The Great Canadian Pottery Throw Down (TV Series 2024– ) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Its the editing. Its still good.
sadoway5 March 2024
The review discrediting Seth is missing some information.

Seth's involvement as a producer has been pivotal in bringing this show to Canada, and it's important to acknowledge his significant contribution. Without Seth's initiative in bringing the show over, it might not have happened at all.

The cast exhibit promise, the editing aspect leaves something to be desired. There are instances where the editing feels rushed, causing important topics to be skimmed over too quickly, leaving viewers feeling a bit lost. This lack of attention to detail impacts the coherence of later scenes and conversations, making it challenging to fully engage with the narrative.

However, it's worth noting that the show's potential remains evident despite these shortcomings. Even without refinements in the editing process, I hope future episodes and season allow for more breathing room to explore key themes and developments. The show could truly soar to new heights. It's clear that there's a solid foundation here, and with a bit of fine-tuning, this show should become a standout gem in its genre.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Seth ruined it
kjmoon-188935 March 2024
Only watched one episode so far. I'm taking 2 points off because of Seth Rogen. Apart from that it wasn't a bad start and the competitors seem pretty good. The building they are using is awful, but they have tried to warm it up with some fake beams and reclaimed timber so it looks a little nicer and more like the original programme. But they need to stop showing that close-up of the outside of the building and concentrate more on the much nicer wider shot and water. The judges will hopefully get better as the series progresses and when they haven't got to deal with Rogen taking the limelight and going on about smoking weed. Yes his laugh is terrible and annoying.

I deducted another point as the wrong person went at the end mostly because of Rogen not liking/getting their work, I think the judges would've made a better choice if they were allowed. But maybe there were other reasons to keep the obvious candidate for leaving Ep1 in the competition ?

Edit after Ep2

I'm going to up my score from 4 to 6 after watching Ep2. It was much better and very much helped by a lot less Rogen to put up with. Although I did like the fact in one take Rogen was going to wire his pot off before he had finished it. (The bad editing of the Second challenge demonstration revealed he forgot the notch in the base in one of his attempts)

In reply to another reviewer I'd just like to say yes Executive Producer Seth Rogen may be responsible for bringing pottery throw down to a rusty warehouse in Canada but that doesn't mean he had to be on the programme.

But Seth did say....

"l must be on television at all costs."

So that kind of explains it.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A boting failure
pinkcandy359114 February 2024
The hosts and judges are stiff and not the least bit personable as they are on the British series. And, Seth Rogen's laugh may just make me stop watching altogether - it's got to be the most annoying laugh I've heard in a long time; even worse than Fran Drescher's.

The fact that Rogen has a weed company and only sells weed ashtrays/accoutrements to justify his pottery credentials is laughable. They don't have any serious potters in the whole of Canada? They had to choose him?

The whole show is just blah. Everyone (hosts, judges and contestants) are like cardboard cutouts of humans. Absolutely no personalities; a boatload of humorless puppets.

Not a good clone of the beloved British series.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not as good as the Brits
kaufman-4052513 February 2024
Unfortunately it did not live up to the Great Pottery Throwdown from the UK. Lifeless setting, the contestants and judges/host (let's stop getting boring pretty people as hosts, more comedians like Siobhan) don't have charm, character, and heart like they do in their counterpart. Didn't really like that the first episode was basically make whatever you want as long as it reminds you of home, made it harder to judge. Was really looking forward to this season and a PNW spin on the original series that I love so much but I walked away disappointed with the first episode. Hope the season continues to improve, both with the challenges, getting to know the contestants/judges, and hopefully an improved setting because that white warehouse with exposed wiring isn't nearly as nice as the colorful and full of plants room in the original!
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I gave up at three episodes!
bobbyluv200129 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Pros: 1. Talent of the Canadians, superb!

2. Judges are masters of their craft except one that laughs oddly that killed my joy of continuing to watch and celebrate the journeys of the contestants (yes, im looking at you Seth!)

3.

Cons:

1. Seth's odd chuckle or laugh (major turn off mate!) sorry!

2. Wld be nice to share some history or background of how pottery culture is/was in Canada?

3. Agree with some editing feedbacks, important storyline skipped too quickly.

4. take us on a journey of knowing the potters more?

5. i'm giving a 5 rating because mainly to credit the potters that make up half of the show's credibility!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed