Konets
- Episode aired Jun 23, 2021
- TV-14
- 43m
IMDb RATING
7.7/10
2.4K
YOUR RATING
Reddington makes a disturbing request to Liz in exchange for the truth about his identity.Reddington makes a disturbing request to Liz in exchange for the truth about his identity.Reddington makes a disturbing request to Liz in exchange for the truth about his identity.
Victoria Bizzoco
- Child at Park
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe same actress, Delphina Belle, who played young Beth in the pilot reprises her role in this episode, having aged from approximately age 7 to age 15 in the intervening years.
- GoofsIt makes no sense that Ressler should still be so sweet on Liz as to tell her that she is not simply better than Reddington but actually a good person. She bombed a hospital. Ressler himself almost died in that explosion when he personally had to throw her bomb out of the window.
- ConnectionsEdited from The Blacklist: Pilot (2013)
- SoundtracksSomewhere Only We Know
(uncredited)
Written by Tim Rice-Oxley, Tom Chaplin and Richard Hughes
Performed by Renee Dominique
Featured review
Konets: kommon sense
Thank you, dear reader, for taking the time to read this review!
In his recent book 'Upheaval' Jared Diamond argues that one of the most worrying effects of the Information Age is that it can, somewhat counterintuitively, lead to a loss of compromise and to an unwillingness to respect discrepancies. It is quite easy, for example, to write an angry comment on the Internet in response to an anonymous user whose reactions we will never see. I write this review in praise of common (kommon) sense. Please let me explain. One of the things that worry me about platforms such as iMDB is that, in an effort to respect a plurality of opinions, they may actually end up intensifying collective anger and eradicating empathy. Hopefully this point will become clearer as I comment on 'Konets' as a possible example.
As a Blacklist episode 'Konets' does contain an important flaw insofar as it deprives fans of a moment that the series had been building up since its inception. I agree with this view. But this is clearly not enough to automatically give the episode a 1/10. In fact, I think this aspect is the only negative thing about the episode and, in what follows, I hope to argue for this hypothesis. On the other hand, some users are giving it the highest possible grade (10/10). Let's all calm down and be sensible for a moment. Personally a 10 or a 9 is the grade I would give to a cultural product that is truly remarkable in terms of acting, story-telling, cinematography, aesthetics... Something similar happens when, at the end of each review users are asked whether they found it helpful. I cannot help feeling that sometimes the polarities of agreement or disagreement are projected here. The question is not 'did you agree with this review?'; the question is 'did you find it useful? Did it help you choose what to watch?'
With all of this in mind, yes 'Konets' is imperfect. Yes it is flawed. Yes, it makes a major creative and narrative mistake that future seasons will have to solve. However, it has some undeniable virtues that, in my opinion, really make it rise above the standard of what, I think is fair to say, has been a relatively uneven Blacklist season.
James Spader has consistently offered riveting performances as Reddington since 2013, showing Reddington as a fully three-dimensional character. But it is in this episode where he absolutely delivers an impressive, fantastic (and perhaps his most definitive) portrayal of his character: he shows his humanity with great emotional power, ranging from joy to Stoic acceptance to hilarious comedy to tragedy and devastating loss. This combination could hardly be more polished. Spader truly elevates the quality of the episode and his performance is somehow reminiscent of his outstanding work in 'Sex, lies and videotape'. The scenes he shares with Megan Boone on this occasion are beautifully made and, although the writers of the show should probably have invested more time in delineating the excessively swift transitions these characters experience, their scenes together work well. This dynamic is made possible thanks to the believable and well-constructed pieces of dialogue that sustain their conversations. The other characters (with the exception of Dembe) lack some depth, but they did not need to be at the centre of the episode on this occasion.
From the standpoint of the photography, 'Konets' is probably one of the most visually striking episodes of the whole series, effectively combining a well-selected set of colours and including them in the exactly most emotionally tense scenes of the episode. Similarly, the music is used to poignant effect throughout. These two stylistic choices cleverly come into dialogue in the final montage, which is very well-shot (no pun intended). The episode as whole focuses less on the plot itself and more on the internal struggles of the characters, which, after the information-packed 'Nachalo', was an apt creative choice to make. 'Konets' is self-contained, calm and seems interested in adding layers of complexity to the main characters.
For all these reasons, as I say, 'Konets' is certainly not a disaster. In fact, it works considerably better than the majority of the episodes of Season 8 and a good deal of creative thinking has been invested in putting this episode together. Its positive qualities outweigh its problematic ones. In terms of writing for series, I also think it's important to know when it feels right to end (cf.: the excellent Fleabag). It is preferable to leave audiences wanting more rather than twisting things excessively: The Blacklist should probably start approaching its final resolution soon and wrapping up its plot-lines and questions in order to have a truly satisfactory ending, but 'Konets' is a reminder that this show remains an entertaining, rewarding and enjoyable piece of TV. And I am happy to say that I think it deserves a 7.6/10 on my part.
To sum up, my broader reflection is the following: can we all just calm down, listen to each other and appreciate the value of things even when they are not perfect?
I thank you for your attention and I hope these comments make us all think holistically about our everyday practices as spectators and critics.
In his recent book 'Upheaval' Jared Diamond argues that one of the most worrying effects of the Information Age is that it can, somewhat counterintuitively, lead to a loss of compromise and to an unwillingness to respect discrepancies. It is quite easy, for example, to write an angry comment on the Internet in response to an anonymous user whose reactions we will never see. I write this review in praise of common (kommon) sense. Please let me explain. One of the things that worry me about platforms such as iMDB is that, in an effort to respect a plurality of opinions, they may actually end up intensifying collective anger and eradicating empathy. Hopefully this point will become clearer as I comment on 'Konets' as a possible example.
As a Blacklist episode 'Konets' does contain an important flaw insofar as it deprives fans of a moment that the series had been building up since its inception. I agree with this view. But this is clearly not enough to automatically give the episode a 1/10. In fact, I think this aspect is the only negative thing about the episode and, in what follows, I hope to argue for this hypothesis. On the other hand, some users are giving it the highest possible grade (10/10). Let's all calm down and be sensible for a moment. Personally a 10 or a 9 is the grade I would give to a cultural product that is truly remarkable in terms of acting, story-telling, cinematography, aesthetics... Something similar happens when, at the end of each review users are asked whether they found it helpful. I cannot help feeling that sometimes the polarities of agreement or disagreement are projected here. The question is not 'did you agree with this review?'; the question is 'did you find it useful? Did it help you choose what to watch?'
With all of this in mind, yes 'Konets' is imperfect. Yes it is flawed. Yes, it makes a major creative and narrative mistake that future seasons will have to solve. However, it has some undeniable virtues that, in my opinion, really make it rise above the standard of what, I think is fair to say, has been a relatively uneven Blacklist season.
James Spader has consistently offered riveting performances as Reddington since 2013, showing Reddington as a fully three-dimensional character. But it is in this episode where he absolutely delivers an impressive, fantastic (and perhaps his most definitive) portrayal of his character: he shows his humanity with great emotional power, ranging from joy to Stoic acceptance to hilarious comedy to tragedy and devastating loss. This combination could hardly be more polished. Spader truly elevates the quality of the episode and his performance is somehow reminiscent of his outstanding work in 'Sex, lies and videotape'. The scenes he shares with Megan Boone on this occasion are beautifully made and, although the writers of the show should probably have invested more time in delineating the excessively swift transitions these characters experience, their scenes together work well. This dynamic is made possible thanks to the believable and well-constructed pieces of dialogue that sustain their conversations. The other characters (with the exception of Dembe) lack some depth, but they did not need to be at the centre of the episode on this occasion.
From the standpoint of the photography, 'Konets' is probably one of the most visually striking episodes of the whole series, effectively combining a well-selected set of colours and including them in the exactly most emotionally tense scenes of the episode. Similarly, the music is used to poignant effect throughout. These two stylistic choices cleverly come into dialogue in the final montage, which is very well-shot (no pun intended). The episode as whole focuses less on the plot itself and more on the internal struggles of the characters, which, after the information-packed 'Nachalo', was an apt creative choice to make. 'Konets' is self-contained, calm and seems interested in adding layers of complexity to the main characters.
For all these reasons, as I say, 'Konets' is certainly not a disaster. In fact, it works considerably better than the majority of the episodes of Season 8 and a good deal of creative thinking has been invested in putting this episode together. Its positive qualities outweigh its problematic ones. In terms of writing for series, I also think it's important to know when it feels right to end (cf.: the excellent Fleabag). It is preferable to leave audiences wanting more rather than twisting things excessively: The Blacklist should probably start approaching its final resolution soon and wrapping up its plot-lines and questions in order to have a truly satisfactory ending, but 'Konets' is a reminder that this show remains an entertaining, rewarding and enjoyable piece of TV. And I am happy to say that I think it deserves a 7.6/10 on my part.
To sum up, my broader reflection is the following: can we all just calm down, listen to each other and appreciate the value of things even when they are not perfect?
I thank you for your attention and I hope these comments make us all think holistically about our everyday practices as spectators and critics.
helpful•137
- fmperiset
- Dec 5, 2021
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime43 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content