Perception (TV Series 2012–2015) Poster

(2012–2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
65 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Superb IN All Aspects
mrmac-425618 March 2022
I am currently watching this series for the first time some 7 years after its run finished and I have to day that I am delighted with what I have seen so far. Eric McCormack has never been better in anything that I have seen him in before. His character is totally believable. You would not think that the beautifully petit Rachael Leigh Cook, at 5' 2", could pass herself off as an FBI agent, but, yet again, her portrayal works so well.

Well done to all involved in this series. It is such a pity that its run didn't go beyond 2015.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyed show but always uncomfortable with it.
scheidlerbarry28 February 2021
I enjoyed the show for its actors and the story lines. Never the less I always felt uncomfortable with the messages of the show. I grew up with a paranoid schizophrenic mother. Her perceptions did not give her an insight into reality. Quite the opposite. It was not manageable by her trying to control her delusions. It was delusions which did not get better over time. It made her manipulative in that her delusions would over come my family. They became unable to convince and take action. That responsibility fell on me. She was extremely abusive and she knew how to hurt you in your weakest point. This incapacitated the rest of the family. I would insist on dealing with the symptoms no matter how much she abused me. Her disorder could only be managed with medicine and she had to be hospitalized until her symptoms were under control. Always the delusions were a detriment to her. Sometimes they were terrifying. Medicine was the only thing that kept her functioning until it didn't. Then the doctors would write new prescriptions to get the symptoms under control. Her paranoid schizophrenia was not a functional condition and medicine is sometimes the only thing that keeps the patient together.
35 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Really good scientific crime drama.
Shopaholic3523 August 2014
I must confess, before I even watched the show I wanted to like it. I was rooting for Eric McCormack to succeed in this role as his successes have been few and far between since Will & Grace ended. You also have Rachael Leigh Cook who has been plummeting since she first starred in the teen hit She's All That. Then finally you have Kelly Rowan who played Kirsten Cohen on The O.C. and hasn't been in much since. All three have been in generational hits and watching Perception leaves you with a feeling of nostalgia. You want them to succeed so you can get a second round of weekly viewing from them.

Well good news. The show is actually very good and definitely worth watching. It will never be loved by the masses but they have created an interesting crime drama that will keep you intrigued. It seems to be based on scientific theory instead of criminal investigation but with a weird twist. You never really know what's real and what's not. It really is all about perception.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stop canceling good shows!!
LydiaHelena26 July 2021
A show to fall in love with, I actually loved this pretty much, but I'm so tired of getting all the good shows ripped away from me just to make room for garbage I don't even understand why people watching.. Don't watch if you need a ending, but still amazing show.. just got cut short for no good reason.
22 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another superb TV show cancelled too soon!
Duddle3-10-24206122 October 2021
This show was superb. Very clever with humour and great acting. Eric McCormac is brilliant as the main character. Brilliant but his schizophrenia is both a curse and a strange gift. Such a shame they only made 3 seasons.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
reality-perception
nadiuskadeinoteron1 August 2013
Pierce's character is well written, so well that it resembles some people who are actually suffering from some kind of mental illness, people i know. No, i'ts nothing like "A Beautiful Mind", in which the character had these hallucinations, and other episodes not related to reality at all. On the contrary, Pierce's manifestations are connected to reality, to his perception of reality. So this show is about the quite interesting relation reality-perception, not even about madness. And that is one of the most interesting subject of psychological and philosophical history. I've never seen a show like this, entirely from a so called "crazy" person's perspective. And, i insist, his own, unique form of perception. It reminds me of English idealism, a philosophical theory about the way we access reality and more important,how can we determine what reality is.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Monk Meets A Beautiful Mind Meets House at Bones
maggieameanderings26 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A neuroscientist who's apparently afflicted with BOTH schizophrenia (he sees imaginary people a la A Beautiful Mind) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (he can't stand his routine being disrupted a la Monk) who is fascinated by puzzles and can't leave one unsolved (a la House) works as a civilian adviser with an attractive FBI agent (a la Bones) to solve crimes. But despite the fact that it's so obviously derivative and so obvious what it's derived from, I've seen two episodes so far and like it well enough to tune back in.

The highlight of the show is the charming, likable and vulnerable portrayal by Eric McCormack as the brilliant but reality challenged, Dr. Daniel Pierce. The murder mystery of the first two episodes was reasonably well written with a combination of "that was obvious" and "I didn't see that coming." And it's a delight to see LeVar Burton again in his guest star role of the dean of the university. However, Rachel Leigh Cook as FBI agent Kate Moretti is nothing special. She's pretty and perky and obstinate and will defy her bosses to finish a case; therefore, she's completely standard TV fare and Cook's portrayal doesn't lift her beyond standard TV fare.

It's only been two episodes, but I don't think that Perception is going to shape up to be great TV. However, so far it's been a decent show and has a higher level of intelligence than a lot of the shows out there. It expects the viewer to pay attention and doesn't dumb things down. If it keeps up at this level, Perception will be worth tuning into for an hour of week if you're fond of the TV genre of "socially inept genius investigator."
30 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This needs to be renewed
michaelhamfan22 October 2014
Very informative crime series (even though not all the neuro-scientific theories are true), it contributes a lot to the destigmatization of the schizophrenics while being very entertaining. Good acting from all the main actors, although Rachel Cook doesn't exactly look like an FBI agent. One of the good series out there right now, it is refreshing to see a crime show without all those super expensive lab tech or superpowers to solve crimes. Neuroscience is a growing field and the more we talk about it in the media, the better it is. People not liking this series simply doesn't understand the meaningfulness of this drama. Must watch if you're into psychological series.
34 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Love the show.
ZinQ4 June 2019
Really enjoy Daniel and all his various connections. Why it only lasted 3 seasons I just don't understand. It had so much scope.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I think its great!
vnklinger200311 September 2012
I would have to disagree with some of the posts.. Its not like the mentalist.. It reminds me of A beautiful Mind. I think its fascinating and the there is a story line. After watching last nights episode, I'm hooked, I already anxiously awaiting for next weeks last episode. I think that Eric character is extremely convincing. I predict that he will win an Emmy for this role. I also, like how the other characters are convincing enough to allow Eric role to be completely revealed. I think there is more to this storyline and we will find out next season.. I also predict that due to viewers ADD the series will only last about 3 or 4 seasons. I could watch it forever because I have always been fascinated by the human mind. I love it!
89 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Its... . . .workable
missmomosa10 September 2012
I love Eric McCormack and as Dr. Daniel Pierce on this show Perception he is great. I love him in this role. . it's a different thing for me to see him like this and I believe it and like it. The only thing I do not like is Rachel Leigh Cook's, Agent Moretti character. Rachel cannot act, simple! Period! She is bland and as dull as a plastic butter knife. She has no emotion, no conviction. Her voice is monotone. I can't take her seriously and that ruins the show for me. She makes it SO hard to get into it because just when a scene is good. . here she comes in her 3 quarter length lamb skin dark brown/maroon jacket with her blandness. She was definitely a miss-cast.
24 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My heart!
AnnaPagrati25 September 2021
This show is everything! I really wished they didn't cancel it, I adored it so so much!
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I love this show! but...
cbergman-newvirtue16 July 2013
This is one of my favorite shows and I am so glad it got a second season. It is kind of like A Beautiful Mind. Watching the main character on screen never gets old and I look forward to new episodes more than any other show at the moment.

With that said, why not a 10 out of 10? One reason. the character Kate Moretti. yes, this one character is so bad that the show drops 3 stars. I do not know who to blame for this as the character is flawed in so many ways. She is quite possibly the worst character in any currently running show. The Actor herself has only one facial expression. She tightens one cheek and smirks. surprise? smirk. frustration? smirk. concern? smirk. she literally looks exactly the same no matter what the situation is. Now for the character flaws. The character brings nothing to the show other then her credentials as an FBI agent. Yes, the show is about Dr. Pierce and not Moretti but look at sub characters from other shows: Mentalist - Lisbon controls Jane. Sherlock & Elementary - Watson provides medical expertise. Bones - Booth is street smart. Castle - Beckett is equally smart and tougher than Castle.

but Moretti...after the pilot episode she brings nothing. she doesn't even try to solve the cases on her own. she follows him around like a preschooler letting him solve the case while she stands there awkwardly. she could at least take out a note book or cross her arms once in a while. Shes more like his chauffeur. her entire character from the screen write to the actor is horrible. the character is so bad she should be tapered off to once or twice a season instead of every episode.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Main Character us good but not much else
slykron11 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I watch a lot of TV and have this show DVR'ed and watch it as a filler show when nothing else catches my fancy. The concept is outstanding but not original. Its as I say typical TV filler. The problem with this show is casting. It uses a lot of big words and fancy medical jargon to make Eric McCormack seem really smart but times sounds like he just googled it off wikipedia. It was posted on the internet it must be true.

Eric McCormack as a one man show this is about all the show has going for it. His teaching and executive assistant Arjay Smith play well together but everyone else is dismal.

The young FBI agent is flat and in my opinion to young to be seriously considered anything more than fluff and adds absolutely nothing to the script. Even the guy that plays her bar tending father adds more to the show.

I really found that having Lavar Burton play a complete moron was not only stupid but offensive. Lavar as an inept college dean give me a break that really JUMPS THE SHARK.

I really have nothing invested in this show and if its renewed I may or may not watch if my DVR continue recording it or no. It concept seemed intriguing for the first couple of episodes but by the 3rd week its kind of depressing and sad. Its a mash-up of "bones" meets "monk" meets "law and order" at "general hospital" while "Joan of Arcadia" solve mysteries all while talking to them self.
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
i am really enjoying this..
harinduonline17 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
i never thought this show had a chance, specially with the bad pilot reviews and comparisons. but after the first season, i should say this show seems to be pretty well written, and the actors do a pretty good job as well.funny thing is how they makes the audience care about a character, which on paper looks pretty much boring.what i find most entertaining is the way they opens up with Daniel doing a lecture about something which ultimately is all about the case he's going to be involved, and warping up with the same one.

anyone one who haven't seen this and are interested in this kind of shows, should give this a chance. the show is unique in its own way and it's one of those shows that makes you a little bit smarter at the end of each episode.
27 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perception is the perfect name!
sandynolen26 September 2021
The perfect name because it tackles a different perception of so many different perspectives of the mind's eye. Not only entertaining but informative too. I love it!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good show
Ewslavens7 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Iove this show for many reason first because it has a nice mix of real science and mystery my favorite example of this is when Daniel is talking to a man in a coma and tells him to think about throwing a baseball for yes and then sing the national anthem for no and then almost solves the case until of course the man has a seizure just one of the reasons I love this show. The second reason is the humor Dr. Pierce is always witty when it comes to his comebacks in one episode agent moretti's partner is making fun of Daniel when Daniel says to moretti "have you ever requested a different partner" and for some reason I just find stuff like that really funny. Reason number 3 is the mystery my favorite episode is cypher when there is a code in the news paper and Daniel tries to communicate with the killer through that. This show is always really interesting to watch and to see the different methods used to solve crime, but is also interesting in the sense that Daniel is crazy and has hallucinations and you never know if who he is talking to is real or not
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Glimpse of psychology mixed with crime
MoodForDancing20 October 2020
The show is procedural, where every episode means another criminal case. One of the main characters is brilliant professor who is struggling with his demons while solving crimes. Perception shows us that nothing in the world is white and black even though lots of people assumes so. However, not everything in this show is so mundane. There are elements of comedy, awkwardness, drama and even a glimpse of human psychology. All of this makes it worth watching in spite of cancelling after third season.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I love this show!
morningstar36830 July 2013
I really like this show. The way things are perceived by Daniel and the things that I am learning from the neuroscience point of view are intriguing. I can't wait for a new episode to learn more!

The one character/actor I am not particularly fond of is Scott Wolf. I am not sure if it is an useless character or I just don't like the actor. A combination of both perhaps. The other character which is needed but could be written differently is the FBI agent. As well, I find Rachel Leigh Cook's acting quite dull. I am just not drawn in by her at all; whereas, Kelly Rowan is fabulous in her role.

A good part this show is fascinating and Eric McCormack is extremely convincing. He plays it beautifully! A little tweaking on Agent Moretti and Donnie Ryan and some better writing and we'll have a real winner!!!!
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Love the McCormack
SnoopyStyle13 November 2014
Dr. Daniel Pierce (Eric McCormack) is a neuroscientist professor who suffers from hallucinations including an old passing acquaintance Natalie Vincent (Kelly Rowan). His loyal assistant Max Lewicki (Arjay Smith) helps him in teaching as well as his life. Paul Haley (LeVar Burton) is the college dean and long time friend. FBI agent Kate Moretti (Rachael Leigh Cook) recruits him for his special knowledge and then Assistant U.S. Attorney Donnie Ryan (Scott Wolf) who also happens to be her ex-husband takes over her cases.

I really like McCormack in this role and RLC is surprisingly good as a cop. It's getting a little bit of a trope to have a tiny woman as a tough cop but she's pretty good at it. The addition of Wolf didn't hurt but wasn't that big of a help either. It definitely threw cold water on any budding romantic chemistry between Pierce and Moretti. That's perfectly fine but the show never truly gave another viable romantic partner for Pierce. Also Pierce keeps going off leaving people behind which gets a little old. The show works a bit better as a cop procedural. The personal stuff is a little clunky but I did like the section with the real Natalie Vincent. The show ends with a cliffhanger of the Moretti Ryan wedding.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent
invister1235 August 2012
First of all, if you hate the same old crime TV shows where there's a guy with a girl solving puzzles and the story is far-fetched to 40 minutes of run-time, yes, you'll be disappointed to watch this show and probably rate it 5-6 stars, which is not the case for people like me. I think comedy and crime don't mix; so the TV series like castle and white collar are overrated and I've hardly seen an another episode of those.

What different in this TV show is that it is quite focused on the Professor who needs his mind kept busy with riddles and cases that eventually makes him go more bonkers and makes the show interesting.

The actor is a simple guy, he doesn't have flair and styles like Dr Lightman from Lie to Me or the Sherlock Holmes actor (these two shows are the top rated in my list). What I like about him is his simplicity and crazy behavior in public that most of us can't afford to have.

The FBI agent is a good actor too, but too cute to look like an agent. I enjoy her character as well. The other interesting character is the Professor's assistant who throws mild tantrums too, which is quite fun to watch.

I love this show and everyone else should too. Thanks.
88 out of 144 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
enjoy but little sad
Luluchang15 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I don't really like the idea from season 2 and 3 with donnie.

It's clear daniel like kate since beginning, but too afraid because his situation. And kate have big crush on him and just ignore hot brittish guy in season one.

Suddenly she forgive her ex husband who cheating on her, yea not good for me.

Season one is awesome, but yeah it just sad feeling like watching house again. With same sad ending.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The only FBI show this close to reality
vespalavis30 January 2022
The first two seasons was so good! It's science-based and soo much better than Criminal Minds and the other similar shows. I would love to keep watching it for years. It's sad they decided to end it.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not everybody's cup of tea, because the main characters's personal story is dark-ish
miaalike14 May 2022
The brilliant mind that solves crimes in this series is also afflicted by a mental disease, that is the dark part of the story. While it is good to bring it into a mainstream series and it sheds light over the lives of people suffering from such afflictions, it makes the series not anybody's cup of tea... and it gives it an edge.

That being said, the way the series is executed is quite professional, goes along with Monk, Lie to Me, The Mentalist and other intellectually written series. It is interesting, educational in ways and also painful to watch.

Also worth mentioning that people suffering from mental syndroms or afflictions, if not rich, are in fact doomed in real life. Sadly. And also in many diafunctional countries - doomed even if a bit wealthy, because they have to hide and have no support network or context or society to integrate into. Just from the stories I know of. Sad, dramatic and scary.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Marvelous Subliminal
norman-42-84375815 May 2017
I got the series 1 DVD from the library and saw the first two episodes last night. It was watchable American fluff but kind of interesting at the same time. It was the same format as Castle with the smart detective needing the assistance of the even smarter non cop sidekick to solve the case. I liked the psychobabble at the beginning of the show. Whether it is current thinking or not, it was entertaining. Nordic Noir the show was not, not even solid real detective series like DCI Banks but something to watch when you brain is telling you it is getting time to close up shop for the night. If you want to see how the non cop lead in a detective series should be done then try Wire in the Blood.

I have nothing against people with mental disorders, it is an illness just like any other even though they may sometimes behave in ways which others would consider odd. There are however many people today that are concerned about a lack of transparency from those above them in the hierarchy. There are many people that feel their world is somehow out of kilter and are trying to discover the truth about certain issues. The internet is full of conspiracy theories and some of them might even be conspiracies. What better way to debunk people who hold such views than to have these concerns declared as all true by a character that goes around clutching his possessions to his chest like Rain-man. I wonder who thought up that little piece of subliminal. For those who did not pick it up then it has done its job.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed