I saw this movie in Preview... the picture talks about the trial of Pierre Goldman, (Half-brother of the french singer Jean-Jacques Goldman) for the murder of two female pharmacists, in the 70's. This movie seems to be a little bit long, cause of the dialogues... The lead character has to defend himself against differents lawyers. Some want to condemn him the others try to free him. Arieh Worhthalter embodies this protagonist with so much passion, his performance is stunning... all the supporting characters are good too. If you like movies which take place at Court, this movie is for you, if you don't, be careful because there are a lot of talking, who can annoy you in the end. But, it still a powerful movie, well directed, well acted, etc...
4 Reviews
Good court room drama with balanced humor
chenp-5470827 February 2024
I am not familiar with the case of Pierre Goldman but the movie is a good legal drama where emotions and dialogue are tense and engaging including great performances, atmosphere, and direction from Cédric Kahn. Kahn approaches the movie with a blend of drama and documentary style together which helps create the realistic setting and setting of the characters and event. The camerawork of 1:33:1 aspect ratio helps create an isolated feeling for the characters and the production is pretty good, while at times a bit cheap.
All of the performances were really good with Arieh Worthalter standing out with strong emotions and dialogue throughout. As well with the rest of the performances from the cast. The narrative is interesting with interesting themes and ideas explored, but it does prevent the movie from being excellent as some of the writing and narrative choices were a bit too thin and is the typical standard structure.
Throughout, the dialogue is well-written with a few being a bit too cartoonish, there are some pretty good balanced humor, and the pacing is tense. Despite some flaws, it is a good courtroom movie.
All of the performances were really good with Arieh Worthalter standing out with strong emotions and dialogue throughout. As well with the rest of the performances from the cast. The narrative is interesting with interesting themes and ideas explored, but it does prevent the movie from being excellent as some of the writing and narrative choices were a bit too thin and is the typical standard structure.
Throughout, the dialogue is well-written with a few being a bit too cartoonish, there are some pretty good balanced humor, and the pacing is tense. Despite some flaws, it is a good courtroom movie.
A Solid, Taut Courtroom Drama
filmfan4621 April 2024
Pierre Goldman is a complex and fascinating character, a French leftist, a small time criminal and an intellectual.
PG was a Polish Jew born in France towards end of WWII. His parents belonged to the resistance group and separated after the war with his mother, a staunch Communist who returned to Poland.
PG was kicked out of various high schools but managed to graduate from Sorbonne. He didn't join '68 student movements but went to Cuba instead and fought as a guerrilla in Venezuela and robbed a bank! Upon returning to Paris he participated in several small time robberies and was arrested with charges of murdering 2 female pharmacists in a drug store which he vehemently denied. He argued on his own behalf during the trial against the wishes of his defence attorneys.
He famously proclaimed that he died the day he was born!
This movie is fundamentally about that '76 trial in totality, a rousing and intense 1hr 46min film.
The film was strongly directed by Cedric Kahn, an actor-director and starring powerfully by Arich Worthalter as Goldman and Arthur Harari as one of his defence attorneys who also happened to be Jewish but declined to use it as a means to induce sympathy from the judges.
It was a sensational trial which attracted many celebrities and intellectuals at the time in supports to Goldman, particularly during that anti-authority anti-police political climate.
What made this film extraordinary is the superb casting from the leads down to the extras who looked real and authentic down to their appearances. The filmmakers probably had conducted extensive rehearsals which resulted this intense and fascinating courtroom drama. I'm not certain that if the script was based on the actual courtroom transcripts but it was very well written as well.
For more details on Pierre Goldman and the case, you may refer to Pierre Goldman on Wikipedia.
Recommended, as a courtroom drama based on actual events.
PG was a Polish Jew born in France towards end of WWII. His parents belonged to the resistance group and separated after the war with his mother, a staunch Communist who returned to Poland.
PG was kicked out of various high schools but managed to graduate from Sorbonne. He didn't join '68 student movements but went to Cuba instead and fought as a guerrilla in Venezuela and robbed a bank! Upon returning to Paris he participated in several small time robberies and was arrested with charges of murdering 2 female pharmacists in a drug store which he vehemently denied. He argued on his own behalf during the trial against the wishes of his defence attorneys.
He famously proclaimed that he died the day he was born!
This movie is fundamentally about that '76 trial in totality, a rousing and intense 1hr 46min film.
The film was strongly directed by Cedric Kahn, an actor-director and starring powerfully by Arich Worthalter as Goldman and Arthur Harari as one of his defence attorneys who also happened to be Jewish but declined to use it as a means to induce sympathy from the judges.
It was a sensational trial which attracted many celebrities and intellectuals at the time in supports to Goldman, particularly during that anti-authority anti-police political climate.
What made this film extraordinary is the superb casting from the leads down to the extras who looked real and authentic down to their appearances. The filmmakers probably had conducted extensive rehearsals which resulted this intense and fascinating courtroom drama. I'm not certain that if the script was based on the actual courtroom transcripts but it was very well written as well.
For more details on Pierre Goldman and the case, you may refer to Pierre Goldman on Wikipedia.
Recommended, as a courtroom drama based on actual events.
Trial of the French society
matlabaraque30 January 2024
This film takes its audience back to the 70s and the political struggles that took place in the aftermath of the 1968's revolution in France.
As a young man accused of a double murder and numerous hold-ups, Pierre Goldman is depicted as a terrorist, radicalised by his communists parents (jews from Poland who left the pogroms back in the 20's) and by the people he met "along the way" in Poland, Cuba and Venezuela. As stubborn as impulsive, he seems to hold a grudge against the whole world, the cops and the heirs of aristocracy above all. He blames the police for being prejudiced against people like him, or his mates, immigrants mistreated by the police.
Will this be a good reason to declare this man guilty of a murder ?
Will the French society of 70's will decide to bury 68's values with this trial ?
Is he the scapegoat that everyone was expecting to blame the 68 revolution for good ?
The fantastic adaptation of this trial will give some anwers for sure. It's to me a fantastic depiction of the French society of the 70's with the opposition betweeen conservatism ( those who clearly lean right and who are represented by DeGaule's supporters very keen to defend patriarchy and old bourgeois way of life) and some revolutionary's aspirations of the lefties (inspired by French intellectuals like Simone DeBeauvoir or other communists's supporters also present in the court).
Tensions, and moral values will pull their weight in this trial whose scenes are incredibly interpreted. The main character interpreted by Arieh Worthalter who definitely deserves an award for his performance(he finally got the Cesar) as well as the other actors (the lawyers, the witnesses, the attorneys and prosecutor) are just perfect in the way they express themselves, in the tension and the moral stake they put in the middle of the room. The whole trial looks perfectly genuine and it's highly interesting to see what was at stake morally speaking in the French society back in those days.
In Europe, the 1970's are years of rebellion, violences and massive opposition between liberalism and communism and it's this struggle of ideas that is portrayed in this film.
A fantastic adaptation and reproduction of a trial that changed France for good.
As a young man accused of a double murder and numerous hold-ups, Pierre Goldman is depicted as a terrorist, radicalised by his communists parents (jews from Poland who left the pogroms back in the 20's) and by the people he met "along the way" in Poland, Cuba and Venezuela. As stubborn as impulsive, he seems to hold a grudge against the whole world, the cops and the heirs of aristocracy above all. He blames the police for being prejudiced against people like him, or his mates, immigrants mistreated by the police.
Will this be a good reason to declare this man guilty of a murder ?
Will the French society of 70's will decide to bury 68's values with this trial ?
Is he the scapegoat that everyone was expecting to blame the 68 revolution for good ?
The fantastic adaptation of this trial will give some anwers for sure. It's to me a fantastic depiction of the French society of the 70's with the opposition betweeen conservatism ( those who clearly lean right and who are represented by DeGaule's supporters very keen to defend patriarchy and old bourgeois way of life) and some revolutionary's aspirations of the lefties (inspired by French intellectuals like Simone DeBeauvoir or other communists's supporters also present in the court).
Tensions, and moral values will pull their weight in this trial whose scenes are incredibly interpreted. The main character interpreted by Arieh Worthalter who definitely deserves an award for his performance(he finally got the Cesar) as well as the other actors (the lawyers, the witnesses, the attorneys and prosecutor) are just perfect in the way they express themselves, in the tension and the moral stake they put in the middle of the room. The whole trial looks perfectly genuine and it's highly interesting to see what was at stake morally speaking in the French society back in those days.
In Europe, the 1970's are years of rebellion, violences and massive opposition between liberalism and communism and it's this struggle of ideas that is portrayed in this film.
A fantastic adaptation and reproduction of a trial that changed France for good.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
