Peter Goodchild: Self - BBC Head of Plays 1984-1989

Quotes 

• [Peter Goodchild, Head of Plays, went to see Ian Curteis, the writer of The Falklands Play, to discuss it] 

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  The two men now have very different recollections of the meeting.

  Ian Curteis : When he came to see me, he started to propose some changes to the script which were pretty radical. He wanted me to take out anything that he described as Margaret Thatcher's *private* character: her writing in her own hand to the relatives of the servicemen who were killed, any sign of emotion, and particularly signs of her crying. Anything of the *private* Margaret Thatcher. The bellicose iron battleaxe, that was all right, that was in. And that is how two previous dramatisations on ITV had shown her. But the private side, the vulnerable side , the human side - that was to be cut out. I was pretty unhappy about that, as you can imagine.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  Goodchild denies that he had a specific problem showing the private side of Margaret Thatcher. According to him, he was merely raising points in the script that needed re-working.

  Peter Goodchild : Basically, what we talked about as far as Maggie Thatcher was concerned, was the question of whether you could actually orchestrate the changes of mood sufficiently to give the character a sense of throughput through the piece. And that was really what worried me. There is the question of, you know... you've got to watch, when you're doing a piece like that... she had enough enemies in the world to mean that someone was gonna pick on you if it seemed you'd produced a sentimentalised version.

  Ian Curteis : The second thing, and actually much more radical, was that he wanted me to rewrite some of the scenes of the War Cabinet meetings, to show them taking military decisions with the coming election in mind. In other words, they were saying "How will this go down with the voters?" Now that seemed to me absolute dynamite. And not only that, it was defamatory.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  Goodchild disputes that he made these requests. In an internal memo following the meeting, Goodchild says that he asked that the political context of the play be explored. He wanted Curteis to produce independent evidence to what was or wasn't discussed during War Cabinet meetings.

  Peter Goodchild : [indignantly]  I wasn't asking him to *change* it. What I was asking him to do was to make sure that everything was clear and above board about what was there.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  What followed was an exchange of letter which were interpreted in totally different ways.

  Ian Curteis : He wrote to me the following day what he had not said to me at the meeting, and that is "These changes are *mandatory*." So that was really trying to bring very improper pressure to bear on me to insert things in the play and to change in a way which he couldn't justify. He wouldn't, couldn't explain where this evidence came from.

  Peter Goodchild : He wrote to me "We agreed I should look into certain things in the text when the producer, director and I get to that stage of things. There in shorthand: "consciousness of the political consequences of war, consciousness of a coming election, Galtieri's origins and rise to power, and more doubters should be heard". That was *his* note to me. That's perfectly fair: it raises the question about doubters, it raises the business about consciousness of the coming elections - he was prepared to look into. Which he did. But he wasn't being *forced*. That note doesn't say he's being forced. And for my part I then wrote "We discussed certain points which had to be addressed before we can go ahead with production. In particular I expressed concern to put the largely military activities of our War Cabinet into more political context, the context reflecting such doubts, fear and opposition as there was. This was the main point. We discussed some aspect of characterisation, but those will come up for discussion between yourself and the producer. How do you get from there... That's a very fair record and those are the two things together: his reaction and my reaction. How you get to suddenly saying that such-and-such is mandatory and has to be complied with? It's a big jump.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  The letter from Goodchild does state that certain things needed to be addressed before production could proceed. For Goodchild, this was normal practice in the re-working of a script. But for Curteis, who believed his play was already in production, it was highly suspicious. He wrote asking for clarification but claims he was never given an answer.

• [fearing that the BBC was going to suppress production of The Falklands Play, Ian Curteis released a statement to the press] 

  Peter Fiddick : When it went public, it went public in more detail than, in my experience, any similar row ever has.

  [shots of headlines such as "BBC accused of Falklands play censorship" and "utterly Biased, morally Bankrupt, politically Corrupt" with the BBC in large type] 

  Peter Goodchild : The press were just going for the BBC in a way that certainly hasn't happened in... there have been occasional scandals... but they were really *going* for the BBC.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  The papers seized on what was portrayed as a left-wing conspiracy, and a media feeding-frenzy followed. For the Thatcher government, the row seemed to confirm their claims about bias at the BBC.

  Conservative MP : [in the House of Commons, voice]  They're trying to enforce changes in the script. Just because it came out as being pro-Britain, pro-government and pro the Prime Minister. These actions are quite disgraceful.

  Margaret Thatcher : [in the House of Commons, voice]  Mr Speaker, I'm grateful for what my honourable friend says. I'm sure that the people concerned will take very careful note of his comments in this house.

  Ian Curteis : It touched a nerve in the national psyche and it released people's anger against the BBC.

  Chris Dunkley : It was a wonderful example of what quite a lot of middle class conservative - small c - people think about the BBC. It bore out all their worst suspicions. "You write a play about the Falklands. Obviously it supports Margaret Thatcher and thinks that what she did was a good thing and that she behaved well. And what happens? It gets banned. Typical pinko BBC." I think that's why typically somewhat right-wing newspapers took it up with the enthusiasm that they did.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  And those papers had no problem getting Curteis's version of events.

  Chris Dunkley : Curteis himself wrote a very detailed account of his side, which was used a lot by all of us, I think. That was what you carried around with you if you were covering the subject.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  But on the other side of the argument, information was scarce.

  Peter Fiddick : The BBC's position very much was one of simply saying "No, we didn't do that." They certainly couldn't prove what they thought or what their political fears might have been.

  Chris Dunkley : The BBC, although it has an huge press office, lots of people in it, is an extremely difficult organisation to get anything out of - if they don't want you to get it out. There was a *deep* suspicion that the BBC had a good reason why it didn't want to give a straight answer.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  In fact the BBC couldn't *give* a straight answer as it had more than one.

  Chris Dunkley : Not till much later in the day did the BBC start leaking the idea that "really the reason for this is that the play just isn't any good". It seemed to be deeply "unfortunate", to say the least, that just didn't happen at the beginning. If they were telling the truth, you'd expect it to come out straight away.

  Michael Grade : I think that I made it very clear at the time to the board of governors, the press, to anyone who was interested, that the sole ground for not going ahead with the commission was the fact that I didn't think the script was good enough. The problem-with-quality issue didn't come across as clearly as it should have done was because Alasdair chose to use the Election as an excuse, rather than say to Ian "Sorry, it doesn't cut the mustard, old boy. We're not spending a million of the licence-payer's money on this. Very disappointing but there you go. That's life." He kind of fudged it, really. And once you start to fudge, we got ourselves into a hopeless public relations muddle.

• Ian Curteis : Everyone is right from their own point of view. And if it was a private company, Michael Grade and Bill Cotton would be entirely justified. But it *isn't* a private company. They blocked the play. They didn't tell me why. They did not commission another play to put a similar viewpoint - the case for the defence.

  Michael Grade : There was no politics at the BBC. The BBC was not trying to change Ian Curteis's view of the world. It was not trying to change the script. We just wanted something we felt was worth a million quid of the licence-payer's money.

  Sir Bernard Ingham : I do not need persuading now, and I did not need persuading then, that there were elements within the BBC that didn't want to broadcast anything that portrayed Margaret Thatcher in a good light.

  Peter Goodchild : I never heard anybody actually saying "This is just a load of right-wing rubbish" or whatever. That wasn't the way it was discussed. There was no conspiracy.

  Eddie Mair - Narrator : [voiceover]  Yet fifteen years on, the BBC still stands accused. Production of the play may be complete but it seems the row behind it will never be resolved.

  Peter Fiddick : It was, from my point of view, impossible then and is impossible now to know what or who to believe.

  Chris Dunkley : It will be extremely interesting to see whether most of us now think it's a good or a bad piece of work.

  Alasdair Milne : I still believe, from the moment I first saw it, that it was worth making. I look forward to seeing it very much.

  Michael Grade : I don't like to see any work buried. I shall watch it with interest.

  Sir Bernard Ingham : I welcome it. Let's see what he wrote. Judge for ourselves.