Gruber's Journey (2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
allergies in times of war
dromasca15 September 2012
In director Radu Gabrea's Gruber's Journey the Romanian cinema gets it's first film seriously approaching the painful theme of the episodes of the Holocaust that took place in Romania between 1940 when the dictator Ion Antonescu took power (in collaboration for the first four and a half months of his regime with the extreme nationalistic Iron Guard movement) until August 1944 when the king deposed Antonescu and made Romania join the Allied for the last period of the war. One of the bloodiest episodes of this period was the pogrom and massacre of more than 13,000 Jews in the Eastern Romania town of Iasi (Yashi, Jassy) in the first days of the war. For many years the Romanian history books ignored or minimized the events, but the truth became more and more evident in the last ten years, despite efforts of Holocaust deniers who still try to hide the responsibility of the Romanian authorities of those times.

A veteran of Romania cinema, Radu Gabrea is not at his first film dealing with sensitive events in the Romanian history. In The Beheaded Rooster (Cocosul decapitat) he described the same period but looked at the events from the perspective of the German population in Romania, part of which collaborated with the Nazis. I did not like that movie but appreciated the courage in dealing with the subject. In Gruber's Journey Gabrea relies on very solid premises, using the memories of the Italian writer Curzio Malaparte who as a war correspondent visited the city soon after the events and mentioned them in his novel Kapput.

The story in the film describes Malaparte's arrival in the city in the first days after Romania entered the war as an ally of Nazi Germany, in June 1941. The war has started, but what bothers Malaparte is a terrible allergy that can be cured by a specialist residing in Iasi. That doctor is not easy to find however, chaos reigns, people cannot be found where they are supposed to be, the Balkan mentality of corruption and disorder seems to be only amplified by the war, and above all the doctor happens to be a Jew. Something terrible seems to have happened to the Jews in this city, but nobody speaks open about this or when they do double-speak hides the facts, the army and the police throw responsibility one on the other. The military commander of the region will be suspended, but not for the loss of the lives of the Jews (he actually is congratulated by dictator Antonescu for the efficient handling of the events) but for allowing its soldiers to rampage through the domain of a count and destroy his wine cellar. The film which starts in a comical register where the innocent Italian writer meets the eternal Romania of playwright Caragiale's heroes, turns into a dramatic confrontation with the horrors of crimes of war.

The team of actors does an excellent job, starting with Florin Piersic Jr. as Malaparte despite the fact that he is or looks just too young for the role, Malaparte was 42 by the time of the events described in the film. Marcel Iures has a short but memorable presence on screen as Gruber, while Claudiu Bleont and Razvan Vasilescu play the chiefs of the army and of the local prosecution office in the greatest and best tradition of Caragiale.

While the international breakthrough of the Romanian cinema was due mainly to films describing the period of 'transition' after the fall of the Communism, the re-evaluation of the past was never out of the interest of Romanian film makers. The exception was the Holocaust period, and this is the first good and courageous film on this subject. Hopefully other will follow.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Holocaust Black Comedy serves as corrective to lies of Holocaust 'Minimizers'
Turfseer15 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
There appear to be a few posters here in major denial regarding Romanian culpability vis-a-vis the Holocaust. One poster on IMDb goes so far as to say that the persecution of the Jews in Romania was by and large a series of "isolated" incidents. In regards to the Iasi pogrom (which is addressed in "Gruber's Journey), he writes: "In June, 1941, in Iasi, the German army rounded up and deported a number of Jews, following their acts of antifascist resistance and sabotage. The real numbers seem to be somewhere between 500 and 2000".

The actual number of Jews killed during Iasi pogrom was put at 13,266 by the Romanian Special Intelligence Service (SSI); the Jewish community statistics listed 14,850 killed. This was all documented by The Wiesel Commission, the common name given to the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania, which was established by former President Ion Iliescu in October 2003 to research and create a report on the actual history of the Holocaust in Romania. According to Wikipedia, "The Commission was led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel; the report was released in late 2004. The Romanian government recognized the report's findings and acknowledged the deliberate participation in the Holocaust by the World War II Romanian regime led by Ion Antonescu. The report assessed that between 280,000 and 380,000 Jews were murdered or died under the supervision and as a result of the deliberate policies of Romanian civilian and military authorities. The Wiesel Commission report also documented pervasive anti-Semitism and violence against Jews in Romania before World War II, when Romania's Jewish population was among the largest in Europe." The Wiesel Commission's report can be found at yad-vashem.org.

Gruber's Journey represents a corrective to those Holocaust deniers and minimizers who seek to minimize the role of Romanian participation in the Holocaust. The film's focus is really on Curzio Malaparte, an Italian journalist who was a press attaché in the Wehrmacht during World War II. We learn that Malaparte, who suffers from debilitating allergies, was earlier referred to a Jewish doctor, an allergist named Josef Gruber, who has disappeared after many Jews have been rounded up in Iasi and transported to parts unknown in packed cattle cars. Malaparte must find Gruber who he believes can help him overcome his allergies so he can basically function on the job.

The story picks up with Malaparte headed for the front accompanied by Colonel Freitag, a high-ranking German officer. Malaparte has a severe allergy attack on the train and they stop off in a local town where he's greeted by the head of the Italian Consulate inside an extremely dusty building where his allergies only seem to get worse (both the Italian Consul and German officer are presented sympathetically as they try to help the ailing Malaparte). At one point, Malaparte is so incapacitated that he remains in his hotel room during an air raid attack. Finally, Malaparte receives information that a Josef Gruber has been deported with other Jews from Iasi.

Malaparte then goes on his own journey attempting to navigate through the bureaucracy of the Romanian Police and Army attempting to find exactly where Gruber has been taken. The film's director, Radu Gabrea, does not whitewash Romanian responsibility for the various pogroms committed against the Jews. While the occupying German force supported their actions, Gabrea makes it quite clear that it was both the Romanian Police and Army along with the local populace (and not the Wehrmacht) who organized and carried out the widespread killings of Jews in Romania.

Unlike Roberto Benigni, who unsuccessfully attempted to mix comedy and pathos during his Holocaust themed-film, 'Life is Beautiful', Director Gabrea is on much more solid ground in his examination of the Holocaust from a comic point of view. "Gruber's Journey' is not only a 'black comedy' but a wonderful illustration of the phrase coined by Hannah Arendt, 'The Banality of Evil'. Malaparte is tossed to-and-fro between one bureaucrat and another as they stymie him in his quest to find out Gruber's fate. Chief among these petty tyrants who put obstacles in Malaparte's path at every turn is Stavarache, the head of the Secret Police and Colonel Niculescu-Coca, the local Army Garrison Commander. It's laughable (but at the same time horribly tragic) that these bumbling 'men of authority' have the fate of thousands of human beings in their hands. Orders are carried out on the pretext that Jewish 'terrorists' and 'provocateurs' are responsible for all the 'disturbances' (most based on rumors or falsely created incidents by local terror squads) which the authorities must address. The 'men at the top' very much indulge themselves by wielding almost unlimited power (checked only when the Germans override them) but descend into petty bickering as they desperately attempt to protect their own turf.

Gabrea intentionally only hints at the pervasive violence all around. When Malaparte enters the police station, locals are wiping off blood from the front walls of the station—evidence of a massacre occurring the night before. And when Malaparte finally discovers the doomed cattle cars, we only hear the screams of the trapped Jews inside—Gabrea resists showing us a scene (which actually occurred) where Malaparte opens one of the train doors and bodies fall out. It's this mixture of detachment and obliviousness coupled with sadism and petty narcissism amongst the populace which is being held up by Gabrea in high relief.

Somewhere along the line, we could have learned a little bit more about Malaparte's character. We do learn from the final credits that Malaparte wrote a widely-read book after the War which condemned the atrocities committed by both the Germans and Romanians. He also became a Communist.

The performances are uniformly excellent including Florin Piersic Jr's Malaparte—despite the fact that his German and Italian were dubbed (amazingly, you will not notice this!). See Gruber's Journey and read the Wiesel Commission's report!
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Outstanding!
tionfiul-121 September 2009
To say the least, a necessary picture. Furthermore, a very subtle point of view, and an interesting, original approach to such an equally difficult and terrifying subject. Well-paced, intelligent, and immensely telling on the subject of the delicate balance between the forces at play in the historical moment in point. A wealth of information delivered subtly gives the film body and weight. Great performances from most artists with a - by now - expected yet amazing power of transformation from Claudiu Bleont, this very versatile actor. Good debut for Mr. Piersic Jr in a star role, and a nice guest appearance from Mr. Iures. Needless to say I am sad that the film's reception so far in its native country looks cooler than should be. I hope it will win in the international festivals circuit the respect and exposure it deserves.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the past
Kirpianuscus31 May 2017
it has many and various meanings.first, it is part of the effort of Radu Gabrea to give a honest image about the recent Romanian history. using the discoveries of a stranger about the realities from a Eastern country, its habits and its vulnerabilities. in same measure, it is a film about Shoah. different by classic perspectives. it represents a precise diagnosis about people under times, remembering, in many scenes, the work of Eugene Ionesco, Urmuz or Caragiale. two names are basic points for the artistic virtues - Florin Piersic Jr. and Marcel Iureș.reflection of past, it is support for reflection.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Tedious story, sloppy directing
dinamomarius2324 September 2009
After all the fuss they made over it, I expected for something at least watchable, but no luck. The story is very wrong written, following a character without personality, who simply got a bad case of allergy - and so what? This makes it lame from the start. Then, it becomes worse. He looks for a doctor who seems to be arrested or shot by the SS - and here it should have started to build up tension, suspense, drama, compassion for the victim, hatred against the criminals. Well, it only gathers boredom. And it also falsifies the historical truth - it was the Nazi army who persecuted and killed the Jews in Romania, not the Romanian army who did its best to spare them. The film makers should make a better research before starting to shoot a movie.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
wake up
Vincentiu30 June 2014
it is a wake up. delicate, precise, careful created. work of admirable team, it is far to be perfect and the absence of enthusiasm from many Romanians could not be a surprise. but, it is a good film. for message. for acting. for manner of Radu Gabrea to recreate a world and impose a not comfortable subject. and that fact does The Journey of Gruber not exactly a show but seed of reflection about a society, bureaucracy, political decisions, price of life. one of beautiful roles of Florin Piersic Jr., a special performance by Marcel Iures, few memorable scenes and the bitter feeling after its end. a film for remember . and for understand. that is all. so, more important than a script far to be the best, are the actors work and the subject.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I doubt a good film can be made with Romanians
ersbel3 March 2015
This is a mockery. The Germans speak German badly. The Italians speak Italian badly. The concept of allergy was just discovered. But in a hole like Moldova there is someone who not only heard of the concept, but can also treat it. A chimera. Maybe that was a good idea.

The only merit I can find this movie: it talks about facts long buried in Romania. The facts are glossed whenever possible. Still, just because these hurt the extreme nationalism of Romania, people feel obliged to take a political stance. Even here, in IMDb, you have people who support the idea to talk about the ugly past of Romania and who think this is a good movie and the right wingers who think this is a badly made movie. The reality is in the middle. It is a piece of junk. But an important piece of junk. And this movie lets some air in a closed country. After decades of showing only movies that glorify mindless blood shed this one present a more decent view. The war is still not ugly. The people are still heroic. Yet death is not prescribed in the Heavens.

Contact me with Questions, Comments or Suggestions ryitfork @ bitmail.ch
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed