Doctor Atomic (TV Movie 2007) Poster

(2007 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Adams and Sellars create an extravaganza
angelofvic14 September 2009
Mesmerized by the fascinating very recent documentary (which sadly I caught only the last 15 minutes of) on the making of this opera, called "Wonders Are Many" and aired recently on PBS, I was more than happy to sit down and watch the entire opera, from the Met, on TV.

In case you don't know, "Doctor Atomic" is the story of physicist Robert Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project -- that is, the building of the first atomic bomb, in seclusion in New Mexico in the 1940s. The opera follows Oppenheimer and the rest of the scientists and aides and their families, holed up in close and distressing quarters, working under great pressure and often filled with moral misgivings about what they were doing yet at the same time rushed by high-level U.S. government officials to complete, test, and roll out the finished product, no matter what.

As you might imagine, the opera is fascinating. Adams' music is, well, certainly up to one's expectations of him, and certainly if you like his other stuff, including the fascinating and groundbreaking Nixon in China, you'll like this.

The libretto, written by Peter Sellars, is also a tour-de-force. It's based on a multitude of sources, including documents and literature. The result is a collage of poetry (Oppenheimer himself was inordinately fond of poetry, and as a young man considered that as a career option), history, biography, and philosophy. In addition to the historical documents and letters, Sellars uses abundant quotations from the Bhagavad Gita, and from the poetry of John Donne, Charles Baudelaire, and Muriel Rukeyser. The result is a mixture of fact and imagery that dazzles, but can occasionally be befuddling.

Excellent notes on the Libretto are found on the Metropolitan Opera's official site. Click: Watch & Listen > Saturday Matinée Broadcasts > All Operas.

Things I liked: The singing was first rate (and that's saying a lot, as the music is quite difficult).

The sets and staging/direction (and even the costuming and makeup) were spectacular -- some of the best and most evocative I've ever seen. And extremely creative, yet always in the service of the story, never detracting from it.

The music was, as mentioned, fascinating, especially during certain sequences like the very end.

Things I didn't like (don't be put off by my grousing -- I like to analyze things): I think the thing should have been edited a bit, either libretto-wise or music-wise.

Namely:

(1) There's a bedroom sequence in which Oppenheimer muses for a full 7 minutes solely about his wife Kitty's hair. That's when I turned the recording off the first time, and started up again at a later date.

(2) Kitty Oppenheimer has one or two scenes with Oppenheimer, which are fine, but the rest of her scenes are solos, and usually very long ones. That would possibly be fine if what she was singing was germane to the story. However, she sings only abstract images and rootless musings which make little or no sense, at least the way the music has them sung. Bits of Rukheyser's or Baudelaire's poetry are very hard to follow and make any sense at all of, unless the music helps the phrases cohere and relate, and unless the music conveys her state of mind and the point of it all. I was left with the impression that Kitty was losing her grip on reality, which was not the actual case. So, in the end, I don't know if this was a libretto problem or a music problem. I think would have been GREAT if Kitty had sung at least a few sane human sentences, to ground her into reality like Oppenheimer's lines were grounded so effectively. Conclusion: If you see the opera, get acquainted a bit with the sources of the libretto, especially the Rukheyser. See the extensive notes on the Met site, and/or check Wikipedia.

(3) It seemed long to me at three hours, largely because of items (1) and (2) above. I think a little editing could have been in order, as it got slightly repetitive and long. To me, that is.

Upshot: Do see it, or watch the DVD, if you have a chance.

I personally would recommend seeing the fabulous 90-minute "Making of" DVD (called "Wonders Are Many") even more than the opera itself! (Amazon reviewers agree with me.) It was exciting, thrilling, abundantly creative and informative, and there was never a dull moment. Frankly, you get to experience the opera without sitting through it. Excellent stuff!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A wonderful production of a fascinating opera
TheLittleSongbird3 November 2011
I have not been acquainted with Doctor Atomic very long, in fact my first hearing of it was only a couple of weeks ago. It is very fascinating particularly in the story, though John Adams's music is every bit as good if not more so as Nixon in China.

This production is wonderful. I have very few complaints actually, just that I personally would have loved to seen the curtain calls and the audience reactions so that we could fully share our appreciation of how much went into performing this difficult opera, and while the choreography is very effective on the most part with the angular movements, there is the odd place where a piece of choreography is going on and it feels like it came from a different production altogether.

On the other hand, the costumes, lighting and sets have great atmosphere to them, and the filming doesn't fall into the trap of being too static. Picture and sound quality are very good. As is the staging, the end of act 1 in particular is very beautiful and powerful at the same time, and some of the best of any opera production I've seen of late.

Musically, this production of Doctor Atomic also excels. The orchestral playing is excellent, and the conducting and chorus singing also. It is a difficult score, but they make it seem easy. The story is still interesting, and I loved along with the interviews and so that there were some well-written libretto notes, which I always read with enthusiasm when available.

The principal singing is superb. I have always found Gerald Finley a reliable performer, and his Oppenheimer is no exception. His voice is as appealing and as handsome as ever, it is very mellow and bright with a slight boyishness to it, and his acting is suitably athletic. He sings Batter My Heart brilliantly, one of the best parts of the opera and one of the best renditions of the production.

Jessica Rivera is also wonderful, prior to this I saw the Met production with the same cast albeit with Sasha Cooke as Kitty. I have to say while I loved that production too I much prefer Rivera's Kitty. Her solos are long but very beautiful. I simply loved her singing of Am I in Your Light, and the staging of it is appropriately quiet and intimate.

Richard Paul Fink sings with a beautiful basso sound, his diction is excellent and acts with finesse. Once again, Eric Downes' sonorous voice is in full flight and his amusing and moving portrayal as Groves remains characterful as it should be.

The more minor roles compliment the central roles wonderfully, with special mention going to Ellen Rabiner.

All in all, wonderful. 9/10 Bethany Cox
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No hope possible in this world
Dr_Coulardeau5 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
[...] The opera divides the stage in three spaces: in the foreground Oppenheimer's home with one night scene with his wife in bed first: a scene that was supposed to be sentimental if not erotic and that turns into some very distantly metaphorical evocation of sensuous pleasures centered on perfumes, the perfumes he finds in his wife's hair and that evoke fruit, foliage and human skin. But he was working on some document at the beginning, he stopped for a short while and he interrupted this sentimental drift to go back to his bomb. Then that private space will be occupied by Kitty Oppenheimer, her infant daughter in a cradle, the Navajo nurse and later three helpers for that nurse. Two short incursions of Peter Oppenheimer, their son can be noted. This private space is centered on the baby and the five women are only there to take care of her.

In a middle stripe on the stage we have the labs and the bomb with two types of personnel, the scientists on one side and then the military people who are managing the first test of this bomb with the scientists, and also trying to manage the weather and the scientists.

Further back, hence in the background of the stage we have an open space where dancers intervene very often, most of the time six dancing on a circle, and once four dancing on parallel lines running from left to right. Personally I do not see what these dancers are bringing to the opera, except that they are dancing in circles like the scientists and the soldiers who are activating themselves, running in circles mostly after their own tails like Chopin's Little Dog Waltz.

Then the back of the stage is most of the time cut in two layers, a top layer that is black and a layer between that top layer and the back line of the stage that is used for light. It is often white, but can be blue or red according to the scenes.

Thus the stage is visually putting one on top of the other five layers from the foreground to the top of the backdrop. This is very interesting for the DVD because cameras can shift from one layer to the next and concentrate or zoom in onto one section of these layers, on one face, one character. We practically never have a full vision of the stage, which is kind of frustrating.

The music is essentially some accompanying music behind the singing. The singing itself having to be clearly understood because of the pregnancy of the text is more chanted than sung. There are very few instances when the singing has any kind of musical complication. At times it is even slightly humdrum. But then the music behind and in-between two sentences can be rich and impressive but always of the accompanying type used to amplify the meaning of the words.

The singing emphasizes some words or phrases by repeating them and such repetitions are never gratuitous and are most of the time triple repetition or a triple simple repetition with a fourth one that is one word longer, or one word shorter. This pattern of four being clearly three plus one is an echo to John Donne's "three-personed God" and this Christian reference is important because then the extension to four is necessarily the extension to the crucifixion. This is a direct allusion to these scientists who are probably very religious in their common life (saying graces at every meal, going to church every Sunday, etc) and yet their very activity is making them the agent of the devil, "your enemy" in Donne's words. Donne's richness is not entirely used. For example the last five lines of the sonnet are very rich in this symbolical way:

"But am betroth'd to your enemy (A), Divorce me (1), untie (2), or break that knot again (3), Take me to you (4), imprison me (5), for I Except (B) you enthrall me (6), never shall be free (C), Nor ever chaste (D), except (E) you ravish me (7)."

The enemy is A-B-C-D-E, hence a pentacle, the devil of course. God is asked to do seven things hence the holy week that ends we must keep in mind on the crucifixion and the resurrection. The crucifixion is carried by the four negatives B-C-D-E- within the pentacle of the devil. And the seven requests to God plus the five attachments to the devil make twelve and there we are whole again since it is the number of the Last Supper's participants, once Judas, the supposed traitor is gone.

In fact in the first scene of the second act Kitty in a long poem by Muriel Rukeyser introduces Jesus:

". . . This earth-long day Between blood and resurrection where we wait Remembering sun, seed, fire; remembering That fierce Judaean Innocent who risked Every immortal meaning on one life."

Jesus, the Judaean Innocent is captured in our memories between blood and resurrection, the crucifixion on the Friday afternoon (death at the ninth hour) and the resurrection on the Sunday morning.

A last remark. The opera starts with black and white images of war scenes, desolation, dead people, bombings, and it ends with the color vision of all the actors and singers lying on their stomach on the ground while the sound tracks gives us some Japanese remarks from people after a bombing looking for help of for relatives, and these Japanese sentences are duly translated in English for us to see the meaning, at least on the DVD. Before we had simple bombings and after the test shown on the stage it will be the next generation of bombings, the atomic generation and the desolation of survivors. War is a cycle from one battle to the next and it never stops.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed