time, as the vibrant, romantic scenes between the two of them have quite an erotic flair. This helps out quite a lot during a bland section of the film by giving this one such a fun atmosphere during these gives further evidence to his affliction as there's a lot added to his relationship with her because of these vibrant, exciting scenes. However, in the end, this one needed to be a lot more consistent to keep it going.

Rated R: Graphic Language, Violence, Brief Nudity and a mild sex scene.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poe this ain't
Leofwine_draca11 February 2016
THE TOMB is an erstwhile modern-day adaptation of the Edgar Allan Poe horror story THE TOMB OF LIGEIA, adapted so memorably for the screen by Roger Corman and starring Vincent Price back in 1964. Sadly, this low budget, shot-on-the-cheap-in-Crimea version of the story is a complete dud.

There's barely any link to the original story here, aside from a ghostly woman and a doomed romance. Otherwise it's a typical indie-looking cheap horror flick: colour filters, flashbacks, softcore sex scenes, the odd snippet of gore here and there. The script is abysmal - sad given the screenwriter also wrote THE CROW back in the day - and the director never worked on anything else. That hardly comes as a surprise.

All that THE TOMB does do well is waste the talents of various cast members. Wes Bentley is the lead but can do nothing with such a dull character, while the likes of Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa, Michael Madsen, and Eric Roberts pop up in various supporting roles or cameos. They're not worth tuning in for either.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Tomb holds Holy Crap
ljarsonbeck-14 October 2022
I bought this dvd for 50 cents at a library book sale. I spent WAAAYYY TOO MUCH. What a pile of garbage. Characters.(like the deadbeat drunken father played by Michael Madsen) you have no empathy for. Other characters that should never have been written into the movie. Storylines that have no center, and change at a moments notice. A total lack of logic or direction.

Wasted talent, wasted celluloid, waste of the viewer's time. And total waste of money for the consumer AND PRODUCERS alike A lack of a huge budget is NOTHING to be ashamed of. Spending $1,000,000 to churn out a pile of garbage, however, is a sin. Oh, and someone THINKING this idea was worth spending a million dollars on: Scarier than anything in this movie.

To put things into perspective about Vision, Continuity, and Artistic Value: This film cost as much to make as ROCKY!!!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Poe Ho
kosmasp14 February 2021
I really wasn't even sure what I'd use as a summary line ... but it kinda makes sense I think. You're welcome and no offense (if you are easily offended that is). There are reasons why one should like this ... based on an Edgar Allen Poe story with quite the actors to boast ... Cary Tagawa, Eric Roberts, Michael Madsen ... even Wes Bentley of American Beauty fame ... though apparently he hasn't done much since then ... nothing much succesful that is.

But the movie really seems quite convoluted and weird in a bad way. This is low budget and the femme fatale (if you allow me to call her that) is quite enticing. So I guess one may be able to understand the troubles our main character is in ...not to mention the supernatural element in all of this. But while this probably isn't that long, it felt like an eternity watching it - no pun intended. It has a few redeeming factors (some mentioned above), but I doubt many will cut this some slack ...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching, but room for improvement
chnau21 May 2010
Some other comments tear this film apart completely. I just felt like someone (else) ought to do justice to some of the good sides.

First, I was amazed after finishing watching "Ligeia" at it only being a little less than 90 minutes long -- felt more like an hour 45-50 to me! Now, don't think of the reason for that being a boring plot. The original story is by Edgar Allen Poe. More like the director really didn't waste any time dragging out the story at all. I believe, though, it would help if the sequence of events wasn't quite as rushed. More precisely, if in places there had been more room for emotion and human appearance of the characters. The parts of Ligeia and Rowena, the female antagonist and protagonist, were very well acted and a terrific choice of actresses. Michael Madson is also convincing doing his usual thing. For some reason, Wes Bentley comes across as very stiff and it's hard to read what's even going through his character's mind most of the time.

But one thing I do believe really worked out great is the atmosphere. From the way the names in the opening cast turn into curls of smoke to the coloring (or reduction thereof) and lighting to the beautiful shots of the locations and sky ...

I guess what's showing is just that it's the director's first serious movie. But the movie is worth watching, especially if you like the genre and an Edgar Allen Poe story drenched in a somewhat Gothic atmosphere with two truly talented and beautiful lead actresses.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Horrible experience
mohanfido13 May 2020
I'm not blaming the characters but they keep staring at each other for a while in between dialog, not in an intimate way as for the role between characters, but creepy. Legiea could have acted well for the whole movie. One scene where Jonathan poisons Rowena(Legiea), after the swig Jonathan spits the poison. That turns out to be the worst twist in a climax. Overall, if you really wanted to watch black magic movie with a slow screenplay, this is the one for you.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
boring
curse-of-egypt22 August 2014
When I first saw this advertised, I was thinking it was a movie based on the book, The Tomb by F. Paul Wilson so I watched the first part of the movie and shut it off. Not really my kind of movie at all. I love a good horror flick that scares the daylights out of me but not this film. I rated it a low budget movie. Not worth watching at all. I've seen great acting in a lot of horror flicks and they will make me hide under my bed. But this movie? Is a joke, not even worthy of being considered a horror film or put under horror genre. I mean come on people. you guys can do a lot better with the movie than what I've seen and let me tell you, I am 54 years old and I've seen many horror films in my life, good and bad ones and this is at the top of my list of bad movies.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
it do works out fine in some parts
trashgang28 May 2013
After all this movie wasn't that bad. It do has a few weaker moments but the story was okay for such kind of flicks. There's not that much to discover if you are a horror geek but the fast editing made it watchable.

The moments I didn't like were the, sigh, CGI moments used to catch the spirits of the death especially when you see faces being catched in tubes. But what i didn't like was again the performance of Eric Roberts. Here he speaks Russian and if he has to speak English it's done with an Eastern European accent but it just didn't work out. Also, there are a few love scene's involved throughout Ligeia but here I did want to repeat what I have said in so many flicks. If you have a love scene how is it possible that the girl is laying with her bra on in bed while being shagged. Face it, in the beginning of this flick we do see Rowena (Kaitlin Doubleday) laying in bed very sexy but once she's being taken by Jonathan (Wes Bently) she still has her bra on, what a turn off for the guy having sex with her. And there are a few scene's were we do have that situation.

Still, it's a bit low on the red stuff but being based on a Poe story it's normal that this have to give the goosebumps by creepy moments. It succeeded in some parts. It's the atmosphere that creates this flick. It isn't going to be a classic or I even won't really call it a Gothic story, therefor the CGI stood in the way.

Ideal for a starter for a horror evening

Gore 0/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2,5/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
i give it 6 of 10
whitemike200025 June 2012
this was a good movie, but had a few minor problems, one that it should have had a little better story line and two which is the most important it needed to show some raw nude action with Sofya Skya, but other then that it was a good movie but i have seen much better. and also it could have a little better acting but as always Sofya Skya remains hot as hell, but Eric Roberts did some what of a shitty role.

could also be looked as a slap in the balls to Edgar Allen Poe, and the caretaker's niece needs to learn to speak Russian but then that is just a opinion by someone who is a perfectionist "me" and also i found the that it wasn't really fallowing the original "The Tomb of Ligeia"
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed