Browncoats: Redemption (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A noble, if flawed attempt
gavynhelfyre20 September 2010
I have a lot of respect for the cast and crew of this film. Everyone took part not because they expected fame or money, they did it because the love the source material. That love shows above all of the problems of this film, and make it worth viewing for any fan of the source material (Firefly and Serenity, respectively). I can only hope that this film captures that fan base and drums up a lot of money for some very good causes.

Now, please understand, I do understand that this is not a professional production. I understand that budget and time was limited. And, looking past the faults, there's an enjoyable story here.

But the film certainly does have it's faults.

The biggest fault in my eyes, is the writing. The biggest problem with the writing on this film is that it breaks one of the biggest rules of screen writing... "Show, don't tell". Too much of this film is people telling us things that have happened, or telling us that this person is good at this or that. Characters, for the most part, don't actually get to have an endearing moment that makes us connect with them. We are forced to bond with the crew of the Redemption by hearing about past adventures, without seeing them in any real action. We get a long voice over to fill us in on past events instead of visually making it a flash back or dripping out information during some sort of action (remember Reese's exposition during the chase in Terminator... sure didn't feel like an info dump, but it was). Additionally, characters are forced to over react to small things. Instead of anyone having a measured response, they immediately think everything is fighting words.

It also seems that there wasn't a strong idea where the film could go when it started. We spend quite a bit of time setting up for a "job" that is completely irrelevant, and a long scene picking up a pilot that really could have been done in a minute instead of five. It is frustrating because the source material always moved along at a brisk clip, but somehow it seems the writers didn't have a grasp on how to carry that over into their own work.

The cast is okay, especially considering they were all volunteers and do well with what they're given. The camera work is a bit annoying as it is all medium shots that seem to hold long past their expiration date. What is genuinely impressive is the digital effects the sets for the ship. Though they clearly had a limited budget for each, what they managed to put on the screen really does work well and looks like they easily spent more than they did.

All in all, the film feels like a long first episode to a series, the plot seeming to exist merely to introduce us to the crew. So perhaps they will be able to make a stronger follow up now that introductions are out of the way.

Honestly, if you are at all curious about the film, buy it/stream it from the source site. The money goes to some great causes and it really is enjoyable despite it's flaws.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good but not Shiny
simoncor21 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I came into this movie wanting to love it. I really did, and to some extent maybe I actually liked it. It was honest folks trying to pay homage to something they loved. I had three problems with this film and I will list them in a constructive way. 1) The references and the cameos. We get it. This is a firefly fan film. That does not mean you have to make references to the show every three seconds. The beagle joke was groanable but when the professional reporter asks the Alliance official on Osiris if anything is known about the whereabouts of the Hero of Canton it kills me a little inside. No one outside of Higgins Moon would care. Does the high up Alliance Official know anything about the Hero of Canton? No. He doesn't, nor should he. The cameos all seem phoned in an offer nothing. Niska comes in and uses the word "reputation" to a point where it physically hurt me. Adam Baldwin sits on the screen says "Patching you through.... heh" And Fanty and Mingo do nothing. 2)The fight. If you want this to pay homage to firefly you missed the thing firefly did in every fight. Have over emphasized sound-effects. This is lacking in those and it makes the fight look and sound like a sloppy production. Just a few sound effects would do. These are easy to make and often cost nothing so why they weren't included is beyond me. Maybe they forgot or maybe they didn't think they needed them. But in the Whedon universe when I see someone throw a punch I expect a whooshing sound and an accompanying pow sound effect. 3) The story. It was 98% exposition and three maybe four minutes of fight scene. That was it. If you want to tell a story tell a good one. Follow Whedon's example. Everyone in your story is the hero of their own story. If they're just there to make a comment at least give them some interesting quirk.

My hope is not thrashed maybe with this film Browncoats can make another film that is better. Or at least more fireflyish without feeling forced.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Five for Effort
XweAponX1 October 2014
And because I understand how difficult it is to assemble a movie from a disparate collection of Film Clips, Music, SoundFX and Special Effects. Not to mention Costumes, lighting etc. And because I really don't like rating TV Shows and Films lower than 10, in all honesty, I could not give this a 10. But I give it a 5 for just trying.

I like that this film shows another group of Space Truckers from the Firefly Universe, and stuff that happens after "Miranda" was uncovered - But it is still a Fan Film. So far the best Fan Film to date has been the fantastic "Of Gods and Men" for the Star Trek Universe. But that film had one advantage over this one: It was conceived and directed by Tim "Tuvok" Russ, and it afforded an opportunity for Trek actors and actresses to one again stand on the Bridge of Enterprises from Various Mirrors Universes.

This film does not lack in Costumes, whoever did this did a swell job if recreating the Starship Troopers Armor that was used in Firefly. This is another thing that the makers of this had no access to: Huge warehouses of Props from Universal/20th Century Fox/Paramount/etc. So they had to do with what they could scrounge up. Also, a regular show has a stable of Actors they can draw from. Now, the actors used for this, did as well as they could, but it was still wooden. The Sound Editing was not done well, so things like Dialogue is not very effective.

I could have lived with all of this, but one thing really stood out: In Firefly the series and the Movie Sequel "Serenity", you would have noticed if you are a fan, that when Kaylee talks about Engine parts, she never uses direct terms related to any Electronic or Engineering tech that exists today. Joss made sure that all of the names of parts did not come from a Radio Shack Catalog. So, in this, there is one scene where the non-Wash pilot activates some kind of Voice Recognition for the ship, and in response the Ship says something about it's "Diodes". That word was never used in Firefly, ever, nor the name of any other electronic component.

Now, I watched various parts of this, cos it was painful to watch it in sittings of longer than 5 minutes each time. With better Directing and Acting skills, the semi-passable lines could have been delivered believably. But the writer created an opening scene which had crew of this ship in a bar, and eventually a fight breaks out, like it used to happen all the time in Firefly. I just didn't buy it, it's not logical that another crew of another ship would act just like the crew of Firefly, even if they were Brown-coats. So I flipped forward, and I did not see any other interesting scenes

So, maybe I'll go back and watch it from start to finish, as much as I love Firefly, the things which endeared that show to me did not exist here. If I view it again and find differently, I'll amend this review and change the rating.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great effort to make a movie out of really bad fan fiction.
high-tech-artist2 August 2011
Browncoasts: Redemption had a great idea behind it - to follow another crew in the Firefly 'verse years after the events of Serenity. Kind of like Firefly: the Next Generation.

Unfortunately, even for a fan film, this movie left much to be desired. As a fan film, one can forgive that the cinematography, audio, editing, and to some degree the acting fell short. The big nail in this movie's coffin was the script.

Creating a movie like this with nothing but volunteers and fan effort is a HUGE undertaking, and I'm sure an ungodly amount of time, effort, and love went into this. However, that makes me question even more what in the sweet hell the creators were thinking when they decided to put all of this effort into making a movie out of this horrible, horrible script. Most of the movie is spent in exposition; we get far, far more information than we needed about the characters and many other aspects of the story. Worse yet, most of that exposition is delivered by people telling stories sitting around at a table or in a hanger. SHOW US, DON'T TELL US!

I love the Browncoats fan group. They are fantastic and generous people, and I hate to make anyone feel bad. I just wish that the story they chose to tell had been selected and edited a bit more carefully.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Complete masturbation.
davidw574817 January 2013
As a hardcore Whedonite (Firefly being my favorite of the bunch), I long for a season 2 (or a sequel to Serenity) with the best of them. I cannot, however, condone the awful chop-job they made of my favorite verse. I am convinced that Fox allowed it just so that people would stop asking for a season 2.

Here's a couple of protips: 1: Adding a few Chinese phrases doesn't make your trash sound like Firefly. Neither does shooting scenes in insufficient light make it LOOK like Firefly. 2: If you plan to USE Chinese phrases, the actors should be able to say those phrases in a way that (regardless of accuracy) at least SOUND like they are comfortable; the Chinese is supposed to be a natural part of their culture. The cast of Firefly managed it regardless of how difficult it was for them. 3: If you are going to use WESTERN phrases, the actors should be able to say those phrases in a way that (regardless of accuracy) at least SOUND like they are comfortable. (see above for the rest; I guess now I know why actual actors get paid so much.) 4: When you screw up a scene, don't just keep going and correct yourself, reminding yourself audibly what your line *should* have been. Cut, and start the scene over. This is not a play, regardless of what the set pieces seem to imply; you don't have to go with your first take. 5: Don't force references to Firefly. Yes, beagles have smallish droppings. Yes, it was funny when Mal said it. No, it is not funny when you say it. Because you're awful at this. Just awful. 6: At least attempt to *modify* the clothes you're wearing into costumes. It doesn't take much effort, and it can go a long way. 7: There's a reason for boom mics. 8: This is the important bit. You must pay close attention to this particular bit, because it is the most vital direction that any reviewer will give you. Here it is: don't screw around with Joss Whedon's stuff. It's too good to live up to. Your attempt at a tribute, no matter how lovingly intended, will be a nausea-inducing insult to everyone who loves Whedon's work enough to watch yours.

In conclusion, I feel as though I've just staggered into a room full of unattractive people masturbating all over something that I love, and I'll be scarred by it for years to come.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Oh dear God...
mrpageflipper11 September 2010
This movie was... interesting. For all non-Firefly fans out there, let me define "interesting"; Oh God, oh God, we're all going to die... This feeling of going to die does not come from the intense action, nor the amazing acting... it's just this general feeling of wanting to curl up in a dark hole...

That's not to say I don't applaud the Browncoats. It was a well intentioned movie that was poorly executed. The writing tried too hard to BE Firefly, which was probably the worst mistake they could have made - there were no unique characters and much of the slang is forced. Also, the audio was terrible at best most of the time...

I understand that this is a fan film and that it shouldn't be expected to blow us away, but I was honestly embarrassed and nauseous from this movie.

I give them a 10 for effort, but a -4 for execution...
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Good charity causes. Horrible film.
johnorvis199915 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
First, let's get the whole charity thing out of the way. Browncoats: Redemption helped raised a bundle of money for some great charities. High marks for raising the money and helping out.

Second, the charity angle was just that. An angle. You have to get your foot in the Fox door somehow, and nothing says 'Just hear me out' like dropping the word charity. Dougherty really wanted to make this movie. I saw his self promotion all over the place, and it's quite clear that he wanted a spotlight, so he made one.

Redemption was touted as the first, full length fan film. Is it? Probably. Should it be? No. Oh, no, not at all. It should be about half as long. There is a very, strong reason why fan films are short. The best ones are tight and consistent. Redemption's primary fault is that it's in love with itself. Dougherty pulls out all the stops when he should have simply stopped. It's way too long and way to dull. Long after each scene has told us what it needs to tell us, it explains everything some more and then adds some stuff to further explain before finishing with even more stuff. Some films spoon feed. Redemption serves it all up like a beer bong hooked up to a vat.

The film also touts original cast members. These shots are some of the most embarrassing of the production. They are forced into the film in the worst way. I learned later that Adam Baldwin had been drinking when they shot his cameo against a hotel hallway wall. The cameos actually bring the production value down in places.

Then there's the Red Camera. If you film on a Red Camera and later reduce it to camera phone and VHS quality, you're doing it wrong.

The most honest line of the film is "That boy's not right". The mechanic and engineer characters are strange. Not good strange, uncomfortable strange. Strange like an unwelcome conversation with a stranger on a bus strange. They sum up everything that'w wrong with Redemption as it tries too hard to be quirky and fun with no real soul.

I'd write more, but I'd have to rematch Redemption to remember everything bad about it, and I'm just not desperate enough.

May Kevin Troy and Mirriam go on to bigger and better things.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A solid effort that died on the cutting room floor
pitchblackprogress9 October 2014
First off I'd like to applaud the cast and crews effort in making this film and congratulate them on all the money they raised for charity.

However that being said, i can't help but feel that BR lacked subtlety, the acting was commendable for a low budget production but had no pace. I suspect this is due to the editing. When i viewed the credits only one person was listed to have edited the film, i can't help but feel that with more hands on deck and a little bit more attention to detail this film could have been a solid 8.

The use of camera angles were minimal, too many wide shots used in intense moments took me right out of the scene, the choreography was tight but the editing was loose.

Subtleties like background sound were missing,Which made conversations seem awkward and staged. Combine this with "extras" on set glancing at the camera and lack of properly scouted locations brought this down to a 5.

In conclusion i feel that had BR had a slightly larger budget and editing team this film could have gone down as a solid browncoats victory, however it crawled along and found no one to carry it...

Alas browncoats your redemption is not yet at hand!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Big Damn Review
lar121220 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Browncoats Redemption takes place within the Whedonverse of Firefly at another pocket of settlers. It chronicles the trials and life of the crew as they struggle to survive against an oppressive regime. A portion of the beginning gives us a glimpse into the world they live in as well as the outer shell of the crew, chief among them Capt. Laura Matthews, played with charm and heart by Heather Fagan. Heather brings to the screen a presence that is captivating, strong and vulnerable and quite frankly just wonderful. When she smiles, the screen lights up, when she is angry, the universe trembles, for such is the life of a Big Damn Hero, thrust into a situation she did not want.

John Patrick Barry as the wheeler dealer Banks is just fun in his sly way bringing a sardonic sense of reality to the work that Redemption does. His eyes are a tell to the universe, letting anyone know that he means business and business is what he does.

Guy Wellman plays Cameron Alan, keeper of the personal history and when push comes to shove, the quiet strength of conviction behind this group. As with any good story, the writers left me wanting more from him, more back-story to bolster his quiet strength.

I would be remiss without mentioning Miriam Pultro as hired pilot Petra Jo Chen. From her introduction in the bar to the final frame of the movie, she sparkles with an infectious energy that made me question who "Pete" really was and what she really wanted.

The rest of the crew: Kevin Troy, PJ Megaw, Michael Levy and many others make for a wild ride.

Kurt Skarstedt is chilling as the amoral Thadeus Stevens, putting a face to the arrogant evil that is the government forces. From his first appearance on screen, the viewer knows the darkness underneath and its reveal is even more evil that first imagined. Also, Ted Taylor, as Minister Turner, is as cold as the dark space personifying the power that corrupts, the Alliance.

I would love to list everyone in the cast, on the ship, ever person in the towns, every child on the sidewalk, every Browncoat… but suffice to say that this is a herculean effort. An effort that shows in every single frame. An effort that belies the term "fan film". Ultimately, the viewer is rewarded with another glimpse into the Firefly universe. 94+ minutes came and went so quickly for me; it was like a bad cliché, wanting so much more. Having been subjected to too many inferior fan films in the past, I was more than pleasantly surprised.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fan film that's worth the effort
was_scott24 October 2010
This is set within the same universe as Joss Whedon's "Firefly" TV series and subsequent film, "Serenity". Like the show and film, we follow the characters of an independent cargo ship who are just taking what jobs they can, both legal and not-so, just to get through each day.

This is a decent first time effort from all involved. The cast are relaxed and there are no "clunkers" amongst them. If anything, the dialogue, being in the particular style that Whedon and his writers wrote for his characters, gave me a new appreciation of how difficult it was for the professionals to recite naturally. There is a well thought out reveal for one character and the direction is confident.

Yes, this is a fan film and that's how it should be viewed, but at the same time, it doesn't come over as a "vanity" production, yet has enough nods to the fandom. If you have enjoyed the source material, then give this a try for no other reason than to appreciate the passion of the production team and cast.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Helping to keep a Great Dream Alive
wsmithmmg14 February 2013
I have to agree with others that the film left me.. well.. just left me.. Of course a fan film isn't going to match JW work.. hell JW will have a tough time matching his work in Firefly.. Firefly was a unique mix of cast, crew, plot, acting, personalities and etc that will probably never be matched.. anyway I digress.. The film was good considering they had no budget.. no real sets and scenes and no real actors.. the acting was forced and not believable in my opinion..so I split my vote.. and 5 is average for me..It would take a few 100K to make a good 40 minute movie.. these guys made a fair movie on 0.00$ basically.. Firefly fans are the best fans in the 'verse.. and you want to agree with me.. or else you might damage my calm... Still Flying..
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great volunteer effort
birdseed-1113 February 2011
This was a clever story set in the 'verse that many of us Browncoats have come to know and love. While the movie had plot and technical flaws, it wasn't cheesy or unwatchable. And believe me when I say I can't watch bad acting. The script was written so as not to stretch the volunteer actors too far. And when they did get hammy the director was clever enough to have them refer to their bad scene as their character acting out of character. So the bad acting is made to work.

One of the problems with a fan movie like this is that the fans want to revel in the atmosphere of the source material. Where the original film, Serenity, and TV series, Firefly, only occasionally highlighted the culture, like companions and crew-as-family scenes, this movie is awash in both. There are companions everywhere and every scene with the crew is some kind of bonding or family support. This is what the fans loved about the series and in this film they overdo it.

The directing was effective. Almost every scene was done with a framed wide shot. A couple of lines needed close-ups so we could see the actor's expression to make the shot work. But every scene was in focus and the pacing was good. And a couple of scenes were downright high quality. The voice-over scene where the captain explains her motivations was excellent, for example.

The casting was excellent. The actors all appear to be cut from the same cloth as the characters they portray. The only mistake was casting the captain as a female tough guy. It just doesn't work. It's the same mistake they made in Cutthroat Island with Geena Davis. Without being too crude let's just say no one thinks that Heide Montag would be great in a street fight because of her overly developed upper body. We're asked to believe that here. (Just to be clear, there's no indication of plastic surgery on any of the cast.)

The special effects were well done. The pacing was good. The acting was acceptable, especially for volunteers. The story was an interesting addition to the Firefly 'verse. All in all a good and commendable effort. And especially worthwhile as a means to donate to some excellent charities.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed