Au nom de la terre (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
an unflinching look at what it is to be a farmer in France
mjfhhh1 April 2020
Pierre takes over his fathers farm at the age of twenty five. He loves the land and his family, wife and two children. They are a happy tightly knit unit and it seems there's no hardship they cannot overcome. But as the debts mount and the business spirals out of control, how long will it be until Pierre breaks under the pressure?

IN THE NAME OF THR LAND is an unflinching look at what it is to be a farmer in France. The beauty, the isolation, the rewarding hard work and the financial reward that doesn't always match the effort that was put in. The best thing about the film is the acting. Guillaume Canet deserves an Oscar for his portrayal of a good man in crisis.

Eduardo Bergeron is a documentary director and the film at times feels as such. You almost expect a voice over commenting on what's going on. Bergeron does not use the shaky camera move or first person shots to make the movie feel real. The tension and drama here comes solely through the performances and supported by the wonderful soundtrack of Thomas Doppelo - the disc should make pleasant stand alone listening.

IN THE NAME OF THE LAND is not an easy film to sit through. It could lose a 10 minutes or so from its running time, but even in shorter form it's hard to watch the characters you deeply care about being emotionally destroyed on screen. This is where the film succeeds and where it fails. There's rarely a ray of hope in the story. IN THE NAME OF THE LAND is a devastating experience.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Farmers and burn out
laurencedesigne31 May 2020
Not only a story about farmers conditions but also about passionated people facing burn out...
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Life story
kosmasp15 July 2023
No pun intended - farmers and burn out - those were the days. Sorry not the days where that happened. But when you could write a few words and be done with your review. I still like to write a bit more than necessary, but on some movies, less is more. This movie right here is important to give us an insight into inheritance, inot life and legacy ... into mental illness too. Not mine of course (yes I watch a lot ... of movies, which makes me able to rate and review a lot too) ... but that of the main character.

Farmers do have a lot to do - a lot to stomach. With their family being torn and maybe even wanting to leave for the city. There is a reason many have issues. Too many to really solve all of them or even touch upon them in one movie (or review) .. but the movie does try to make it as accessible as possible. Kudos for that ...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fin de decade masterpiece .
ulicknormanowen1 June 2020
A movie dealing with the rural world, a subject which is rarely treated : in the past ,in "Farrebique" and its remake "Biquefarre (1945 and 1983) ,Georges Rouquier depicted his own family ; recently "petit paysan" attracted attention.

"Au nom de la terre" ,against all odds, out of the blue ,was a blockbuster when it was released ,even beating the umpteenth "Rambo" , which was released the same day in France .

Based on a true story ,director Edouard Bergeon's own family ,it's probably the fin de decade masterpiece of the French cinema;I was skeptical about Guillaume Canet cast as a farmer ,but I had to make amends: the actor was a horse -breeders' son and he knew all the tricks of the trade ;his performance in the film is one of his very best ;his metamorphosis is stunning :from the dashing go-getter fresh from Womying where the big herds impress him to the human wreck of the second part ,his facial expressions run the whole gamut from enthousiasm to despair.

The first part is close to documentary :it pits Pierre Jargeau 's modern methods against his dad Jacques (an admirable Rufus )'s old ways ("I started when I was 13 , and I had almost nothing ").Pierre thinks big ,he invests , his farm expand ; the director does not pass over in silence the mistakes :the intensive farming of chickens ,does it replace the fresh eggs you get from hens living in open air?That his wife finds him unconscious in the huge henhouse is revealing.Although there are moments of true happiness (Christmas and a birthday celebration) , it become obvious that his hard labor has taken the best of him (which the wise dad could have predicted); and the debts pile up , life becomes harder and harder till an unexpected disaster ruins all Pierre's hopes.

The second part of the movie is a descent into hell ,showing warts and all with a great sense of decency : the most harrowing moment is perhaps the impossibility for the dirty slovenly dad to attend a wedding: he's no longer part of the society ;and thanks for using a French song instead of the obligatory American ones .In this context ,Barbara's poignant " dis,quand reviendras-tu? " (+tell me,when will you come back?) heard on the beautiful landscapes (lovingly filmed),goes straight to the heart .

May the farmers cease to be victims !
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Authentic story
emense-460013 January 2020
French countryside is often represented in the cinema and especially foreign films in an idyllic setting. The landscapes are beautiful but farmers lives are extremely difficult. This movie depicts the reality of a small family farm which is the norm in France. Sad but true.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wonderful, sad and authentic film
paulineahoggan2 March 2020
I saw this at a one off showing at the Glasgow Film Festival. Beautifully made and played by a great cast, it was so quietly powerful. A good role model on social comment in movies as there was no self righteous lecturing from the director and it was all the more effective for that. Please do see. Oh, and the music was great and appropriately used.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A grim and often bleak look at the hardships faced by farmers
gregking47 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first feature fiction film for Edouard Bergeon, a former photojournalist and documentarian, and it has been largely inspired by the life of his own father, a farmer who passed away in 1996, and to whom In The Name Of The Land is fittingly dedicated. This is a grim and often bleak look at the hardships faced by farmers and depicts the harsh realities of life on the land. A post-script at the end tells us that, in France, a farmer commits suicide every second day on average. A sobering statistic. And the experiences of a farming family facing hardship, financial problems, natural disasters, family conflicts, and stress and depression will resonate strongly with Australian audiences. French actor Guilluame Canet (Tell No One, etc) plays Pierre Jarjeau, the prodigal son who returns home after several years working on a ranch in Wyoming and takes over the family farm. He plans to revolutionise the farm using modern technology and methodology, which leads to some clashes with his more traditional father Jacques (Rufus, a regular in the films of Jean-Pierre Jeunet). The film spans some twenty years. We observe the family dynamics and see the impact that Pierre's descent into depression has on his supportive and long-suffering wife Claire (Belgian actress Veerle Baetens, from The Broken Circle Breakdown, etc) and his oldest son Thomas (Anthony Bajon). Bergeon's background in documentary filmmaking lends a realism to the farming scenes in particular. Visually the film is quite striking thanks to the widescreen lensing of cinematographer Eric Dumont; but he also works in closeup at times which lends a claustrophobic feel to those scenes in which Pierre suffers from depression and paranoia. The film and its drama hinges around Canet's raw performance as he runs the gamut from early enthusiasm and drive through to disappointment, anger, confusion and bitterness.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good topic, Bad movie
marionchoupot22 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I am moved and interested by this very important, current and legitimate topic. Farmers in France have been suffering for decades and suicidal tendencies are very predominant. However the movie is long, inefficient with a tendency to shortcuts and mediocre artistic choices. The characters are not well evolved and worked, one scene Pierre is happy and confident, and the next one he is bumped out. There is no introspection w there is no leading into his mind or inner suffering. He is just bumped out and that's it. We're not going deep enough on certain levels, the movie is just not working. I was left unsatisfied with a bitter taste.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Miserable, depressing film.
estronbase31 December 2019
I hated this film. I really don't understand why anybody would choose to watch such a dismal story. I saw it in a sneak- preview and would have left the cinema if I could have without disturbing others. Veerle Baetens was wonderful.
5 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed