"1923" Nature's Empty Throne (TV Episode 2022) Poster

(TV Series)

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
It's not what I expected
WordsworthStone25 December 2022
Based on previous experiences with the Dutton clan, I didn't think Taylor Sheridan would offer such a well-rounded wholesome journey. Let's first put it out there, he runs very much on the gruff man trope, the quintessential American cowboy, stoic beyond pain--as cowboy'n isn't a passion but a life. And he always reminds us, the plight of the indigenous natives, that Manifest Destiny brought to the lands, regardless of the period. From the eastern shores of Roanoke and its arduous journey west, civilization has conquered freedom, where ever it's been and still going. The land of the Yellowstone ranch, an allegory of man's attempt to shield a pocket of that freedom from the so-called sprawl of progress.

But I didn't expect it would take us to the Serengeti, where the English did the same with colonies far distant from their shores. There, Spencer, a Dutton to the t's, still lives the struggle of existential freedom, counterpart to life on the ridge with the herd, had the Great War not demand the presence of ...men too smart to be brave but born still to do it. How western society romanticized all of it, the cowboys, the Indians, soldiers on the front, even the unnatural colonization of the harshest of climates that produced real apex predators (Africa and Australia, I don't get why man wants a land where the plant life and the smallest of creatures to carnivores honed to hunt or survive from the hunt, for millennia). Sheridan wants to show you the hard truths of the building of that romance; real blood, real pain, real death. And he does it well, better than any other who delved into such matters, that's why "he's so hot right now."

All the story grinds on a different empathy, our need to see ourselves, overcome. I live on it, vicariously, too. But my favorite is when, he draws a sudden halt, and reminds us, despite man's odd engagement with these struggles, that is still the romance of it. Boom. Do you want another?
32 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Far better than the first episode
a-kris-e2 January 2023
I didn't hate the first episode, but this one was far more interesting.

There was a lot more character development. The writing was brilliant. The relationships between various characters, past (1883), present (1923), and future (Yellowstone), began to emerge.

Three distinct storylines are present, and just how they will merge should be prove intriguing.

Taylor Sheridan clearly has a penchant for bold, headstrong women, as he continues write so many so beautifully. (As much as I love James, and Rip, and Spencer, and John, the women have far more depth of character, from Elsa & Margaret & even Claire, to Cara & Emma & Alexandra, to our darling Beth.)
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great first episodes
8512221 June 2023
Greetings from Lithuania.

First two episodes of "1923" were everything I expected from a spin off of Yellowstone. Great dialogs, amazing scenery, gorgeous cinematography and great actors. In case of 1923 there are even a legendary actors. But what I enjoyed the most again was setting, place and time. It's a harsh world we are living and this spin off from Yellowstone is showing characters in their harsh world. Yet the setting and the storyline in Africa is a stand out for me so far - didn't expected that and it a bit reminded me of "Out of Africa" movie.

Overall, great first episodes so far.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Episode 2
bobcobb30125 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
While last week's premiere focused heavily on the Western front and less on the safari, this epsiode took the opposite approach and gave us a little too much of the chaos happening overseas. This is not what I think anyone wanted when they signed up to start watching the show, but it is not necessarily bad TV either. The guy is almost identical in tone to Rip on Yellowstone, which is going to give you some laughs, but also can get repetitive.

So far I am impressed with the show, but I keep being left a little disappointed. I feel like being on Paramount+ and not regular cable TV they could afford to take some more risks and be a bit edgier.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Too many unbelievable elements
ptone-932071 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I am going to stop here. I had my doubts after watching the first episode, but I can't continue with this series.

Let's take maybe the least offensive flaw first: the music. The director (and creator/writer) wants to gear the music to what emotions they want you to have during the scene. They don't give the audience the credit to decide for themselves; if I notice the music that much, then it's probably too manipulative of the audience.

But there's a lot of overacting going on too. Or is it the script that traps the actors into it with poor direction? First of all, there's the macho macho man in Kenya, who takes a leopard to the face but still manages minor lacerations (nowhere near his handsome countenance though) and then doesn't even flinch when he's being treated. This guy is ridiculously virile, and women giggle and swoon en masse at times in his presence. And we are supposed to believe that Alexandra will dump her fiance in a heartbeat after a few minutes of conversation with him. And he isn't even nice to her.

The guy is damaged, he has nightmares about the war, he is your standard brooding loner. What a guy. And I guessed wrong that he would feel some guilt for not getting the leopard before it tore the throat out of a beautiful blonde. He's more like The Terminator than a human being...

But meanwhile, back in Montana, there is the nastiness between our hero cattle ranchers (of course, the Duttons!) and the evil sheep ranchers, who even after some serious warnings don't back off. I mean, how unlikely is it that the only survivor of the mass hanging is the owner? In early Bond movie fashion, Dutton and Company ride off instead of actually making sure they're dead (this sort of thing was lampooned in Austin Powers, where Scott suggests to Dr. Evil that he just dispatch Austin with Scott's gun instead of using the ill-tempered sea bass setup).

Now, I'm not a big fan of Catholicism, but this subplot is over the top preposterous. I mean, this priest and this nun are way worse in the morality and cruelty department than our sheep ranchers. They should hire this priest to do in the Duttons! Yes, there is some truth to how Native Americans were treated badly by religious zealots, but this depiction is about as far away from nuance than you can get. Even the dimmest viewer will get the message.

So why was I watching in the first place? Because I like Helen Mirren and was interested to find out if Harrison Ford could pull his part off. Sadly, there just isn't enough of them in it for my taste.

By the way, that hairstyle on the (yet another) beautiful blonde who's about to be married doesn't look very 20's Montana to me. Just like the blonde in Kenya. They must have had some stylist beam in from the future.

Taylor Sheridan gets my "James Cameron 'King of the World' Award" for simple-minded melodrama bordering on soap opera.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed