- The remains of a small boy discovered in a wall by workmen are identified as those of Tommy Keegan, who disappeared twenty-five years earlier. A neighbour, Edward Connor, a suspected paedophile, was arrested then but released for lack of evidence. Brooks and Devlin believe that Julia Mortimer, who used to play with Tommy when they were children, is subconsciously suppressing her memories of the events of the time, and, under regression hypnosis, names her estranged father Vernon not only as the killer but as a paedophile himself who molested her too. The court trial leads to angry exchanges between Julia and her father. Which one is telling the truth?—don @ minifie-1
- The police re-open a dormant case when a construction crew uncover the remains of Thomas Keegan who disappeared 1983 at the age of 8. The boy had his skull crushed with a blunt object and his body was bricked into a wall. They meet with the retired policeman in charge of the original investigation and he was convinced that he knew the culprit but couldn't get - or beat - a confession out of him. They also meet a childhood friend of little Tommy Keegan who had seen him before the day before he died. They notice an anomaly in her statement and ask her to undergo hypnosis to see if they can retrieve any additional memories. What they learn is that she too was sexually abused as a child and is able to identify her molester. It's left to Crown Prosecutor James Steel however to get the man to admit it on the witness stand.—garykmcd
It looks like we don't have any synopsis for this title yet. Be the first to contribute.
Learn moreContribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content