Sagan (2008) Poster

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A charming little monster
jotix1002 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Francoise Sagan loved to live large. Success came early in her life. The appearance of her novel "Bonjour tristesse" propelled her into the French literary stratosphere with a book that became a sensation. She came from the bourgeois world, by surrounding herself with an entourage of people that loved to party, cost her dearly. Among her friends were Florence Malraux, the daughter of legendary writer Andre Malraux. The film emphasizes how much she loved the material things that came with her celebrity, although she could not care less about money. The proof is how she went through fortunes and ended alone and penniless.

Her love for fast cars caused her an accident that almost killed her. From the drugs that she was given to allay her pain, she became addicted to some them, specially cocaine, which she and her friends loved. Ms. Sagan was never a happy woman. In spite of the wealth she was able to accumulate, she died almost penniless. The house she loved had to be sold to pay her debts.

The woman who supposedly led a privilege life never found real love in her life. She married Guy Schoeller early on, only to divorce him a few years later. Her romance to American Robert Westhoff ended amicably when he decided to take a male lover after giving her a son. Ms. Sagan became involved with fashion stylist Peggy Roche in a lesbian relationship that lasted until her death from cancer. At the same time she was having an affair with a French Playboy editor, something that was left out of the film.

At the end of her life, Francoise Sagan was involved in a tax evasion scandal, as another woman, the mysterious Astrid, came into her life making her dependent on her, and abandoning her at the worst moment in her life when she became ill.

Diane Kurys, co-wrote and directed "Sagan", a film made for French television which was shown on cable recently. All the salient points of the life of a celebrity like Francoise Sagan are documented in the picture. Her take on the novelist shows a sympathetic view of a woman who had it all and squandered her talents carelessly. Her love for the fast life and excesses ultimately brought upon her sad ending.

Sylvie Testud showed an uncanny physical similarity to Ms. Sagan. This actress is the main reason for watching "Sagan'. The actress shows a vulnerable side of a woman that had it all but was never comfortable with her own celebrity. Her reckless living was her worst enemy. She was a monster, and yet, she had a tremendous sense of loyalty to the group of friends that stayed with her until the end. The supporting cast does good work for Ms. Kurys.

Whether one liked Ms. Sagan's literature, or not, she was an influential figure of the last century. One of the best things in the film is the crisp cinematography of Michel Abramowicz who clearly understood the world of Ms. Sagan and photographs her playgrounds in vivid colors. The music score is by Armand Amar.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
comme si, comme ça
etudiantemo14 April 2009
Sagan's charisma lies in two elements: her intelligence and sincerity. She is apt at using simple but touching words and phrases, for example, the monologue on the first page of Bonjour, Tristesse. Her legendary life, full of inspiration, enthusiasm, caprice, sometimes looks like an enigma, mysterious and compellent,even her unconventional behavior looks acceptable. Though the film seems to be a little bit insipid, or rather dull, lacking passion and elegancy;the final scene her unreal talk to his son is truly moving. Sylvie Testud's casting is admirable, and i think she wears a unique temperament, close to a temperament of a poet and aristocratic temperament.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another French heroine
stensson28 October 2008
It seems to be a trend in French mainstream movies nowadays, to film the story of celebrities' lives. "Sagan" is just another example.

This author lived a quite unhappy life, being used but also letting herself be used by flatterers and others. They all disappeared and betrayed her, like she betrayed many people, including her son.

But this story is told in such a common way. The main character is complex, but still made very easy to understand. It's all simplified in a moralizing way. Not that you can object much about moralizing over this destructive life and surely, this is entertaining and absolutely not stupid. But Sagan deserves better.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rushed, and somewhat incoherent
bob99830 August 2011
This film started as a TV miniseries; it was chopped down to feature length for general release. I don't think it is an important film, being rushed and skimpy on character development. Guy Schoeller meets Francoise at a book signing and ten seconds later, they're getting wed, and shortly after that, divorced.

It was very hard to keep track of the many characters who drop in to the story, then abruptly exit. Just when did Mme. Lebreton enter Francoise's life anyway? Sylvie Testud does a tremendous job of playing Francoise Sagan; she must have been a sort of Rimbaud of the moneyed class, and Testud captures all the wild, impulsive, spendthrift behavior Sagan was noted for. Pierre Palmade as Chazot walks through an underwritten part (all the supporting parts are underwritten) but is interesting to look at.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Certain Style
writers_reign15 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Thirty two years ago Diane Kurys wrote and directed Diabolo Menthe, a thinly-disguised autobiographical take on the childhood of her sister and herself. She followed with others in the same vein, Coup de foudre, La Baule le Pins etc, all beautifully realised. Now, thirty one years later - Sagan was shot as a two-part TV special and aired in 2008 - she has finally come full circle with a genuine BIOgraphy, namely Francoise Sagan, who was catapulted to fame via a novel she batted out in her school vacation, Bonjour, Tristesse. It wasn't actually a very good novel any more than its successors, A Certain Smile, Aimez-vouz Brahms but none of them were outright trash, all sold in droves and all were filmed. The movie has been considerably pared down from its original 180 minutes so it's difficult to be too harsh at what often seem abrupt modulations - the housekeeper/companion who appears seemingly out of the blue during Sagan's last few years, for example. Sylvie Testud is one of the finest French actresses of her generation and I can't recall a single bad performance (though I have not seen everything) and here she is at the top of her game managing to capture the sense of someone permitting Life to live them rather than vice versa. There is fine support especially from Denis Podalydes and Jeanne Balibar but it will be remembered as a curio rather than an essential part of the canon.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Above average for a biopic
aFrenchparadox22 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It leaves you a weird feeling afterwards, if, like me, you enjoy and believe in free life-styles. Because she was really free, in advance on her time, never cared about other's opinions... which is something I entirely admire and quite try to do. But she ended up alone, pathetically alone. And this makes you wonder if this life-style you aim to reach is a good choice. Strangely I am convinced it wasn't the aim of the movie, to make you wonder about the emptiness of her life. So maybe it's me again who is projecting (some worries nowadays about where my Independence drives me?). Or maybe, as we say in French, you can't have the butter and the money for the butter, meaning, every life-style choice has negative consequences: chose freedom, you will end up alone; chose love and commitment to others, you will end up feeling coerced. In any case, happiness is not at the end, so enjoy the moment...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Piaf on Prozac
richard_sleboe16 October 2008
Why another biopic? Why biopics at all? Writer-director Diane Kurys doesn't know. Perhaps so you have something to take your mother to. But chances are she'd fall asleep. Francoise Sagan may have had an exciting life, but you certainly wouldn't know from this movie. It feels like the entire cast and crew were high on 875, that mysterious morphine Sagan was a slave to half her life. Because nothing ever happens, you will quickly find your mind wandering to the fringes of the screen. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it's even a cinematic strategy, but I wouldn't bet on it. Take Florence Malraux, the eminent writer's daughter. Played by Margot Abascal, she is so much more vibrant and adorable than everybody else you wonder why the movie isn't about her. Or take the shady guy: When Francoise and Peggy, drunk as hell, check into the Hotel Raphael for a little lesbian loving, they pass a nameless stranger walking the other way. I wonder what his story is. Where is he going, wearing giant shades, in the middle of the night? Perhaps I should have followed him.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loved it
victoryrou6 March 2021
Nice movie with Françoise Sagan's real life. I think the actress is very successful and perfect for the role. If you haven't read the writer's books, go ahead and watch this movie, it's quiet representative for her whole point of view and life
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bonjour Tristesse, Bonsoir Solitude
jromanbaker6 June 2021
Diane Kury's has achieved the impossible, and that is recreating Francoise Sagan's life to the screen. I have not seen the telefilm, but the shortened version for the cinemas. At first I thought Sylvie Testrud would not be able to remain in character for all the different visual and voice changes in this extraordinary woman's life, but achieve it she does, and magnificently. I am not going into the details of this life, but one of the many relationships Sagan had really stood out; the relationship with Peggy Roche and their love for each other. Jeanne Balibor played her to perfection, and in this film it is essentially the women in her life that interested me most. The latter relationship with a woman called Astrid was equally well portrayed by Arielle Dombasle and her ( perhaps ) fickle nature was in total contrast to that of Peggy Roche. I agree with some reviewers that too much is played out in too little time, and the film itself is slightly flawed because of that. But I do not think it could have been otherwise. Sagan was a brilliant writer and a complex woman, and personally I would have liked Kurys to have drawn more attention to her as a dramatist as well as a fine author. And yet I feel the essential is there, and that is of a life obsessed with a sad joy of life while realising that all ends in people dying, or leaving and that solitude is too often the final feeling that most people know. It is a hard film to watch, and despite a certain softening of her political involvements it appears as accurate as it could possibly be. I hope that those who see this film will return to her books, and read her plays if they want to see how fully she was involved in that sad passion which is life itself.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed