(TV Series)

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
In defense of Lerner and Lowe
sheezcrazy23 January 2020
I haven't actually seen this particular production of "Camelot", I wish I could. I did see there was only one review here, and I am writing to defend Lerner and Lowe's work, which I've seen three different productions of. The reviewer states this is a weak musical. No, it's not. It's a fantastic musical: intelligent, amusing with fantastic music like most of Lerner and Lowe's work. Julie Andrews made her bones with this musical, co-starting with Richard Burton. This show was immensely popular in the sixties, and the Broadway production in the 80's with Richard Harris was also brilliant. Rock Hudson toured successfully starting as King Arthur as well in the 70s. Please don't let fubared1's review of this influence your opinion of this wonderful production. Please see it for yourself and judge, it's worth watchiing. Also, fubared1 mentions "Lewis's Once and Future King". Maybe he was referring to C.S. Lewis? The Once and Future King was written by T.H. White
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weak
fubared19 February 2017
This is a very weak performance of a highly overrated musical. Gabriel Byrne hardly sings at all and sounds like he has a bad cold. He also turns Arthur into a sniveling wimp...pathetic, in short. Marin Mazzie couldn't act her way out of the proverbial paper. Christopher Lloyd plays his usual wacko 'Taxi' character. Stacy Keach and Fran Drescher are very short-lived and basically wasted (Drescher is particularly horrid with her usual Queens dialect). Lancelot is a over-blown opera singer and not very good-looking. All in all a total waste of time. I guess I never liked this show much because it trashes Lewis' Once and Future King which was a fabulous book. Giving it a 5 out of 10 was being generous.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Kitschy casting puts a damper on an other wise evening that certainly will be forgot.
mark.waltz4 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It's a shame that in spite of a terrific leading lady and some wise choices in the supporting cast that the production of this as a whole had to resort to stunt casting to make this worthy of PBS broadcast. I saw this musical live on the national tour in 1984 with Richard Harris (which had a Cameron McIntosh like Sensibility) and while I would love a Broadway revival of it, I hope that they rely on talent over names that have no place in being in this musical. Unfortunately, Gabriel Byrne seems very uncomfortable as King Arthur, and while I didn't expect him to talk/sing like Richard Burton, I didn't expect him to be singing Lerner and Lowe like he was reciting Shakespeare. Fortunately, the gorgeous Marin Mazzie is there as Guinevere, and she sings the part beautifully. While she seems to be enjoying everything she's doing on stage and at one point seems to be laughing at actor Christopher Lloyd's antics as King Pellinore, she remains in character and doesn't just treat this as if it were a concert. Byrne, at certain moments, seems to forget that and stands around like he should have a script in his hand to refer to.

One thing about this musical I have never gotten is the purpose of the character of King Pellinore, and while Christopher Lloyd does make him amusing, he's basically there as just a sounding voice for Arthur. His arrival following the very upbeat "Lusty Month of May" is appropriate mood wise, and that is followed by Mazzie with a group of Broadway veterans singing "Then You May Take me to the Fair", another highlight. Nathan Gunn is picture perfect as Lancelot, singing with a fine operatic voice and ruggedly handsome and heroic. Bobby Steggert plays Mordred like a punk rocker and seems out of place even though he is a fine performer in his one song and few minutes on stage. But what is Fran Drescher doing there other than to get applause and laughs over her consumption of food? Even as a fan of hers, I found her cameo to be distracting and her performance in general to be out of place.

Along side Mazzie and Gunn, the other highlight is the fabulously Lush New York Philharmonic, show lavish and sweet in its use of the fabulous orchestrations presenting this renowned score. This is still a show with Act 2 problems, what do you know about slowing beautifully in the first act at 83 minutes, but at under an hour in the second act, it seems to be messed up. Those expecting a repeat of the filmed Broadway production with Richard Harris from 1982 or the underrated movie has long as you will be disappointed because this is a concert with limited costumes and only a few set pieces, but some of the costumes seem more modern that they should be. The color scheme seems to be red for Merlin, played by Stacy Keach and the chorus girls, but dark for everyone else. It has its moments of greatness, but some people seem underwear Hurst or not fully sure of themselves, and as good of a musical as it is emotionally, the flaws are obvious, making this slightly disappointing. It is easy to see why this show rarely gets a large-scale revival because of those weaknesses, but when it is done right, the show overall can leave you with chills and in tears.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed