I'm Not Harry Jenson. (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Refreshing
Logiebear428 February 2010
INHJ fascinates me. As a media student having studied the horror and thriller genres, the codes, conventions and clichés are expected, blatant and eradicate all suspense film-makers aim to achieve from their use. This film tip-toes around nearly every single one of them and creates something entirely fresh.

The main character, Stanley, is a writer who pens novels based on murderers; such as Harry Jensen who killed 37 people prior to his execution. Finding this particular murderer hard to write down, Stanley's agent Tom sends him on a trek deep in the New Zealand scrub, reachable only by helicopter. After the trek's first night in the bush, one of his fellow travellers is dead and anyone could be the killer.

Stand-out performances from Gareth Reeves, Renato Bartolomei and excellent editing and sound take the film from beginning to end with no hesitation. The climax is to be seen to be believed.

INHJ is an excellent first film from the directors, I certainly hope to see more films in this class from the NZ film industry.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classy piece, unfortunately lacking X-factor, but overall an excellent polished piece of work
caitlin-ivory7 February 2010
I enjoyed this film immensely and believe that as a first film effort it's pretty outstanding. The script was tight, casting generally excellent, although the character of Marrisa felt a little under developed. Cinematography was great, perfect choice of colour tones and gritty edges. Very effective editing and some cunning use of flash forward and backwards at crisis points. I was locked into the 'it could be anyone' for a healthy length of time, and didn't pick up on the final twist until right at the end, which was great. The closing sequence was perhaps a little wordy, could have been minimised or stylised rather than presented as a whole new scene, it did seem to make the film drag a bit at the end. It also could have been cut by about 15 minutes overall without losing important tension building footage. Unfortunately, I believe it lacks the requisite X factor which could have taken this creepy and sophisticated who done it to cult status. None the less, it is a highly polished, evolved piece of work that bodes well for the future of this writer/director. I felt I got my money's worth and will definitely keep an eye out for further work.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great try but not quite there
kevinmccready19 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The film swings between some nice noir at the beginning then some awful TV soapy techniques. So I wasn't sure whether I was meant to take it seriously.

When I saw the small backpacks for the trek and when a few other things started to jar, I thought nahh. As the improbables built up I thought, this could be fun. But I was left thinking that I wasn't meant to think so.

Improbabilities included a NZ accent for an Australian radio announcer, the general tension at the start of the walk (these people were off together on an adventure remember), and, the huge unlikelihood of a single woman leaving herself alone with a possible murderer, even if she didn't believe it was him. The reveal of the murderer was clunky but I enjoyed toting up the number of bullets left in the gun. Were seven fired? I quite enjoyed the last dinner scene where the agent's role was revealed.

The high strung piano introducing some of the scenes, though a cliché I was happy to accept, began to grate on me.

On the good side there were great performances by all the actors, some superb film techniques and a humanity that shone through (the treatment of the prisoner by the young woman).

With just a tiny bit of finesse the film could have been improved as far as it R-rating went. Cutting out the bad language and displaying gore less graphically would have added to the tension and not detracted from the film.

Overall a credible effort from director and writer James Napier Robertson. I enjoyed it, though perhaps not for the reasons James might have hoped. He might have been better listening to some advice, presuming it was available, on avoiding the mish mashes.

I'd recommend the film as part of the NZ filmscape and would happily try another of Napier's offerings, hoping all the while that he has matured somewhat, or become settled in a style.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed