Vicious returned to ITV up on its first series finale, according to overnight figures for Monday (June 1).
Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Derek Jacobi's divisive sitcom aired to 2.99m (14.1%) at 9pm (97k/0.6% on +1). The final episode of series one brought in 2.77m (12.2%) overnight in June 2013, giving the series an increase of 220,000 viewers.
Earlier, Johnny Kingdom's Wild Exmoor interested 2.72m (12.5%) at 8pm (83k/0.4%), while Off Their Rockers entertained 1.77m (9.3%) at 9.30pm.
BBC One's Panorama was seen by 2.23m (9.9%) at 8.30pm, while Rome's Invisible City gathered 4.37m (20.7%) at 9pm to be the most watched programme outside of the soaps on Monday.
Meanwhile, Sky Atlantic's Game of Thrones epic thrilled 1.00m (4.8%) at 9pm.
BBC Two's Antiques Road Trip brought in 1.36m (6.6%) at 7pm, before Springwatch averaged 2.55m (11.5%) at 8pm, and Outbreak: The Truth About Ebola informed 880k (4.2%) at 9pm. Episodes followed with 720k (4.1%) at 10pm.
On Channel 4,...
Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Derek Jacobi's divisive sitcom aired to 2.99m (14.1%) at 9pm (97k/0.6% on +1). The final episode of series one brought in 2.77m (12.2%) overnight in June 2013, giving the series an increase of 220,000 viewers.
Earlier, Johnny Kingdom's Wild Exmoor interested 2.72m (12.5%) at 8pm (83k/0.4%), while Off Their Rockers entertained 1.77m (9.3%) at 9.30pm.
BBC One's Panorama was seen by 2.23m (9.9%) at 8.30pm, while Rome's Invisible City gathered 4.37m (20.7%) at 9pm to be the most watched programme outside of the soaps on Monday.
Meanwhile, Sky Atlantic's Game of Thrones epic thrilled 1.00m (4.8%) at 9pm.
BBC Two's Antiques Road Trip brought in 1.36m (6.6%) at 7pm, before Springwatch averaged 2.55m (11.5%) at 8pm, and Outbreak: The Truth About Ebola informed 880k (4.2%) at 9pm. Episodes followed with 720k (4.1%) at 10pm.
On Channel 4,...
- 6/2/2015
- Digital Spy
A group of Singaporean filmmakers including Anthony Chen, Boo Junfeng, Royston Tan and Kelvin Tong has issued a statement protesting the local ban of Tan Pin Pin’s documentary To Singapore With Love.
The documentary examines the lives of Singaporean exiles, including trade unionists, student leaders and Communists, who left Singapore in the 1960s and 1970s due to their fear of being imprisoned under Singapore’s Internal Security Act.
Singapore’s Media Development Authority (Mda) classified the film yesterday as “Not allowed for all ratings”, on the grounds that it undermines national security. The classification means that the film can’t be shown or distributed in Singapore.
The group of 38 high-profile filmmakers and members of Singapore’s arts community expressed their “deep disappointment” at the Mda’s decision and called on the government body “to release their version of the events in question”, rather than banning the film outright (see full statement below).
To Singapore With Love...
The documentary examines the lives of Singaporean exiles, including trade unionists, student leaders and Communists, who left Singapore in the 1960s and 1970s due to their fear of being imprisoned under Singapore’s Internal Security Act.
Singapore’s Media Development Authority (Mda) classified the film yesterday as “Not allowed for all ratings”, on the grounds that it undermines national security. The classification means that the film can’t be shown or distributed in Singapore.
The group of 38 high-profile filmmakers and members of Singapore’s arts community expressed their “deep disappointment” at the Mda’s decision and called on the government body “to release their version of the events in question”, rather than banning the film outright (see full statement below).
To Singapore With Love...
- 9/11/2014
- by lizshackleton@gmail.com (Liz Shackleton)
- ScreenDaily
IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.