"Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Ad Astra Per Aspera (TV Episode 2023) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
82 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
a classic Star Trek episode
nerrdrage30 November 2023
Pike's first introduction to Star Trek was in the famous courtroom episode Menagerie so it's appropriate that SNW should do a standout courtroom episode of its own.

This was really written in the style of a lawyer show, with a lawyer depicted as being smart and eloquent in defending her client, even if she has misgivings about said client.

The details of the case seem plausible as an example of future jurisprudence. I was a bit skeptical that the Vulcan admiral would really be allowed to ask the defendant a question to implicate someone else (Pike). Shouldn't that be done in an independent investigation outside the courtroom? But that was the only questionable detail.

I also appreciated that Uhura actually refused to go along with an illegal command. Imagine that, crew members behaving professionally! But mainly this episode stood out for depicting how this crew has jelled as a team, as friends, and as a family,

However, I don't think the theme of "genetic modifications are perfectly okay" is going to stand up too long. Even in DS9's time, long after SNW, it was still a taboo. So I figure there's another shoe that's going to drop, maybe not till next season.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Proper Star Trek
endalayng22 June 2023
Have watched Star Trek since the TOS in the 60's. Loved it , also TNG and DS9 in particular.

Loved the "Measure of the Man" with Data story in TNG. The court case in the Menagerie was also a brilliant episode (2) .

This is a really good episode , personally I always like a good courtroom drama. Good storyline and acting. All the ensemble contributes well and overall I would rate it a very strong episode.

I've read some negative reviews , which being honest puzzle me. I hate all the negativity , not really sure what people expect.

I really prefer New Worlds to Star Trek Discovery and am looking forward to the next few episodes.
78 out of 134 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Season 2 has started!
siahyagraves22 June 2023
After a less than stellar season opener this was the episode that season 2 should have started off with. We don't need random super soldier formula, dragged out fights, or even Klingons. All we need is our captain and his crew, and stories of things that remind us of the world around us but told through that Trek lenses that we love so much. Season 2 has started.

I've always enjoyed when Star Trek tackles deeper real life issues. When things aren't always black and white but have that grey in them. This episode really focused on those issues. Star Trek is at its best when it focuses on things that make you think.
46 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best episodes of all Star Trek Franchise
yigittt22 June 2023
Star Trek is definitely more than just a sci-fi show. It is dreaming of a better society, a better system. Looking for places to improve. It questions norms, argues. It asks what can be done and how can be done. It tries to give answers. It experiments with ideas, extrapolates thoughts, tries to see how they will work in practice.

For example; identifies money as the cause of some problems. Then removes money and creates a world where money is not needed or money's functionality is provided by other means.

"Ad Astra Per Aspera" is one of those episodes that is less sci-fi but more psychological, sociological and philosophical. It has brought about an unexpected flood of emotions and thoughts.

Excellent text and excellent acting as well. The Star Trek in the recent years have been sort of okay, but I had kinda forgotten that I loved Star Trek. Today, I remembered.

I'll for sure be more aware of 'opportunities to be my better self' and try to seize them. :)
145 out of 224 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It brought tears to my eyes
murat-coskun22 June 2023
Wonderfully written and acted very emotional episode of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. I don't think I will ever see the Una character in the same way, a great background story. I guess the people who love Star Trek will now remember Starfleet code 8514 forever. Don't mind the naysayers, this is one of the best Star Trek episodes I have ever seen.

While Starfleet isn't perfect, it'd be wonderful if we can achieve something similar for humanity's future in real life. That's why I always enjoyed watching the Star Trek series. It brings out the best of humanity and shows us we can do better.

Let's hope the future episodes will continue at this level!
110 out of 170 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Star Trek Is Best When It Touches A Nerve
bruce-spencer-ky22 June 2023
'Ad Astra Per Aspera' is Star Trek holding a mirror to our society (social criticism), a direct reflection of who we are, and a prescription for who we can be (for the better). That mirror has been part of Star Trek from the beginning and this episode does a great job of giving us a close up look, showing every blemish. Court room episodes have been used many times in Star Trek to make a point, and I believe 'Ad Astra Per Aspera' will stand beside 'The Measure of a Man', and 'The Drumhead' as one of the best.

To those who don't want to look in that mirror, I remind them that Gene Roddenberry once said, "Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms."

I think Roddenberry would be very proud of this episode.
115 out of 179 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best Trek episodes I have seen in 25 years.
jim689322 June 2023
I agree with the decision to not open with this episode as it is 100% talking and the general audience does need a more action oriented episode to start off the season with.

With this episode we get to see the core philosophies of Gene Roddenberry's world questioned and held up against itself.

There is a danger in allowing oneself to come to the belief that the reasons for your decisions are absolute and shouldn't be requestioned, that's exactly what this episode brought to the modern iteration of Star Trek in a way that Discovery constantly faltered.

The question every Starfleet officer should ask themselves is are my actions in line with the intent of the law, not just the word of it.

It was wordy, but within those words was a well thought out story that hit to the core of what many of us believe Star Trek is.
104 out of 166 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Measure of a Manifestation
mikeawalsh22 June 2023
Strange New Worlds, the latest manifestation in the Star Trek franchise adds Una Chin-Riley to the menagerie of USS Enterprise Commanders to face court-martial.

The bar is high when it comes to these right of passage episodes, indeed, they may be the measure of success of any Trek series, so this one had to reach for the stars and boy does it get there. The only disappointment is I can't score it more than 10.

Not a phaser fired, a warp drive engaged, or a new alien encountered - yet this will surely be rated as one of THE greatest Trek episodes of all time.

Outstanding writing, clever plot, and a brilliant understanding of Trek law. Starfleet may not be perfect, but this episode probably is.
97 out of 158 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I have to sing with the Choir
pontram1 July 2023
Up to this episode I was not a great fan of that franchise, though I like Pike very much, he is just the person I would have appreciated much more as the Captain of the Enterprise in TOS than Kirk, 40 years ago, when I was young.

However, this is for me the first grown-up episode, and it isn't an accident that "The Orville" had a similar intriguing episode about gender identity in its 3rd season (completing a story arc that begun in season one with a failed trial).

Here, everything is laid out in a very easy setting and, since court cases are a big part of everyday's life in the U. S., it is made with the uttermost diligence in pacing and dialogue. Not a minute was wasted as a filler or surplus backstory.

Very impressive, I must say, and the only point that I have against it, is what someone here wrote in a review. Technically, the right approach for defence would be that the violated law itself is not only against Federation's principles and "bad", but indeed unconstitutional, and therefore void.

8 Stars for a very good and mature episode.

As an afterword to all fellow reviewers who are complaining about wokeness - please change your mind or stop watching Star Trek before you can manage to progress into a sentiment that agrees with what Star Trek stands for. If anything, diversity is one of the core agreements in this universe, and Roddenberry himself introduced it with the famous Uhura kiss half a century before.
27 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful episode
bmcarbaugh17 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A wonderfully written piece of TV fiction that showcases the absolute best of what a series like Trek, with one-off episodic storytelling, can be. In the best tradition of the series, it presents a fascinating premise that serves as a kind of ethical prism, through which various reflections of the theme can be explored, without being too directly allegorical to any one specific thing. It can be read as a civil rights metaphor, a don't-ask-don't-tell-metaphor, an apartheid metaphor, you name it.

The result is a beautiful hour of television that's able to pirouette like any good courtroom drama across a variety of heady subject, including race and rights in a stratified society, the letter of the law vs the spirit of the law, the realistic day-to-day of any advanced bureaucracy vs its idealized self-image, etc. (Though oddly, for a story that hinges on genetic modification, it doesn't touch on the actual bio-ethics of that much at all.)

It also helps that, like a lot of classic 80's and 90's TV, it's anchored by an outstanding actress in a walk-on role just knocking it out of the park.

I loved it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best dramatic episodes in the history of Trek
terrylarosa23 June 2023
Ignore the whiny viewers who dislike practically everything. Fantastic episode that mirrors current events here. There's rarely anything more dramatic than a courtroom episode and this did not disappoint. Still missing Pike ( still the best thing that's happened to Trek since Shatner ) having a bigger role but with eight eps left I'm sure they'll compensate. LOL line with Spock of all people. This show is night and day compared to the abomination that Disco's become. Great insight into Una's past and good dialogue throughout. There was also an element of suspense since, though I knew she wasn't going to be convicted, there was a chance she might not be allowed back into Starfleet ( actors and actresses in Trek have left their shows sometimes abruptly ). If I had one caveat its the lawyer ( the actress did a fantastic job ) looking like a supermodel and walking like she was at a modeling show but a small blip in an otherwise excellent episode. Looking forward to more encounters with the Gorn and a somewhat less emotional Spock.
57 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Low rating & complaints = you missed the point of the story
ansonthepants-2086622 June 2023
Star Trek has always been about people - individuals, crews, family, friends, species, cultures and societies. Roddenberry and his successors have always used the Trek universe to hold a mirror up to ourselves. So, anyone who views this episode unfavorably clearly doesn't get it. I've often said that sometimes a message needs to be heavy-handed to smack the point into ones head, proverbially.

There are numerous ways to interpret this episode, but just like other similarly themed episodes like TNG's The Measure of a Man and The Drumhead and VOY's Author, Author, it shows that the social problems of the past, present, and future (real and invented) have remained, and will continue to remain, constant... about rights, about freedoms, about individuality, and the evolving laws that serve to protect and/or limit.

Una, in trying to save herself from persecution on her homeworld 25 years prior, sought refuge among the very societies and political organization which look down upon her, criminalize her, and demonize her. In those years, she formed deep, meaningful relationships. She stood for and upheld the ideals of the Federation and Starfleet. She was a Federation citizen and Starfleet officer in every sense... Mainly because she was able to blend in. The episode focuses on the legal villification of how she arrived and those who supported her.

Hmmm... looks very much like the topic of immigration and asylum practices.
56 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not horrible, but too soon in the series for episodes like this.
DJ_Reticuli29 June 2023
Essentially, this is "Measure of a Genetically Engineered Woman", and done before the audience can actually give a damn.

It's too early in the series to be doing stuff like this when I really don't care about these characters enough yet. If the first officer was replaced, it wouldn't upset me. It's only been like a dozen episodes, which is less than half what TNG had in already by the time they did the episode with Data.

Shows need to put in more ground work of just entertaining, episodic stuff before delving into this sort of main characters in deep moral peril stories. To those claiming it's already episodic: The stuff with the Gorn, augments, and these genetically engineered people the 1st officer is a part of has all been serial in its story telling, not episodic. They literally are recapping in the beginning of the episodes what happened in prior relevant episodes. You don't do that with episodic TV.

They're taking the viewers for granted in how they're running this show in season 2, devolving into more of the Discovery mold compared to season 1 that was passable compared to the majority of Discovery. I hope they regain their footing.

P. S. Speaking of footing... the pants, particularly on the men, need to be at least the same width from the knees to the shoes, even if they're not belled at the bottom at all. They look extremely lame currently, figuratively and literally.
41 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
big morality episode
muchobliged27 June 2023
Una is on trial for having lied about her identity as someone who has genetic modifications. The Federation apparently doesn't like genetic engineering (and lying about it) so this is a problem. Instead of exploring the nature of these genetic alterations and their possible societal impact vs. The rights of the individual, we get a simplistic, overly sentimental, preachy courtroom play about the discrimination of minorities.

This episode is heavily inspired by the TNG episode 'The Measure of a Man', which did it a lot better more than thirty years ago, where there was more room for nuance and looking at the case from different angles before settling on one. 'Ad Astra Per Aspera' could've been a worthy successor had it been willing to actually explore the topic instead of insisting on serving us a one dimensional morality lesson.

I didn't like the acting either, it was often wooden and unnatural. There were also some bad directing choices. For instance there was this scene where Una and her lawyer were having a dialogue standing in fornt of each other the whole time like in a cheap soap opera. If they're gonna talk for a while, why not let them grab a chair like normal people? It's okay to sit in Starfleet. This didn't look right.

'Ad Astra Per Aspera' wants to be a big morality episode and tries to convince you that it is by relying heavily on pushing the sentimental buttons and making dramatic gestures, but ultimately fails due to a lack of substance and actual food for thought.
72 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Explores Roddenberry's original vision
amesmonde14 July 2023
Ad Astra Per Aspera" provides a welcome breather from the fast pace of the season opener, focusing on a trial and drawing parallels to real-world issues. Number One's experience cleverly resonates with various struggles, without being too preachy and in your face, such as people hiding their identities or individuals unable to live openly. While the episode offers a just resolution for Number One, it acknowledges that the larger issue is not fully resolved and that Starfleet still has work to do.

It may not be Gene Roddenberry's space wagon action episode but probably explores Roddenberry's original vision of a modern society of the future more than most.

Overall, writers and director Valerie Weiss offer a wonderfully crafted and shot court room-type episode while the cast particularly Mount, Peck, Romijn and Chong are outstanding offering emotional depth.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
In the best tradition of ST
rudkip-51-40329922 June 2023
It is not the first time that a Star Trek chapter addresses the issue of discrimination through criminal proceedings and he always does so from the perspective of Starfleet and Federation ideals. And he always breaks established rules. This episode is not the exception. Well written, well-acted, well directed and with a clear message. SNW is a worthy heir to the spirit of ST. All franchise series have their own and focus on one aspect of the story but STSNW is true to the original idea of STOS. I hope they get better as season 2 progresses and I also hope for a 4 and 5. This particular episode, in the words of Admiral Pasalk, focuses on emotions but also on logic and the idea that law without justice is incomplete.
37 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What Trek Is All About!
bigunclem-7404023 June 2023
What an absolutely amazing episode! After the action-packed first episode of Season 2, this slow-burn one was exactly what we needed

Not only did it show what makes Trek so amazing, it showed what true diversity and friendship can do.

So many of the main cast turned in a stellar performance and made fictional issues blend in and be relevant to so many things the planet is going through today.

And what about Yetide Badaki's performance... she was fantastic. She took what could so easily have been a "stuffy lawyer" type character, and made it one of the most memorable guest star roles ever. I really hope we see her again.

10/10.
33 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Now *THIS* is Star Trek
simianfriday23 June 2023
I haven't been the biggest fan of Kurtzman-era Trek - most of it is only marginally entertaining garbage - but this episode is absolutely brilliant and is exactly the sort of thing I expect out of Star Trek.

Ad Astra Per Aspera does what good Trek should do - it holds a mirror to our present day society, reflecting each and every wart and blemish, and shows us a path forward. This is easily the best episode of Strange New Worlds thus far, and it will stand shoulder to shoulder with some of the greatest episodes of Star Trek as a whole.

This is what Trek is about. This is what Trek can be.

Now somebody just needs to keep Kurtzman away from the writers room so he doesn't ruin this show.
45 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the finest episodes of any Star Trek
mhorg201823 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
If any single episode of Discovery had been this well written, my low opinion of that show would be way higher. As it, after an uneven first season and a poor first episode, this is the first truly great episode of any of the new Treks. Some may dismiss it as a rip on TOS "Court Martial", but that is doing this show a disservice. This episode, centering on the trial of Number One, Una Chin-Riley, defended by a fellow Illyrian, Nessa, brilliantly portrayed by Yetide Badaki (last seen by this reviewer in the sadly cancelled "American Gods") starts a little slow (But does highlight how much Pike thinks of Una) and then hits stride as Nessa takes the Federation (phonies as usual since they tout freedom and equality, but step on it when it displeases them) and Starfleet to task. Yetide is simply brilliant in her role as defense attorney and yes, she does bring echoes of Kirk's defender from "Court Martial" and she uses Starfleet's own laws to get her client acquitted. She truly reveals this sham trial for what it is, a fearsome witch hunt, left over from Khan's days as a tyrant. Even with the one flaw in the story; how did Una avoid being discovered by Starfleet Medical? Doesn't effect how this viewer reacted: I jumped up and cheered when the verdict was disclosed. I also question Starfleet by applying their out of date law to an alien species. Does every race that joins Starfleet have to bend to every law? I'd like to see Yetide again. She's a great actress and I'm glad at the end, she still isn't a fan of Starfleet or the Federation. At this point in their chronology, I'm not sure I am either. They certainly have some backward thinking. And Ethan Peck has sealed himself as the best Spock since Leonard Nimoy. When he's sitting in the dining hall, simply staring at his adversary, a fellow Vulcan he admits he doesn't care for, and apologizes to M'Benga and Ortega (who I'm starting to like) for his 'outburst', as well as revealing that Una was hiding a like for Gilbert and Sullivan operas... he's sealed the deal. My one complaint? Let Uhura grow her hair out already! A fine episode.
43 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Thoughtful, insightful, wonderful!
marcelmariano-1273123 June 2023
A diferent topic, but a return to the theme of classical episodes that allow the audience to think and connect with the script.

Cap. Kirk in trial, accused of killing a crewmam. Cap. Picard in trial, accused of sedition. Commander Riker in trial, accused of murder. Data first fighting to be recognized as a sentient being, and then to keep his daughter. Dax, in a hearing while her acuser tries to force her to inherit responsability for a crime that a previous host supposedly commited.

In particular, I LOVED that they brought back a technology from the original series that SHOULD have appeared in every trial.

Lately, Star Trek shows have been using too much action and leaving narrative hooks behind. Not that it never happened before, like on ST-TNG S04E19, where Picard should have received a new type of propulsion from the Cytherians, and don't mention it again even when it's found out that warp speed destroys the fabric of space on ST-TNG S07E09.

Even so, so much is left behind on fast-paced episodes, one after another, without time to breathe, that seeing an episode like this, where you can sit back and relax, is amazing.

Just leave the plot of the Gorn behind. A race based on feral babies that MUST eat meat, grows exponentialy fast to be combat-worthy and kill each other until there's only only survivor... I don't see how it could evolve to develop space travel. (Not that the Klingons are much better, seeing how they disregard science, but we love them anyway. ;-)

Anyhow... Congratulations to the writing staff. Amazing episode.
27 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great episode bridging TOS
tonyandpam27 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This was a well written lesson in social studies. TOS was well known for disguising a societal lecture in the guise of science fiction. One attempt was in the Season 3 episode "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" with Lou Antonio and Frank Gorshin as two bi colored beings whose respective societies discriminate against the other. The discussions of racism and discrimination are a little less obvious than in the newest episode.

Ad Astra Per Aspera hits on many of our current issues, but reminds us that while at any point in time the law of land is law, the point made several times is that laws change. Slavery was abolished, segregation was abolished. This court was not going to fix it for all Illyrians today but certainly opens the door for closer evaluation of genetically engineered people. The Eugenics Wars resulted from some experiments gone awry, but it is also certain that the technology advances and not all genetically modified beings are evil.

This one replaces my "Best Star Trek Episode that is a lecture on racism".

Well done.
19 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Procedural With A Heart
WordsworthStone22 June 2023
The feels--clearly, the writers and crew understood the assignment. I know episodes of Star Trek yore also experimented with mixing genres and tropes, but the injection of modernity presents as refreshing and captivating.

I especially liked the end of the 2nd act, with the twist and dramatic pause--a commercial break like the traditions of television past. I might be giving extra credit to standard story structure but Welcome Back to episodic television. Now, if only, they can bring back 24 episode seasons to sustain the livelihoods of artists that bring all this together.

The binge model is just not sustainable, it makes me feel like I'm cramming for exams again. 8 hour sessions, information information, information osmosis.

OH. ALSO. The episode's PSA message for the marginalized, disenfranchised and checking on governments falling to a path of hegemonic exceptionalism. Space wars, say no to Space-Fascists.
41 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meh
c-wise29 June 2023
A derivative episode competently put together. We've seen this kind of thing all before which is fine in a 25 episode series, but SNW doesn't get that many episodes, so this felt like a waste to me. I was disappointed to see race and gender get a mention. The rhetoric is everywhere. It smothered Discovery. Hopefully SNW will keep the nonsense to a minimum and concentrate on good storytelling. The episode looks great as usual but some money was saved here to spend on later episodes.

In conclusion, this is not why I watch Star Trek, it was done better on TNG. I expect much better to come. Don't disappoint us.
21 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This was a pretty good episode.
marianciobanuz22 June 2023
There is a reason for Gene Roddenberry to make TNG as being apart of TOS and this episode reflects pretty well why he did it, not even in our present times a sentient being would face prison just because of a genetic modification, that is so silly, just like that Federation law which condemned to death any being which enters in the space of Talos, those are just some silly cheesy ideas back from the 60's which are looking now just like some ideas for a retro space parody, but somehow, the writers handled this issue pretty well, i am trully impressed. By the way, i loved to see that ENT tellarite back in the franchise, i hope they will bring back event the Enterprise era Andorians too, as a race of the same species as the one from Discovery, ,for example, we humans have unleast 5 different races(white, chinese, black, native americans, australian natives..), it is the time to bring back Enterprise in the canon, because they handeled those species much better than the most recent reinarnations of the Franchise.
35 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Worthy of the Original series
risxcel31 August 2023
I have been watching Star Trek from the Original series first shown in B&W through all it's reincarnations and this is the first episode that would be worthy of the original series.

Yes it is a court room drama but it relies not space being the final frontier but what it is to fight prejudice despite our alleged intellect as advanced lifeforms No science fiction technology that I was mesmerised by as a ten year old in the original series . . . Just the triumph of all lifeforms to overcome our deep seated prejudices and realise that we only survive if we fight our prejudices and mean it. Live long and prosper.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed