An Ordinary Execution (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The healer
jotix10026 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Anna, a young female urologist working in the Moscow of the 1950s is the object of envy and admiration from her peers. Anna has a gift, which exasperates some of her learned colleagues. She practices a healing techniques, using her hands, something that brings immediate comfort to the pain they are experiencing. Anna is happily married to Vassili, a physicist. The couple has been trying to conceive without positive results. Anna is told by her building's concierge she and Vassili are heard making passionate love, something that disturbs the place of the apartment house.

Stalin, ruling the country with an iron fist, has decreed to get rid of all the Jewish doctors because they are seen as a menace. Unfortunately, he was also dying from a mysterious ailment that obviously had no cure. His only alternative was to summon Anna to practice her kind of healing on him, which produced the desired effect, for he was relieved, at least temporarily of the sessions with the doctor.

To complicate things, Stalin wanted to keep his ailments as a secret. Knowing that Anna was married to Vassili, he wanted to make sure of her loyalty, making her lie to her husband about the times she had to be away. Stalin made sure of sending Vassili away so he could have Anna for himself whenever he needed her professional services. In an unprecedented and unexpected finale, Anna is able to free herself and her husband from Stalin's cruelty.

Marc Dugain, wrote and directed this interesting film which is based on his novel. We are taken inside the Russian leader's private world, something that was guarded with the utmost secrecy. The interiors chosen for the film are always in the dark, something that cinematographer Yves Angelo captures with his camera. The cruel man showed that even as he was dying he would not show any pity for even the ones that were able to ease the pain he was experiencing.

The coup for Mr. Dugain was in the casting. Andre Dussollier plays Joseph Stalin with conviction. The actor transformed himself to give a clear portrait of the powerful man who controlled everything during the years as head of the now defunct Soviet Union. Marina Hands also does a great contribution as Anna. The actress did an excellent job for Mr. Dugain. Edouard Baer plays Vassili and Denis Podalydes is seen as the concierge.

There is a funny reference in the film from one of Stalin's guards who confesses to Anna he has a new grandson. His name: Vladimir Putin!
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A disgusting story for a fascinating movie.
searchanddestroy-16 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I spent more than a hour and a half in a very better way than I could expect. I already knew the topic. In 1953 Russia - Soviet Union - a woman, who is also a scientist's wife, is brought to Stalin himself in order to heal him. Because his usual doctors are all arrested and sent in jail, into the famous and terrific Loubianka. The nearly dying tyrant is more fascinating than we could expect. Andre Dussolier is here absolutely outstanding. I think he gives here his best performance ever. He shows the total perversion and ugliness of the entire soviet system. How human beings were worthless and expendables.

You may feel dizzy and very uncomfortable when you get out of this film.

Edouard Behr plays here a poignant character. He surprised me as well.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A dark drama set in a black period of Russian history
andrew-mcalpine714 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This bitter tale should be shown widely in Russia where there is an increasing tendency for the history of Stalin to be sanitised and his millions of victims forgotten. The Putin regime increasingly hails the Stalinist period as one of heroic rectitude and struggle with few flaws. The intelligent malevolence of the dictator is surperbly displayed as is the corruption which infected his regime. Despite the endemic evil however moral bravery is also on display. Anyone who wants to get a 'feel' for the cruelty and pain of the last days of Stalin's regime should see this film. The backdrop to the film is the so-called doctors plot when the paranoid dictator had sacked not only his physicians but also his long standing body guard. His recruitment of a young female doctor to tend him, whose life is transformed by their relationship, is to my best knowledge fictional, but compellingly plausible.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
puzzle of suggestions
Vincentiu7 August 2013
it is a nice film. for its image, acting, intentions of writer/director. but it is a product for Westestn public. that is only sin. it is necessary to present the tragedies of East Europe and the long pain of Soviet space. but , in same measure, it is not easy to create the perfect image of system. the film has not chance to convince. and the cause , I supposed, it is the distance between director and the story. it sounds strange but the team does a good work. an admirable, touching reconstruction of an universe. the basis is a real case. but it is not enough. a special ingredient is missing. maybe, only for Eastern viewer who knows little more than the clear , honest testimony of this movie.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
useful
Kirpianuscus11 February 2016
a case. who defines an entire period. a film about Soviet Union under Stalin . and a beautiful introduction to the atmosphere of regime. far to be great, it is one of films who reminds, in correct manner, a great tragedy. ideal for discover the rules, logic and cynicism of Soviet power, for defines a leader who could be hero in some from East Europe regions, for the tension of a fight, for the essence of fear as the most convincing rule, for the image of woman in the heart of dictatorship, for a remarkable portrait of Stalin and for its end who is the definition of an entire process. a film who only suggest the tragedy of Communism. in correct manner, only too cold but useful as point of research about crimes and about high cynicism of a war against yours citizens.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed