Contact (TV Series 2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
39 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The interviews are good.
Nemesis422 October 2021
If you can suffer the irritating production style, within the show are some revealing interviews with witnesses. If you're a researcher on the subject you'll find a few nuggets. They've looked at a few big cases, then discuss parallel cases that relate. I found this useful info.

They tend to skim over cases and leave out details, which is what will happen if one is trying to cover 5 cases in 45 minutes ! But they did get some good interviews, so watch it for those.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Eh
phillyfiredaddy-7417527 September 2019
Kind of a waste of time. Learned very little more of substance than I learned with that other show. The one with the guy from Blink 182. That's a much better show.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watch & Throw Out...Kind of Like Rinse Again & Spin
AudioFileZ25 January 2020
The NY Times outing of the ATIP program has raised UFO shows from the dead. There's that one with the guy from Blink whatever and this one. They're both doing the "jump and scare" tactic of attempting to verbally make something admittedly strange bombastic and earthshattering. There exclamations insult the viewer more than add anything important or game changing. Their "war room" with the supposed made for the CIA link analysis software and experts give me gas. Silly in the claim that they're using anything that is hardly in reality more sophisticated than Google. They try too hard to make cases for stupid things like caves for instance. They act all surprised like they're uncovering something amazing and you, the viewer, should be taken back. Why is this become the fate of UFO shows? It makes you wonder if the genre is ever going to be compelling again. In fairness there are a few good questions pondered (those unexplained sounds) and witnesses, but there's more silly conjecture trying to passed off as groundbreaking investigation Will someone please make a new UFO show that actually adds credibility to the phenomenon?
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
POOR RESEARCH OF NAVY OPERATIONS
akarakos-3672227 September 2019
The episode where a former Sailor was supposedly hiding to avoid being questioned about a USO/UFO he observed, when his aircraft carrier made the crew go to darken ship, lacked credibility. The narrator explained that the aircraft carrier went to darken ship without telling the crew if it were a drill or not. A nyone who has served in the Navy, with half a brain, can tell you that Navy ships go to "darken ship" everhy single evening when underway (at sea). he ship makes sure all exterior lights are out however the ship keeps Mast lights (white), Stern Light (white) and Port (red) and Starboard (green) running lights on in accordance with international and inland rules of the road. The former Sailor "may" have seen something but the darken ship condition does not have anything to do with it. It occurs from sunset to sunrise. Also, it's not uncommon to be outside the skin of the ship during those hours. Everyship that is at sea has a port, starboard and after lookout on watch. These 3 personnel are junior personnel and the bridge watchstanders can number from 4 to 7 more personnel.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Data and research on point! The rest... It's Hollyweed Style
dtinytalk23 December 2021
If you have the patience to deal with the sensationalism and fake intrigue and build-up of the show and concentrate only on the findings and research done it's a very informative show. Besides, you can get to hear from other parts of the world where UFO's have been seen...

It gives you more insight of what we all want to really know and no government want us to know... You can find all that if you google it. Lots of fake stuff.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Global events
mhne-9993021 December 2020
I've binge viewed this series. Sceptics saying it's old info rehashed may be right? There is a lot of info I haven't seen or read before, I'm certainly no expert, but when you watch this, like I have in December 2020,after the year we have had with an unprecedented pandemic, it's food for thought!!!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Exceptional! Well Done.
drisley-722309 June 2021
After watching all the terrible documentaries and series on History Channel hosted by "UFO Researchers" that have no evidence or data, and fill in blanks with theories from books of fiction, it's nice to watch this show!

Finally some real evidence and research, along with some new information that isn't found anywhere else.

It's done in a very "X-Files" sort of way but I appreciate that the research is done very scientifically without jumping to conclusions from "UFO Theorists".

I hope this comes back for another season.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Big red flag confusion an airplane for a ufo.
bmoss-7482624 August 2019
On episode 2 they show, what many seasoned ufo investigators already know, a video of an aircraft emitting a condensation trail, calling it a ufo. With a glaring mistake like that, there goes any credibilty. It was flight IB6830. Do better homework and use REAL ufo investigators, it will keep you from making future huge mistakes.
25 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Better Than Most!
drisley-722307 June 2021
After watching so many terrible UFO documentaries and series, like those on the History channel, this one is very refreshing.

I'm sick of shows like Ancient Aliens that have no data or facts, but instead rely on "UFO researchers" to fill in blanks with "theories". These "theorists" are just authors of fiction that they try to pass off as fact and I couldn't care less what they believe. Data is all that matters.

Contact is the kind of documentary you will like if you want more data than guessing. And surprisingly , they find a lot of new evidence and stories, or present things in a new way.

I also like how the show is edited to make it feel almost like an X-Files series without relying on "theories with no evidence". Sure some might not like this, but it makes what may be mundane a lot more entertaining.

I believe this show should be rated a lot higher than it is, but I also suspect most people who like the UFO question prefer science fiction and having other people's beliefs force fed them so they don't have to think themselves.

If you would rather be presented evidence and data without others filling in the blanks for you with ridiculous "extraterrestrials" statements, then this is the show for you.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This show is Fake, and heres why!!!
devryguy13 September 2019
Ok so I've been watching this series now for about 4 days off and on in my free time... but heres what told me the show is fake..... season 1, episode 6 @ 31 minutes in sara and the other guy find an underground bunker, they decide to climb down inside of it, they then find a blast door they open and go through. NEXT, Sara sees a bunch of newer looking batteries on the floor, like car batteries, and some newer looking electronics equipment on the shelves... the thing is if this place has been abandoned for sooo long.... why is the electronics turned on and LEDs lights are turned on on the equipment...????? Did anyone else catch this? This makes NO SENSE. THAT EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE OLD AND DEFF NOT GETTING POWER TO THEM....
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very interesting
4ri4n423 September 2019
I really like this show, because it's more investigative as opposed to Ancient Aliens. Having witnessed a few UFOs myself, I think we need more shows like this one to open the minds of the people. The hosts are using good investigative techniques to uncover some truths. The only thing that's a bit weird is as to how they trespass so much :P
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a crock of ****
electronica-uk12 September 2019
I was hoping for a whole lot more from this series. To say it's laughable is an insult to comedy. Their constant assertion that they're using an ex-CIA link analysis software is even more of a laugh - it's just a glorified Google search with some fancy graphics. Not to mention the constant wild assumptions that Myke Cole makes - that's without his pretentious spelling of Mike. As others have pointed out they're corrupting getting known sightings details. Then there's the guys down in South America who are just making stuff up left right and centre. How you can say that a bolt sticking out of the ground is the mounting point for a generator or that a nondescript building was some secret laboratory is beyond me. It's programs like this that give legitimate investigations into the UFO conundrum a bad name.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating stuff presented in a mostly down-to-earth and nerve-steadying way
jrarichards9 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The first and main thing to be said about "Contact" on the Discovery Channel is that it cannot be seen in isolation, but rather as some kind of parallel effort to the History Channel's "Unidentified". Doubtless there is a superficial element of competition here of the "if they've got a programme, we have to have one too" kind; but anybody who sees both series (and I expect there will be many) will realise that what unites the programmes is far greater than what divides them - even if the subject matter is kept somewhat separate and non-overlapping.

Ostensibly the competitor programme is the bigger deal, as - featuring deep Washington/military insiders Luis Elizondo and Christopher Mellon - it coincides with the US Navy's ADMISSION THAT UFO FOOTAGE EXISTS AND IS REAL, albeit with this not necessarily taken as meaning extra-terrestrial.

In contrast, "Contact" - which mainly confines the above story to its first episode - does feature "former" (ha ha ha) people from the CIA, USMC, FBI and so on apparently using a database out of a California HQ to spearhead on-the-ground UFO-related investigations to often-remote bits of the USA and several South American countries (Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Brazil). Not always remote, though, as Phoenix is in there, as well as Arizona Governor Fife Symington, who entirely ridiculed UFOs there while in office, only to take the sightings entirely seriously once he had left the post!

This inclusion of the "Phoenix Lights" makes the point that stories the protagonists act all shocked over are actually wellish-known, so we know that our investigators are ACTING surprised. This is just one element of this show's artificiality. But then that is the point about the "leading us out here to enlightenment with government say-so" mission of the programme, which is presumably expected to reach beyond the ranks of already-committed UFO fans.

A bit paradoxically, the team also extends to a Brit in the (good) shape of Sarah Cruddas, who is presented as a scientist but is actually more of a science broadcaster-journalist (though she does have training in astrophysics to Bachelor level). Her presence is interesting and a bit curious, but her CV notes that when still a kid she won a competition in science that got her a place on NASA Space Camp.

These statuses, the unopposed access the teams mostly get to sites, and the willingness of people (even ex-military and ex-CIA) to talk to them without obscuring of faces etc. all tend to give the lie to the programme's claim that they are courageously uncovering activity by a government (governments) ever-so-willing to cover things up. Clearly, whatever they are doing is with the tacit approval/cooperation of the (US, but also Chilean/Brazilian) government, or at least parts of it/them - and this is the key way in which the programme resembles "Unidentified". An annoying feature here, by the way, is that witnesses speaking Spanish or Portuguese are NOT translated in a proper way, but only in soundbite summaries. Even at my level of Spanish I can tell that, and it looks unprofessional, and offers just one more piece of evidence that the large-scale issues someone wants us to be guided towards here are treated as far important than the nitty-gritty details of what people actually say!

Those of us who have taken (an even more or less sceptical) interest in this kind of topic for years are thus faced with the unthinkable, exciting, amazing truth that these are now the years in which - for whatever reason - the powers that be want us (or at least more of us than before) to be let in gently to the truth which is out there, as it were.

As in "Unidentified", the makers here flirt and tease with the idea that the unexplained aspects covered might as well be foreign powers spying on things or otherwise interfering as they may be aliens - or might even "just" be our own high tech that one branch of the regime has kept secret from others. Sounds reasonable, but probably nobody is very convinced by that, as examples of one side having and the other not having advanced solutions are rather few and far between for very obvious reasons. Similarly, places like Malmstrom AFB in Montana - with missile silos spread out over a vast area - are not where you would want to work on any experimental aircraft, or any funny business of any kind - yet it seems missile control systems may have been switched off there more than once, in association with reported UFO activity.

Frankly, then, "Contact" is showing what "they" want us to be shown (not least UFO interest in volcanoes, lakes (and the water in general) and nuclear facilities), but at this stage I'm more than willing to take what is on offer, with the strong feeling that this is just the beginning of a remarkable process.

"Contact" is not an extremely thrilling watch, and this again seems a deliberate strategy. It prefers to move inexorably on at a steady pace. But overall it is fascinating (even as it is artificial-looking), and all the more so because one only grasps well after the episodes just what the magnitude of its content might actually be.

Why things are working in this way at this point in time is anybody's guess, and probably a more fascinating question than the two series put together...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Misleading and not fully revealing.
kennethvancraeynest2 October 2019
It seems to be the new way of making viewers "hooked" or interested in a supposed revealing information that already was known or not that heavily mediatized all over the world. They "discover" "unknown" structures but then they show footage and information that is to me not that special. Similar like in "Hunting Hitler". That was more revealing at some side aspects of history and the speculation about the general subjects. So...you get interested on a subject that has not been much on tv for a long time but eventually based on already known facts and partly suggested or speculated information. The researchers almost overact and the voice presentation are becoming the "new" way of directing/editing in the documentary genre. Some bits and parts are perhaps revealing but don't fall for it for 100% When you get to the point you're "hooked' at the point of 3rd or 4th episode you're getting to ask yourself what are they telling me without telling me anything. Then feeling being mislead and lost some time, but that is personally...
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So far I love it
suzi63-126 February 2021
To me it is less fake than all the other UFO shows & at least that damn narrator on Ancient Aliens isn't narrating. My main reason for liking this is that it takes a lot of theories and sightings and tries to make sense of them an showing how similar occurrences happen in places far aware. I hope it comes back. Or maybe they just knew too much for the aliens. Probably Trump's fault.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Fake as fake can get
sami-279506 September 2019
"The team use a CIA developed software" blah blah. No. They have a fake thing that tries to look like tech. "Importing SQL" yeah sure. Why is it so hard to even try to make something look like it's real? Because the target audience believes anything you throw at them?

It's yet another show that tries to look like they're doing something when in reality they just want to travel around and talk crap with people. They don't do any actual research on anything. And of course they won't come to any conclusions. That would break the illusion.
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the best realistic so far indept investigation
row333au17 September 2020
At the start, I was kinda disappointed.... but then realise its a start from scratch to whatever and whereever "the truth" leads ya to get to the truth.... where you only get what data you have available..... and logically follow to the next and from that to the next..... as each time the rabbit hole gets further, deeper and many tunnels to choose, which are open or allowed to and going around about it...... the thing is...... the facts and logical data to be analyze are still building up base on season one alone....... they are still on the stage of scratching the surface.....

if one is going to the hindsight of the progress others who've tried the kind of investigation they did (UFOlogist, organisations and other public 'truther' avenue) what they have done are much more progressing than any of them have before..... the amount of proving beyond doubt of existence and building trust among whitleblowers and other researchers/experts who would have contributed further would be mind blowing, if they are allowed to keep doing what they were doing and even maybe invent more creative investigation...... its not about the sensationalizing at the edge of you're seat every episode (they could if they added more television viewer crowding gimmick or realistic CGI reenactment for rating), but it is about getting to the 'truth'....... those are what will make them far endearing than ever....
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Seriously!!
andriux-5509424 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Here we have a show with Ex CIA FBI Intelligence Officers etc....and they are as thick as a plank of wood really is this the best people they could find to investigate anything?? The show is a joke, these people seem to just dumb and i mean really dumb the stuff they say shows no intelligence no investigative skills and at the end you get nothing....it all goes no where. As an example.....Episode 6 the Huemul Island ..a simple search tells you everything about the island .and these planks don't even check that possibly, maybe they don't even know smartphones have been invented yet..damn even Amazon is selling a book about the history of the island...Really don't waste your time on this it will simply make you dumber....

Maybe they got paid well to act so stupid...good for them but please no more of this crap.....))))))
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Based on facts not conjecture - its must watch TV!
chupk-5203720 September 2019
I must say from the very first episode I was hooked. The pace of this show is intense and they cover a lot of ground - literally. I love their link search system - really wish we had this instead of Google so we could uncover social media posts and relevant news articles in real time. The militaristic rigor they use to go from one clue to the next is refreshing for this subject matter and you can tell they put a lot of time and effort into each show. I for one really appreciate it - I was getting tired of the same old UFO stories out there about Roswell etc. This show really brings it home for me. Its not scary alarming but kind of makes you realize we're not the top dogs in the universe. When you learn that these visitors can travel at over 3600 miles per hour in our own atmosphere - you know they've got some super cool technology we can learn from! Keep up the great work - hope you guys can make more episodes. Thanks!
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible acting, terrible script
asuntosdeluis2 November 2019
Its just frustrating to watch, but you want to watch more just in case something worthwhile comes out, but as you keep ok watching you get more and more frustrated over the louzy acting by every single one
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Thank you
SandOwl_29 September 2019
Thank you for making this series. Thank you for investigating these situations all over the world & tracking down credible witnesses to events.

The last episode of season 1 gave me chills. Hearing that man recount his experience on the Nimitz in 1995.

I hope you will continue to investigate & bring the results to the rest of the world.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
HUGE LETDOWN
dennyayden-1705027 September 2019
This is a very poorly put together realty-docudrama. Asking questions about UFO sightings and stramge experiences. Trying to come to conclusions by piecing what they think is happening. This show is an embarrassment to Discovery Channel...
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great
sseala4 October 2019
Love the use of new tech to uncover new details..love the whole thing including the cast. Keep up the good work.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
More serious, please
Dusan_Indjic-Luigi27 August 2019
Well made, high production, but on tricky subject and "thin" science, so to say. If someone already "glides" into muddy waters of today "UFOlogy", they definitively should be more precise and thorough. I'll try to illustrate here through the contents reduction... While I'm personally not intrigued with such questions and being more interested into scientific Fermi's paradox point of view; after watching first three episodes I came with a much firm Answer to extraterrestrial interest in (super-)volcanic activity. Being a part of seismically active, and therefore volcanic system that could be one of a dozen global super-volcanoes. Say, aliens could simply be monitoring activity of these "global killers" interested in eventually settling our planet, after volcanic winter. While not hurting people directly. To clearify, one of such eruptions, 75.000 yrs ago nearly destroyed homo-erectus and presents (geologically) recent "bottleneck" of our species. Super-volcano Toba in Indonesia destroyed most us then, and by some (mostly genetic) studies some thousends survived from about a million, pre-event. So, above is an example of how three 45 mins episodes can be explained in just one paragraph. It illustrates story-idleness (though filled instead with good narration, scenario, photography and other fruits of high-budget production), I would recommend to interested to find something more comprehensive or more serious on the subject.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed