I just sat through this pile of selfindulgent pseudo-arty rubbish and I'm not sure why. It felt like I being ranted at by some crazy drunk in a bar, but having the rant played out for me. We get it. You're not a fan of organised religion. The acting wasn't excruciating, for the most part and some of the shots were pretty enough to bump my rating into a positive number. I've seen films with worse cinematography and certainly with worse actors. This one's downfall was the writing and direction and I sort of got the impression that it was all pretty much made with some sordid ulterior motives in mind. "Wanna be in my movie?". Clearly not made with any kind of budget whatsoever - and it certainly couldn't stretch to spending much more than ten minutes per visual effects shot.
Looking at the credits list, it seems very small. I wonder how many people who worked on it refused a credit for fear of association. It's not a career springboard and I don't think we'll be seeing any of the cast in anything else- let alone a sequel - the very thought of which sends a cold shiver down my spine.
ETA:
The 10 star review from "theplumery" below is an interesting-if revealing one. They say: "...Apparently the director (according to their FB page) has worked with Alexander McQueen, so its no surprise..."
I just had a look at that same director's FB page, and by some enormous coincidence, his bio (currently) lists that he owns a company called The Plumery.