Doomsday Meteor (2023) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Terrible, absolutely terrible. Passable Turkey Time movie. :)
recklessron27 January 2024
If you like turkey time movies then I'd say this one is a 6/10.

For example:

Scene: In a large telescope control room the lead character is told an asteroid clump is heading directly for earth. The techie tells him that "the density is 2 objects per meter". Of course that's using the well-known objects per meter density scale, eh! Lol

If you can see the comedy in that then this is worth a laugh or 3.

I can't say this for a fact but it looks like the casting call was for celebrity look-alikes. None of them are playing the celebrity they look like - they are simply acting - however almost everyone in the caste looks like a bit like a star with the minor exception of an actual semi-star Sean Murray, who played Timothy McGee on NCIS.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Generic, but watchable, natural disaster movie...
paul_haakonsen29 February 2024
Of course I opted to sit down and watch this 2023 natural disaster movie titled "Doomsday Meteor", as I happened to stumble upon it by blind luck here in 2024. I had never heard about the movie, but I do like natural disaster movies, though the vast majority of them are questionable at best. But I harbored no expectation to the movie, so writers Lauren Pritchard and Joe Roche and director Noah Luke had every opportunity to impress and entertain me.

And when the movie started and The Asylum logo popped up, I must admit that some of the air already seeped from the balloon. The Asylum aren't exactly known for their stellar natural disaster movies, and they do have a couple of not so great ones out there. But I still opted to give the movie the benefit of the doubt, as The Asylum do spit out a good movie every now and again.

The storyline in the movie, written by Lauren Pritchard and Joe Roche, was very generic, even for a natural disaster movie. So you're not in for anything out of the ordinary here. If you've seen any movie with a meteor threatening the extinction of life on Earth by colliding with Earth, then you've already seen "Doomsday Meteor", for better or worse.

And you just got to love the ridiculous plans that people concoct in order to get a massive meteor to deviate from its flight path and thus preventing it from impacting with Earth and cause a global disaster. You just sort of get weary and tired of these goofball plans with lasers, missiles, and what not.

The acting performances in the movie were fair enough. There were only a couple of familiar faces on the cast list, that being Patrick Labyorteaux, Anthony Jensen, Caroline Williams and Joseph Michael Harris.

I will say that the special effects and CGI in "Doomsday Meteor" are actually good, taking into consideration that this is a movie from The Asylum. It is nice to see that they keep shoveling money into their effects department, because proper effects are a make-or-break deal in movies such as what The Asylum often spew out.

If you enjoy natural disaster movies, then you might actually get a proper kick out of sitting through 86 minutes of watching "Doomsday Meteor". If not, then you're in for a rather bland natural disaster movie experience that is very much like so many other movies before it.

My rating of "Doomsday Meteor" lands on a four out of ten stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Armageddon ripoff, 25 years too late
pwcfzhqxx10 May 2023
This movie is so cheap they didn't even bother getting an actual general's uniform. The just pinned random badges to a blue suit. They're traveling in a space shuttle, but it looks like a makeshift room in a warehouse, with regular gravity. The "special effects" were done with the new Windows Vista operating system.

The Asylum is known for schlocky movies, but this one is even more cheaper looking than usual. Do these actually make ANY money? Other than confusing people when they're looking for the original movie.

Bruce Willis may need to sue for defamation. This is just another embarrassment.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hey, there"s so much worse ! This B one is okay !
fabrizio-297-9059986 January 2024
We like to put on the news or anything very common when cooking or eating when we let the TV set on.

This time we just picked this one on and it's been exactly what you should expect when reading this ridiculous title !

The plot is easy to keep on, it's just a copy of Armageddon"s. But it's missing Ben Affleck, no love story as it's amed at kids audience.

The CG is above the average of the other B-movies. The acting is better than expected. I mean, above 2/10 movies.

The dialogues are really, really funny. They're so much stupid that I guess they had a lot of fun writing it. "That each one be at peace with his God" (or something like that). And many other ones. And when they cried we laughed out very loud.

The fun was to guess in which order each city was going to be destroyed. (I lost, no World's Capitals, just US cities...).

We laughed a lot, much more than with most of today's comedies.

At least, this movie is very okay for kids.

Have fun.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why?
rolfosterberg26 January 2024
At first I thought, Hey! Asylum have made a tiny bit better cgi but then it went to hell. And when they sent out an astronaut in a regular motorcycle helmet I gave up. Asylum movies works when they do spoofs like Sharknado. But this? Its just sad. The actors are laughable and its sad to see Caroline Williams of Texas chainsaw 2 fame look like she just want to escape. Alternatively she looks like she dont know what shes doing.

Its ridiculously serious and not tongue in cheek.

Im so happy I didnt pay to watch this piece of garbage. It doesnt need to exist! Why? If you cant make something good why even bother?

Avoid like the plague.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"The world is ending. Let's put 6 guys on it."
bitbucketchip7 February 2024
A huge meteor is about to crash into the earth killing everyone. Our government springs into action and assigns a grand total of six people to work on the problem.

The team gets down to work by watching old movies and decides Deep Impact looks like fun. They find an old space shuttle from the retired program (probably the one in the Smithsonian), fill the tank, light the fuse, and off they go. No spoilers but if you're alive to read this you can figure out they succeeded.

The acting is bad. Really bad. Like bad for Asylum bad. If you don't know what that's like imagine your personal worst-actor-ever nominee and remove that individual's ability to remember lines and move their facial muscles.

The CGI is actually better than usual for Asylum, but that isn't saying much. It's the practical effects that let them down. There is gravity in space. The surface of the asteroid has plants. The costumes are from a popup Halloween store.

The drama is gripping. The world is about to end and our lead hero asks his team if they want to bail on the rescue mission "because most of you probably have families". None of our heroes take him up on his offer. A couple minutes later he gives the exact same speech and asks again. In a surprising turn of events none of our heroes take him up on his offer. That's good writing.

Asylum is celebrating its 25th anniversary. Over the past twenty five years the only thing the brain trust in the Asylum has learned is that people have different sexual preferences. We're informed our male hero is gay as is our female pilot. It has nothing to do with anything but there you go.

One half a star compared to a professionally produced. For an Asylum film that's average. Five stars.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another AIP Throwback from Asylum Studios
rdfranciscritic2 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
To appreciate the Asylumverse's production variants of Armageddon and Deep Impact, as well as the sci-fi disaster junk sciences shucked via the major studio frames of Moonfall and Geostorm (and the better-inciteful Greenland): one must have a past appreciation of American International's and Crown International's budget-constrained sci-fi films of the 1950s and 1960s, films themselves rife with ludicrous-to-outlandish, ridiculous scientific inconsistencies and inaccuracies (my youthful favorites of 1959's Angry Red Planet, 1965's Space Probe Taurus, 1968's Mission Mars comes to mind, and that's appreciated).

Now, you may ask: Do we really need fresh, present-day retro-homages to those films? Are these Asylum space disasters "bad" (read: look cheap) on purpose or do these films ironically suffer the same budgetary constraints of AIP and CIP films?

Doesn't matter. I'm burnt out on those old films I've watched more times than any human should. I need something new to watch.

Yes, the Asylum's CGI'd falling-rock resume has recaptured the snowy days of my UHF-TV youth, courtesy of the studio's prolific go-to screenwriter, Joe Roche. He and his writing partner, Lauren Pritchard, also gave us Collision Earth (2020) and Moon Crash (2022); on his own, Roche wrote Meteor Moon (2020). While Collision Earth served as his debut, in three short years, he's written eleven-and-counting, fun films for the studio (nope, Roche didn't write that other Eric Roberts-starring falling-rock epic, Asteroid-a-Geddon: that's Asylum's other, adept-at-the-Canon Reds-and-Final Draft sci-fi action purveyor, Geoff Meed).

After watching Roche's debut, the Eric Roberts-fronted Collision Earth, and his quickly-produced follow-up, Meteor Moon (starring Dominque Swain), I was immediately hooked on his tech-crazy scripting; Roche does his research, and the physics, while improbable, sounds accurate: he sells the galactic dues ex-machinas with confidence.

Meanwhile, on the thespian front: Well, it's always hit-and-miss with the cardboard-to-hysterical emoting, as some do it better than others, but everyone does their best selling Roche's tech-jargon (and Pritchard's comedic one-liners and inter-personal drama sidebars). Remembering Roche's crazed, tech-exposition can't be easy, so kudos ye thespians. Everyone has extensive resumes, so they're doing something right in front of the cameras.

So, at the risk of plot-spoiling (as if you haven't already figured it out): In an undisclosed future, another falling rock hurls towards Earth -- and that tax-payer funded warning system failed again. So, instead of a usual phalanx of missiles (from some secret weapon platform; see AIP's Meteor from 1979 starring Sean Connery), the Earth's nations watched Godzilla movies one to many times and developed a Japanese monster-moviesque "laser cannon" network -- that rise from ground silos (a convincing CGI dupe that trumps the Pacific Rim in-camera toys from the disaster '70s).

Oops.

Another tax-payer funded boondoggle: that pesky rock is pure iron and the laser cannons can't split-divert the rock.

Yep.

It's time to fire-up that Deep Impact-styled space shuttle (complete with in-cabin gravity and a cockpit that looks like a Ed Woodian update from Plan Nine from Outer Space) manned by a coed, rag-tag volunteer crew to install a rocket-on-the-rock to alter its trajectory. Along the way, as one of the crew attempts a repair-in-space to save the mission: she's cooked-to-a-crisp on the ship's hull (actually a pretty decent CGI-effect that Alfonso Brescia wished was able to pull off amid his five, late 70s-to-early-80s Star Wars knock offs -- that he ripped from 2001: A Space Odyssey).

Amid all the "What are we gonna do nows!" we have -- in the Eric Roberts name-on-the-box role -- the always welcomed-familiar Patrick Labyorteaux (from today's NCIS and yesterday's Little House on the Prairie). Sure, he's adorned in a not-accurate General's uniform (they never are in these consultant-lacking films), but he's convincing as a guff General. Having Patrick, here, supporting the cause helps the watch, but I wished he was here, more, in the spaceship as the Bruce Willis-Armageddon hero.

In the director's chair is the more-than-qualified Noah Luke: a long-time actor and cinematographer who also gave us the production-similar (and production-ambitious) Attack on Titan (2022; with Eric Roberts, natch) and the aforementioned Moon Crash. He knows how to pull it together on a tight budget and even tighter schedule.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Doomed from the start
haystacks-6176628 April 2024
I went into watching this with an open mind, knowing it was never going to be the best disaster movie ever made, and I was right. Everything from the story, acting, music and special effects where a joke. In many scences you could see errors in the background, such as bushes on a meteor, and sound effects that aren't timed correctly with the action. The acting is woeful, I've seen better at primary school nativity shows, every line was wooden and had no passion or belief to it. You could tell they were just reading from the script and left you in no doubt they couldn't care less about the realism. The costume designer needs shooting. Bike helmets, plastic backpacks and silver skin tight gloves for landing on a meteor? I'm 100% the local am dram could produce better with the contents of the recycling bin and a trip to hobby craft.

Even if you have time to waste, and like a cheesey made for tv movie, don't bother with this, you'll be wishing for a meteor to put you out of your misery after 10mins.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed